Council of Nations [OPEN - OOC]

[Chkalovsk II]

Chkalovsk, be realistic. We aren't operating under a IRL time constraint like the UN. If we wanted to, we could freeze IC time for all we care. I'm still sticking to the time periods I mentioned before, though perhaps I may change them if you make a compelling enough case.

We already said we dont want a bloody intervention secretary.
You've been delaying this for so long can we just fucking vote.

Jesus.

[Furstentum Rheinstadt]

Actually I agree with this.

For example if we are intervening in a role play that previously didn't involve us, the OPs of said RPs might not be willing to freeze IC time and continue their genocide or whatever.

We would adjust the voting period accordingly, then. But not now. We aren't in any type of RP like that.

Well alright then. If we can adjust the vote accordingly then I am with it.

But like Chkalovsk has said, I thought we voted on not having an intervention secretary?

[New Roma Republic]

Chkalovsk, be realistic. We aren't operating under a IRL time constraint like the UN. If we wanted to, we could freeze IC time for all we care. I'm still sticking to the time periods I mentioned before, though perhaps I may change them if you make a compelling enough case.

Thats assuming you can, and then the timeframe becomes unrealistic, but you know what, whatever.

A slow RP with tons of OOC chatter is LOADS better than a fast passed RP. It makes for a better story, and is less likely to turn into a number-wanker.

[Furstentum Rheinstadt]

Thats assuming you can, and then the timeframe becomes unrealistic, but you know what, whatever.

A slow RP with tons of OOC chatter is LOADS better than a fast passed RP. It makes for a better story, and is less likely to turn into a number-wanker.

But the problem is, we're more likely to intervene in more fast paced RPs where rouge states are doing genocide or etc.

[Chkalovsk II]

Thats assuming you can, and then the timeframe becomes unrealistic, but you know what, whatever.

A slow RP with tons of OOC chatter is LOADS better than a fast passed RP. It makes for a better story, and is less likely to turn into a number-wanker.

> Assuming

Not EVERYONE wants to roleplay when its like one post in a fucking three/four/five/week span.

But honestly once again, the voting time should serve the CONSTANTLY ACTIVE MINORITY if this alliance is going to be functional.

[Furstentum Rheinstadt]

A slow RP with tons of OOC chatter is LOADS better than a fast passed RP. It makes for a better story, and is less likely to turn into a number-wanker.

> Assuming

Not EVERYONE wants to roleplay when its like one post in a fucking three/four/five/week span.

But honestly once again, the voting time should serve the CONSTANTLY ACTIVE MINORITY if this alliance is going to be functional.

^^

[Tectonix]

We would adjust the voting period accordingly, then. But not now. We aren't in any type of RP like that.

Well alright then. If we can adjust the vote accordingly then I am with it.

But like Chkalovsk has said, I thought we voted on not having an intervention secretary?

I tacked on the amendment; we are voting on it now as a standalone because previously y'all wanted to postpone the vote on the two remaining Executive Board positions.

[Chkalovsk II]

[redacted]

[Tectonix]

A slow RP with tons of OOC chatter is LOADS better than a fast passed RP. It makes for a better story, and is less likely to turn into a number-wanker.

> Assuming

Not EVERYONE wants to roleplay when its like one post in a fucking three/four/five/week span.

But honestly once again, the voting time should serve the CONSTANTLY ACTIVE MINORITY if this alliance is going to be functional.

So then, what should it be in your mind?

[Chkalovsk II]

Well alright then. If we can adjust the vote accordingly then I am with it.

But like Chkalovsk has said, I thought we voted on not having an intervention secretary?

I tacked on the amendment; we are voting on it now as a standalone because previously y'all wanted to postpone the vote on the two remaining Executive Board positions.

We voted aye WITHOUT THE AMENDMENT because we didnt want the intervention secretary and the other position P E R I O D

[Furstentum Rheinstadt]

I tacked on the amendment; we are voting on it now as a standalone because previously y'all wanted to postpone the vote on the two remaining Executive Board positions.

We voted aye WITHOUT THE AMENDMENT because we didnt want the intervention secretary and the other position P E R I O D

^ This is the exact reason I voted without the amendment.

[Tectonix]

I tacked on the amendment; we are voting on it now as a standalone because previously y'all wanted to postpone the vote on the two remaining Executive Board positions.

*faceslam*

When will you learn ffs?

Okay, thats enough. YOU were the one who constantly dodged and weaved from voting on the amendment and wanted to postpone it, and dragged along the others. I am now presenting it as a standalone amendment.

[Tectonix]

I tacked on the amendment; we are voting on it now as a standalone because previously y'all wanted to postpone the vote on the two remaining Executive Board positions.

We voted aye WITHOUT THE AMENDMENT because we didnt want the intervention secretary and the other position P E R I O D

Not what many said in the General Council. They just wanted to postpone the vote on it.

[Furstentum Rheinstadt]

*faceslam*

When will you learn ffs?

Okay, thats enough. YOU were the one who constantly dodged and weaved from voting on the amendment and wanted to postpone it, and dragged along the others. I am now presenting it as a standalone amendment.

We did not want the other positions.

That is why we voted without the amendment.

[Tectonix]

Okay, thats enough. YOU were the one who constantly dodged and weaved from voting on the amendment and wanted to postpone it, and dragged along the others. I am now presenting it as a standalone amendment.

We did not want the other positions.

That is why we voted without the amendment.

Maybe you and Chkalovsk, but I'll assure you that most people either wanted to postpone it or just went along.

[Tectonix]

Hold on...Guys, give me a second. I need to verify something.

[Chkalovsk II]

We did not want the other positions.

That is why we voted without the amendment.

Maybe you and Chkalovsk, but I'll assure you that most people either wanted to postpone it or just went along.

"Most people"

> Was literally 6-1 (with all votes being AYE without the amendment except one that was just a regular aye)

[Tectonix]

Maybe you and Chkalovsk, but I'll assure you that most people either wanted to postpone it or just went along.

"Most people"

> Was literally 6-1 (with all votes being AYE without the amendment except one that was just a regular aye)

Postpone. Postpone, postpone postpone.

[Chkalovsk II]

"Most people"

> Was literally 6-1 (with all votes being AYE without the amendment except one that was just a regular aye)

Postpone. Postpone, postpone postpone.

No it wasnt.
We dont want to wait another 12 fucking hours to repeat a vote we already did.

[Tectonix]

But seriously, there's something I need to tend to.

[Federated Kingdom]

tbh after some thinking we don't need the intervention secretary. the president of the assembly could just take on the roles of the rapporteur.

[Council of Nations Admin]

tbh after some thinking we don't need the intervention secretary. the president of the assembly could just take on the roles of the rapporteur.

You may be correct, though the Charter will still need some tinkering.

[Federated Kingdom]

tbh after some thinking we don't need the intervention secretary. the president of the assembly could just take on the roles of the rapporteur.

You may be correct, though the Charter will still need some tinkering.

Maybe. Can we begin with the vote concerning the Chief Director?

[Tectonix]

You may be correct, though the Charter will still need some tinkering.

Maybe. Can we begin with the vote concerning the Chief Director?

Yes.

[Federated Kingdom]

Maybe. Can we begin with the vote concerning the Chief Director?

Yes.

Excellent. Begin the vote on the thread, in that case?