THIS THREAD HAS BEEN DEAD DO NOT POST.

[Janpia]

Rep. Mavov: If they opposed your independence, then why would they place a government, made to be ruled by Galapasogians? Plus, in my opinion, Galapagos could've been independent as of right now if you didn't opposed. Your just giving the occupiers a hard time placing a democratic government, thus, adding more soldiers there. Although occupation IS bad, you should choose the democratic option.

Did you not here the news, SM is coming back to kill children and oppress the Galapagos, and again I say the Galapagos will never submit to the slavers, we will fight till the last man and then fight some more. SO’s promises of democracy are hollow and even if they are serious SM will surely oppose any attempts at self-rule as they still want their slave state.

Rep. Mavov: I've seen the news. They're sending some elite group. BUT, they are equipped with non-lethal weapons

[Respublica Hyliana]

Lord Valex Herd: * listen with his headphones to the song space oddity by david Bowie *

[The Military State of the Galapagos]

Did you not here the news, SM is coming back to kill children and oppress the Galapagos, and again I say the Galapagos will never submit to the slavers, we will fight till the last man and then fight some more. SO’s promises of democracy are hollow and even if they are serious SM will surely oppose any attempts at self-rule as they still want their slave state.

Rep. Mavov: I've seen the news. They're sending some elite group. BUT, they are equipped with non-lethal weapons

Yea sure “Non-lethal” weapons. SM’s word is as good as Hitler’s and at-least Hitler had some honor

[New Provenance]

Ambassador Warren: "I stand by my decision. Mister Jones [of the American delegation], may we proceed to vote on the ejection of the Galapagos Liberation Army and the severing of all ties with the GLA with haste?"

[Respublica Hyliana]

Lord Valex Herd: But damn it! fix that damn problem without erasing the GLA! if we do this we will lose an ally in the region!
manage to find a compromise "Merdia" !

[Janpia]

Lord Valex Herd: But damn it! fix that damn problem without erasing the GLA! if we do this we will lose an ally in the region!
manage to find a compromise "Merdia" !

Rep. Mavov: The GLA IS the problem

[Respublica Hyliana]

Lord Valex Herd: find a compromise ! it's not complicated holy god

[Janpia]

Lord Valex Herd: find a compromise ! it's not complicated holy god

Rep. Mavov: Then what do you propose?

[Kingdom Of The UN]

Lord Valex Herd: find a compromise ! it's not complicated holy god

Rep. Mavov: Then what do you propose?

Miklos Sawa: If I may gentlemen, I explained that we can create a plan to ensure democracy in Galapagos and to keep the GLA on a tight leash as well. All we must do is help them but also in the mean time keep a eye on them, to ensure no militias intent is happening and if something happens where the GLA exercises these thoughts and possibilities that you have been talking about, then we will get involved and secure our authority to ensure that the GLA does not fall out of line.

[Greatest States Of America]

Douglas Jones: Keeping in mind the concerns, opinions, judgements, conclusions, evaluation, apprehensions, agitation, perturbation and consternation, The United States Of America is ready to put forward the resolution proposed by Atlantica for a vote if it gets the consent of senior and old members of this alliance. However, the United States Of America is in favour of the idea & proposition put forward by the Kingdom Of The UN.

[Croato-Slavia]

Lord Valex Herd
*while reading the French review "Diplomatie"*

- Why not carry out a bombing campaign in the galapagos ? the pressure caused by the bombardment could force the invaders to give in.
We just have to aim at the military targets, doing this will limit the civilian casualties.

Ivan Kusković: "The Government of Croato-Slavia finds that this approach is very ineffective, time-consuming and expensive and that this is a dumb idea in general. Croato-Slavia is fully against the idea."

[Croato-Slavia]

OC: I'm a bit bored I just wanna play some Roblox now

[New Provenance]

Rep. Mavov: Then what do you propose?

Miklos Sawa: If I may gentlemen, I explained that we can create a plan to ensure democracy in Galapagos and to keep the GLA on a tight leash as well. All we must do is help them but also in the mean time keep a eye on them, to ensure no militias intent is happening and if something happens where the GLA exercises these thoughts and possibilities that you have been talking about, then we will get involved and secure our authority to ensure that the GLA does not fall out of line.

Ambassador Warren: "Please do elaborate."

[Respublica Hyliana]

OC: I'm a bit bored I just wanna play some Roblox now

i play at roblox me too

[Zarnicovia nova]

OC: I'm a bit bored I just wanna play some Roblox now

i play at roblox me too

I used to before I got perm banned. and found better games. ):
"I support a compromis."

[Frethotia]

As I mentioned before the frethotian Communist problem is rising a new independent state of Communist Frethotia has formed I ask for military assist to take it down

[Janpia]

As I mentioned before the frethotian Communist problem is rising a new independent state of Communist Frethotia has formed I ask for military assist to take it down

Rep. Mavov: As a representative of a communist country myself, the main reason why people revolt to a communist banner is because, maybe you have worst treatments to workers, or the poor. Or maybe, they are just educated and wishing to fight for communist ideals. Now my suggestion is, to make compromise with them. Ask what they need first.

[The Military State of the Galapagos]

As I mentioned before the frethotian Communist problem is rising a new independent state of Communist Frethotia has formed I ask for military assist to take it down

Atleast your not being forced to become communist against the people’s wants. Unlike what SM is attempting to do against the people’s wishes.

[Kingdom Of The UN]

Miklos Sawa: If I may gentlemen, I explained that we can create a plan to ensure democracy in Galapagos and to keep the GLA on a tight leash as well. All we must do is help them but also in the mean time keep a eye on them, to ensure no militias intent is happening and if something happens where the GLA exercises these thoughts and possibilities that you have been talking about, then we will get involved and secure our authority to ensure that the GLA does not fall out of line.

Ambassador Warren: "Please do elaborate."

*Miklos stands up and walks around presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: I believe that the GLA rose up to take arms is because they want a change for the better, that a independent state ruled by Galapagians for Galapagians what they truly want, to install a socialist liberal regime that is pro SM in a nation that is already anti-SM and is more keen to conservative ideas will only divide a nation, an example being places like Afghanistan, Hungary, Poland and even my country just to name a few. So that is why I believe that we should side with the GLA, I don't know what much you want to justify supporting them, you say they COULD carry out horrendous acts and that they COULD become a non-democratic country if they take control of the nation but with SO it is evidence that they have murdering civilians of their respected nation. What if you would like an elaboration it is just a simple concept, we help GLA in this conflict to help gain their independence and help gain control of the country but they must follow these steps.

*Miklos Sawa counts each proposal on his fingers*

1. They must follow the Geneva Convention
2. An invasion of SO is prohibit
3. The GLA must return power to the people and hold an election afterwards
4. The GLA must remain as not a party but as a branch of the military
5. That any civilian from the SO is rounded up and killed
6. That the GLA collaborates with both left and right parties
7. The GLA must have a sense of control on the populist and to maintain order to ensure another revolt must not happen
8. Peace needs to be ensured between SO and Galapagos for years to come

*Miklos Sawa stops and continues walking around and presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: Rules from 1-5 are mandatory, although 6-8 are important but those are more of looking into the future of things but if 1-5 are broken support from NATO coalition members will be taken away and if some of these aren't meant NATO involvement may a cured. Basically saying if they fall out of line and begin committing war crimes or a invasion of SO or fail to return elections to the nation, NATO members will step in to cease control and get involved that is my simple proposal.

*Miklos Sawa sits back down and takes a sip of water*

[Janpia]

Ambassador Warren: "Please do elaborate."

*Miklos stands up and walks around presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: I believe that the GLA rose up to take arms is because they want a change for the better, that a independent state ruled by Galapagians for Galapagians what they truly want, to install a socialist liberal regime that is pro SM in a nation that is already anti-SM and is more keen to conservative ideas will only divide a nation, an example being places like Afghanistan, Hungary, Poland and even my country just to name a few. So that is why I believe that we should side with the GLA, I don't know what much you want to justify supporting them, you say they COULD carry out horrendous acts and that they COULD become a non-democratic country if they take control of the nation but with SO it is evidence that they have murdering civilians of their respected nation. What if you would like an elaboration it is just a simple concept, we help GLA in this conflict to help gain their independence and help gain control of the country but they must follow these steps.

*Miklos Sawa counts each proposal on his fingers*

1. They must follow the Geneva Convention
2. An invasion of SO is prohibit
3. The GLA must return power to the people and hold an election afterwards
4. The GLA must remain as not a party but as a branch of the military
5. That any civilian from the SO is rounded up and killed
6. That the GLA collaborates with both left and right parties
7. The GLA must have a sense of control on the populist and to maintain order to ensure another revolt must not happen
8. Peace needs to be ensured between SO and Galapagos for years to come

*Miklos Sawa stops and continues walking around and presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: Rules from 1-5 are mandatory, although 6-8 are important but those are more of looking into the future of things but if 1-5 are broken support from NATO coalition members will be taken away and if some of these aren't meant NATO involvement may a cured. Basically saying if they fall out of line and begin committing war crimes or a invasion of SO or fail to return elections to the nation, NATO members will step in to cease control and get involved that is my simple proposal.

*Miklos Sawa sits back down and takes a sip of water*

Rep. Mavov: This seems plausible. Everyone wins basically. But how would we act on to this? Knowing that SM-led coalition does not want the NATO to interfere? Especially that we're recognizing, and helping the GLA? Oh and another thing, whats with rule number 5?

[Zarnicovia nova]

"Anti-Government protests have turned voilent. The military and Far-Right groups are now fighting on the streets. The church is still trying to take power. Tho for now the voilence is minor but the situation is esclating by the minute."

[The Military State of the Galapagos]

*Miklos stands up and walks around presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: I believe that the GLA rose up to take arms is because they want a change for the better, that a independent state ruled by Galapagians for Galapagians what they truly want, to install a socialist liberal regime that is pro SM in a nation that is already anti-SM and is more keen to conservative ideas will only divide a nation, an example being places like Afghanistan, Hungary, Poland and even my country just to name a few. So that is why I believe that we should side with the GLA, I don't know what much you want to justify supporting them, you say they COULD carry out horrendous acts and that they COULD become a non-democratic country if they take control of the nation but with SO it is evidence that they have murdering civilians of their respected nation. What if you would like an elaboration it is just a simple concept, we help GLA in this conflict to help gain their independence and help gain control of the country but they must follow these steps.

*Miklos Sawa counts each proposal on his fingers*

1. They must follow the Geneva Convention
2. An invasion of SO is prohibit
3. The GLA must return power to the people and hold an election afterwards
4. The GLA must remain as not a party but as a branch of the military
5. That any civilian from the SO is rounded up and killed
6. That the GLA collaborates with both left and right parties
7. The GLA must have a sense of control on the populist and to maintain order to ensure another revolt must not happen
8. Peace needs to be ensured between SO and Galapagos for years to come

*Miklos Sawa stops and continues walking around and presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: Rules from 1-5 are mandatory, although 6-8 are important but those are more of looking into the future of things but if 1-5 are broken support from NATO coalition members will be taken away and if some of these aren't meant NATO involvement may a cured. Basically saying if they fall out of line and begin committing war crimes or a invasion of SO or fail to return elections to the nation, NATO members will step in to cease control and get involved that is my simple proposal.

*Miklos Sawa sits back down and takes a sip of water*

Rep. Mavov: This seems plausible. Everyone wins basically. But how would we act on to this? Knowing that SM-led coalition does not want the NATO to interfere? Especially that we're recognizing, and helping the GLA? Oh and another thing, whats with rule number 5?

OOC: I’m confused on that one to though I think it’s supposed to be “That civilian from the SO is not rounded up and killed”

[Kingdom Of The UN]

*Miklos stands up and walks around presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: I believe that the GLA rose up to take arms is because they want a change for the better, that a independent state ruled by Galapagians for Galapagians what they truly want, to install a socialist liberal regime that is pro SM in a nation that is already anti-SM and is more keen to conservative ideas will only divide a nation, an example being places like Afghanistan, Hungary, Poland and even my country just to name a few. So that is why I believe that we should side with the GLA, I don't know what much you want to justify supporting them, you say they COULD carry out horrendous acts and that they COULD become a non-democratic country if they take control of the nation but with SO it is evidence that they have murdering civilians of their respected nation. What if you would like an elaboration it is just a simple concept, we help GLA in this conflict to help gain their independence and help gain control of the country but they must follow these steps.

*Miklos Sawa counts each proposal on his fingers*

1. They must follow the Geneva Convention
2. An invasion of SO is prohibit
3. The GLA must return power to the people and hold an election afterwards
4. The GLA must remain as not a party but as a branch of the military
5. That any civilian from the SO is rounded up and killed
6. That the GLA collaborates with both left and right parties
7. The GLA must have a sense of control on the populist and to maintain order to ensure another revolt must not happen
8. Peace needs to be ensured between SO and Galapagos for years to come

*Miklos Sawa stops and continues walking around and presenting his point*

Miklos Sawa: Rules from 1-5 are mandatory, although 6-8 are important but those are more of looking into the future of things but if 1-5 are broken support from NATO coalition members will be taken away and if some of these aren't meant NATO involvement may a cured. Basically saying if they fall out of line and begin committing war crimes or a invasion of SO or fail to return elections to the nation, NATO members will step in to cease control and get involved that is my simple proposal.

*Miklos Sawa sits back down and takes a sip of water*

Rep. Mavov: This seems plausible. Everyone wins basically. But how would we act on to this? Knowing that SM-led coalition does not want the NATO to interfere? Especially that we're recognizing, and helping the GLA? Oh and another thing, whats with rule number 5?

Miklos Sawa: I suggest going into different phases of escalation. We send military aid like weapons vehicles etc to GLA forces through a supply chain that we can connect to not only that but send small volunteer forces like special forces to help GLA forces with training, espionage and special operations. Another phase being that if military conflict continues to go down south as the Americans like to say, then we send more volunteers to help combat the threat at hand. We also continue to pressure SM to sue for peace to help stabilize the region, our goal is to exhaust them to a point where when we truly get involved is through peace talks. Also, rule five was made because in history people tend to take their anger on civilians who happened to be the opposition, once the war is over we wouldn't want people from SO to be dragged onto the streets by Galapagians soldiers and killed because they so happened to be civilians of that country.

[Kingdom Of The UN]

Rep. Mavov: This seems plausible. Everyone wins basically. But how would we act on to this? Knowing that SM-led coalition does not want the NATO to interfere? Especially that we're recognizing, and helping the GLA? Oh and another thing, whats with rule number 5?

OOC: I’m confused on that one to though I think it’s supposed to be “That civilian from the SO is not rounded up and killed”

OOC: It is exactly that.

[Frethotia]

1000th post on here