The United Left (OOC/SIGNUPS/2.0)

by **Republic of Vietnam** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 9:34 pm

Cyllea wrote:
Republic of Vietnam wrote:I swear if Cyllea does this image beating thing to me,
I am so going to stop giving him checks.

OK, OK, I NO HURT YOU! ;-;

Good.

Have another check
*Hands check*
BTW, I gave you military equipment. Not the best, but will suffice.

by **Bojikami** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 9:37 pm

Republic of Vietnam wrote:
Bojikami wrote:Da.

Can you make one for me?

Tomorrow.

by **Republic of Vietnam** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 9:38 pm

Bojikami wrote:
Republic of Vietnam wrote:Can you make one for me?

Tomorrow.

Thanks!!!

by **Jazakstan** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:10 pm

Sorry for posting here again xD but http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ukulingana is this guy Western European Republic? :shock:

by **The United Motherland** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:11 pm

Jazakstan wrote:Sorry for posting here again xD but http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ukulingana is this guy Western European Republic?

Indeed.

by **Jazakstan** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:13 pm

Man, I don't know shit about anything :palm:

1 less OEN member I suppose. thanks tho

by **Glorious ReBublic of Alevstan** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:16 pm

Oi, Bojikami, remeber Israel is a hypercube in Polandball comics. And Reichtangle is a rectangle.

by **Ardoki** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:07 pm

I thought we weren't using chemical weapons?

by **The United Motherland** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:43 pm

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=299674

Nice kids. Even though there were many Causus Bellis, and there were many reasons for invasion, and, this was our only offical aggressive stance...

... Calls us an aggressive pact.

BTW. This also counts in terms for the IFA. I'll see what I can do to change his mind, but... Some people...

by **The United Motherland** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:43 pm

Ardoki wrote:I thought we weren't using chemical weapons?

? Never said we wouldn't These aren't exactly WMDs, which aren't banned.

by **Vargaard** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:47 pm

The United Motherland wrote:
Ardoki wrote:I thought we weren't using chemical weapons?

? Never said we wouldn't These aren't exactly WMDs, which aren't banned.

combine WMD and chemical weapon.
=
mass pwnage

by **The United Motherland** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:48 pm

Vargaard wrote:
The United Motherland wrote:? Never said we wouldn't These aren't exactly WMDs, which aren't banned.

combine WMD and chemical weapon.
=
mass pwnage

Nah. Honestly, saying they already had mines on their bays; landing would be a suicide mission.

by **Ardoki** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:48 pm

Vargaard wrote:
The United Motherland wrote:? Never said we wouldn't These aren't exactly WMDs, which aren't banned.

combine WMD and chemical weapon.
=
mass pwnage

Hello.

by **Vargaard** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:51 pm

Ardoki wrote:
Vargaard wrote:combine WMD and chemical weapon.
=
mass pwnage

Hello.

hullo

by **Ardoki** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:52 pm

The United Motherland wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=299674

Nice kids. Even though there were many Causus Bellis, and there were many reasons for invasion, and, this was our only offical aggressive stance...

... Calls us an aggressive pact.

BTW. This also counts in terms for the IFA. I'll see what I can do to change his mind, but... Some people...

They are a rival. They must be crushed.

by **The United Motherland** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:52 pm

Well. This new ravioli pact or whatever; is not passing my standards.

Hmm.

by **The United Motherland** » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:53 pm

Ardoki wrote:
The United Motherland wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=299674

Nice kids. Even though there were many Causus Bellis, and there were many reasons for invasion, and, this was our only offical aggressive stance...

... Calls us an aggressive pact.

BTW. This also counts in terms for the IFA. I'll see what I can do to change his mind, but... Some people...

They are a rival. They must be crushed.

Lets talk to this one. They seem much more passive than aggressive unlike the OEN.

Honestly, they may have just been fed incorrect information, or looked at the situation wrong. I'll see what I can do.

by **The United Motherland** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:00 am

http://prntscr.com/3rdh70

My views explained.

by **Ardoki** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:02 am

The United Motherland wrote:http://prntscr.com/3rdh70

My views explained.

+1

by **The United Motherland** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:28 am

Also, another small thing for the Ravioli pact to understand:

Let us take Nazi Germany.

The only thing that changes is its foreign policy; being officially neutral with all the other states.

Membership is voluntary.

Italy and other countries of the such join.

They slaughter Jews, Gypsies, and Homosexuals still, but they never attack outside nations.

Would you attack it because of this violation of human rights? Or no, because their not attacking you?

Now, let us take that Nazi Germany and replace it with the OEN(bit of an exaggeration, but, metaphorical sense).

Same exact thing, and should you attack it due to these violations?

Yes.

by **The United Motherland** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:33 am

Also, one of my last posts for tonight;

The entire IFA council has voted, I, personally have counted up the votes.

AYE: 11
NAY: : 0
ABSTAIN: 2

Democracy works; just when it makes sense.

by **Vedria** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:03 am

Why does this war go so fassssssttttt....

by **Ardoki** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:04 am

Vedria wrote:Why does this war go so fassssssttttt....

I know. I'm in a different time zone to the others, so I have to continuously keep up.

by **Asigna** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:04 am

Vedria wrote:Why does this war go so fassssssttttt....

I'm only seeing a word war. Is this a cold war or an open gunning against each other?

by **Victoriala** » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:05 am

Vedria wrote:Why does this war go so fassssssttttt....

Because you will end up liek sanic da heghog

The United Left (OOC/SIGNUPS/2.0)

Who is online