NationStates

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

Zarnicovia nova wrote:"We can truely comfirm that SO are diet democracy and warmongers. In an attempt to make a peace deal over disputes between us and them we sent a diplomatic mission. Upon arriving they arrested the mission and had them tried for spying with a punishment for death. A act which in our culture is the equal to a declaration of war and nearly started a war."

OOC: I’m all in favor of making SO look bad but can you give us the proof that happened?

Zarnicovia nova wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:OOC: I’m all in favor of making SO look bad but can you give us the proof that happened?

somewhere in this mess: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=506473&start=3000

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

Ellinika Nisia wrote:“We agree, NATO has become too aggressive against other nations and now threatens International peace more than they claim the UF do! If NATO doesn't clean up its act, the Balkans will withdraw.”

You must not have a functioning brain to agree with this facist. SO is a menace and a threat to international peace and NATO should deal with it as such. Even if that means burning Constitution City to the ground and hanging Chamber Minister Jordan for his crimes. We must extinguish this threat once and for all.

New Provenance wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:You must not have a functioning brain to agree with this facist. SO is a menace and a threat to international peace and NATO should deal with it as such. Even if that means burning Constitution City to the ground and hanging Chamber Minister Jordan for his crimes. We must extinguish this threat once and for all.

Ambassador Warren: "NATO stands for peace, not war. Atlantica shall not stand to see this organization devolve into one which harbors only hatred for the United Federation. Our goal is to unite, not divide. Our goal is to cooperate, not hate. Our goal is to work with, not work against. We need and we must work with the Olpenese government to achieve a peaceful settlement in the Galapagos. I appeal to the entire boardroom: It is never too late to do the right thing."

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

New Provenance wrote:
Ambassador Warren: "NATO stands for peace, not war. Atlantica shall not stand to see this organization devolve into one which harbors only hatred for the United Federation. Our goal is to unite, not divide. Our goal is to cooperate, not hate. Our goal is to work with, not work against. We need and we must work with the Olpenese government to achieve a peaceful settlement in the Galapagos. I appeal to the entire boardroom: It is never too late to do the right thing."

Yes and right now the right thing is invasion to finally liberate the oppressed people of the Galapagos. SO will never accept peace unless they have their way which is why is say we don’t let them have their way. Thanks to SO and SM the Galapagos is in ruins and you say we should work together? I say we should burn Constitution City to the ground and make them pay for what they did to my people.

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:

New Provenance wrote:
Ambassador Warren: "NATO stands for peace, not war. Atlantica shall not stand to see this organization devolve into one which harbors only hatred for the United Federation. Our goal is to unite, not divide. Our goal is to cooperate, not hate. Our goal is to work with, not work against. We need and we must work with the Olpenese government to achieve a peaceful settlement in the Galapagos. I appeal to the entire boardroom: It is never too late to do the right thing."

Yes and right now the right thing is invasion to finally liberate the oppressed people of the Galapagos. SO will never accept peace unless they have their way which is why is say we don’t let them have their way. Thanks to SO and SM the Galapagos is in ruins and you say we should work together? I say we should burn Constitution City to the ground and make them pay for what they did to my people.

Kingdom Of The UN wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Yes and right now the right thing is invasion to finally liberate the oppressed people of the Galapagos. SO will never accept peace unless they have their way which is why is say we don’t let them have their way. Thanks to SO and SM the Galapagos is in ruins and you say we should work together? I say we should burn Constitution City to the ground and make them pay for what they did to my people.

Miklos Sawa: My inter life I grew up surrounded by conflict. It was when I was a boy when the Nationalist Catholics took over the country, then I was a naive teen who took up arms in the civil war to fight against the Liberalist. Then when I was a little older I fought in the deserts of Iran, and lastly I watched and took part in the over throw of my country, that has only been 4 years ago. My inter life I've never seen my country so peaceful. In order to keep the peace of my nation I feel the need to protect democracy in other parts of the globe including Galapagos but what I have learned through these continues conflicts that I have faced is that you don't fight fire with fire. Burning Constitution City will only result in them being in ruins and a invasion will only result in more suffering and death to both your side and theirs. I believe Galapagos deserves to be freed and protected but causing more bloodshed should not be a way of freeing your nation, what that will do is only spark another fire.

Ellinika Nisia wrote:

New Provenance wrote:Ambassador Warren: "I would like to make it clear that Atlantica will not support any and all attempts to undermine South Olpen or paint its leadership in a bad light. We will furthermore oppose any and all attempts by NATO to militarily violate South Olpen's sovereign territory which includes the Galapagos territory. Atlantica stands firm in believing that all nations have an equal right to be heard, and we should all be patient enough to hear out South Olpen and Southern Marajarba's arguments before launching into a war which will kill millions."

“We agree, NATO has become too aggressive against other nations and now threatens International peace more than they claim the UF do! If NATO doesn't clean up its act, the Balkans will withdraw.”

Kingdom Of The UN wrote:

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Yes and right now the right thing is invasion to finally liberate the oppressed people of the Galapagos. SO will never accept peace unless they have their way which is why is say we don’t let them have their way. Thanks to SO and SM the Galapagos is in ruins and you say we should work together? I say we should burn Constitution City to the ground and make them pay for what they did to my people.

Miklos Sawa: My inter life I grew up surrounded by conflict. It was when I was a boy when the Nationalist Catholics took over the country, then I was a naive teen who took up arms in the civil war to fight against the Liberalist. Then when I was a little older I fought in the deserts of Iran, and lastly I watched and took part in the over throw of my country, that has only been 4 years ago. My inter life I've never seen my country so peaceful. In order to keep the peace of my nation I feel the need to protect democracy in other parts of the globe including Galapagos but what I have learned through these continues conflicts that I have faced is that you don't fight fire with fire. Burning Constitution City will only result in them being in ruins and a invasion will only result in more suffering and death to both your side and theirs. I believe Galapagos deserves to be freed and protected but causing more bloodshed should not be a way of freeing your nation, what that will do is only spark another fire.

Christoffeland wrote:John Rosenveldt, the Christoffelijns Representative, Arrives in the NATO Boardroom, taking a seat.

John Rosenveldt: "If I may have the distinguished honor of speaking here, in this House of Freedom's greatest minds, It is truly a Privilege to stand here today. The nations part of this Alliance have long searched for Freedom world over. I don't wish to speak for too long, To get to the gist of things, What is going through the Motions currently?"

Janpia wrote:Rep. Mavov: I have returned from my homeland comrades. Now, as for our nation's opinion on Galapagos, I suggest that we just stay neutral, and don't act. In the first place, we are just gonna put ourselves in a sticky situation if we ever get involved. Not to mention, this is a UF's problem. If we interfere, we would just be put on bad spotlight.

Greatest States Of America wrote:

Janpia wrote:Rep. Mavov: I have returned from my homeland comrades. Now, as for our nation's opinion on Galapagos, I suggest that we just stay neutral, and don't act. In the first place, we are just gonna put ourselves in a sticky situation if we ever get involved. Not to mention, this is a UF's problem. If we interfere, we would just be put on bad spotlight.

Douglas Jones:Thank you Mr. Mavov for your precious opinion. But if the Sm-led coalition are failed to stop the violence and turmoil then I'm afraid that the spillover of the devastation will be immense. That's it.

Greatest States Of America wrote:

Ellinika Nisia wrote:“We agree, NATO has become too aggressive against other nations and now threatens International peace more than they claim the UF do! If NATO doesn't clean up its act, the Balkans will withdraw.”

Douglas Jones:I'm sure Ellinikan Nisian representative must have some proof to back up their claims at least. Till now no acts of aggression has been pursued by NATO and neither the United States. Who is the peace of enemy and who's not? That's up to debate. We didn't announce any aggressive proclamation or declaration against UF and its members and we would like to urge Ellinika Nisia to ‘‘carefully’’ release out any statements and comments which can be highly sensitive. Thank you!!

Ellinika Nisia wrote:

Greatest States Of America wrote:Douglas Jones:I'm sure Ellinikan Nisian representative must have some proof to back up their claims at least. Till now no acts of aggression has been pursued by NATO and neither the United States. Who is the peace of enemy and who's not? That's up to debate. We didn't announce any aggressive proclamation or declaration against UF and its members and we would like to urge Ellinika Nisia to ‘‘carefully’’ release out any statements and comments which can be highly sensitive. Thank you!!

” Why are we allowing a terrorist group supporter to constantly called for war against UF members? Why is King Isle allowed to stay in this alliance while they've had a history of kidnapping, oppression and lies? I won't bring up private communications between NATO members but claiming the UF want world domination and that there is a war in shadows are aggressive when it's been mainly only SM trying to campaign for any takeover. It is now clear to the Balkan Federation and its people, NATO no longer can be trusted (especially after one of your own officials commented on a NATO member behind their back for being “soft”. We resign from NATO, and will evict any military assets or personnel from the Balkans.”

New Kowloon Bay wrote:

Ellinika Nisia wrote:” Why are we allowing a terrorist group supporter to constantly called for war against UF members? Why is King Isle allowed to stay in this alliance while they've had a history of kidnapping, oppression and lies? I won't bring up private communications between NATO members but claiming the UF want world domination and that there is a war in shadows are aggressive when it's been mainly only SM trying to campaign for any takeover. It is now clear to the Balkan Federation and its people, NATO no longer can be trusted (especially after one of your own officials commented on a NATO member behind their back for being “soft”. We resign from NATO, and will evict any military assets or personnel from the Balkans.”

Uhh...I thought King Isle left for GA.

Ellinika Nisia wrote:

New Kowloon Bay wrote:Uhh...I thought King Isle left for GA.

OOC: They were still chatting and threatening tryantio. Look at the last page or two.

Respublica Hyliana wrote:Lord Valex Herd
*while reading the French review "Diplomatie"*

- Why not carry out a bombing campaign in the galapagos ? the pressure caused by the bombardment could force the invaders to give in.
We just have to aim at the military targets, doing this will limit the civilian casualties.

Respublica Hyliana wrote:Lord Valex Herd
*while reading the French review "Diplomatie"*

- Why not carry out a bombing campaign in the galapagos ? the pressure caused by the bombardment could force the invaders to give in.
We just have to aim at the military targets, doing this will limit the civilian casualties.

Greatest States Of America wrote:

Respublica Hyliana wrote:Lord Valex Herd
*while reading the French review "Diplomatie"*

- Why not carry out a bombing campaign in the galapagos ? the pressure caused by the bombardment could force the invaders to give in.
We just have to aim at the military targets, doing this will limit the civilian casualties.

Douglas Jones spitting water out of his mouth says in shock:
My good friend!! We cannot attack Galapagos. It'd be a disaster for all of us. We believe the Situation will get better although, we doubt it. Also, we cannot intervene in Galapagos as our other nato allies will not support it and neither will DC. If we intervene the problems can get worse or worst and thanks for your concern gentlemen!!