Nation Name: The Hellenic Republic of Pino Grand Fenwick
Nuclear Preference: Thermonuclear
Nuclear Stockpile: 2.000
Number of Nations Nuked:10
Number of Worlds Nuked: 2
Advertisement
by Pino Grand Fenwick » Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:49 pm
Nation Name: The Hellenic Republic of Pino Grand Fenwick
Nuclear Preference: Thermonuclear
Nuclear Stockpile: 2.000
Number of Nations Nuked:10
Number of Worlds Nuked: 2
by Felkesjud » Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:45 pm
Estenia wrote:Nation Name: Estenia
Nuclear Preference: YES
Nuclear Stockpile: 14 Hydrogen Bombs, 3 Nuclear Bomb Cannons
Number of Nations Nuked: 1 Gianlang
Number of Worlds Nuked: It is impossible
Rawlincia wrote:Nation Name: the Republic of Rawlincia
Nuclear Preference: Cold Fusion, RELIABLE!
Nuclear Stockpile:OVER 9,000!!!
Number of Nations Nuked:1
Number of Worlds Nuked:1 (I didn't destroy the world but I needed to nuke it to nuke the other nation)
Pino Grand Fenwick wrote:Nation Name: The Hellenic Republic of Pino Grand Fenwick
Nuclear Preference: Thermonuclear
Nuclear Stockpile: 2.000
Number of Nations Nuked:10
Number of Worlds Nuked: 2
by Opplandia » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:17 pm
And, with that, I am going to start a specific project: "Project TK-1." What would y'all say would be the benefits and drawbacks of a cobalt bomb, as well as its capabilities? Obviously, the theory behind it would be that of a dirty bomb meant to irradiate the enemy's lands over a long period of time, making them essentially useless for a certain amount of time and increasing the rates of cancer in survivors. But, how would this effect be maximized? What do y'all think? Do not be afraid to share your opinion. And, I trust everyone to be polite in their discussion
by Quirina » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:25 pm
Opplandia wrote:And, with that, I am going to start a specific project: "Project TK-1." What would y'all say would be the benefits and drawbacks of a cobalt bomb, as well as its capabilities? Obviously, the theory behind it would be that of a dirty bomb meant to irradiate the enemy's lands over a long period of time, making them essentially useless for a certain amount of time and increasing the rates of cancer in survivors. But, how would this effect be maximized? What do y'all think? Do not be afraid to share your opinion. And, I trust everyone to be polite in their discussion
what shall be the use of such a Thing? with 'normal' nukes you could seize the land after roundabout 30years, but with this Thing it would be lost for 100yrs or more. so, why?
by Felkesjud » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:34 pm
Opplandia wrote:what shall be the use of such a Thing? with 'normal' nukes you could seize the land after roundabout 30years, but with this Thing it would be lost for 100yrs or more. so, why?
by Atomic Utopia » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:52 pm
Felkesjud wrote:And, with that, I am going to start a specific project: "Project TK-1." What would y'all say would be the benefits and drawbacks of a cobalt bomb, as well as its capabilities? Obviously, the theory behind it would be that of a dirty bomb meant to irradiate the enemy's lands over a long period of time, making them essentially useless for a certain amount of time and increasing the rates of cancer in survivors. But, how would this effect be maximized? What do y'all think? Do not be afraid to share your opinion. And, I trust everyone to be polite in their discussion
by Big Brain City » Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:01 am
Nation Name: The State of Big Brain City
Nuclear Preference: Full fusion.
Nuclear Stockpile: 3.3 million M34 Full Fusion Weapons
Number of Nations Nuked: none but parts of our own
Number of Worlds Nuked: 44
The Big Brain wrote:Freedom? People are fools and unworthy of much freedom. Even I am a fool. Many people have recognized that and want me to suffer for it.
Unfortunately for them, I can glass their planets.
by Quirina » Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:13 am
Big Brain City wrote:Is there anything I have to do besides the app and the posting of the link in my sig?Nation Name: The State of Big Brain City
Nuclear Preference: Full fusion.
Nuclear Stockpile: 3.3 million M34 Full Fusion Weapons
Number of Nations Nuked: none but parts of our own
Number of Worlds Nuked: 44
by The United Colonies of Earth » Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:50 pm
Quirina wrote:Big Brain City wrote:Is there anything I have to do besides the app and the posting of the link in my sig?Nation Name: The State of Big Brain City
Nuclear Preference: Full fusion.
Nuclear Stockpile: 3.3 million M34 Full Fusion Weapons
Number of Nations Nuked: none but parts of our own
Number of Worlds Nuked: 44
Perhaps your opinion about the benefit and disadvantage of cobalt bombs (the current discussion) might work and help.
by Atomic Utopia » Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:14 pm
by Opplandia » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:16 am
Atomic Utopia wrote:Out of curiosity, what is your favorite nuclear device of all time? I am torn between these two devices.
Davy Crockett
I love the portability and small size of the device in the test, however it fails to produce a blast as beautiful as the second test.
Atomic Annie
I also love how portable, and the blast is absolutely beautiful in the respect that the mushroom cloud is well formed, and stays a nice red color for about three seconds (the Davy Crockett did not do that). However it is not man portable, or as elegantly small.
by Slakonian » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:51 am
Turmenista wrote:>USA/Obama drops bombs in Syria for over a year, nobody bats an eye or says a word.
>Russia/Putin drops bombs in Syria for a day and-
WE INTERRUPT THIS SHITPOST TO INFORM YOU THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN AND RUSSIA ARE TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!
by Usmcs12 » Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:18 am
Felkesjud wrote:Lortehul wrote:Nation Name: Lortehul
Nuclear Preference: Fission weapons
Nuclear Stockpile: Five crude ICBMs. (We're working on it.)
Number of Nations Nuked: None (Sadly)
Number of Worlds Nuked: None (sadly)
Accepted, and welcome, Yearning Captain of the FissionOpplandia wrote:Nation Name: The Federal Republic of Opplandia
Nuclear Preference: fusion bombs (H-Bombs ftw!)
Nuclear Stockpile: thousands
Number of Nations Nuked: n/a
Number of Worlds Nuked: n/a
Accepted, and welcome, Burning Fusion King
by Aeyariss » Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:33 am
Nation Name: The Holy Empire of Aeyariss
Nuclear Preference: Fission
Nuclear Stockpile: 8,200 warheads
Number of Nations Nuked: 1
Number of Worlds Nuked: 0
by Opplandia » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:17 pm
by Atomic Utopia » Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:01 pm
Opplandia wrote:What do you guys think of these?
This so called Atomic Demolition Munitions, aka 'nuclear landmines', were meant to destroy Dams, Factories and other facilities; or to stop/kill enemy Forces, without the intensity of a 'fully grown' nuke. What are your thoughts on such 'defensive nukes'?
by Atomic Utopia » Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:14 pm
Opplandia wrote:hehe nice to meet another friend of these nasty little bastards
by Atomic Utopia » Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:23 pm
Opplandia wrote:ah okay, thats an explain then. the W-54 was nice yea, but it could have done better with more detonation-force.
by Kerpentans » Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:55 am
Nation Name: The Corporate Theocracy of Kerpentans
Nuclear Preference: Hydrogen
Nuclear Stockpile: 10,236
Number of Nations Nuked: 8
Number of Worlds Nuked: 2
by New Pyrrhius » Sun Nov 09, 2014 11:50 pm
1000%!! I USED TO GIVE A FUCK
by Atomic Utopia » Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:15 am
New Pyrrhius wrote:Nation Name: New Pyrrhius
Nuclear Preference: Tunguska Cannon, a weapon that launches nuclear weapons with nuclear blasts.
Nuclear Stockpile: 117 million and counting. FT nation, go figure.
Number of Nations Nuked: 27 sovereign entities have been atomized.
Number of Worlds Nuked: Three entire planets sterilized with nuclear weapons and/or a neutron slug, 11 that got a few continents blown to smithereens.
the Tunguska cannon is a weapon that uses a principle that is rarely seen in weapon propulsion, and that is nuclear propulsion. For the most part, atomic rockets are too much of an investment to be wasting on "torch missiles" capable of hitting a target from across a solar system. Still, many wanted the easy access to high velocity propulsion that did not rely on the massive energy bill of ship mounted gauss guns or the need to tamper in the anomalous physics associated with gravimetric propulsion. New Pyrrhius however was more unable to resist than most, and built the Tunguska cannon.
The device uses a diamondoid chamber held together with buckminsterfullerene components. The weapon is encased in a aluminum and concrete casing which locks onto a series of shock absorbers. The weapon itself also has these shock absorbers attached to a pusher plate that is the iconic piece of the orion drive. A shaped nuclear charge is inserted into the casing and detonated, while an electromagnetic barrel stabilizes the munition and funnels debris and plasma away from bits of the ship. The casing, having protected the rest of the ship from leftover radioactive bits, is ejected. The system is much more efficient than a weaponized torchship, although the need for large amounts of diamondoid and carbon nanotubes makes it prohibitive to nations lacking the needed nanotech.
by New Pyrrhius » Tue Nov 11, 2014 2:36 pm
1000%!! I USED TO GIVE A FUCK
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cavirfi
Advertisement