Angle Empire wrote:IshCong wrote:
Is that a common ratio for your troops to have, 3,000 archers mounted on 200 Oliphaunts? Because that would work out to about 15 archers on each Oliphaunt, but if one looks at your overall force declaration, if you were to put 15 archers on each of your 5,000 Oliphaunts, you'd have a total of 75,000 archers. That's 10,000 more archers than you claim in your force declaration, without even considering foot archers, so I'm guessing that's not what you had in mind originally? =T
If one were to put 13 archers on each one of your 5,000 Oliphaunts, that would equal the 65,000 archers in your overall force declaration, but only if you don't use any foot archers...
Also, and I just realized this, you have claimed 5,000 Oliphaunts. I had originally thought that either those 200-700 were basically all the Oliphaunts you had, and/or that 200-700 figures accounted for the soldiers riding them. Even then, 200-700 Oliphaunts seemed kinda excessive to me, but not worth making a big deal out of. But 5,000? That seems, well, a bit much. It's not like even war elephants were very common IRL, and Oliphaunts would seem likely to be even less common than war elephants to me.
And then numbers of the beasts aside, the sheer logistical strain of supporting that many Oliphaunts, with the amount they must consume, must be horrendous. I could see that sort of mass of Oliphaunts consuming so much as to devastate local wildlife, especially if there are yet more Oliphaunts in the wild in your lands.
Like, dude i figured that out awhile ago. I only have 200 now. I even said that it is illogical to have that many.
So, just to be clear, you now only have 200 Oliphaunts, and they're all with Argban and Bithius, right?
I was just confused, because you had left the 5,000 figure on your overall force declaration.






