Advertisement
by The Republic of Lanos » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:15 pm
by Puzikas » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:19 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:I'm going to come out and apologize to Trans for being the derp on the subject.
Then proceed to become already me and be forever a-me.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by The Republic of Lanos » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:20 pm
by Hodori » Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:54 am
Aqizithiuda wrote:The Kievan People wrote:I am going to plug the 6.5x49mm for ANTO. Which I just made up but is a lot like the Russian 6x49mm. Which was awesome btw.
Basically, the idea is that the Powell Board's recommendation of a .258 caliber round was considered seriously and ended up appeasing both factions of the army (those who wanted long range performance and those who wanted lighter weights and recoil).
If we do diverge from this idea, then I'm going to submit the 6.5x45mm, which is just a shortened version of the 6.5x50mm Wesi, Triggthiuda's round from the mid 1890s to the mid 1950s.
by Aqizithiuda » Fri Jan 24, 2014 2:39 am
Hodori wrote:Aqizithiuda wrote:
Basically, the idea is that the Powell Board's recommendation of a .258 caliber round was considered seriously and ended up appeasing both factions of the army (those who wanted long range performance and those who wanted lighter weights and recoil).
If we do diverge from this idea, then I'm going to submit the 6.5x45mm, which is just a shortened version of the 6.5x50mm Wesi, Triggthiuda's round from the mid 1890s to the mid 1950s.
I drew a round of similar caliber and case length, but I'm not sure how much this differs from 6.5x45mm Wesi.
...I may need to update a few things...
Also I offer my 6.5x45mm round for consideration as 6.5 ANTO, and allow Emmeria or other major ANTO powers to claim credit for developing the round.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by The Kievan People » Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:09 am
by Puzikas » Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:07 am
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Aqizithiuda » Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:31 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Would this 6.5x45mm be able to provide ~2,500 joules out of a ~500mm barrel?
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by The Republic of Lanos » Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:13 pm
by Puzikas » Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:19 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:This story sounds interesting regarding the PAK FA. But even if the Indians know what they're talking about, I highly doubt Puzikas would be having issues with his PAK FAs like what the article is talking about.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by The Republic of Lanos » Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:22 pm
Puzikas wrote:The Republic of Lanos wrote:This story sounds interesting regarding the PAK FA. But even if the Indians know what they're talking about, I highly doubt Puzikas would be having issues with his PAK FAs like what the article is talking about.
Its already flying in TF and has been since 2010 so I'm going to say no, it doesn't have these issues for the sake of RPing.
Plus I'm pretty skeptical as to anything that an indian business magazine is reporting on aviation.
by The Kievan People » Fri Jan 24, 2014 5:51 pm
Business Standard has reviewed the minutes of that meeting. The IAF's three top objections to the FGFA were: (a) The Russians are reluctant to share critical design information with India; (b) The fighter's current AL-41F1 engines are inadequate, being mere upgrades of the Sukhoi-30MKI's AL-31 engines; and (c) It is too expensive. With India paying $6 billion to co-develop the FGFA, "a large percentage of IAF's capital budget will be locked up."
by Val Nube » Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:55 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Puzikas wrote:
Its already flying in TF and has been since 2010 so I'm going to say no, it doesn't have these issues for the sake of RPing.
Plus I'm pretty skeptical as to anything that an indian business magazine is reporting on aviation.
I thought so. Plus, the article also says the Indians have so much modern technology coming into their services that they don't know what they're talking about.
Does this mean the F-35s issues are also sidelining the fighter as in RL or is it flying already?
by Kastingrad » Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:10 pm
Val Nube wrote:
I though the deathtraps were already flying. At least in Emmerian service anyway.
by Transnapastain » Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:12 pm
by Val Nube » Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:24 am
Transnapastain wrote:Kastingrad wrote:
In RL they don't enter service until 2015.
Well, RL, the PAK FA isn't in service either, so...
Virana said that the F-35 is in service, just as the PAK FA is, I don't think there are huge quantities of either.
by Glaswegistan » Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:48 am
21:46 Trans|Work Theres something wrong with every one of you.
No ideas are bad, but some are just stupid ~ Unknown
I quit ~ SsgtKirill
by The Republic of Lanos » Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:03 pm
by Puzikas » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:05 pm
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Premislyd » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:06 pm
Puzikas wrote:Just wanted to say, the Vladimir Lenin Class Destroyer is now active in TF. There's two versions: A nuclear powered and a standard powered. The nuclear is no sale to anyone who isn't me (Restrictions I've placed on myself), but the standard is to certain, pre-approved nations.
If you have any interest in purchasing one ICly, let me know.
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing
by Fortunagen » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:39 pm
Mistelemr wrote:With how many shootings that happen almost daily now, I find it hard to care.
Sure I hate myself for it, but fuck it, we invited this. It's sad, but at some point you just stop caring. People can scream and cry but nothing will ever get done about it. When was it last that a shooting incident like this (or any other) actually made people legitimately search for answers or try a new approach? None that I can think of, It's been the same people, shouting the same expletives with the same people dying.
I hear they have good internet over in Scandinavia.
by Kastingrad » Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:09 pm
by Spirit of Hope » Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:20 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: British Arzelentaxmacone, Einaro, Legatia, Rezreks, Rhanukhan, Verska
Advertisement