*To anyone who isn't Costa Mejis or certain KC states
Advertisement
by The Republic of Lanos » Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:30 pm
Tule wrote:Can anyone tell me exactly which cartridges have been standardized under NACO?
by Virana » Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:31 pm
by Tule » Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:55 pm
by Virana » Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:04 pm
Tule wrote:Thanks. Prem and I got into an argument over whether or not 7.62x51 ANTO was permissible as a service rifle cartridge under ANTO standardization.
I know it's ANTO now I'm not that inactive, was just a slip of the pen.
7.62 it is for me.
by Tule » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:05 pm
Virana wrote:Tule wrote:Thanks. Prem and I got into an argument over whether or not 7.62x51 ANTO was permissible as a service rifle cartridge under ANTO standardization.
I know it's ANTO now I'm not that inactive, was just a slip of the pen.
7.62 it is for me.
7.62 was the standard AR cartridge before it was replaced with 6.35mm. Once battle rifles gained newfound importance on the battlefield (in the form of DMRs), 7.62x51mm was put back into use out of convenience by ANTO members (and of course, this is ignoring its use in MMGs, etc).
If you're using 7.62 as your standard, you'd most likely ICly be in a transition phase from 7.62 to 6.35 for your primary military service rifle. While it's ultimately your choice, that would be my strongly recommended course of action.
by Aqizithiuda » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:31 pm
Tule wrote:Virana wrote:7.62 was the standard AR cartridge before it was replaced with 6.35mm. Once battle rifles gained newfound importance on the battlefield (in the form of DMRs), 7.62x51mm was put back into use out of convenience by ANTO members (and of course, this is ignoring its use in MMGs, etc).
If you're using 7.62 as your standard, you'd most likely ICly be in a transition phase from 7.62 to 6.35 for your primary military service rifle. While it's ultimately your choice, that would be my strongly recommended course of action.
Sorry, but I think I'm going to be a bit of a dick and keep the 7.62.
I think the 6.35 is neither light enough nor short enough to warrant a cartridge change. The 6.35 cartridge weighs 17 grams and is 64 mm long.
The 7.62 load I use is 21 grams and 70 mm long.
If I tried lightening the 6.35 to achieve a similar benefit the bullet would have horrible sectional density.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Tule » Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:52 pm
Aqizithiuda wrote:Tule wrote:
Sorry, but I think I'm going to be a bit of a dick and keep the 7.62.
I think the 6.35 is neither light enough nor short enough to warrant a cartridge change. The 6.35 cartridge weighs 17 grams and is 64 mm long.
The 7.62 load I use is 21 grams and 70 mm long.
If I tried lightening the 6.35 to achieve a similar benefit the bullet would have horrible sectional density.
Or you could buy ammo from me and specify that you want a polymer case .
by Aqizithiuda » Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:36 am
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by San-Silvacian » Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:16 am
by Transnapastain » Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:46 pm
by San-Silvacian » Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:16 pm
by Licana » Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:26 pm
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by San-Silvacian » Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:39 pm
by Transnapastain » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:35 pm
by Premislyd » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:36 pm
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing
by Transnapastain » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:37 pm
Premislyd wrote:who will b of killings emmeria now? D:
by San-Silvacian » Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:39 pm
Premislyd wrote:who will b of killings emmeria now? D:
by Puzikas » Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:42 pm
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by San-Silvacian » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:01 pm
Puzikas wrote:San, are you trying to take Esto in a more Western direction?
Because there's going to be an issue with that...
by Transnapastain » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:04 pm
by The Republic of Lanos » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:32 pm
by Puzikas » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:34 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Technically, since Renaldi's not in ANTO, having Baltic States a member seems moot since there isn't an easternly expansion of the alliance. Renaldi staying in or perhaps a Germany that's ANTO could help Baltic and maybe even Poland conceivably join ANTO.
So far, just Baltic States seems cray cray.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
Advertisement
Advertisement