Vistora wrote:Empire of Donner land wrote:I try to add some realism to my things, but in the end it requires some suspension of disbelief for my cool shit* that I spent hours to think up and reading through Wikipedia on subjects I shouldn't have to learn until I go to College or the Air Force. But at the same time I try not to make it rediculous (see: Project Dolos) and work with others on how I could do something. In the end, there's always that person that goes "Not possible, go in the corner for trying to be creative."
*May or may not be actually cool shit.
Same here. Though I've made a bit of a name for myself for my attention to detail and commitment to realism as far as mid/high PMT goes, there's no doubt that a decent amount of extrapolation exists where my technology is concerned; of course, such is an unavoidable requisite when using a futuristic setting. The only way to 100% guarantee realism is by using MT tech, and making a world 135 years in the future yet being identical to today is quite unrealistic in as of itself.
This is also why I try not to chastise other people on technological realism unless I am doing so in a jocular manner or their tech happens to be outrageous, anachronistic, and unintentionally unrealistic all at once. I don't think Aterria had audacious wankery in mind when he made that silly railgun rifle of his, hence my critique of it (and that was after asking him). Similarly, that is the reason I, the supposed xXg0dofr33lizmXx, continually and adamantly stress how technological realism and development are not the most important metrics when judging a nation's viability for being PMT.
Trying to guess what humanity will have in the future is like asking George H Daniels what will replace steam power.





Also, magnetically throw shit around?
