Advertisement
by Chrinthanium » Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:29 am
by AMW Applications » Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:29 pm
by Europe - Prussia » Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:25 pm
by Chrinthanium » Sat Nov 26, 2016 9:05 pm
by Europe - Prussia » Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:27 am
Chrinthanium wrote:I'm not certain if this is one claim or 9 claims all at once.
I think, in spite of being hopped up on cold medicine, I get the general idea of the claim. I'm not entirely certain its purpose. Why do the territories need to be so ethnically diverse? Why does it have to be so fractured as to render itself ineffective? Couldn't a single nation with a little stronger central government have the same kind of issues internally as you've presented here? I think I'm just not sure what to make of it at this point.
by Chrinthanium » Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:10 pm
Europe - Prussia wrote:Chrinthanium wrote:I'm not certain if this is one claim or 9 claims all at once.
I think, in spite of being hopped up on cold medicine, I get the general idea of the claim. I'm not entirely certain its purpose. Why do the territories need to be so ethnically diverse? Why does it have to be so fractured as to render itself ineffective? Couldn't a single nation with a little stronger central government have the same kind of issues internally as you've presented here? I think I'm just not sure what to make of it at this point.
Ah, I understand your concerns Chrin. What I want with this claim is to create something radically different to qhat exists in AMW. I could have created a republic (because Valendia is a monarchy so that's a no-no) with a civil war or something like that, but I simply find that idea too bland, because even in such case there one side more powerful than the other, and conflict is more the exception to the norm.
What I wanted to create is to create a claim where conflict is the norm and not the exception, and a fractured state, a union of equals with their own plans (in contraposition with a republic with problems where the parts in conflict are definitively not equals).
And if I'm creating a secondary claim, of course I will make something out of the norm, so we can inject some variety in AMW. Otherwise, what's the point of it?
by Europe - Prussia » Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:23 pm
Chrinthanium wrote:Le snip
by Chrinthanium » Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:00 pm
Europe - Prussia wrote:Chrinthanium wrote:Le snip
Ok Chrin I understand. While I don't see the complexities of this claim, in fact I believe this claim will be much more simple to maintain than Valendia, I understand your concerns, so how about this: while I will not change the way its government works (because that's the whole point of this claim) how about a reduction of both city-states and ethnicities living within the claim? 4 or 5 at most, and using the cultures of the countries capable of reaching america by the XVII century.
by Europe - Prussia » Thu Dec 08, 2016 7:34 pm
Chrinthanium wrote:Europe - Prussia wrote:
Ok Chrin I understand. While I don't see the complexities of this claim, in fact I believe this claim will be much more simple to maintain than Valendia, I understand your concerns, so how about this: while I will not change the way its government works (because that's the whole point of this claim) how about a reduction of both city-states and ethnicities living within the claim? 4 or 5 at most, and using the cultures of the countries capable of reaching america by the XVII century.
Unless someone else says something, just stick with your idea. No need to adjust for one single person.
by Chrinthanium » Sat Dec 10, 2016 6:38 am
by McMulland » Sun Dec 11, 2016 8:09 pm
by Chrinthanium » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:34 pm
by AMW Applications » Fri Dec 16, 2016 8:31 pm
by The Crooked Beat » Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:14 pm
by Chrinthanium » Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:46 pm
McMulland wrote:Excellent! Thank you all for the kind words, should I wait for more votes or go ahead and start participating in RP/discussion?
by AMW Applications » Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:41 pm
by Chrinthanium » Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:25 pm
by Walmington on Sea » Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:11 pm
by Chrinthanium » Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:56 am
Walmington on Sea wrote:I do feel that my little empire is missing an Aussie/Kiwi element, but I can't see where that'd realistically reside without having told us to sling our hook years ago.
by Walmington on Sea » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:45 pm
by Chrinthanium » Tue Jan 24, 2017 6:22 pm
Walmington on Sea wrote:Tasmania is about the ideal size. It may seem a bit weird to have such a little outpost so remote, but then perhaps whomever takes the mainland would be willing to say that Walmington once had more and was only able to hold on to the island?
I'd be happy to add the Tassies if no one objects. It's only, what, half a million people?
by Chrinthanium » Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:54 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Mokastana
Advertisement