Keep the Cards! [PETITION]

[Union of Socialist Alpine Republics]

U.S.A.R. - 142

[Yodle]

Yodle - 143

[American MapleStory]

American MapleStory - 144

I actually quit NS back in January. I just came back three times to keep my nation alive since I havn't decided if I want it to die yet. This happened because I got bored of just answering questions everyday that repeated 15 times. This feature is greatly needed!

KEEP!

[Nyoronet]

a

[Storalia]

Storalia - 145.

This feature is great! It'd be awesome if it was also expanded a bit.

[Arkaudia]

Arkaudia - 146
I want mine card, my dudes

[The Alma Mater]

The Alma Mater - 147

Yes, keep them - but with two changes:

1. Once obtained a card is "fixed" - if the nation changes its flag, region, status to ex-nation or whatever the card stays the same.
That way you can also release different versions of the same nation.

2. Ban puppettrading

[Undarat]

148

[Wahlid]

Wahlid- 149? (actual number of yes votes is 400something)

[Capitolius]

Capitolius - 150

[Zjaum]

Yeah, seriously. You could just call it "buying government debt" or "buying government bonds." The trade factor is completely reasonable, and it would explain the difference between card rarities.

[Newmanistan]

The way the game is now is too much of a drain on the system. Good for a week, and periodically, but in its current state, is not something that I feel should continue.

I say in its current state, because I think the game has potential, but the trade market is an absolute snoozefest because people are selling cards way too cheaply. (a penny above junk for an epic? why?) Improve the trade market, so there's an incentive to trade, other then a couple pennies.

Also "epic" cards need to truly be rare, and common cards need to truly be common. Right now they are just words with no real base on how rare or common that they really are in the game. For example, late last night, I became the first find on a common, while my two epics at the time had 10 and 11 finds. That should be the other way around. That "common" based on how things are distributed, is really epic. The game is interesting, but needs improvement. If no improvements are made, then I vote to not retain the game.

[Australian rePublic]

Sahriastan- 22

It shouldn't stay because the value of cards will deteriorate and soon 1 in 3 have a "lengendary" card

Q: Is Sahriastan a democracy?
A: Of course we are!

Q: What kind of nation is Sahriastan
A: Sahriastan is a moral one party state where the Sahria Party makes the law of the land.

Q: What does your nation specialize in?
A: Military and Conquest

Q: Is there a state religion?
A: Yes, obviously!

You can remove the ability to buy/sell, and trade history, keeping only the cards accumulated in the week period

[A m e n r i a]

Amenria 151

[Greater Gilead]

Gilead 152

[Kadolha]

Kadolha - 153

[Firaxin]

Firaxin - 154

[Kyrloth]

Kyrloth - 155

[Tiberistan]

Tiberistan!

[Haute Blanc]

Haute Blanc 156

[Northern Poland]

Northern Poland-159
KEEEP TEH CARDS 4 EVA HEHEHEHEHEE

[Auphelia]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=116561

So what is your end goal with this card game?

[Mallorea and Riva]

So far our efforts have seemed to go very far! Hopefully some moderators will see this thread.

I've seen it, but the thing to remember is that having a bunch of nations say they want something is not actually helpful at all. Posting here with a number next to your name isn't constructive, what is constructive is telling us how you want the game to look going forward, what features can be changed, what challenges the card game will face and how to address those challenges, etc. "We like this" is all well and good, but if it isn't sustainable in its present form then that's not actually much for us to work with.

[Werreales]

So far our efforts have seemed to go very far! Hopefully some moderators will see this thread.

I've seen it, but the thing to remember is that having a bunch of nations say they want something is not actually helpful at all. Posting here with a number next to your name isn't constructive, what is constructive is telling us how you want the game to look going forward, what features can be changed, what challenges the card game will face and how to address those challenges, etc. "We like this" is all well and good, but if it isn't sustainable in its present form then that's not actually much for us to work with.

I know this will sound horrible to some people, and maybe the technical issues with this idea would be hard to fix... nevertheless, I can't help myself but to think that cards would be a powerful tool to indicate a nation's "influence" / "soft power", alongside regional influence.

[Zjaum]

So far our efforts have seemed to go very far! Hopefully some moderators will see this thread.

I've seen it, but the thing to remember is that having a bunch of nations say they want something is not actually helpful at all. Posting here with a number next to your name isn't constructive, what is constructive is telling us how you want the game to look going forward, what features can be changed, what challenges the card game will face and how to address those challenges, etc. "We like this" is all well and good, but if it isn't sustainable in its present form then that's not actually much for us to work with.

All right, have you seen my recommendations on this feature? I can telegram those same recommendations to you now, as well as plenty more.