Nation Name: Albarine
Movie Name: Smokescreen
Is this movie nominated for:
Best Picture [ ]
Documentary [X]
Documentary (Short Subject) [ ]
Animated Feature [ ]
Short Film [ ]
Synopsis of Movie: The film traces the use of public relations tactics that were originally developed by the tobacco industry to protect their business from research indicating health risks from smoking. The most prominent of these tactics is the cultivation of scientists and others who successfully cast doubt on the scientific results. Using a professional magician, the film explores the analogy between these tactics and the methods used by magicians to distract their audiences from observing how illusions are performed. For the tobacco industry, the tactics successfully delayed government regulation until long after the establishment of scientific consensus about the health risks from smoking. As its second example, the film describes how manufacturers of flame retardants worked to protect their sales after toxic effects of the retardants were reported in the scientific literature. The central concern of the film is the ongoing use of these tactics to forestall governmental action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in response to the risk of global climate change.
The filmmakers interviewed more than a dozen individuals who have been involved in a series of conflicts ranging from the regulation of tobacco products due to the health risks to global climate change. In the sequence in which they appear in the film, they are:
-Esteban Glantz is a professor of medicine and activist for regulation of tobacco smoking. In 1994 he received a carton of documents copied from the records of the Elsbury tobacco company that revealed their awareness of health risks as early as the 1950s.
-Sam Roeson and Amanda Callahan are reporters at the Saint Raneau Times newspaper who in 2012 exposed "manufacturers that imperil public health by continuing to use toxic fire retardants in household furniture and crib mattresses, triggering reform efforts at the state and national level." They were finalists for an Investigative Reporting award.
-James Hensburg is a former AIA scientist whose 1988 testimony on climate change to congressional committees helped raise broad awareness of global warming, and has become a prominent advocate for regulation of greenhouse gas emissions.
-John Pasmelbane is the former executive director of Greensun, an organization of environmental activists.
-Marty O'Keefe is the chief executive officer of the Drett Institute, an organization that opposes government regulation of greenhouse gas emissions.
-Fred Hael is a physicist and environmental scientist who founded the Science Policy Project for Environments (SPPE) in 1990 to work against regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, among other issues.
-Aaron Shermer is a writer and publisher of the magazine Contro. He was initially a "contrarian" regarding regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, but his views changed as the science of climate change advanced.
-Isaiah Crawford is a writer. He is a former director of the Drett Institute who resigned over the influence of the Institute's sponsors in determining the Institute's activities and positions.
-Marcus Borano is a political activist who has published the climate denial website ClimateSpot since 2009. To encourage complaints to scientists whose work is viewed as supporting action on greenhouse gas emission, the website publishes their addresses.
-Edward Santer and Katharine Febista are climate scientists who have received personal threats because of their global climate change work.
-Jonathan Phillips is the president of Albarineans for Prosperity, which works against government regulation on climate change and other issues.
-Mark Angalis is a former MP from New Altai; he lost his district seat in the parliament following his announcement that he had changed his view and recognized global climate change as a problem that government should address.
The film embeds commentary and performances by magician Tito Ian. The premise of these interludes is that there is an analogy between the techniques of professional magicians and the tactics of public relation organizations. Magicians learn how to distract their audiences from noticing the deceptions that underlie their tricks and illusions. The organizations distract the public from the risks associated with products. These tactics were systematically developed by the tobacco industry in the 1950s in response to scientific research showing that smoking was a significant health risk; the research was a significant threat to tobacco sales. The principal distraction tactic has been the use of convincing personalities who claim that the uncertainties in the risks militate against taking action.
An unsigned review in The New Altai Globe explains, "To make his point clear, Slenn follows up Ian's magic act and fancy patter with a snappy montage of various experts over the years denying that cigarettes cause cancer, or extolling the virtues of pesticide, or proclaiming that asbestos is “designed to last a lifetime — a trouble free lifetime.” And then the inevitable parade of climate change deniers bloviating in parliament or on cable news, all backed by songs of irony. Ian's presence, and the animated playing cards that sometimes fly across the screen, feel like a glib and somewhat condescending gimmick, an attempt to wring some fun out of a grim and appalling story."
Director: Mathias Slenn
Movie Poster (optional):
