Advertisement
by Reliquary » Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:11 am
by -The Unified Earth Governments- » Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:28 am
Reliquary wrote:On the topic of biological weapons/technology:
My main FT nation, the Panterran State, goes by a slightly modified version of Clarke's Third Law:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from nature.
To explain a bit better, they don't really recognize a difference between organic and artificial. The way they see, both are simply elements and compounds put together in such a way to form a structure. The fact that some the structures naturally evolved and others were built is irrelevent, especially when you get to the point where muscle fibers are being replaced by carbon nanotubes while wires and circuits are being replaced by masses of neural tissue. Both naturally evolved structures and manmade structures have advantages over the other, and in certain usages one easily trumps the other. The best of both worlds is using each where they are best suited, rather than purposefully limiting yourself to an entirely inorganic robot or an entirely organic soldier.
The Ceph from Crysis are a good example. Also, Peter Watts' Rifter series.
Alternately, ignore me and do whatever.
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.
by Reliquary » Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:34 am
-The Unified Earth Governments- wrote:Reliquary wrote:On the topic of biological weapons/technology:
My main FT nation, the Panterran State, goes by a slightly modified version of Clarke's Third Law:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from nature.
To explain a bit better, they don't really recognize a difference between organic and artificial. The way they see, both are simply elements and compounds put together in such a way to form a structure. The fact that some the structures naturally evolved and others were built is irrelevent, especially when you get to the point where muscle fibers are being replaced by carbon nanotubes while wires and circuits are being replaced by masses of neural tissue. Both naturally evolved structures and manmade structures have advantages over the other, and in certain usages one easily trumps the other. The best of both worlds is using each where they are best suited, rather than purposefully limiting yourself to an entirely inorganic robot or an entirely organic soldier.
The Ceph from Crysis are a good example. Also, Peter Watts' Rifter series.
Alternately, ignore me and do whatever.
Thats because there is none, regardless is there any specific questions you have?
I'm tired so I may have missed them :|
North Calaveras wrote:so im thinking about trying out a new race that is basically reverseed
a sentient machine A.I who uses biological weapons of war(think of humans using drones but reversed)
by Alidina » Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:00 pm
SquareDisc City wrote:Almost everybody in FT uses FTL comms of some description. That said, to not have communications independently of the drive is perfectly feasible. You'd just have to send all your messages by courier, manned or robotic as takes your fancy.Yortini Systems wrote:What's the general consensus on FTL communications? Is that even possible? I'm wondering about using some kind of handwavium to explain it, something like quantum entanglement, but I was wondering if there are any other explanations.
by Volesia » Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:10 pm
Alidina wrote:SquareDisc City wrote:
Almost everybody in FT uses FTL comms of some description. That said, to not have communications independently of the drive is perfectly feasible. You'd just have to send all your messages by courier, manned or robotic as takes your fancy.
Yort, Our good friend Dolm doesn't use FTL comms if I remember correctly because it creates more problems and leads to interesting plots that wouldn't have happen otherwise.
by Abys » Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:42 pm
Arcus wrote:Launch aluminum into the high atmosphere, block out le sun.Aby wrote:we will recharge our lasguns by the light of your burning corpses anyway, so who needs the sun
by Vocenae » Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:39 pm
18:34 <Kyrusia> Voc: The one anchor of moral conscience in a sea of turbulent depravity.
by Alouria » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:29 pm
by New Tsavon » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:30 pm
Alouria wrote:Well, if no one is going to say anything about my star system, I'll move on to infantry equipment.
My first idea was to employ coilgun tech in my infantry weapons. How feasible is this?
by OMGeverynameistaken » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:57 pm
by Yortini Systems » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:25 pm
Alidina wrote:SquareDisc City wrote:
Almost everybody in FT uses FTL comms of some description. That said, to not have communications independently of the drive is perfectly feasible. You'd just have to send all your messages by courier, manned or robotic as takes your fancy.
Yort, Our good friend Dolm doesn't use FTL comms if I remember correctly because it creates more problems and leads to interesting plots that wouldn't have happen otherwise.
by Yortini Systems » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:30 pm
Alouria wrote:Alright, so I decided to make that puppet I had mentioned.
I now wish to start working with specs, numbers, etc. since I don't see any FT roleplays in II or NS apart from 'Alius Bene' or something like that, which basically requires detailed info about your nation to join, something that I don't have.
Anyway, I will start with this: I found a star system generator and created a system for Alouria.
I intend for my planet to have fully colonized the solar system but also choose to not look much farther. Reading back earlier in the thread, someone referred to this as a 'Brown-Space Fleet'. That's basically what I'm going for. Any advice so far? If this is all good, then I'm going to venture first into the infantry weaponry of my planet/system's forces (By the way, my species is basically a human-clone race that's mostly Caucasian by our standards).
by The Ben Boys » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:42 pm
Yortini Systems wrote:Alouria wrote:Alright, so I decided to make that puppet I had mentioned.
I now wish to start working with specs, numbers, etc. since I don't see any FT roleplays in II or NS apart from 'Alius Bene' or something like that, which basically requires detailed info about your nation to join, something that I don't have.
Anyway, I will start with this: I found a star system generator and created a system for Alouria.
I intend for my planet to have fully colonized the solar system but also choose to not look much farther. Reading back earlier in the thread, someone referred to this as a 'Brown-Space Fleet'. That's basically what I'm going for. Any advice so far? If this is all good, then I'm going to venture first into the infantry weaponry of my planet/system's forces (By the way, my species is basically a human-clone race that's mostly Caucasian by our standards).
The only problem I have with it is that the Jovian gas giant is closer to the sun than the terrestrial planet. That's unlikely, since the heat and gravity of the sun would most likely prevent the huge atmospheres that jovian planets have from forming. Look at the Sol system, our solar system, all of the gas giants are far away from the sun, while the terrestrial planets, including Earth are closer.
by Avenio » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:06 pm
Yortini Systems wrote:The only problem I have with it is that the Jovian gas giant is closer to the sun than the terrestrial planet. That's unlikely, since the heat and gravity of the sun would most likely prevent the huge atmospheres that jovian planets have from forming. Look at the Sol system, our solar system, all of the gas giants are far away from the sun, while the terrestrial planets, including Earth are closer.
by Arkotania » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:17 pm
by The Ben Boys » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:19 pm
Yortini Systems wrote:Alidina wrote:
Yort, Our good friend Dolm doesn't use FTL comms if I remember correctly because it creates more problems and leads to interesting plots that wouldn't have happen otherwise.
Oh really? Does he have messenger ships or something? IIRC, Dolm only has one system, so I guess conventional communications are more feasible at that level.
Abys wrote:-snip-
Alouria wrote:-snip-
by SquareDisc City » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:36 pm
Look at numerous other planetary systems and you'll find the opposite.Yortini Systems wrote:The only problem I have with it is that the Jovian gas giant is closer to the sun than the terrestrial planet. That's unlikely, since the heat and gravity of the sun would most likely prevent the huge atmospheres that jovian planets have from forming. Look at the Sol system, our solar system, all of the gas giants are far away from the sun, while the terrestrial planets, including Earth are closer.
by Yortini Systems » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:38 pm
The Ben Boys wrote:Yortini Systems wrote:The only problem I have with it is that the Jovian gas giant is closer to the sun than the terrestrial planet. That's unlikely, since the heat and gravity of the sun would most likely prevent the huge atmospheres that jovian planets have from forming. Look at the Sol system, our solar system, all of the gas giants are far away from the sun, while the terrestrial planets, including Earth are closer.
Actually,though I'm searching for the article,most extrasolar gas giants are closer to their suns.
by Yortini Systems » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:41 pm
Avenio wrote:Yortini Systems wrote:The only problem I have with it is that the Jovian gas giant is closer to the sun than the terrestrial planet. That's unlikely, since the heat and gravity of the sun would most likely prevent the huge atmospheres that jovian planets have from forming. Look at the Sol system, our solar system, all of the gas giants are far away from the sun, while the terrestrial planets, including Earth are closer.
The vast majority of exoplanets that have been found are Jupiter-sized planets orbiting very close to their parent stars. The theory is that while the jovians may have formed out beyond the frost line (ie the line beyond which water and other compounds can form ice grains), they, over the course of their development, migrate into the inner solar system via either interaction with other planetesimals or through the force of accretion into a very tight orbit around the star.
by Yortini Systems » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:43 pm
SquareDisc City wrote:Look at numerous other planetary systems and you'll find the opposite.
The message to take from the wide variety of planetary systems we've discovered is that chances are, if you dream up a system for your writing, then yes it's possible. Multiple asteroid belts? Check. A sunlike star with five gaseous planets all closer to it than Mercury is to the Sun? Check. A planet orbiting the binary pairing of white dwarf and neutron star, in the middle of a globular cluster? Check. Two moons sharing the same orbit around their gas giant primary? Check.
by Vocenae » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:46 pm
18:34 <Kyrusia> Voc: The one anchor of moral conscience in a sea of turbulent depravity.
by The Ben Boys » Sun Jan 26, 2014 7:08 pm
Yortini Systems wrote:The Ben Boys wrote:Actually,though I'm searching for the article,most extrasolar gas giants are closer to their suns.
Ha, what do you know, I'm wrong.
There you have it then, I guess that solar system is ok then.
Why are jupiter and Saturn and Uranus so distant from our sun then?
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: European Federal Union, LFPD Soveriegn, Southeast Marajarbia
Advertisement