NationStates

Greatest States Of America wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Who invited the slaver here? I thought NATO stood for democracy not facism.

Douglas Jones: MOC Jordan administration told us that they wanted us to hear their case so we agreed it wasn't an invitation to be precise.

Fine let’s hear the side of the oppressor

South Olpen wrote:Secretary J. Cleetus (over a computer): “Hello, NATO representatives. Mr. Jones invited me to state South Olpen’s case to this once august body. We both know why I am here. So, what has NATO decided regarding the Galapagos.”

"What you want?"

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

South Olpen wrote:Secretary J. Cleetus (over a computer): “Hello, NATO representatives. Mr. Jones invited me to state South Olpen’s case to this once august body. We both know why I am here. So, what has NATO decided regarding the Galapagos.”

Who invited the slaver here? I thought NATO stood for democracy not facism.

seems bit far for anything. They may be warmongers and have issues with their democratic state but... this is too far of acuscations.

Ambassador Warren: "I motion to immediately eject the Galapagos Liberation Army from NATO operations and indefinitely suspend all support and communications with this rogue rebel state as they have made their intention clear to commit mass genocide against Olpenese civilians."

New Provenance wrote:Ambassador Warren: "I motion to immediately eject the Galapagos Liberation Army from NATO operations and indefinitely suspend all support and communications with this rogue rebel state as they have made their intention clear to commit mass genocide against Olpenese civilians."

Sealand fully supports this proposal.

New Provenance wrote:Ambassador Warren: "I motion to immediately eject the Galapagos Liberation Army from NATO operations and indefinitely suspend all support and communications with this rogue rebel state as they have made their intention clear to commit mass genocide against Olpenese civilians."

That would be a move against the entirety of the Galapagos which we represent. I would also like to motion a suspension of NATO cooperation with New Provenance until the Galapagos crisis is over for their continued support of the facist puppet government of the Galapagos and close ties with SO.

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

New Provenance wrote:Ambassador Warren: "I motion to immediately eject the Galapagos Liberation Army from NATO operations and indefinitely suspend all support and communications with this rogue rebel state as they have made their intention clear to commit mass genocide against Olpenese civilians."

That would be a move against the entirety of the Galapagos which we represent. I would also like to motion a suspension of NATO cooperation with New Provenance until the Galapagos crisis is over for their continued support of the facist puppet government of the Galapagos and close ties with SO.

Ambassador Warren: "So you shall be pushing forward with committing genocide against tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, most of whom have had no hand or influence in whatever the Olpenese government did to your people? You do realize doing that would make you no better than them?"

New Provenance wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:That would be a move against the entirety of the Galapagos which we represent. I would also like to motion a suspension of NATO cooperation with New Provenance until the Galapagos crisis is over for their continued support of the facist puppet government of the Galapagos and close ties with SO.

Ambassador Warren: "So you shall be pushing forward with committing genocide against tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, most of whom have had no hand or influence in whatever the Olpenese government did to your people? You do realize doing that would make you no better than them?"

Let me remind you that The Galapagos Times is not apart of the GLA, they simply support us. We do not wish to follow in SO’s footsteps and kill unarmed civilians. We only want independence from their oppressive regime.

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

New Provenance wrote:Ambassador Warren: "I motion to immediately eject the Galapagos Liberation Army from NATO operations and indefinitely suspend all support and communications with this rogue rebel state as they have made their intention clear to commit mass genocide against Olpenese civilians."

That would be a move against the entirety of the Galapagos which we represent. I would also like to motion a suspension of NATO cooperation with New Provenance until the Galapagos crisis is over for their continued support of the facist puppet government of the Galapagos and close ties with SO.

I would prefer a government that is trying to hold elections over one that is fascist and engages in international terrorism, as well as failing to condemn genocidal thoughts, then when a country realizes this and stops supporting the latter, they attempt to assassinate the leader of that country. I agree with New Provenance here. The GLA are terrorists and fascists intent on destroying the democratic foundations that SO is trying to construct.

The Territories of Sealand wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:That would be a move against the entirety of the Galapagos which we represent. I would also like to motion a suspension of NATO cooperation with New Provenance until the Galapagos crisis is over for their continued support of the facist puppet government of the Galapagos and close ties with SO.

I would prefer a government that is trying to hold elections over one that is fascist and engages in international terrorism, as well as failing to condemn genocidal thoughts, then when a country realizes this and stops supporting the latter, they attempt to assassinate the leader of that country. I agree with New Provenance here. The GLA are terrorists and fascists intent on destroying the democratic foundations that SO is trying to construct.

SO is as evil and as authoritarian as us. If they were so democratic then why do the gun down protesters and censor anti-SO media? Answer me that first and then I may consider your argument as valid. They are nothing more then oppressors bent on enslaving the Galapagos and installing their own corrupt regime in charge. We the GLA are fighting against this evil empire and bravely resisting these monsters in the name of the Galapagos. We fight against you slavers and will continue fighting until you leave our lands.

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

The Territories of Sealand wrote:
I would prefer a government that is trying to hold elections over one that is fascist and engages in international terrorism, as well as failing to condemn genocidal thoughts, then when a country realizes this and stops supporting the latter, they attempt to assassinate the leader of that country. I agree with New Provenance here. The GLA are terrorists and fascists intent on destroying the democratic foundations that SO is trying to construct.

SO is as evil and as authoritarian as us. If they were so democratic then why do the gun down protesters and censor anti-SO media? Answer me that first and then I may consider your argument as valid. They are nothing more then oppressors bent on enslaving the Galapagos and installing their own corrupt regime in charge. We the GLA are fighting against this evil empire and bravely resisting these monsters in the name of the Galapagos. We fight against you slavers and will continue fighting until you leave our lands.

"Which if true is saying a lot about yourself. You have gone too far. We back the motition to kick or punish GLA."

Jacksi Yutogy stand up: “The people of my homeland (frethotia) are under attack by communist rebels we ask for military support if you’d don’t help we might have a Communist Frethotia

Zarnicovia nova wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:SO is as evil and as authoritarian as us. If they were so democratic then why do the gun down protesters and censor anti-SO media? Answer me that first and then I may consider your argument as valid. They are nothing more then oppressors bent on enslaving the Galapagos and installing their own corrupt regime in charge. We the GLA are fighting against this evil empire and bravely resisting these monsters in the name of the Galapagos. We fight against you slavers and will continue fighting until you leave our lands.

"Which if true is saying a lot about yourself. You have gone too far. We back the motition to kick or punish GLA."

Miklos Sawa: Everyone please remain calm please. We are at each others throats at the moment and we must keep resolve, we as members and colleagues must look at this both ways. Galapagos is a nation trying to push back a invader who continues to push into their nation and commit atrocities that need to be answered. Yes I do agree though that our colleagues has said some outrageous things but this is coming from someone who is under a oppressive regime that continues to yes harm his people, I bet any of us would be pent with emotion if we were in the same circumstance. That is why we need to remember that first, we should not be going at each others throats. That goes for Galapagos and New Provenance we need to create a compromise. That is why I believe we can create "The Galapagos compromise" this will allow NATO forces to ensure democracy and stability in the shattered nation of Galapagos and the GLA on a tight leash. I myself remember when I was in this same circumstance when I was fighting in a civil war and you wanted nothing but the worst for the other side but that is when we must still keep our resolve both Galapagos and our fellow colleagues.

New Provenance wrote:Ambassador Warren: "I motion to immediately eject the Galapagos Liberation Army from NATO operations and indefinitely suspend all support and communications with this rogue rebel state as they have made their intention clear to commit mass genocide against Olpenese civilians."

Lord Eggsworth: in full support, the Galapagos has proven itself to be an army of death instead of liberation, they could have formed peaceful protests but they didn’t, they are just ruining the reputation of this august body and giving the Un-august body of the UF.

(Note: Galapagos I am still supporting you, just making this out to seem good.)

Rep. Mavov: I fully support the proposal sent by Ambassador Warren. The GLA has proven itself to be a vermin to the foreigners. Their accusations that the occupiers shooting down protesters are true, however, these are none lethal bullets. I suggest the GLA to join the democratic process being held by the occupiers.

OOC: can I maybe get a mini update on what happened? I've been away due to school. Thanks

Eclius wrote:OOC: can I maybe get a mini update on what happened? I've been away due to school. Thanks

Tensions between NATO and the United Federation (South Olpen and Southern Marajarba in particular) are rising, SO and SM are fighting a war against the Galapagos Liberation Army (GLA), and NATO is currently debating whether or not the alliance should back the GLA (leaning towards no right now).

Janpia wrote:Rep. Mavov: I fully support the proposal sent by Ambassador Warren. The GLA has proven itself to be a vermin to the foreigners. Their accusations that the occupiers shooting down protesters are true, however, these are none lethal bullets. I suggest the GLA to join the democratic process being held by the occupiers.

We will only attack when provoked. SM and SO have wronged us and we only responded to that.

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

Janpia wrote:Rep. Mavov: I fully support the proposal sent by Ambassador Warren. The GLA has proven itself to be a vermin to the foreigners. Their accusations that the occupiers shooting down protesters are true, however, these are none lethal bullets. I suggest the GLA to join the democratic process being held by the occupiers.

We will only attack when provoked. SM and SO have wronged us and we only responded to that.

Rep. Mavov: Rioting deserves to be put down. With non-lethal force. However, launching a rebellion is different.

Janpia wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:We will only attack when provoked. SM and SO have wronged us and we only responded to that.

Rep. Mavov: Rioting deserves to be put down. With non-lethal force. However, launching a rebellion is different.

So your saying we should just let SM and SO enslave us then? Your saying that we should allow foreign facists to oppress us? The Galapagos people are only trying to make their voice heard against these slavers and by banning us your suppressing that voice as much as them.

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

Janpia wrote:Rep. Mavov: Rioting deserves to be put down. With non-lethal force. However, launching a rebellion is different.

So your saying we should just let SM and SO enslave us then? Your saying that we should allow foreign facists to oppress us? The Galapagos people are only trying to make their voice heard against these slavers and by banning us your suppressing that voice as much as them.

Rep. Mavov: Peaceful protests are different from riots. As far as I know, the occupiers are trying place a democratic, socialist style of government. If you truly are the voice of the Galapasogians, then wouldn't it hurt to join that government as a representation?

Janpia wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:So your saying we should just let SM and SO enslave us then? Your saying that we should allow foreign facists to oppress us? The Galapagos people are only trying to make their voice heard against these slavers and by banning us your suppressing that voice as much as them.

Rep. Mavov: Peaceful protests are different from riots. As far as I know, the occupiers are trying place a democratic, socialist style of government. If you truly are the voice of the Galapasogians, then wouldn't it hurt to join that government as a representation?

We would never side with communists and the Galapagos people have made it clear that the occupiers are enemies of the people and due to actions from these so called “democracies” hundreds of innocent civilians lay dead in the streets. We will not join the side of the slavers.

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

Janpia wrote:Rep. Mavov: Peaceful protests are different from riots. As far as I know, the occupiers are trying place a democratic, socialist style of government. If you truly are the voice of the Galapasogians, then wouldn't it hurt to join that government as a representation?

We would never side with communists and the Galapagos people have made it clear that the occupiers are enemies of the people and due to actions from these so called “democracies” hundreds of innocent civilians lay dead in the streets. We will not join the side of the slavers.

Rep. Mavov: Well, you could just join it, and change it? After all, its democratic. The Government implemented by the occupiers are made to be ruled by Galapasogians. That is their claim

Janpia wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:We would never side with communists and the Galapagos people have made it clear that the occupiers are enemies of the people and due to actions from these so called “democracies” hundreds of innocent civilians lay dead in the streets. We will not join the side of the slavers.

Rep. Mavov: Well, you could just join it, and change it? After all, its democratic. The Government implemented by the occupiers are made to be ruled by Galapasogians. That is their claim

Their claim means nothing. They clearly oppose any Galapagos independence, they have made that very clear and there is no way they would allow the GLA in government despite us speaking for the people. There will be simply no compromise, we both want different things. They want a devastated and defeated Galapagos to exploit the population of, we want an independent and flourishing Galapagos free of the slavery of SM and SO

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

Janpia wrote:Rep. Mavov: Well, you could just join it, and change it? After all, its democratic. The Government implemented by the occupiers are made to be ruled by Galapasogians. That is their claim

Their claim means nothing. They clearly oppose any Galapagos independence, they have made that very clear and there is no way they would allow the GLA in government despite us speaking for the people. There will be simply no compromise, we both want different things. They want a devastated and defeated Galapagos to exploit the population of, we want an independent and flourishing Galapagos free of the slavery of SM and SO

Rep. Mavov: If they opposed your independence, then why would they place a government, made to be ruled by Galapasogians? Plus, in my opinion, Galapagos could've been independent as of right now if you didn't opposed. Your just giving the occupiers a hard time placing a democratic government, thus, adding more soldiers there. Although occupation IS bad, you should choose the democratic option.

Janpia wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Their claim means nothing. They clearly oppose any Galapagos independence, they have made that very clear and there is no way they would allow the GLA in government despite us speaking for the people. There will be simply no compromise, we both want different things. They want a devastated and defeated Galapagos to exploit the population of, we want an independent and flourishing Galapagos free of the slavery of SM and SO

Rep. Mavov: If they opposed your independence, then why would they place a government, made to be ruled by Galapasogians? Plus, in my opinion, Galapagos could've been independent as of right now if you didn't opposed. Your just giving the occupiers a hard time placing a democratic government, thus, adding more soldiers there. Although occupation IS bad, you should choose the democratic option.

Did you not here the news, SM is coming back to kill children and oppress the Galapagos, and again I say the Galapagos will never submit to the slavers, we will fight till the last man and then fight some more. SO’s promises of democracy are hollow and even if they are serious SM will surely oppose any attempts at self-rule as they still want their slave state.