Yes.
And then you lost against colonists.
Doesn't bode well for an all-mighty Empire.
Advertisement

by Grand America » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:27 am

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:32 am

by Grand America » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:39 am
Grand Britannia wrote:Grand America wrote:
Yes.
And then you lost against colonists.
Doesn't bode well for an all-mighty Empire.
Correction, I lost against a coalition of Spanish, French, and German forces helping the colonists. You guys barely did anything other than get your asses handed to you until they arrived.

by Grand America » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:39 am

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:42 am
Grand America wrote:Grand Britannia wrote:
Correction, I lost against a coalition of Spanish, French, and German forces helping the colonists. You guys barely did anything other than get your asses handed to you until they arrived.
While I admit that we would have lost otherwise, we were actually winning via guerrilla warfare tactics back on the homefront. In a frontal assault, we weren't doing very well, but in the trees, our troops hid and picked off your troops one by one, taking out the commanding officer first.
I'll also have you know we beat every single one of those guys later
Spanish-American War
Quasi War
World War Two

by Super Bwitain » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:24 am

by Grand America » Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:36 am

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:18 pm

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:34 pm

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:36 pm
New Emperica wrote:"Oh after WWII all the empires begun to dissolve. All of them started giving back countries. Then there's England over there. We say, 'Hey, England. What's that you're hiding behind your back?', and England replies, 'Oh, India and an assortment of other countries...'.
'Give them BACK England.' we say. 'Oh, fine...but we need to keep the West Indies! No? Oh, then the Falkland Islands. We need them for...err... strategic SHEEP purposes.'"

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:50 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:We just wanted the oil.
And we still have India, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, mind you D:<

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:26 pm

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:29 pm

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:30 pm

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:32 pm

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:33 pm

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:34 pm

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:47 pm

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:50 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:It would be preferable that everyone uses a population below their game side one. Preferably below the ranges of 800 million.
And don't go saying 799,999,999....Assign your population in relation to your size. As an example, I'm using a population of 470 million for the RP.

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:53 pm
New Emperica wrote:Grand Britannia wrote:It would be preferable that everyone uses a population below their game side one. Preferably below the ranges of 800 million.
And don't go saying 799,999,999....Assign your population in relation to your size. As an example, I'm using a population of 470 million for the RP.
What do you think for mine? Since I'm essentially the Soviet Union?

by Altaiire » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:55 pm

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:57 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:Considering the northern areas of the Soviet Union are inhospitable, I think bumping up the RL population of the country at the time would work.

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:58 pm
Altaiire wrote:How bout 100 million for us?

by Grand Britannia » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:58 pm

by New Emperica » Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:00 pm
Grand Britannia wrote:
You do have Mongolia which the RL Soviet Union didn't have. So 225 million would be good.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bhikkustan, Bigpipstan, Clovd, Estremaura, Google [Bot], Holy Karenland, Sarawak Darulhana, The Great state of Joseon, White star empire
Advertisement