Advertisement
by Tarockanien » Sat Apr 15, 2023 7:04 am
by Giovanniland » Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:09 pm
by Fauzjhia » Sun Apr 16, 2023 9:16 pm
by Tarockanien » Tue Apr 25, 2023 12:05 am
Giovanniland wrote:I don't think that would be a very good division. "Purity" is very subjective and any label like that would be subject of much controversy, nor do I believe there's a need for more categories as things stand.
by New Makasta » Tue Apr 25, 2023 7:36 am
Tarockanien wrote:Giovanniland wrote:I don't think that would be a very good division. "Purity" is very subjective and any label like that would be subject of much controversy, nor do I believe there's a need for more categories as things stand.
So you think, a 'collection' that contains, let´s say, 600 cards, but in fact only 200 or maybe 300 'unique' copies, each card two or three times, but from different issues, is more 'impressive' or 'noticable' than a collection, that consists only of, let´s say, 500 cards, but each copy of a card is 'original', 'unique' , different and maybe collected with great invest of time (and maybe money) and effort over years ?
I would call this a 'cheap trick' to get 'massive (but simply uninteresting) collections', compared to 'pure' ones, which I still believe, should be 'classified' and handled different.
by Vylixan » Tue Apr 25, 2023 7:49 am
Tarockanien wrote:Giovanniland wrote:I don't think that would be a very good division. "Purity" is very subjective and any label like that would be subject of much controversy, nor do I believe there's a need for more categories as things stand.
So you think, a 'collection' that contains, let´s say, 600 cards, but in fact only 200 or maybe 300 'unique' copies, each card two or three times, but from different issues, is more 'impressive' or 'noticable' than a collection, that consists only of, let´s say, 500 cards, but each copy of a card is 'original', 'unique' , different and maybe collected with great invest of time (and maybe money) and effort over years ?
I would call this a 'cheap trick' to get 'massive (but simply uninteresting) collections', compared to 'pure' ones, which I still believe, should be 'classified' and handled different.
by The Grene Knyght » Tue Apr 25, 2023 9:34 am
Giovanniland wrote:I don't think that would be a very good division. "Purity" is very subjective and any label like that would be subject of much controversy, nor do I believe there's a need for more categories as things stand.
Also one can't deny that some collections' impressiveness relies heavily on their size, for example the rarity collections, default flags, ex-nations and so on. I do have in mind that the volume collections' bar should be increased if there's a feeling that there are too many collections there so that it's not really special anymore, though.
I'll hopefully update the thread this week.
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian MoralistPRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
by Mushroom Gorge » Tue Apr 25, 2023 9:22 pm
by Giovanniland » Fri Apr 28, 2023 12:56 am
by Ferengi Alliance Union » Sat Apr 29, 2023 1:33 pm
by Valoptia » Tue May 09, 2023 4:52 pm
by Giovanniland » Tue May 23, 2023 8:11 pm
by The Colonial BuccaRuu » Fri Jun 09, 2023 3:36 pm
by A Failed President » Sun Jun 18, 2023 2:07 pm
by Coffin-Breathe » Tue Jun 20, 2023 2:43 am
by A Failed President » Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:07 am
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Sorry, but what´s the title or theme of this collection ? I´d say, 'my collection' is a little bit vague...
by Giovanniland » Wed Jun 28, 2023 12:21 am
by Coffin-Breathe » Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:16 am
by A Failed President » Sat Jul 01, 2023 5:14 am
Giovanniland wrote:Season 3, Update 8
Added:
*snip*
Not added:
- A Failed President's collection, because I don't think it's a wise idea to highlight a collection on a very controversial and politically contentious person.
by A Failed President » Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:20 am
Coffin-Breathe wrote:a failed president should have stayed with his/her collection of 'US-presidents, and it would, imo, have been added without any problems...
by Panagouge » Thu Jul 13, 2023 7:25 pm
by Giovanniland » Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:20 pm
Panagouge wrote:I am the fourth person to collect all animated cards in all seasons: https://www.nationstates.net/page=deck/collection=65150
Many thanks to Kwaj for the last card.
by Panagouge » Sat Jul 15, 2023 11:39 pm
Giovanniland wrote:Panagouge wrote:I am the fourth person to collect all animated cards in all seasons: https://www.nationstates.net/page=deck/collection=65150
Many thanks to Kwaj for the last card.
Congrats Rewan!
If you don't mind answering, what were the second and third people? I currently have the link to Big Shot, which was the first, but would like to add a mention just like it's done with rarity collections.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement