
Advertisement

by Lolder » Fri Oct 04, 2013 4:28 pm


by Nyte » Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:57 pm

by Tribea » Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:24 pm
Nyte wrote:
...
...
...
The above is why I will not take your answer seriously. A giant NO is not an answer. If you're not willing to endeavor to explain yourself clearly and give a specific reason(s) as to why you have a problem with something then what's the point? Also, Kyuria already checked it and apparently has no problems with it. Admittedly, it's still a work in progress so that may change.![]()
If you really have a problem with it, it might help to actually explain to me exactly what it is. Otherwise, I'm just going to assume that the giant NO is just you crying out for attention.
Sediczja wrote:Sediczjan infantryman drops fro the ceiling, entrenching tool in hand. Extremist shits pants, followed by death. Great success.

by Nyte » Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:26 pm
Tribea wrote:Nyte wrote:
...
...
...
The above is why I will not take your answer seriously. A giant NO is not an answer. If you're not willing to endeavor to explain yourself clearly and give a specific reason(s) as to why you have a problem with something then what's the point? Also, Kyuria already checked it and apparently has no problems with it. Admittedly, it's still a work in progress so that may change.![]()
If you really have a problem with it, it might help to actually explain to me exactly what it is. Otherwise, I'm just going to assume that the giant NO is just you crying out for attention.
I actually was waiting for you to say that, as it would have made it funnier if not that i realized that the colors arent op enough, so the people arent really.

by Yalos » Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:32 pm
Nyte wrote:Tribea wrote:I actually was waiting for you to say that, as it would have made it funnier if not that i realized that the colors arent op enough, so the people arent really.
Seriously though... If you have a problem with it let me know. I actually do want other peoples opinions on it. If there's something that seems OP or broken to you then let me know.

by Nyte » Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:52 pm
Yalos wrote:Nyte wrote:
Seriously though... If you have a problem with it let me know. I actually do want other peoples opinions on it. If there's something that seems OP or broken to you then let me know.
To be quite frank, it reminds me of, perhaps too much, of G-tech's choir people.
both are virtually immortal, unless killed, shape shifting, advanced, hard to kill and, well...
Either way, they seem awfully similar, so I might watch out for that

by Equalsun Empire » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:29 am
Nezon wrote:Sorry if I held up the IC Equalsun. I was just I'll yesterday and had to rest.
Il get something up today.

Awarded the Honourable Epicness Award for Persuasive Nuclear Weapon Placement 2015
Dogs of War wrote:While the motto of the British SAS is "Who dares wins" the motto of Equalsun's SAS is "Who cares who wins?"
The Great and Kawaii™ Ella wrote:As much as I love Stellaris, video games are a magnet for powerwankers, and when the AI beats them too hard, they come over to II and P2TM and take their anger out on us.

by Tribea » Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:19 am
Sediczja wrote:Sediczjan infantryman drops fro the ceiling, entrenching tool in hand. Extremist shits pants, followed by death. Great success.

by Yortini Systems » Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:47 am

by Tribea » Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:49 am
Sediczja wrote:Sediczjan infantryman drops fro the ceiling, entrenching tool in hand. Extremist shits pants, followed by death. Great success.

by Nyte » Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:58 am

by Oogium » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:02 pm

by Nyte » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:27 pm
Oogium wrote:Oi! Ky! I know it isn't finished yet, but could you tell me what you think of my thing for the Kassquit?

by Kyuria » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:32 pm

by Tribea » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:40 pm
Kyuria wrote:Alrighty, I'll see to it Ogg.
And hey, lookit, it's Nyte! I'll give you my thoughts in a real quick rundown before you have to go off.
1- All energy arsenals are interesting, typically leading to serious WTF moments when up against those with exceptionally powerful energy shielding and/or prioritize kinetic weaponry to a similar degree. I say, your best be would likely to be to either go for conventional lasers and perhaps particle beams for heavy weapons. (Technically, I like to classify plasma and particle weapons as their own type all together, but still a sub type,... kind of an energy/kinetic hybrid, but I don't get the vibe that's what you're going for.) However, if the impression I get is correct, it would be highly likely that their technology level would be high enough for more,... "exotic" forms of bedazzling goodness. Though, that would introduce a need for phlebotonium.
2- Considering the lack of any real need for one (so far as I can tell) besides a possible defensive application a la shields, I might think that it could be used as a sort of manipulation tool, e.i. pushing things around, perhaps even as a cutting tool in some cases.
3- Kewl.
But I do recall a reading a certain short story wherein most ships were actually fighter sized,... what makes me bring this up is that having them being highly advanced simulacra opens up an interesting possibility. In the story, most crafts were primarily composed of a though matarial, a "hyper fiber" that, when put under conditions of stress or had the correct quantities of energy run through it at certain frequencies, could reshape and mold itself anew. The possible applications of such a tech would likely greatly influence the craft's overall design structure, as well as the pilots' philosophy compared to/versus those in command. However, this would take a great deal of control skill as well as relative "power level" on the part of the pilot, which would be something to consider.
4- Jawsome.
5- Hrmmm,... mind elaborating a bit more on the structure and roles of the air support unit?
6- If you go with the tank, it should be a vehicle. If it's small and compact enough, it could be mass produced to similar numbers as the standard simulacra, and deployed fairly haphazardly iin regards to asset protection. Meaning, they could be basically high mobility/versatility rather than high durability. I say this because since they really don't have to worry about dying all that much, it'd make sense for them to eschew the typical self preservation tactics in favor of more effective/direct approaches towards solving their problems on t he battle field. (Possibly making the ideas of "suppressing fire" and "playing it safe" drop very low on their priorities list.)
If a mech, then a larger and more advanced simulacra is obviously the way to go. High speed, mobility, and most importantly of all agility will be the orders of the day when these things are around, as I doubt they would exactly be for heavy fire support. Partially based upon the idea that pilots would get it into their head that they did not need to treat them as vehicles, and could instead focus on performing more advanced maneuvers thanks to the inherent superiority of a control scheme similar to their own bodies and an interface that basically is an actual neurosystem.
...
Just some really quick and poorly thought out thoughts/ideas I had on my first reading of it. Eh,...
Sediczja wrote:Sediczjan infantryman drops fro the ceiling, entrenching tool in hand. Extremist shits pants, followed by death. Great success.

by Nyte » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:01 pm
Kyuria wrote:Alrighty, I'll see to it Ogg.
And hey, lookit, it's Nyte! I'll give you my thoughts in a real quick rundown before you have to go off.
1- All energy arsenals are interesting, typically leading to serious WTF moments when up against those with exceptionally powerful energy shielding and/or prioritize kinetic weaponry to a similar degree. I say, your best be would likely to be to either go for conventional lasers and perhaps particle beams for heavy weapons. (Technically, I like to classify plasma and particle weapons as their own type all together, but still a sub type,... kind of an energy/kinetic hybrid, but I don't get the vibe that's what you're going for.) However, if the impression I get is correct, it would be highly likely that their technology level would be high enough for more,... "exotic" forms of bedazzling goodness. Though, that would introduce a need for phlebotonium.
2- Considering the lack of any real need for one (so far as I can tell) besides a possible defensive application a la shields, I might think that it could be used as a sort of manipulation tool, e.i. pushing things around, perhaps even as a cutting tool in some cases.
3- Kewl.
But I do recall a reading a certain short story wherein most ships were actually fighter sized,... what makes me bring this up is that having them being highly advanced simulacra opens up an interesting possibility. In the story, most crafts were primarily composed of a though matarial, a "hyper fiber" that, when put under conditions of stress or had the correct quantities of energy run through it at certain frequencies, could reshape and mold itself anew. The possible applications of such a tech would likely greatly influence the craft's overall design structure, as well as the pilots' philosophy compared to/versus those in command. However, this would take a great deal of control skill as well as relative "power level" on the part of the pilot, which would be something to consider.
4- Jawsome.
5- Hrmmm,... mind elaborating a bit more on the structure and roles of the air support unit?
6- If you go with the tank, it should be a vehicle. If it's small and compact enough, it could be mass produced to similar numbers as the standard simulacra, and deployed fairly haphazardly iin regards to asset protection. Meaning, they could be basically high mobility/versatility rather than high durability. I say this because since they really don't have to worry about dying all that much, it'd make sense for them to eschew the typical self preservation tactics in favor of more effective/direct approaches towards solving their problems on t he battle field. (Possibly making the ideas of "suppressing fire" and "playing it safe" drop very low on their priorities list.)
If a mech, then a larger and more advanced simulacra is obviously the way to go. High speed, mobility, and most importantly of all agility will be the orders of the day when these things are around, as I doubt they would exactly be for heavy fire support. Partially based upon the idea that pilots would get it into their head that they did not need to treat them as vehicles, and could instead focus on performing more advanced maneuvers thanks to the inherent superiority of a control scheme similar to their own bodies and an interface that basically is an actual neurosystem.
...
Just some really quick and poorly thought out thoughts/ideas I had on my first reading of it. Eh,...


by Tribea » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:16 pm
Kyuria wrote:A bit busy doing other things, and there are still a few people ahead of ya on the que line.
Sediczja wrote:Sediczjan infantryman drops fro the ceiling, entrenching tool in hand. Extremist shits pants, followed by death. Great success.

by Kyuria » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:29 pm

by Zeinbrad » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:29 pm

by Nyte » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:37 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:God, Mind if I refugee her, The OP of infinity is pissing me off.

by Zeinbrad » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:41 pm

by Zeinbrad » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:45 pm
Hyracor wrote:Lets not start bitching about another rp and whatnot. If you want to do that, go to TGs.
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Anarchic States, Champlania, Eclius, Google [Bot], GreatOceania, Kurey, M-101, Moltian, New Imperial Britannia, Qui Qua, Santoak, Senscaria, The Ice States, Utquiagvik, Yokron pro-government partisans
Advertisement