Advertisement
by Orsandia » Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:20 pm
by Aruia » Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:15 am
by Ainslie » Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:30 am
Aruia wrote:So there was no recognition of niether of my post.
At this point i wanted to have an evacuation of the Aruian embassy but my involvement is staggered considering my posts are ignored.
Ill halt my posts untill i am relevant.
The Unified Electorates of Ainslie
Discord gdayer and weather alarm man from The Western Isles."Aprosia and Townside: hey, let's do history and culture, things that affect many aspects of our nations
ainslie: hehe alarm go brrrrr"
- Aprosia, 2021
"Factbooks are never finished, as Ains would say"
- Torom, 2018
by Ainslie » Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:39 pm
The Unified Electorates of Ainslie
Discord gdayer and weather alarm man from The Western Isles."Aprosia and Townside: hey, let's do history and culture, things that affect many aspects of our nations
ainslie: hehe alarm go brrrrr"
- Aprosia, 2021
"Factbooks are never finished, as Ains would say"
- Torom, 2018
by Yorrkon » Sun Jan 28, 2018 9:27 am
by Ostehaar » Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:13 am
Yorrkon wrote:- Yorrkon Special Forces Deployed
- A Spec Ops operation involving the death of a PLF high value target is publicly announced by the Chancellor to make Yorrkon's presence in the conflict known.
- Minimal Infantry Deployed - Serve as support units for other coalition armies
by Yorrkon » Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:28 am
Ostehaar wrote:Personally I'm against the idea of a "coalition" - we're individual nations operating for our own interest, only cooperating to prevent cross-fire and such.
I also think we should limit the number of agents, spec-ops, and military forces to a manageable level. So if, for example, Yorrkon wants to send in spec-ops, then I'd rather not do it myself as well and instead concentrate on government agents. Similarly, I think Yorrkon shouldn't send its own government agents (two foreign agencies should be enough). That's the point - if more players join, I think each player would have to do less. Otherwise it would become a mess.
by Thuzbekistan » Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:32 am
Yorrkon wrote:Ostehaar wrote:Personally I'm against the idea of a "coalition" - we're individual nations operating for our own interest, only cooperating to prevent cross-fire and such.
I also think we should limit the number of agents, spec-ops, and military forces to a manageable level. So if, for example, Yorrkon wants to send in spec-ops, then I'd rather not do it myself as well and instead concentrate on government agents. Similarly, I think Yorrkon shouldn't send its own government agents (two foreign agencies should be enough). That's the point - if more players join, I think each player would have to do less. Otherwise it would become a mess.
Understandable. I did not have intentions on sending my own government agents. The "intelligent sources" are ment to be the intel already gathered from the other two agencies available for Yorrkon's use to coordinate Ops directed at Thuzbeks. That's the purpose for Yorrkon's involvement. To spite Thuzbek, and for my government to make a stance on it's willingness to take action against the further spread of communism. Having infantry be supportive units for other nations are indeed up to the individual. However, I do know that I would like to deploy Spec Ops.
by Aruia » Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:35 am
by Ter Natiour » Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:07 pm
by Ostehaar » Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:35 pm
Ter Natiour wrote:I will be sending a Wasp Class Carrier with 10 cyclone ships and that's it.
by Ter Natiour » Sun Jan 28, 2018 4:43 pm
by Yorrkon » Sun Jan 28, 2018 4:47 pm
Ter Natiour wrote:amphibious assault ship-wasp class
I call it a carrier because it holds troops, supplies, and helicopters-not armed
by Ter Natiour » Sun Jan 28, 2018 5:02 pm
by Ostehaar » Sun Jan 28, 2018 5:56 pm
Ter Natiour wrote:amphibious assault ship-wasp class
I call it a carrier because it holds troops, supplies, and helicopters-not armed
Ter Natiour wrote:Yorrkon wrote:Amphibious Assault Ship?
Wasp-class amphibious assault ship
https://www.google.com/search?q=wasp+cl ... e&ie=UTF-8
by Orsandia » Sun Jan 28, 2018 9:11 pm
Ostehaar wrote:Ter Natiour wrote:amphibious assault ship-wasp class
I call it a carrier because it holds troops, supplies, and helicopters-not armedTer Natiour wrote:Wasp-class amphibious assault ship
https://www.google.com/search?q=wasp+cl ... e&ie=UTF-8
You're a nation of 1 million people with a GDP of 10 billion. My entire military budget is higher than your entire GDP (and that's not even your government budget) - and I don't have something like the Wasp. Carriers are for nations that need forces with expeditionary capabilities. Why would your nation need expeditionary capabilities?
Ter, please post your military stats on the RMB for others to reviews them and comment on them (it would be the best to have them in a separate dispatch).
by Oturia » Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:21 am
by Orsandia » Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:43 pm
by Thuzbekistan » Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:54 pm
by Ostehaar » Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:53 pm
by Thuzbekistan » Mon Jan 29, 2018 6:40 pm
by Orsandia » Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:33 pm
Thuzbekistan wrote:I'm actually kinda in limbo cuz I really want to RP the set up of this stuff with Samu...
by Thuzbekistan » Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:45 pm
by Orsandia » Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:59 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement