by Tsardom Universalis » Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:43 am
by San Martin Caballero » Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:57 pm
by Tsardom Universalis » Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:32 pm
by San Martin Caballero » Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:59 pm
Tsardom Universalis wrote:So what's our position with Embassies? I've had a request from "Monarchist Continent and Archipelago" region, at a glance they dont appear to be united by faith. Personally I don't mind contructing embassies with anyone who isn't opposed to our ideals, it gets us out in the open
by Ros Ekasna » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:01 pm
by Ros Ekasna » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:03 pm
San Martin Caballero wrote:Tsardom Universalis wrote:So what's our position with Embassies? I've had a request from "Monarchist Continent and Archipelago" region, at a glance they dont appear to be united by faith. Personally I don't mind contructing embassies with anyone who isn't opposed to our ideals, it gets us out in the open
((OOC: I don't even know. What does "establishing embassies" mean? What does it actually do? Other than a good way to spam up the regional happenings board?))
by Clacton Deutschland » Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:34 am
by Clacton Deutschland » Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:36 am
by Lenton provinces » Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:38 am
by Lenton provinces » Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:31 pm
by San Martin Caballero » Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:30 pm
Lenton provinces wrote:On another issue would the formation of a map of the region be an idea worth doing?
by Ros Ekasna » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:07 pm
San Martin Caballero wrote:Lenton provinces wrote:On another issue would the formation of a map of the region be an idea worth doing?
I don't like that idea. I see us more as an international alliance than a geographic region. Besides, there are signatories to the coalition that aren't part of the region. I think the word "region" is only meant to entertain NS convention.
by Tsardom Universalis » Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:29 am
by San Martin Caballero » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:39 pm
by Ros Ekasna » Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:53 pm
Tsardom Universalis wrote:Should we extend embassy invite to "The Glorious Garden of Eden"? They are a Christian region, but I have misgivings regarding their founder, are they unwarranted? I do know many members of their region.
by Ros Ekasna » Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:54 pm
San Martin Caballero wrote:What about this guy:
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=mcconia
He just showed up in the region, I don't think he signed the charter or anything.
Does anybody even know anything about his country?
If he hasn't signed the charter, he needs to do so quickly. What's the point of being in a charter-based region if you don't have to sign the charter to be in it?
by Tsardom Universalis » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:23 pm
by San Martin Caballero » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:43 pm
Police Wanting Help With Their Inquiries
The Issue
After delayed DNA evidence put a notorious rapist behind bars the police have demanded that it be mandatory for those accused of a crime to surrender blood and tissue samples to aid the elimination process.
The Debate
1. "I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up sooner," says Chief Constable Abraham Shiomi. "If we have DNA samples of all the accused it will make solving crimes like rape and murder that much faster! Sure, some people will think it's a tad invasive, but in my experience if you're worried by something like giving up a few drops of the red stuff then you've probably got something to hide."
2. "This is a breach of privacy in every meaning of the word!" criminal defence attorney Roxanne Mombota exclaims. "Or three words, but this is an outrage! It's these peoples' bodies, not the government's nor the police's. If they want to give a DNA sample it should be THEIR decision! Now I'll admit there have been times when DNA sampling has helped solve a case or two but shouldn't we be upholding the inherent right of every man and woman to have their body remain unmolested unless they should so choose it? Undoubtedly! DNA sampling should only take place with the person's informed consent."
3. "What about the victims of these crimes?" asks DI Konrad King, ever gruff and stalwart in the face of adversity. "Do they not have rights? Their right to privacy's been violated so it ought to be the responsibility of the criminal to give up his own. What I propose is the collection of DNA samples from every citizen in San Martin Caballero so we can track down the culprit if none of our suspects come up with anything. It'll be expensive, sure, there's 128 million people to go through... but it's just a small blood sample. Don't you think it's worth it?"
by Tsardom Universalis » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:18 pm
by San Martin Caballero » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:57 pm
Tsardom Universalis wrote:I created a National DNA Record. If people are innocent, they've nothing to hide!
by Ros Ekasna » Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:25 am
San Martin Caballero wrote:For the life of me, I cannot discern the most Godly way of approaching this dilemma.Police Wanting Help With Their Inquiries
The Issue
After delayed DNA evidence put a notorious rapist behind bars the police have demanded that it be mandatory for those accused of a crime to surrender blood and tissue samples to aid the elimination process.
The Debate
1. "I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up sooner," says Chief Constable Abraham Shiomi. "If we have DNA samples of all the accused it will make solving crimes like rape and murder that much faster! Sure, some people will think it's a tad invasive, but in my experience if you're worried by something like giving up a few drops of the red stuff then you've probably got something to hide."
2. "This is a breach of privacy in every meaning of the word!" criminal defence attorney Roxanne Mombota exclaims. "Or three words, but this is an outrage! It's these peoples' bodies, not the government's nor the police's. If they want to give a DNA sample it should be THEIR decision! Now I'll admit there have been times when DNA sampling has helped solve a case or two but shouldn't we be upholding the inherent right of every man and woman to have their body remain unmolested unless they should so choose it? Undoubtedly! DNA sampling should only take place with the person's informed consent."
3. "What about the victims of these crimes?" asks DI Konrad King, ever gruff and stalwart in the face of adversity. "Do they not have rights? Their right to privacy's been violated so it ought to be the responsibility of the criminal to give up his own. What I propose is the collection of DNA samples from every citizen in San Martin Caballero so we can track down the culprit if none of our suspects come up with anything. It'll be expensive, sure, there's 128 million people to go through... but it's just a small blood sample. Don't you think it's worth it?"
I looked all over the Internet, but couldn't find an official Catholic church position on this issue.
And San Martin Caballero's current crime rate is irrelevant. It would be better to live in the most crime-ridden country in the world if that country were right with the Lord than a country that has sold its soul for a low crime rate.
What do my brothers in Christ suggest?
Yours in Christ,
San Martin Caballero
by Tsardom Universalis » Sun Apr 10, 2011 8:31 am
The Holy Forden Church wrote:The Holy Pupa would like to sign the charter.
by Ros Ekasna » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:27 am
Tsardom Universalis wrote:The Holy Forden Church wrote:The Holy Pupa would like to sign the charter.
Very well, welcome!
You have been vouched for - not that I have any doubts! I take your expression of interest as an acceptance of the charter and I shall add you as a signatory.
We also encourage you to move to our region, you may decline our invitation to relocate if you have strong ties with your current region and do not wish to leave - we will not hold it against you!
by San Martin Caballero » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement