IFC Council (IC)

by **Ontorisa** » Sun Mar 06, 2016 1:17 pm

OOC: Nah, I'd say keep it here buddy.

by **Inyourfaceistan** » Sun Mar 06, 2016 1:20 pm

by **Novo Wagondia** » Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:27 pm

Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:
[OOC: You do know you're not a member, right? It's much simpler to move the Council than to remove your delegate. She's like a limpet. And she will not be invited wherever we meet next].

Inyourfaceistan wrote:
Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:[OOC: You do know you're not a member, right?

Says you. One dude with an ego complex.
(And one buddy who always agrees with everything you say).

And why was Aravea ejected?
For proposing a resolution that you don't like?

It's much simpler to move the Council than to remove your delegate. She's like a limpet. And she will not be invited wherever we meet next].

Except I've said time and time again I would leave if properly voted out by the members of the Council and that vote failed.
So this arguement is just as null as it is an obvious cover story.

You just want to move the council somewhere to make yourself or someone else in your pocket OP so you can continue to reject logic and undermine/bypass democracy just to get your way because of OP powers.

How about this:

You admit that you want to use the IFC to further your own foreign policy agenda, that you don't give a fuck about freedom or democracy and that you don't care what members want and I will leave and never look back.
You just openly say what you and I both know and I quit the IFC and stay out of its affairs forever, I swear.

End this pointless underlying argument between us right here just by admitting it, and you will never have to deal with me here or any reincarnation of the IFC ever.

What do you say?

Keep it to Telegrams, folks. This is a strictly IC thread; lambasting each other has no place in these halls.

by **Inyourfaceistan** » Sun Mar 06, 2016 5:05 pm

by **Novo Wagondia** » Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:35 pm

The Constitutional Empire of Wagondia
His Excellency César Emilio

Judicial Powers Act

[Resolution Number: 12]

This Council,

Expanding on the ideas outlined in Section 2.1 of Resolution 10 separate from any political agenda, to isolate any said judiciary from legislation which may taint the lack of bias

Noting the absurd degree of infighting, power abuse, and sectionalism that passionate tempers and individual antics have wrought,

Yet recognizing this issue to be chiefly due to individual irresponsibility rather than issues inherent in the IFC

1. Creates a judiciary branch known as the 'Judicial Committee' which shall dispense just rulings and condemnations where warranted to resolve the immature and universally chaotic infighting which has led to such widespread disillusionment and a scourge of recent resignations

2. Proposes this committee consist of three level-headed and fair-minded individuals who can appropriately hear arguments and dispense consequences as per the values outlined in the IFC charter and the common standards of ethical behavior and constructive commentary; these individuals are prospectively to be the author, the representative from Flardania, and the representative of the URA. Being accountable to the people in very regard, these individuals can at any time be voted off the committee by a council supermajority for perceived bias in rulings or other corrupt activities slandering the equity of all those heard before the committee.

3. Subjects all member nations and all legislation to the purview of the said committee, which is ordered to treat each member fairly and hear at least a case and rebuttal in self-defense before prescribing a punishment. These punishments shall range from verbal warnings to temporary bans for exceptionally vitriolic, counterproductive, or repetitive infractions. The maximum length of expulsion shall be one month, as any permanent expulsions require a council vote.

4. Ensures that all proceedings by the committee shall be held in public on a separate thread, and prohibits any attempts to shield rulings or arguments from the general membership.

5. Invests in this committee the power of judicial review of legislation, if that legislation is seen as contrary to the principles of the alliance or is otherwise intended not for the prosperity of the coalition but for individual gain or vengeance

6. Members of the judiciary committee are prohibited from running for Prime Minister while serving on the committee, and the Prime Minister, Secretary General, or any alternate executive, is prohibited from joining the committee or tainting its lack of political or personal bias.

[His Excellency César Emilio, The Constitutional Empire of Wagonida]

by **Secundus Imperium Romanum** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:37 pm

"Delegate Antonio Maschette, representing the Second Roman Empire, votes IN FAVOR of resolution number 12 made by the most excellent César Emilio, from Wagonida."

by **New Roma Republic** » Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:18 pm

Secundus Imperium Romanum wrote:"Delegate Antonio Maschette, representing the Second Roman Empire, votes IN FAVOR of resolution number 12 made by the most excellent César Emilio, from Wagonida."

Hey, this Council thread is no longer in use. Go here for the current Council thread.

by **Secundus Imperium Romanum** » Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:23 am

New Roma Republic wrote:
Secundus Imperium Romanum wrote:"Delegate Antonio Maschette, representing the Second Roman Empire, votes IN FAVOR of resolution number 12 made by the most excellent César Emilio, from Wagonida."

Hey, this Council thread is no longer in use. Go here for the current Council thread.

ops, sorry

IFC Council (IC)

Who is online