Which type of roleplay is better?

[Holy Roman Empires2]

Heres a question I'd like to ask:
Is an active roleplay whose posts arent of very good quality, or a not so active roleplay with very good, long quality posts better? I've been wondering.

[Lillorainen]

Oii, HRE2,
I think, this isn't a question there is one single, universal answer for, but rather a matter of personal taste. I personally tend to prefer quality over quantity, with RPs where replies might not float in every few minutes, but are of a certain quality standard. Of course, this quality standard may still be very situational, and some cases don't necessarily allow awfully long replies to be written, but I generally do put some effort into my posts and usually also expect players I interact with to do so as well.
I don't know what kind of RPs you're into, but to give you a rough idea as to how I make my posts, this is a small party RP hosted by a friend of mine, which I'm participating in, and this was a political/diplomatic RP I've hosted myself (with a different account).
But as said, this is a very subjective matter, and everyone has a different taste.
(Unless it comes to one-liners. They are objectively terrible. ^^)
I hope, this answers you question a bit.

Regards,
Lillo

EDIT: P.S. - in case of further inquiries on details, do not hesitate to use this thread. ^^

[Holy Roman Empires2]

I see, thanks for the response!

[Lillorainen]

I see, thanks for the response!

No problem!