Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2024 5:52 pm
The Silver Circle wrote:Top 10? Not bad GG
Behold, the Power of the Queer Pirates!!
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
The Silver Circle wrote:Top 10? Not bad GG
Artoznik wrote:HOLD ON YALL WERE 8 PEOPLE????
Kogekitekinaheigosha wrote:Second Sina wrote:
Question, if its a lesbian wedding in the picture you are showing, shouldn't both of them be wearing dresses? Just a curious question, please don't go all liberal snowflake on me.
In lesbian relationships, one must be the dominant one, thus the suit on one of them, of course I wouldn't know this cause i'm a male and a Femboy, not a woman who's lesbian
Kogekitekinaheigosha wrote:Second Sina wrote:
Question, if its a lesbian wedding in the picture you are showing, shouldn't both of them be wearing dresses? Just a curious question, please don't go all liberal snowflake on me.
In lesbian relationships, one must be the dominant one, thus the suit on one of them, of course I wouldn't know this cause i'm a male and a Femboy, not a woman who's lesbian
Gaybeans wrote:Kogekitekinaheigosha wrote:In lesbian relationships, one must be the dominant one, thus the suit on one of them, of course I wouldn't know this cause i'm a male and a Femboy, not a woman who's lesbian
As a card carrying lesbian, its's not about "dominance", that's nonsensical. It's more aligned to what style the bride prefers. I've seen full femme weddings with both brides in dresses, seen full butch weddings of both brides in suits and all sorts of combos. Hell, I've seen a lot of straight women get married in suits (some with skirts some with trousers). Placing the butch lesbian as inherently 'dominant' over the femme is poop gender dynamics but Gay TM.
If I somehow trick some girl into marrying me, we are getting married in armour babyyyyyy
(also sorry if you were kidding on, sometimes i struggle to realise when people are joking in text)
Mercov wrote:Chapel Roan's nationstates account?