Urmanian wrote:YellowApple wrote:We appreciate your willingness to assist in ensuring that genocidal actions do not occur without appropriate repercussions. Even if New Sangheilian membership is ultimately rejected, you have our gratitude and support, though we also will understandably keep a wary eye on all members of the AAPS, for our own safety.
Giving a nation that states "however, once they begin forcing ponyism on other states, they become a problem that has to be neutralised", which basically means "once they try to restore civil rights, most importantly freedom of conscience and thought, in a state that quells them, they become a problem that has to be neutralised" means to spy on the Coalition may seem a rather silly idea, but probably it's just me.
Woah, woah, woah!
First, you cut out the start of that post. It clearly read; I maintain the ideology that ponyist states have the right to be ponyost states...
Thats not what it means at all!
If that's you line of thought, you may as well say Hitler was a revolutionary for trying to expand a booming economy and military!
What I was trying to say was, if you take unprovoked military action against a nation for the sole purpose of expanding ponyism, you become a problem that has to be neutralised. Anti-imperialism. What the AAPS was founded for.
And I'm not a spy, I'm equalist. I don't want ponies killed, I just don't want them to abandon their beliefs and force imperialism on others.