Advertisement
by Belkan Provinces » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:13 pm
by Belkan Provinces » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:17 pm
Mostrov wrote:Nation Full name: The Co-Dominion of Mostrov
National Leader Name (full name please): Nikolai Kvashnin
Military forces you wish to divert in case of emergency: Strategic Weapons; in particular our submarine forces and missile weaponry.
NS Government Type: Single-party state, (currently a psychotic dictator ship) with a bit of technocracy mixed in.
Any other alliances you are currently associated with: CSN
What is your position in said alliance: Member
*Form of Socialism You Associate with (if any): The original revolution was a communist one, however gradually it has taken more autocratic tendencies, the original party even changing entirely.
*What do you wish to gain from this alliance: Protection and development of Mostrovite industries.
*What is the your largest ship in naval service: 140 metre attack submarine, KAS-15. class; however our largest military ship is the 160 metre ballistic submarines of the KNIS-4. class. Since our coastline is frozen for most of the year, we have a navy almost entirely comprised of submarines.
by Belkan Provinces » Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:19 pm
by FreedomStates » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:09 pm
by Belkan Provinces » Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:08 pm
by Hassett » Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:43 am
by Belkan Provinces » Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:22 pm
Hassett wrote:THE VLADIVOSTOK ALLIANCE
Nation Full name: The Galactic Empire of Hassett
National Leader Name: President for Life Hassett
Military forces you wish to divert in case of emergency: Navy, Army, Air Force, Galactic Force
NS Government Type: Corporate Bordello
Any other alliances you are currently associated with: None
Form of Socialism You Associate with (if any): None whatsoever
What is the your largest ship in naval service: H.S. Destroyer (Interstellar Class)
Give a brief summary about your nation: An economically frightening nation with a strong millitary history.
TG me if military assistance is needed.
by Belkan Provinces » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:50 pm
by Belkan Provinces » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:16 am
by La Habana » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:17 am
by Belkan Provinces » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:21 am
by Rumackistan » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:35 am
by Belkan Provinces » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:44 pm
by Belkan Provinces » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:22 pm
by La Habana » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:26 pm
Belkan Provinces wrote:We may have a problem brewing:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=31160
Pray that Britannica doesn't recommit its forces
by Belkan Provinces » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:37 pm
by Aljaharra » Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:03 am
by Sorgan » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:10 am
by Grittonia » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:17 am
Sorgan wrote:I have a small proposal. I say, that for POWs we construct a alliance wide prison where POWs can be placed. That way member nations won't have to deal with the dangers of having dangerous criminals within their borders. It would also save space and create a fortress which could be used in times of war. Any questions?
((OOC: Yeah Yeah, It's not a great proposal but,it will become useful.))
Grittonia's Law wrote:Everyone is gay, they just don't know it.
One who automatically claims they are straight without probing are undoubtedly gay.
Gren's Theorem wrote:Everyone is attracted to Grit. Those who say differently simply refuse to acknowledge it.
"Oy vey! All he talked about was parties and sex! And those Perviolosi twins kept tugging at my pants. Get me some tylenol." - Roman Ambassador after meeting Pappa Nick & his entourage
by Belkan Provinces » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:01 pm
Grittonia wrote:Sorgan wrote:I have a small proposal. I say, that for POWs we construct a alliance wide prison where POWs can be placed. That way member nations won't have to deal with the dangers of having dangerous criminals within their borders. It would also save space and create a fortress which could be used in times of war. Any questions?
((OOC: Yeah Yeah, It's not a great proposal but,it will become useful.))
Well, I could take over all the POW's, Grittonia's economy depends (for a small, not essencial part) on Prisoner Labor...
I would even pay for them, like $10 a piece?
Aljaharra wrote:I am hosting a conference that would begin on Monday. Anybody interested can join. This is the link http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=30817#p1227622
by La Habana » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:23 pm
Belkan Provinces wrote:Grittonia wrote:Sorgan wrote:I have a small proposal. I say, that for POWs we construct a alliance wide prison where POWs can be placed. That way member nations won't have to deal with the dangers of having dangerous criminals within their borders. It would also save space and create a fortress which could be used in times of war. Any questions?
((OOC: Yeah Yeah, It's not a great proposal but,it will become useful.))
Well, I could take over all the POW's, Grittonia's economy depends (for a small, not essencial part) on Prisoner Labor...
I would even pay for them, like $10 a piece?
I think its a good idea, however we will still have to worry about prisoner treatment to avoid being tried for War Crimes, but if other members aggree (council members) that Grittonia can imprison them during war, then it should be done.
However I have a few questions regarding POWs:
Now what should be done if an individual nation goes to war? like parsay Polish Denmark and Me for example, should all the POWs go to the alliances' prisions or only the POWs that were captured by alliance forces (ERF)? or only the ones the member nation doesn't want?
by Belkan Provinces » Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:27 pm
I agree that a prison under the oversight of The Alliance would be a good idea; however there should be a number of conditions:
1. The prison shouldnt be under the jurisdiction of any one member of The Alliance.
2. The human rights of prisoners should be respected; i.e. no torture, mistretment, given adequate sleep, adequate food, adequate exercise time, access to leisure materials like books, and kept in warm cells.
3. Prisoners should not be forced to labour for an excessive number of hours a day, and should give them special privelidges such as extra exercise time as reward for hard work.
4. Prisoners should be repatriated as soon as possible after hostilities end.
5. Prisoners should have a right not to be interrogated excessively for information.
6. Prison staff should include people from all Alliance members, so that abuses do not occur, or are minimized.
7. Law enforcement officials from member nations have the right to inspect the prison with no prior notice required to be given to the prison.
What does everyone think?
by Onekawa-Nukanor » Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:50 pm
by La Habana » Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:35 pm
Onekawa-Nukanor wrote:Hey I don't want to sound barbaric or anything but we kill most of our POW, so is that oky, I can change ut it is a really old tradition, and it is in a humane manner
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Asucki, European Federal Union, Eusan Federation, Magnoliids, San Rosito, Shimono, The Daeva
Advertisement