Queendom of Carthage wrote:**IFCAPP**
Thank you for application! Given your stated disinclination to reform, it is rejected.
In other news, I am very pleased to announce that Mizrad is our new Minister of Foreign Affairs, a post which will be closely assisted by Flardania, as Special Advisor, and Devonta, as Special Envoy to the Right. We are currently searching for a special envoy to the left, and would welcome applicants.
Valaran wrote:Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:That's completely untrue (although an unfortunately common belief). Any decent MT RPer knows that their things should work in theory if they don't exist, and that the reason(s) why they don't exist IRL should not matter in NS.
[...]
The trouble starts when most people don't know what else can work in theory but isn't used in practice because, for example, it's not economical IRL. Or when you don't agree on whether anybody should invest money in it in NS either - for instance, I would have grave reservations about 99% of NS using Lyras' nuclear-engine bomber, because for all except about a dozen nations, it does not make any sense to invest in all the infrastructure required, unless your military spending is over about $10 trillion, focused on long-distance concerns, and the nation happens to have a plot of flat space where nuclear radiation is not a concern...
For the record Lib, I have a profound and effectively intractable disagreement with your view on this. This isn't meant to start an argument (which is why I try not to bring it up), but since you did flatly state this view to be correct (or rather, for another view to be incorrect), I felt a need to register my opposing viewpoint.
Not meaning to start an argument either, simply curious - which bit do you dislike? Or do you mean all of it? If so, what standard do you use to judge people's designs?
Is it just me, or is this is a complete non-sequitur?
Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:The important question is whether something is feasible on the balance of probability.
I do not expect anyone to be absolutely certain my invention is realistic (it would be arrogant and wrong of me to think so myself), and equally I would have hoped nobody would have become absolutely certain it was not realistic.
New Aeyariss wrote:Ah so you finally admit that it is not realistic!
I.e., has Cuscy finally decided the rules of logic are not for him?










