by Somewhereistonia » Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:24 am
by Spyr » Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:17 am
by Talost » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:31 pm
Vecron wrote:One reason that NATO wouldn't crush USAR might be Rome. We might enter the conflict as a third party, we wouldn't want NATO in Africa anymore than the USAR would. Rome would not be an ally with the USAR, but might have a non-spoken, non-aggression, the enemy of my enemy is my friend type of deal.
Vecron wrote:Provided that BG can get his supplies and what-not into the USAR without Rome noticing.
Hmm, tanks might be a little harder to smuggle… But I’ll be damned if I won’t try!BG wrote:I think it'll probably become pretty apparent when somebody counts the wheels on a shiny new USAR tank and realises, hey! That's not a T-55, that's not a T-55 at all! :/
by Beth Gellert » Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:19 pm
by Cassanos » Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:12 pm
by Beth Gellert » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:09 pm
Cassanos wrote:So we might see if one could pull off a sea blockade without the USQ or Britain? Hmmm...
Besides, TR-85s blow up the same as T-55s once you hit them with modern ATGMs .
by Somewhereistonia » Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:35 pm
by Talost » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:21 pm
by Somewhereistonia » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:38 pm
by Talost » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:42 pm
by Cassanos » Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:30 am
Cass, as it seems that it will mainly be me and you going in originally as peace keepers, shall we have the same battalions going that were originally going to USAR in the SoA?
Couple things before I start work on the OP. First, Cass, would you mind if it was only Germany that was involved, instead of Cassanos too? Or limited presence from the latter? I'm just wondering how Cassanos/USAR relations are, since ICly I purchased some tanks and equipment from you and have imagined us to be at least moderately favorable to each other, even if only as a customer.
by Beth Gellert » Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:39 am
by Cassanos » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:16 am
by Spyr » Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:03 pm
by Somewhereistonia » Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:23 pm
by Cassanos » Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:09 am
by Gurguvungunit » Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:08 pm
by Cassanos » Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:54 am
by Somewhereistonia » Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:39 am
by Somewhereistonia » Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:10 pm
by Cassanos » Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:18 pm
1. Yemen is fairly unlikely to be claimed, whilst someone could claim Oman or Arabia and then be able to get going more quickly. It helps to open the middle east a bit.
2. This is going to be a much bigger deal for Britain as it isn't far from Sudan and involves India.
The same. The general area is much more interesting because it at least touches SOME sphere of interest.
3. It helps to kick off Spiz's civil war to get some action going.
For which we've been waiting for some time now, and there are still Tamils waiting to unleash their terrible fighting for.
4. It's a war! No more stand offs, we get some actual fighting!
by Gurguvungunit » Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 pm
by Spyr » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:55 am
by Somewhereistonia » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:13 am
by CCA1 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:21 am