Valaran wrote:Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:A: The ICON has been clingy enough to threaten merger in three separate times. After the IU fell, Midway in the ICoN, and after the fall.
B: A somewhat viable option is never unavailable.
It is also noteworthy that it has never gone through with it on all three occasions. Latent IFC influence (and it is latent, since it usually has been suggested only at points of crisis or just after) doesn't seem to have triumphed, if you will.
No one said* it was unavailable. But somewhat viable isn't a ringing endorsement, and nor does it really convince me to agree. (I can't speak for anyone else so if they want to add their opinion feel free)
Finally, how exactly would ICON cut ties?
A: That being said, it was close and well threatened, and has all reached close attempts, and have mostly been given up.
B: While I would give endorsement, I wouldn't have a problem if denied, not do I strongly support it due to me saying it is somewhat viable.
C: More simply, we can firstly stop with such things as IFC merger requests for the time being.





