War Against Ucrumba (OOC Thread)

by **Globexanter** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:49 am

Read the title.

by **West Reich** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:53 am

by **West Reich** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:57 am

Free Tristania please close the thread.

by **Shnercropolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:00 am

this was well needed. It shouldn't be closed. There are already a bunch of OOC disagreements.

@Globexanter: is my newly edited post realistic?

by **Herrebrugh** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:12 am

I haven't RP'ed in quite some time. This should be fun! :lol:

by **Globexanter** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:21 am

Shnercropolis wrote:this was well needed. It shouldn't be closed. There are already a bunch of OOC disagreements.

@Globexanter: is my newly edited post realistic?

No need to close the thread, this applies to West's comment.
Um, no, you need to RP your plane taking off, therefore allowing Free Tristania to at least attempt to intercept it.

by **Shnercropolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:23 am

Globexanter wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:this was well needed. It shouldn't be closed. There are already a bunch of OOC disagreements.

@Globexanter: is my newly edited post realistic?

No need to close the thread, this applies to West's comment.
Um, no, you need to RP your plane taking off, therefore allowing Free Tristania to at least attempt to intercept it.

why would he be able to intercept it if its in international airspace? There was no attempt at stealth.

by **Globexanter** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:24 am

Shnercropolis wrote:
Globexanter wrote:
No need to close the thread, this applies to West's comment.
Um, no, you need to RP your plane taking off, therefore allowing Free Tristania to at least attempt to intercept it.

why would he be able to intercept it if its in international airspace? There was no attempt at stealth.

Because a large military plane heading directly to your Nation/National Waters is kind of obvious?

by **Shnercropolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:27 am

Globexanter wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:why would he be able to intercept it if its in international airspace? There was no attempt at stealth.

Because a large military plane heading directly to your Nation/National Waters is kind of obvious?

yes, but there would be no point in shooting it down if it just turned away.

by **Globexanter** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:28 am

Shnercropolis wrote:
Globexanter wrote:
Because a large military plane heading directly to your Nation/National Waters is kind of obvious?

yes, but there would be no point in shooting it down if it just turned away.

Radars, magical instruments which can also, detect U.A.V.s regardless in size.

by **West Reich** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:30 am

by **Shnercropolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:32 am

Globexanter wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:yes, but there would be no point in shooting it down if it just turned away.

Radars, magical instruments which can also, detect U.A.V.s regardless in size.

o my goodness! I never thought of that![/sarcasm]
I am goin to tell you again and again, I'm not trying stealth of any sort.

by **Globexanter** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:33 am

Shnercropolis wrote:
Globexanter wrote:
Radars, magical instruments which can also, detect U.A.V.s regardless in size.

o my goodness! I never thought of that![/sarcasm]
I am goin to tell you again and again, I'm not trying stealth of any sort.

Exactly, giving him the opportunity to intercept and destroy your drone.

by **Ucrumba** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:39 am

They are losing sense becuase we are pursuing this pointless argument that will make no difference. Move on to this new conflict.

by **West Reich** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:40 am

Ucrumba wrote:They are losing sense becuase we are pursuing this pointless argument that will make no difference. Move on to this new conflict.

I like sheep.

by **Herrebrugh** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:44 am

West Reich wrote:
Ucrumba wrote:They are losing sense becuase we are pursuing this pointless argument that will make no difference. Move on to this new conflict.

I like sheep.

Sheep is tasty isn't it?

by **West Reich** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:45 am

yeah we got kebab in England, it's yummy

by **Ucrumba** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:47 am

Haha, mainly for when your drunk though tbf. Thats the only time I can bare them

by **West Reich** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:47 am

Shnercropolis stop one-lining it ruins a IC thread. Come up with more.

by **Shnercropolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:49 am

West Reich wrote:Shnercropolis stop one-lining it ruins a IC thread. Come up with more.

I can't think of anything else to say. Its all the drone is doing, and I don't want to ruin plans.

by **Namabia** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:59 am

Saw the UAV argument. You might want to read about UAV Drones before you start godmodding with them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmanned_aerial_vehicle

by **Shnercropolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:14 am

Namabia wrote:Saw the UAV argument. You might want to read about UAV Drones before you start godmodding with them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmanned_aerial_vehicle

I edited and now what I did was not godmodly in any way.

by **Globexanter** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:33 am

Just came back and already we are at this point, good to see we are waisting no time.
Civilian UAVs aren't important, they still breached National sovereignty by going into his airspace...

by **Shnercropolis** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:00 pm

Globexanter wrote:Just came back and already we are at this point, good to see we are waisting no time.
Civilian UAVs aren't important, they still breached National sovereignty by going into his airspace...

say, how far do you think the blockade has gone?

by **Globexanter** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:02 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:
Globexanter wrote:Just came back and already we are at this point, good to see we are waisting no time.
Civilian UAVs aren't important, they still breached National sovereignty by going into his airspace...

say, how far do you think the blockade has gone?

What blockade?
Also, for future reference, my Nation isn't a small patch of land (U.K. but vertical), image four USAs lined next to each over.

Government:	Pro-Capitalist Liberalism
Economic System:	Capitalism
RP Population:	194,510,000
Capital City:	Westley (RP Population 19,400,000)
Religion:	89% Anglicanism \| 5% Catholicism \| 2% Judaism \| 3% other

Government:	Pro-Capitalist Liberalism
Economic System:	Capitalism
RP Population:	194,510,000
Capital City:	Westley (RP Population 19,400,000)
Religion:	89% Anglicanism \| 5% Catholicism \| 2% Judaism \| 3% other

Government:	Pro-Capitalist Liberalism
Economic System:	Capitalism
RP Population:	194,510,000
Capital City:	Westley (RP Population 19,400,000)
Religion:	89% Anglicanism \| 5% Catholicism \| 2% Judaism \| 3% other

Government:	Pro-Capitalist Liberalism
Economic System:	Capitalism
RP Population:	194,510,000
Capital City:	Westley (RP Population 19,400,000)
Religion:	89% Anglicanism \| 5% Catholicism \| 2% Judaism \| 3% other

Government:	Pro-Capitalist Liberalism
Economic System:	Capitalism
RP Population:	194,510,000
Capital City:	Westley (RP Population 19,400,000)
Religion:	89% Anglicanism \| 5% Catholicism \| 2% Judaism \| 3% other

War Against Ucrumba (OOC Thread)

War Against Ucrumba (OOC Thread)

Who is online