Merger between IFA and WC (OOC)

[Flardania]

I Second the motion

That is how United Airlines and Continental Airlines merged. The combined airlines uses 'United' and uses the logo of Continental.

"Flardania also approves of this motion."

[Liberated Counties]

What is the motto in english?

Where there is doubt there is freedom? My Latin is rusty...

Your latin is correct. I chose that phrase because it represents our freedom to make our own decisions, instead of simply doing as one is told.

[Valaran]

Where there is doubt there is freedom? My Latin is rusty...

Your latin is correct. I chose that phrase because it represents our freedom to make our own decisions, instead of simply doing as one is told.

It's a nice phrase, I like it quite a lot.
Perhaps something about freedom being the guiding lux, though your phrase is more apt and generally better.

[Liberated Counties]

Your latin is correct. I chose that phrase because it represents our freedom to make our own decisions, instead of simply doing as one is told.

It's a nice phrase, I like it quite a lot.
Perhaps something about freedom being the guiding lux, though your phrase is more apt and generally better.

Even if you don't use my flag, you oughta use that phrase. I like its meaning too :3

[Bratislav]

It's a nice phrase, I like it quite a lot.
Perhaps something about freedom being the guiding lux, though your phrase is more apt and generally better.

Even if you don't use my flag, you oughta use that phrase. I like its meaning too :3

Sure we can have both a motto and also a wallpaper type graphic.

[Vanitan]

Even if you don't use my flag, you oughta use that phrase. I like its meaning too :3

Sure we can have both a motto and also a wallpaper type graphic.

S...So I just made my flags...for nothing *sad violin plays*

[Bratislav]

Sure we can have both a motto and also a wallpaper type graphic.

S...So I just made my flags...for nothing *sad violin plays*

I mean it was good to see the possibility of a combined logo. Often times people create many logos then decide on just one. But I do think the new alliance should have a graphics department that can make cool graphics, wallpapers, sigs, etc.

[Vanitan]

S...So I just made my flags...for nothing *sad violin plays*

I mean it was good to see the possibility of a combined logo. Often times people create many logos then decide on just one. But I do think the new alliance should have a graphics department that can make cool graphics, wallpapers, sigs, etc.

Okay...

[Globus]

I have created some possible logos, if we are interested in an entirely new logo. Check them out, and feedback is appreciated.

Replacement: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=304270&p=20928136#p20929024





Also, a few name ideas if we are looking for a new name.

• International Freedom Coalition
• International Peace Coalition
• Coalition of Freedom
• Freedom Coalition

[Bratislav]

I have created some possible logos, if we are interested in an entirely new logo. Check them out, and feedback is appreciated.

(Image)

(Image)

(Image)

Also, a few name ideas if we are looking for a new name.

• International Freedom Coalition
• International Peace Coalition
• Coalition of Freedom
• Freedom Coalition

International Freedom Coalition is a possibly good name. I still think in terms of the logo we should go with the Western Coalition star, at least personally I like it a lot but we can put it up for a vote. Or for simplicity sake, adopt IFA as the name, and adopt the WC logo. Just imagine how many things have to be renamed if we put a whole new different name.

[Muzztopia]

I have created some possible logos, if we are interested in an entirely new logo. Check them out, and feedback is appreciated.

(Image)

(Image)

(Image)

Also, a few name ideas if we are looking for a new name.

• International Freedom Coalition
• International Peace Coalition
• Coalition of Freedom
• Freedom Coalition

I have to admit I really love that first logo, it just looks so good

[Vanitan]

I have created some possible logos, if we are interested in an entirely new logo. Check them out, and feedback is appreciated.

(Image)

(Image)

(Image)

Also, a few name ideas if we are looking for a new name.

• International Freedom Coalition
• International Peace Coalition
• Coalition of Freedom
• Freedom Coalition

I have to admit I really love that first logo, it just looks so good

IKR I would kiss that thing if it was real.

[Gibberan]

International Freedom Coalition sounds like the best name to me. As to the logo, the third one seems good, maybe with the star of the second one on it's chest?

[Bratislav]

International Freedom Coalition sounds nice, I just hope people will pick up on the fact that it is the name of the new merged alliance, since both IFA and WC have had much more name recognition.

As for the logo: out of the three I like the third one, but my overall favorite is the star logo of WC.

[Globus]

The first logo has been recalled. I just realized it is the same logo as the GE&T Central Security Corporation.

This one is similar to it.

[Gibberan]

The first logo has been recalled. I just realized it is the same logo as the GE&T Central Security Corporation.

This one is similar to it.

(Image)

It's really good, though its more of a flag than an.emblem.

[Bratislav]

I guess I'm the only one that favors the WC or IFA logo

Though guys, we should finalize the more crucial points in the merger, For example, the admittance policy. WC uses a different admittance policy than IFA because they look at the country's NS freedom ranking. While IFA doesn't and looks more to ensure that the incoming member is a functioning democracy that fits our ideals.

[Rentalla]

I guess I'm the only one that favors the WC or IFA logo

Though guys, we should finalize the more crucial points in the merger, For example, the admittance policy. WC uses a different admittance policy than IFA because they look at the country's NS freedom ranking. While IFA doesn't and looks more to ensure that the incoming member is a functioning democracy that fits our ideals.

Perhaps we could use both sets of criteria. Although it would seem that some members of the WC are opposed to the IFA's admittance policy.

[Gibberan]

I guess I'm the only one that favors the WC or IFA logo

Though guys, we should finalize the more crucial points in the merger, For example, the admittance policy. WC uses a different admittance policy than IFA because they look at the country's NS freedom ranking. While IFA doesn't and looks more to ensure that the incoming member is a functioning democracy that fits our ideals.

Perhaps we could use both sets of criteria. Although it would seem that some members of the WC are opposed to the IFA's admittance policy.

I'm honestly all right with either policy, though it depends on whether the alliance will associate with gameplay or be a roleplay-only group.

[Flardania]

I guess I'm the only one that favors the WC or IFA logo

Though guys, we should finalize the more crucial points in the merger, For example, the admittance policy. WC uses a different admittance policy than IFA because they look at the country's NS freedom ranking. While IFA doesn't and looks more to ensure that the incoming member is a functioning democracy that fits our ideals.

Perhaps we could use both sets of criteria. Although it would seem that some members of the WC are opposed to the IFA's admittance policy.

Yea I don't think my Constitutional Autocracy would meet IFA standards. In other news I am in Favor of the name IFC (International Freedom Coalition).

[Bratislav]

Perhaps we could use both sets of criteria. Although it would seem that some members of the WC are opposed to the IFA's admittance policy.

I'm honestly all right with either policy, though it depends on whether the alliance will associate with gameplay or be a roleplay-only group.

The alliance will be like IFA and WC was, there is gameplay and usually there are alliance related RPs. I think the IFA admittance policy may be a bit more flexible in some regards, just because the NS legislation are sometimes very weird, and not everyone's NS country ranking reflects their actual RP policies. (mine does though ) Obviously though a country should justify why they are labelled as a psychotic dictatorship when they portray themselves as very democratic.

Perhaps we could use both sets of criteria. Although it would seem that some members of the WC are opposed to the IFA's admittance policy.

Yea I don't think my Constitutional Autocracy would meet IFA standards. In other news I am in Favor of the name IFC (International Freedom Coalition).

Not necessarily. Basically we are going to admit any moderate country that can show that they have a generally democratic structure of governance as opposed to authoritarian, communist, extremist, etc. So it's a rather wide criteria.

I think the International Freedom Coalition sounds good. It combines our two alliances nicely.

[Gibberan]

I'm honestly all right with either policy, though it depends on whether the alliance will associate with gameplay or be a roleplay-only group.

The alliance will be like IFA and WC was, there is gameplay and usually there are alliance related RPs. I think the IFA admittance policy may be a bit more flexible in some regards, just because the NS legislation are sometimes very weird, and not everyone's NS country ranking reflects their actual RP policies. (mine does though ) Obviously though a country should justify why they are labelled as a psychotic dictatorship when they portray themselves as very democratic.

I actually had no idea the IFA was ever gameplay-oriented. The WC used to be but stopped when we did away with the region.

Yea I don't think my Constitutional Autocracy would meet IFA standards. In other news I am in Favor of the name IFC (International Freedom Coalition).

Not necessarily. Basically we are going to admit any moderate country that can show that they have a generally democratic structure of governance as opposed to authoritarian, communist, extremist, etc. So it's a rather wide criteria.

I think the International Freedom Coalition sounds good. It combines our two alliances nicely.

How would they show that? Would it be a series of rights questions, similar to those in the WC application?

[Bratislav]

The alliance will be like IFA and WC was, there is gameplay and usually there are alliance related RPs. I think the IFA admittance policy may be a bit more flexible in some regards, just because the NS legislation are sometimes very weird, and not everyone's NS country ranking reflects their actual RP policies. (mine does though ) Obviously though a country should justify why they are labelled as a psychotic dictatorship when they portray themselves as very democratic.

I actually had no idea the IFA was ever gameplay-oriented. The WC used to be but stopped when we did away with the region.

Not necessarily. Basically we are going to admit any moderate country that can show that they have a generally democratic structure of governance as opposed to authoritarian, communist, extremist, etc. So it's a rather wide criteria.

I think the International Freedom Coalition sounds good. It combines our two alliances nicely.

How would they show that? Would it be a series of rights questions, similar to those in the WC application?

Well IFA never had a region, just we had roleplays based on events with our members .

I think we can expand upon the application, ask more questions, but let´s leave out the NS ranking part. Basically combine the WC app questions with IFA app questions.

Here are the two apps:
Formal Country Name:
Capital:
Population:
Head of State:
Head of Government:
Form of Government:
Economic System:
Military Size (active):
Reason for Joining IFA:
How do you describe the political atmosphere of your state? (Far-Left/Left/Center-Left/Center/Center-Right/Right/Far-Right):
Is your Government by the people (exercised either directly or through elected representatives)?
What other military alliances are you a part of:
Representative to the IFA Council:

---

Basics:
Formal Nation Name:
Head of State:
Head of Government:
Military Size: (_/10)
Nuclear Arsenal (if any):
Goals (optional):
Capital city:
National Creation and Brief History of your nation:
Language:
Demonym:

Does your nation have...
Freedom of speech
Freedom of conscience
Freedom of assembly
Freedom of religion
Freedom of movement
The right to a fair trial
Universal adult suffrage
Racial discrimination
Religious discrimination
Gender discrimination
LGBT discrimination
Laws to prevent racial/religious/gender/LGBT discrimination
Slavery
Retroactive laws (i.e. punishing someone for doing an action in the past when it was legal at the time)
Political Freedoms ranking (found on your homepage, and must be average or higher):
Civil Rights ranking (also on your homepage, and also must be average or higher):

Name of Ambassador to the Provisional Council:
Do you hereby agree to abide by the terms and conditions set forth by the Western Coalition Charter?

Name of Military:
Branches of Military:

Does your nation have an IIwiki page as of yet?
RP example:

[Bratislav]

How about we just use the WC app, take out these questions:

Retroactive laws (i.e. punishing someone for doing an action in the past when it was legal at the time)
Political Freedoms ranking (found on your homepage, and must be average or higher):
Civil Rights ranking (also on your homepage, and also must be average or higher):

and add these:

What other military alliances are you a part of:
How do you describe the political atmosphere of your state? (Far-Left/Left/Center-Left/Center/Center-Right/Right/Far-Right):
Is your Government by the people (exercised either directly or through elected representatives)?
Economic System:
Reason for Joining:

[Gibberan]

How about we just use the WC app, take out these questions:

Retroactive laws (i.e. punishing someone for doing an action in the past when it was legal at the time)
Political Freedoms ranking (found on your homepage, and must be average or higher):
Civil Rights ranking (also on your homepage, and also must be average or higher):

and add these:

What other military alliances are you a part of:
How do you describe the political atmosphere of your state? (Far-Left/Left/Center-Left/Center/Center-Right/Right/Far-Right):
Is your Government by the people (exercised either directly or through elected representatives)?
Economic System:
Reason for Joining:

Seconded