Advertisement

by Altaiire » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:10 pm

by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:12 pm

by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:13 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:It was supposed to be an assault gun, but it came out a bit on the heavy side. So, they decided to leave it for defensive purposes.
Only 12 of the were built. You won't see them deployed anywhere in the battlefield unless you are attacking a base on my own soil.
Also, there's a reason I'm going broke. All the nobles in my nation started wasting money on expensive and possibly impractical crap.

by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:17 pm


by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:18 pm

by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:19 pm


by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:21 pm

by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:22 pm



by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:23 pm
Altaiire wrote:I was about to say... that thing is massive. It's going to be WAAAY too heavy if you want to put a reasonable-sized gun and and a fair amount of armor on it.
Well, okay... just don't expect it to move faster than a snail's crawl.

by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:24 pm

by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:24 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:
I know my WW2 tech.
If the Maus could go 3 miles an hour, I expect this to go at least 8 considering it has less armor.

by YellowApple » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:27 pm
Altaiire wrote:For the PT war:(Image)Type: Super-heavy Tank
Weight: 86.2 metric tons
Length: 11.1 m
Width: 4.39 m
Height: 2.84 m
Crew: 4
Main Armament: 105mm cannon with 62 rounds of ammunition
Secondary Armament: .50 caliber machine gun with 660 rounds of ammunition
Engine Horsepower: 704 hp
Power/weight: 8.2 hp/ton
Suspension: double track
Operation range: 160 km
Maximum speed: 18 kph
Maximum Armor Thickness: 30.5 cm

by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:28 pm
YellowApple wrote:That RP must be very far PT if you're deploying fixed-front tank barrels. WWII had (relatively) free-rotating turrets galore.

by Altaiire » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:28 pm

by Altaiire » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:33 pm
YellowApple wrote:Altaiire wrote:For the PT war:(Image)Type: Super-heavy Tank
Weight: 86.2 metric tons
Length: 11.1 m
Width: 4.39 m
Height: 2.84 m
Crew: 4
Main Armament: 105mm cannon with 62 rounds of ammunition
Secondary Armament: .50 caliber machine gun with 660 rounds of ammunition
Engine Horsepower: 704 hp
Power/weight: 8.2 hp/ton
Suspension: double track
Operation range: 160 km
Maximum speed: 18 kph
Maximum Armor Thickness: 30.5 cm
That RP must be very far PT if you're deploying fixed-front tank barrels. WWII had (relatively) free-rotating turrets galore.

by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:33 pm
Altaiire wrote:It's also much, much bigger. At lest 24 feet tall, by my estimates. Bigger = more armor to cover the whole thing. More armor = more weight. Do you mean less total armor or less armor thickness? If it's the former your armor is going to be extremely thin, and if its the latter it's going to be extremely heavy. you can take the high weight, but remember your engine has to propel that weight. Big engine = more space taken up = less room for ammo, armor, or people.

by Imperial--japan » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:39 pm

by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:40 pm
Imperial--japan wrote:Anyways can you relink me to the thread so I can bomb vladivostok or however its spelled.

by Grand Britannia » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:40 pm
Imperial--japan wrote:Anyways can you relink me to the thread so I can bomb vladivostok or however its spelled.


by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:42 pm
Imperial--japan wrote:Nyet! We agreed on you and the Union fighting over Hawaii being the starting point of the war!

by Grand America » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:44 pm

by New Emperica » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:47 pm
Grand America wrote:We never did.
Or rather, I never did. Which sums up to the same thing if you didn't either.
Emp: he gave me Hawaii. I can join for other reasons.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Grand California, Imperial-Octavia, Kravato, Tummylandia and Susistan, Tvembov, Uspeon
Advertisement