Card Collection

[Giraffeton]

5 is 5 and .05 is .05
(its also bank not dollars)

[Giraffeton]

the sad truth is the only way to get more bank is by making puppets (even if its just a few)
anyway to respond to what mike was saying about you spending on inflated commons. i'll just say this MV is not the value everyone is happy to buy the card at as MV is easily manipulated so only spend what you want spend on a card. MV is just one factor in you making your own evaluation of a card

[The Seinians]

Ok thanks

[The Otter Archipelago]

I created one puppet; I must say it made the game a lot more fun. I’d love to join a trading alliance or something; could be a blast. Let me know if you (always) and Sein come up with anything concrete.

…but declaring open war on Mike doesn’t sound like a winning strategy! lol

[Always Winners]

Ok… I’ve decided that for all my troubles I will help u guys out
Instead of junking your cards, start an auction for .01 and I’ll buy it for .02
I’m more active on weekdays so if I miss it on weekends sorry

[One Small Island]

yikes.

[Ioavollr]

Would be much easier to trust you, if you would be a little less secret about the "top players" and how your "great plan" would work...
At the moment all I can see is a relatively meager try to fraud good-intended other players.

Ok here is the first few steps of the plan. If someone sent me this I would have the same concerns.
The first stage of our plan is to interrupt his transfers - at any given moment he has many transfers going. If we were able to undercut some of his trees or strategically buy one of the cards that he has a monopoly or a near monopoly on we could possibly scam him there.
Second stage would be to make sure he doesn’t get and cards via the market. I am willing to devote my whole deck and bank to trying to stop him.
We have a couple of ideas for the next few stages but need to see what works and what doesn’t
Always Winners

I know this has been walked back since this post, but I would argue that targeting a specific player with intent to "interrupt his transfers," "make sure he doesn't get [sic] and cards via the market," and being "willing to devote my whole deck and bank to trying to stop him" probably constitutes harassment, as per viewtopic.php?f=16&t=260044#009