NATION

PASSWORD

2025: Dawn of Change | OOC | Open

For all of your non-NationStates related roleplaying needs!

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:22 pm

NewLakotah wrote:Nationstates Name: NewLakotah
Nation Name: United States of America; the United States; America; US(A)
Capital: Washington D.C.
Territory: United States of America
Population: 331,449,281
Official Language: De jure: none. De facto: English
Recognized Languages: There are a number of regional and state level recognized languages. The most notable of which are the variety of indigenous languages. Spanish and French also hold status in some states and other localities recognize Mandarin. However, the most commonly spoken languages in the United States are English and Spanish
Flag:
National Anthem (optional): Star Spangled Banner

Head of State: President Gavin Newsom
HoS Picture:
Head of Government: President Gavin Newsom
HoG Picture (If different from HoS):
Legislature Name: United States Congress; United States Senate (Upper), United States House of Representatives (lower)
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each):
Senate:
Democrats - 51
Republicans - 49

House of Representatives:
Republicans - 222
Democrats - 213




GDP Nominal: $25.035 Trillion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $75,179
GDP (PPP): $25.035 Trillion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $75,179
Currency: dollar

Domestic and Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges:
- The United States faces a divided congress and divided political parties. The 2024 election proved to be one of the closest and most controversial elections in modern American history and the after effects are still being felt as President Newsom is inaugurated. Newsom is progressive, but still largely moderate and is able to work well with the Republican moderates. This upsets the House minority leadership under Representative Alexandra Ocaiso-Cortez who is markedly more progressive. Much of the House Democratic Party is likewise dominated by the progressive movement sparked by Meeks, while the Senate is largely more moderate and more in line with the Clarkian Democratic Establishment. The Republican Party is equally split between traditional Reaganite Conservatives, led by figures like Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Rick Scott, Senator Tim Scott, and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan. The ‘Liberal Republicans’ in the form of the Powellian Republicans, led by figures such as former President Mitt Romney, Congresswoman Liz Cheney, Senator Charlie Crist, and Senator Susan Collins.
- The United States is also facing a serious deficit crisis. High spending has been partially offset by higher taxes, however, this has also slowed economic growth and inhibited factors that encourage greater revenue. Calls from all sides are coming to focus on budget issues, while others call for greater spending on infrastructure and social services or on defence spending to outmatch the Soviets and the Chinese.
- the United States remains the aging dominant superpower of the world. Its force projection and its system of integrated alliances around the world still leave it unmatched in power. However, the United States spent much of the 2000s deep in its own 'splendid isolation'. Its focus was on domestic issues and dealing with affairs in the United Nations and with peacekeeping operations. This self-imposed isolation based on security of victory over its enemies has come crashing down, as the USSR has made significant efforts and has recently moved hard to challenge American hegemony in the world, while China continues to threaten its allies in the South China Sea. This has forced the United States to reenegage the world in a new light, adapting to the newly forming world order.

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here):

Largely the same as IRL

The branches of the United States Armed Forces are:
The United States Army
The United States Navy
The United States Marine Corps
The United States Air Force
The United States Space Force
The United States Coast Guard (in times of war only)

The Space Force is the newest branch of the Armed Forces, having been established in 2013 by President Romney as part of a ‘pivot’ towards revitalizing the space efforts of the United States. By 2025, the Space Force operates two X-37B unmanned spaceplanes for orbital and testing operations. Plans to integrate a manned spaceplane is in the works with the X-37C being the most likely candidate. However, the DreamChaser is also considered by the Department of Defence.

In 1990, the United States Armed Forces peaked at 2.24 million servicemen and women. During the following warming of relations between the United States and the Soviet Union, the US military was reduced gradually until by 2000, there were approximately 1.4 million servicemembers. During the War in Afghanistan and the ensuing Global War on Terror, further troop reductions were put on hold. However, as the war dragged on, further troop reductions continued under Romney as part of the drawdown of the War of Afghanistan. These were accelerated under President Meeks and the Armed Forces would bottom out in the aftermath of Fall of Kabul to nearly 1.2 million soldiers. Recent recruitment efforts has redrawn this to around 1.29 million soldiers as of 2024.

Alliances (If different from IRL): NATO

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP):

In the 1980s, the United States was firmly under the control of Reaganite domestic and foreign policy. As the decade wound down, the feeling of a Golden Age seemed to set in on the American people. In the world, the United States was scoring significant victory after victory against their Soviet enemies. By the end of the decade, the Soviets were forced to withdraw from Afghanistan with their tails between their legs and the Warsaw Pact was all but dissolved as East Germany fell, followed by other Eastern European proxies.

Buoyed by this success abroad, former Vice President George H. W. Bush would steam ahead to an easy victory for the Republican party, still drawing on that Reaganite base of support in the Democratic and Republican parties. The late 1980s and early 90s would prove vital in forming the future foreign policy directives of the United States. As the USSR fractured from within, the Soviet leadership began to implement stronger and stronger reforms during the 1980s and 1990s.

President Reagan had met these reforms with even more goodwill projects and further easing of the tensions. By the early 1990s, the United States media and elected officials were already declaring victory over the USSR. Buoyed by these foreign policy successes, Bush was able to avoid a desperate campaign from Democratic nominee Bill Clinton and upstart businessman Ross Perot. Steaming ahead to secure his second term of office. However, the effects of the election would loosen the grip that the Reaganites had on both parties. However, that would come slowly over the entire second term of Bush.

With the United States scoring a variety of foreign policy successes, focus was returned to domestic policy. With the United States able to relax as the USSR gutted its military forces and its alliance fell apart abroad, the United States moved to reduce its military spending in order to offset its rising deficit. Further reductions to public spending included to social services and public services, which greatly upset the voting public following the earlier tax hikes by Bush and the defence spending cuts.

This would lead to a Democratic wave in the 1994 midterm elections, effectively leaving Bush as a lame duck president. Determined to ride on the coattails of the foreign policy successes, the Democrats nominated former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe General Wesley Clark and his running mate Al Gore. Gore ran against Republican nominee Bob Dole, a conservative traditionalist. Clark stormed to an easy election, gaining over 300 electoral votes and breaking the long red bloc of the south under Reagan.

Clark was elected on a moderate platform that urged for better social spending, balancing of the federal budget, and a focus on jobs and job creation. With the full support of both the house and the senate, the Clark administration set about setting the United States on a new path. One that was less focused on dealing with the USSR as a flagging enemy, but as a potential partner.

Clark would begin his administration with further reductions to the United States Armed Forces. Closing down two European bases and combining all European bases into three major centres. This was coupled with a reduction to the reserve and inactive reserve components of the US Army, Marines, and Navy. Development of the F-22 was delayed and the eventual buildout was significantly less than originally anticipated, largely due to the budget cuts to the defence budget.

However, these moves would end in 2001 when terrorists hijacked several planes and flew them into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington. In an instant, the entire focus of US foreign policy shifted and, after just a few months, US soldiers were on the ground in Afghanistan. By the following year, the Taliban had been overthrown and a new government had been put into place. However, the fight to find Bin Laden and bring the terrorist group Al-Qaeda to just proved to be far more difficult a task. Meanwhile, the Taliban retreated into the high mountains and worked hard to rebuild and re establish themselves once the United States left.

This focus caused a significant change in US foreign affairs. The USSR, now in full reform mode, had transitioned from a Communist one party state into democratic socialist state and then into a social democratic state. Its economy had slowly begun to recover from the disaster of the 90s and was looking for partners to help develop its new industrial bases. The United States was more than happy to agree. In 2003, in Geneva, President Wesley Clark and President Grigory Yavlinsky of the Soviet Union would meet and officially declare the Cold War over and that a ‘new era’ of relations between the USSR and the US would begin.

Across the United States, the move was widely celebrated and many began to talk about nobel peace prizes for both Yavlinsky and Clark. Under Clark, in an attempt to soothe relations with the USSR, agreed not to expand NATO and delayed several applications from Eastern European states and by and large attempted to avoid getting entangled in the entire Eastern European region. This would prove largely unpopular with many of the US’s European allies who saw the opportunity to expand NATO and improve the position and security of Europe in one fell swoop. Calls from the Republicans to expand NATO also grew stronger, however, Clark resisted the calls and the Era of Good Relations between the USSR-US continued well into the 2000s.

Domestically, Clark was able to address many of the issues that he ran on. By 1999, the federal budget had been balanced. However, the dot.com bubble of the early 2000s saw a drain on the overall US economy. The focus was also given to the climate. New climate measures, designed to limit the growth of coal were passed in 1998. The goal to have half of all US energy come from clean energy sources by 2030. This resulted in significant investment into renewables and even nuclear energy. However, the nuclear craze had long since died and only 2 nuclear power plants were ordered during the Clark administration and opened in 2009 and 2012 respectively. Hydroelectric and wind saw new investments, however, overall progress would be slow.

Furthermore, Clark would invest heavily into stronger social services. In 2000, the New American Century Act was passed that would see nearly 30 billion in new initiatives to improve healthcare access for children. Improve Medicaid and Medicare programs and provide better access to prescription drugs. This was followed by the Medicaid Expansion Plan, which established a new bracket for healthcare. Apart from this, Clark established Health America, an umbrella department under the Department of Health and Human Services, to act as the general Healthcare department of the United States, combining the functions of Medicare and Medicaid into a single department to cut waste and redundancy.

Health America would see its first expansion with the Child Health Program, which would see nearly 15 of the 30 billion invested into child wellness programs, seniorcare programs, and programs to reduce the costs of prescription drugs through promotion of generic branded drugs.

In 2004, Vice President Al Gore steamed ahead to secure the Democratic nomination for President. He was challenged by former general and moderate Republican Colin Powell. Powell ran on a very bipartisan and moderate platform that highlighted the differences between Clark’s more spend happy last few years and Powell’s vision of a leaner federal budget. Powell’s vision won out and, once elected, became the first African American to become president.

Powell was elected with running mate Governor Leavitt. Together, the administration didn’t undo much of Clark’s programs and instead even expanded its infrastructure developments, however, focused more on highway and road infrastructure, as well as water and other public utilities, rather than public transit. The primary focus on the spending plan was on repairing and building new bridges, highway extension and interchanges, as well as modernization of the US rail system. Because of these spending initiatives, the deficit continued to grow steadily under Powell, especially after the 2008 Tax Act saw major tax reductions across the board for Americans. This greatly increased the deficit, especially coupled with the war spending of Afghanistan.

2008, however, would prove to be a difficult year for the United States. In 2007 and 2008, the United States housing market would collapse, causing a domino effect with the entire US financial market. Powell reacted quickly, launching two successive stimulus programs, following the 2008 tax cut. While both these efforts helped stablize the economy in the short-term, it did little to offset the greater impacts of the Great Recession.

In 2008, Powell would eke out a small reflection on a campaign of tackling the recession through strong stimulus and tax cuts that had proved popular. However, Powell would lose both the senate and the house in the 2008 election and win only 271 electoral votes and 45.5% of the popular vote, following strong showings from the Green and Libertarian parties. The Democrats had nominated long-time senator and former Secretary of State under Clark, John Kerry. However, Kerry proved unable to unseat Powell’s Reaganite support from moderates, independents and Republicans.

However, The Powell administration moved markedly more left in the following four years. In an effort to stifle further hardships, Powell instituted the 2011 Banking Act which saw major new restrictions added to the financial sector. This was followed by a third stimulus and bailout, aimed at the US automobile industry. Further stimulus programs into clean energy were continued in 2011 and 2012 with two new solar power plants established in Nevada and Arizona, creating over 1,000 construction jobs and 200 full time jobs and over 2,000 secondary jobs.

Furthermore, in step with the Democratic majorities in both the house and senate, Powell passed the United States Healthcare Initiative Platform, which was designed to further simplify Health America and Veterans Affairs and how they managed their programs. Powell’s program was significantly more moderate than the Democrats would have wanted and significantly more liberal than what most Republicans wanted. The focus expanded Child health tax benefits, individual health exclusions, and increased funding for Medicaid by 4% over 5 years in order to expand its coverage for underinsured, underemployed citizens.

Meanwhile, in 2011, President Powell passed the American Immigration Plan, which would see significant investment into border security and protection, expansion of physical and technological barriers in order to prevent illegal immigration, while also working to simplify pathways to citizenship for landed illegal immigrants who were already employed in the US economy. However, this was launched in conjunction with a mass deportation scheme where hundreds of thousands of recent illegals, illegal immigrants who had some sort of criminal record, and those who had been caught multiple times were deported.

However, with spending increasing and the deficit becoming a problem, support within both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party with Powell began to run short. Former Vice President Leavitt attempted to secure the Republican nomination, but was upset by former governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney who secured the nomination with Senator Marco Rubio as his running mate.

Romney was elected on a likewise moderate platform, but one that was markedly more traditional Reaganite Republican rather than the more Rockefeller Republican that Powell was in. Romney would run on a platform of moderate economic and fiscal conservatism, social conservatism, Reaganite foreign policy.

Romney would continue with the ideals of small government through the reimplemenation of Powell’s tax cuts. The tax cuts had reduced the top 3 brackets by 2.5% each and the middle income brackets by 1.5% each. Lower brackets had not been reduced. These were extended under Romney. Meanwhile, the Defence budget saw new increases as Romney established the Space Force as the newest branch of the Uniformed Services, expanded ship production in order to secure American interests in both the Atlantic and Pacific.

Investment programs into industrial development to ‘bring back jobs’ proved to be mildly successful, with many industrial bases being established in Rust Belt states as well as in the less union friendly south. However, the increasing deficits and lack of social spending would prove to be Romney’s undoing. The economy had recovered somewhat by 2015 and calls to balance the budget and address the rising income gap in the United States grew even stronger. Romney attempted to respond to the calls, however, the 2016 election proved to be too much for Republicans to withstand. The calls for change were too strong.
Led by young progressive Florida Senator Kendrick Meeks, the Democratic Party stormed into 2016 and defeated incumbent Romney and secured the house, but not the senate. That was enough for Meeks, however, who began to undo many of the conservative policies that the United States had imposed. This began with healthcare.

In 2017, the Next American Healthcare Act was passed by the slimmest of margins by the senate. It was a pale imitation of what Meeks had originally planned for. The plan saw the expansion of Health America through the creation of a single market account by which Medicare providers, Medicaid providers, private healthcare providers, and other regional hospital or insurance networks would be hosted in a single marketplace. Furthermore, the Healthcare Act expanded drug coverage for Medicare and Medicaid recipients and eased the restrictions to access Medicaid. Furthermore, the expansion for childcare was expanded with greater funding of government sponsored child care clinics, expansion of health coverage at schools and universities, and promotion of health and wellness programs in K-12 education. This plan was a gutted formula, however, it still proved mildly successful in bringing down drug costs and coverage costs and reducing the uninsured rate by a small amount.

Meeks also ordered for the withdrawal of all US soldiers from Afghanistan by the end of the decade. However, that would prove too tall a task and the withdrawal was postponed until 2021. Moreover, Meeks announced significant budget cuts to most branches of the military. The only exceptions were on the Space Force, new fighter and bomber aircraft, and naval construction. In a public statement, Meeks called the USSR a ‘grave threat’ to the world order, ushering in a new era of hostility and sparking fears of a new Cold War. Meeks, however, was quick to dismiss claims of a new Cold War and continued to reduce spending on defence and reducing America’s overseas commitments.

Furthermore, Meeks would cut funding from border security. Ending several federal programs designed to entrap illegal migrants, cutting funding for future wall expansion, and cutting funding to ICE. Further immigration reform would have to wait as the Republicans controlled the senate throughout the entire first term of Meeks. However, the 2020 would see Meeks storm to reelection against the right-wing traditional conservative candidate Ted Cruz from the Republican Party, winning 299 electoral votes and securing 52 seats in the Senate and 239 seats in the house. Finally, Meeks had a full mandate and the power to enact his full vision for the future.

However, February of 2020 had also seen the sudden outbreak of COVID-19, forcing the United States, and the world, into temporary lockdown. In the United States, the federal ‘lockdown’ would last for two months before a gradual reopening process was introduced. A stimulus check was issued in the summer, a second in the fall, and a third and final check in the spring of 2021. The impacts of COVID would have lasting impacts on large sectors of the US economy for years afterwards. The lockdowns themselves and the stimulus programs had cost trillions of dollars in lost income and extra government spending.

Thus, the Meeks Reform Plans would have to largely wait as the battle against COVID took precedence. However, by 2021, Meeks announced the Health America 2.0 Act which was passed with ease in both houses. The Health 2.0 Act would expand on Meeks earlier creation of the Health America singular account. By the expansion of Medicaid and the introduction of a new Public Option, the single account allowed for Americans to have subsidized healthcare for seniors over 65, citizens making less than the federal poverty line, and disabled citizens. Furthermore, through the Health America account, payments could be made directly through income payroll as part of the Medicare Tax Expansion Act. This provided multiple levels of health coverage, both public and private networks, and reduced the uninsured population to virtually zero.

However, the expansion came with hefty costs. In order to offset it, Meeks instituted the Medicare Tax Expansion Plan and the 2022 Tax Act that saw the creation of several new tax brackets. One new for income, and three income tax brackets on tertiary benefits. The creation of a wealth tax was narrowly defeated by several moderate Democrats. However, corporations did see their net taxes increase under the new tax minimum on multinational corporations set at the base level for local businesses. Further actions against corporations saw the blocking of the Disney-Fox merger and several other high profile mergers in order to protect competitive rights.

These actions would be cannon fodder for Republicans. The attacks against businesses threatened American competitiveness. Especially with the Soviets and Chinese rapidly expanding as new competitors, Republicans argued that Meeks was making American uncompetitive. This idea caught fire across many areas. Particularly those most impacted by job-loss to overseas competition. Thus, the 2022 midterm elections would see the Republicans swing with wild momentum into the midterms. In the end, the Senate ended in a flat 50-50 draw and the house went solidly to the Republicans who won 241 seats.

However, Meeks attempted to work with the new Republican coalition led by the New Establishment figures of Nikki Haley, Chris Sununu, Tim Scott, and Paul Ryan. Their platform was built on fiscal conservatism and cutting of the federal deficit. Meeks attempted to compromise where he could, however, much of the last two years of Meeks presidency were deadlocked in stalemate. The greatest successes were investments into small businesses across the United States, and cutting taxes for green energy start-ups in a variety of fields, including nuclear energy. The Republicans were divided between the moderate and more conservative factions, however, the moderate faction would win out in the nomination. This would lead to the eventual Sununu/Charlie Crist ticket. They squared off against moderate-progressive California governor Gavin Newsom and former Speaker of the House and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. Despite the general animosity against the Democrats, the Republicans proved unable to undo the goodwill of the Democratic Party.

However, the mandate given to the Newsom government was not nearly as straightforward as the Meeks' presidency. Newsom received 274 electoral votes to Sununu’s 264 in one of the most debated and controversial elections in American history. In the end, the counting came down to three states: New Hampshire, Iowa, and Virginia. New Hampshire would be called first, in favour of the Republicans, giving them the edge the day after Tuesday. Virginia would be called next, late in the evening. Iowa would go through a long recount process that took nearly 2 full weeks to finally complete. However, when it was called, it came down by 594 votes in favour of Gavin Newsom. Even in the down ballot, the Democrats barely gained much ground, as the Republicans maintained their control over the house and the Democrats eked out a small majority in the senate.

The new Newsom administration inherits an economy that is still facing significant budget crises. Higher taxes has offset this slightly, but high spending programs offset the tax hikes. While President Newsom will have to continue to build on the progress made by President Meeks, there are also strong pushes to begin to reel back high spending in order to prepare for a potential recession. Meanwhile, foreign policy becomes more and more complicated as tensions with the Soviet Union have continued under Democratic leadership and tensions with China have also increased, leading to fears of a three-way Cold War or the USSR and the People’s Republic of China reforming their old friendships in order to defeat the United States and their hegemony.

In both cases, the United States faces a number of key issues, both on the foreign and domestic fronts. Whether or not President Gavin Newsom and his newly selected Cabinet are capable remains to be seen.

Do not remove - Alpha777

Accepted
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Deblar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5210
Founded: Jan 28, 2021
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Deblar » Wed Mar 22, 2023 5:38 am

This seems interesting, count me in

NS Name: Deblar
Nation Reserving: People's Republic of China
Territory: modern day China

DO NOT REMOVE - OMEGA777

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Wed Mar 22, 2023 6:12 am

Deblar wrote:This seems interesting, count me in

NS Name: Deblar
Nation Reserving: People's Republic of China
Territory: modern day China

DO NOT REMOVE - OMEGA777

I have reserved China first.
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
Deblar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5210
Founded: Jan 28, 2021
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Deblar » Wed Mar 22, 2023 6:17 am

Arvenia wrote:
Deblar wrote:This seems interesting, count me in

NS Name: Deblar
Nation Reserving: People's Republic of China
Territory: modern day China

DO NOT REMOVE - OMEGA777

I have reserved China first.

Oh, my bad, didn't see it

User avatar
Deblar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5210
Founded: Jan 28, 2021
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Deblar » Wed Mar 22, 2023 6:18 am

Aight then, Plan B

NS Name: Deblar
Nation Reserving: East African Federation
Territory: modern day Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi

DO NOT REMOVE - OMEGA777

User avatar
Ardchu
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1014
Founded: Oct 07, 2021
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ardchu » Wed Mar 22, 2023 6:32 am

Nationstates Name: Ardchu
Nation Name: Republic of Ireland
Capital: Dublin
Territory: the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland is disputed
Population: 5 million
Official Language: English, Irish
Recognized Languages: English, Irish
Flag: regular Irish flag
National Anthem (optional): A Soldier's Song/Amhran na Bfiann

Head of State: Michael D. Higgins
HoS Picture: uhh look him up
Head of Government: Dail Eireann
HoG Picture (If different from HoS): N/A
Legislature Name: Oireachtas
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Fianna Fail (majority), Fine Gael (minority)

GDP Nominal: $504 billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $106,000
GDP (PPP): $666 Billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $108,967
Currency: Euro

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges: Some terrorism problems, industrialization, global warming's effect on Ireland, generally supporting liberal change, keeping the Irish economy growing

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges: Northern Ireland, the EU, building relations with the UK, keeping Ireland attractive to foreign businesses

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here): nope

Alliances (If different from IRL): nothing different

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP): N/A


Do not remove - ALPHA777
Ardchu is a fun country to enjoy nature in, but also you can be murdered on the street by police or by the native wildlife, who are citizens here. And yes, we can talk with them and they can talk with us. They are equal citizens of this country, and we are disgusted by speciesism. They are canonically as smart as humans and can think for themselves, and many of them have run the country. National language is Ardchuan, but it's mandatory to learn at least one other nature language in school.

please check these out as well, I feel like it could be a cool thing to do:


Flag made by Reprapburg

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:39 am

Deblar wrote:
Arvenia wrote:I have reserved China first.

Oh, my bad, didn't see it

That was my bad, I forgot the PRC on the reservation list. Sorry about that.
Last edited by Chewion on Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:40 am

Reservations should all be noted and on the OP list. We are reviewing posted applications as well. Lord willing, the plan is to possibly post the IC tonight
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:42 am

Ardchu wrote:
Nationstates Name: Ardchu
Nation Name: Republic of Ireland
Capital: Dublin
Territory: the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland is disputed
Population: 5 million
Official Language: English, Irish
Recognized Languages: English, Irish
Flag: regular Irish flag
National Anthem (optional): A Soldier's Song/Amhran na Bfiann

Head of State: Michael D. Higgins
HoS Picture: uhh look him up
Head of Government: Dail Eireann
HoG Picture (If different from HoS): N/A
Legislature Name: Oireachtas
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Fianna Fail (majority), Fine Gael (minority)

GDP Nominal: $504 billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $106,000
GDP (PPP): $666 Billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $108,967
Currency: Euro

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges: Some terrorism problems, industrialization, global warming's effect on Ireland, generally supporting liberal change, keeping the Irish economy growing

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges: Northern Ireland, the EU, building relations with the UK, keeping Ireland attractive to foreign businesses

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here): nope

Alliances (If different from IRL): nothing different

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP): N/A


Do not remove - ALPHA777

One thing to note is the GDP you’ve given is the current irl GDP. This takes place in 2025 so, if you’d like, having it a bit higher to around the 2025 projections is totally fine.
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Ardchu
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1014
Founded: Oct 07, 2021
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ardchu » Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:45 am

Chewion wrote:
Ardchu wrote:
Nationstates Name: Ardchu
Nation Name: Republic of Ireland
Capital: Dublin
Territory: the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland is disputed
Population: 5 million
Official Language: English, Irish
Recognized Languages: English, Irish
Flag: regular Irish flag
National Anthem (optional): A Soldier's Song/Amhran na Bfiann

Head of State: Michael D. Higgins
HoS Picture: uhh look him up
Head of Government: Dail Eireann
HoG Picture (If different from HoS): N/A
Legislature Name: Oireachtas
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Fianna Fail (majority), Fine Gael (minority)

GDP Nominal: $504 billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $106,000
GDP (PPP): $666 Billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $108,967
Currency: Euro

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges: Some terrorism problems, industrialization, global warming's effect on Ireland, generally supporting liberal change, keeping the Irish economy growing

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges: Northern Ireland, the EU, building relations with the UK, keeping Ireland attractive to foreign businesses

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here): nope

Alliances (If different from IRL): nothing different

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP): N/A


Do not remove - ALPHA777

One thing to note is the GDP you’ve given is the current irl GDP. This takes place in 2025 so, if you’d like, having it a bit higher to around the 2025 projections is totally fine.

yeah I know
I'm not great with economic stuff, but I imagine it would probably be pretty similar to the current gdp
so am I accepted or...
Ardchu is a fun country to enjoy nature in, but also you can be murdered on the street by police or by the native wildlife, who are citizens here. And yes, we can talk with them and they can talk with us. They are equal citizens of this country, and we are disgusted by speciesism. They are canonically as smart as humans and can think for themselves, and many of them have run the country. National language is Ardchuan, but it's mandatory to learn at least one other nature language in school.

please check these out as well, I feel like it could be a cool thing to do:


Flag made by Reprapburg

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:59 am

Ardchu wrote:
Chewion wrote:One thing to note is the GDP you’ve given is the current irl GDP. This takes place in 2025 so, if you’d like, having it a bit higher to around the 2025 projections is totally fine.

yeah I know
I'm not great with economic stuff, but I imagine it would probably be pretty similar to the current gdp
so am I accepted or...

Sure. Tho, if you’d like, the 2025 estimate for nominal GDP is 505,598,561,511 but it’s up to you.
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Ardchu
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1014
Founded: Oct 07, 2021
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ardchu » Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:01 am

Chewion wrote:
Ardchu wrote:yeah I know
I'm not great with economic stuff, but I imagine it would probably be pretty similar to the current gdp
so am I accepted or...

Sure. Tho, if you’d like, the 2025 estimate for nominal GDP is 505,598,561,511 but it’s up to you.

I'll keep it as is
Ardchu is a fun country to enjoy nature in, but also you can be murdered on the street by police or by the native wildlife, who are citizens here. And yes, we can talk with them and they can talk with us. They are equal citizens of this country, and we are disgusted by speciesism. They are canonically as smart as humans and can think for themselves, and many of them have run the country. National language is Ardchuan, but it's mandatory to learn at least one other nature language in school.

please check these out as well, I feel like it could be a cool thing to do:


Flag made by Reprapburg

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:03 am

Ardchu wrote:
Nationstates Name: Ardchu
Nation Name: Republic of Ireland
Capital: Dublin
Territory: the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland is disputed
Population: 5 million
Official Language: English, Irish
Recognized Languages: English, Irish
Flag: regular Irish flag
National Anthem (optional): A Soldier's Song/Amhran na Bfiann

Head of State: Michael D. Higgins
HoS Picture: uhh look him up
Head of Government: Dail Eireann
HoG Picture (If different from HoS): N/A
Legislature Name: Oireachtas
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Fianna Fail (majority), Fine Gael (minority)

GDP Nominal: $504 billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $106,000
GDP (PPP): $666 Billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $108,967
Currency: Euro

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges: Some terrorism problems, industrialization, global warming's effect on Ireland, generally supporting liberal change, keeping the Irish economy growing

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges: Northern Ireland, the EU, building relations with the UK, keeping Ireland attractive to foreign businesses

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here): nope

Alliances (If different from IRL): nothing different

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP): N/A


Do not remove - ALPHA777

Accepted
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Ardchu
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1014
Founded: Oct 07, 2021
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ardchu » Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:03 am

Chewion wrote:
Ardchu wrote:
Nationstates Name: Ardchu
Nation Name: Republic of Ireland
Capital: Dublin
Territory: the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland is disputed
Population: 5 million
Official Language: English, Irish
Recognized Languages: English, Irish
Flag: regular Irish flag
National Anthem (optional): A Soldier's Song/Amhran na Bfiann

Head of State: Michael D. Higgins
HoS Picture: uhh look him up
Head of Government: Dail Eireann
HoG Picture (If different from HoS): N/A
Legislature Name: Oireachtas
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Fianna Fail (majority), Fine Gael (minority)

GDP Nominal: $504 billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $106,000
GDP (PPP): $666 Billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $108,967
Currency: Euro

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges: Some terrorism problems, industrialization, global warming's effect on Ireland, generally supporting liberal change, keeping the Irish economy growing

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges: Northern Ireland, the EU, building relations with the UK, keeping Ireland attractive to foreign businesses

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here): nope

Alliances (If different from IRL): nothing different

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP): N/A


Do not remove - ALPHA777

Accepted

Thanks!
has the IC been made yet?
Last edited by Ardchu on Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ardchu is a fun country to enjoy nature in, but also you can be murdered on the street by police or by the native wildlife, who are citizens here. And yes, we can talk with them and they can talk with us. They are equal citizens of this country, and we are disgusted by speciesism. They are canonically as smart as humans and can think for themselves, and many of them have run the country. National language is Ardchuan, but it's mandatory to learn at least one other nature language in school.

please check these out as well, I feel like it could be a cool thing to do:


Flag made by Reprapburg

User avatar
Catalaonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 201
Founded: Oct 15, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Catalaonia » Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:21 am

Ardchu wrote:
Chewion wrote:Accepted

Thanks!
has the IC been made yet?


I think they said it was planning to go up tonight?

User avatar
Deblar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5210
Founded: Jan 28, 2021
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Deblar » Wed Mar 22, 2023 3:20 pm

Nationstates Name: Deblar
Nation Name: East African Federation (official); East Africa (shorthand)
Capital: Arusha, Special Capital District
Territory: Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi
Population: 190,273,000
Official Languages: English, Swahili, French
Recognized Languages: hundreds of African languages and dialects from across the Federation, aka way too many to list
Flag:
Image

National Anthem (optional): "Jumuiya (Together)"

Head of State: President Martin Ngoga
HoS Picture:
Image

Head of Government: Premier Peter Mathuki [RLP]
HoG Picture (If different from HoS):
Image

Legislature Name: Federal All-People's Congress
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each):
Chamber of State (Upper House): United East Africa (radical centrist, big tent)
Chamber of Deputies (Lower House): Radical Labour Party (democratic socialism, left-wing populism)

GDP Nominal: $376 billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $1,979
GDP (PPP): $972 billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $5,111
Currency: East African shilling (EAS)

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges:

A Newborn Union - Having only completed the unification process in February 2022, the East African Federation is in its early infancy. There is certainly a long road ahead of the EAF towards uplifting the people of the nation and proving itself on the world stage, all while attempting to firmly establish the authority of the Federation.

What, Me Corrupt? - While the East African Federation is a democracy, and has demonstrated its willingness to protect said democracy, corruption runs rampant through the governments of the Republics - the individual states of the Federation - and even the federal government (to a lesser extent). Premier Mathuki has pushed the All-People's Congress to pass legislation that would allow the federal government to take a much harder stance against corruption in all levels of government, but attempts keep being stifled by the Chamber of State, controlled by the center-right coalition led by UEA that fears setting a precedent for tolerating federal overreach. The situation remains tense, as the lack of development caused by the corruption has angered much of the populace, which could be crucial come the elections in May.

Minor Insurgencies - The formation of East Africa was a momentous occasion celebrated by most as an opportunity to accelerate the region's development, though not everyone was supportive; namely, ethnic nationalist militias primarily within Rwanda and Burundi. Objecting to the Federation's formation as an assault on and affront to their people, these groups led a mild insurgency against the new government soon after its formation. With primarily Western support, as well as fairly minor Soviet support, the East African Defense Forces were able to quash most of the uprisings within months, though small slices of territory remained - and still remain - under rebel control. There has been renewed support among the military and the government, following military victories in South Sudan, for a renewed offensive against the rebels to finally rid the stain of insurgency once and for all, and it may not be very long before they get their way.

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges:

South Sudan Intervention - Though the South Sudanese Civil War came to an end at around the time that the EAF formed, violence and insurgency still persisted. One such insurgency threatened to overthrow the South Sudanese Unity Government, which requested military aid from the Federation, which would come in April 2023. Following months of combat and a string of military victories for East Africa and South Sudan, the insurgency had been successfully defeated by summer of 2024, though East African troops have maintained a presence in South Sudan as a peacekeeping force. The conflict caused South Sudanese-East African relations to deepen immensely; so much so that the Federation has reportedly begun negotiation with South Sudan to bring it into the EAF; while the report is correct, this has not been officially confirmed by either side as there is a mutual interest in keeping negotiations underground for now.

Where to Turn, Who to Trust - With the dueling worldwide influences of the United States and the Soviet Union, as well as the rising power of China, East Africa has had to maintain a delicate balancing act in cooperating with all three sides; There has been significant diplomatic and military cooperation with the United States and, to a lesser extent, the Soviet Union, and the Federation has considered getting in on the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. However, there are some who resent the levels of cooperation and prefer a foreign policy of asserted self-determination - most notably, the Radical Labour Party, which controls the Chamber of Deputies.

Military Information:

Branches of the East African Defense Forces:
- East African Federal Army
- East African Federal Navy
- East African Federal Air Force
- East African Constabulary (in times of war)

Manpower:
Active Troops - 665,956
Reserve Troops - 12,600,000
Paramilitary - 53, 154
Total Current Manpower - 13,319,110
Available Manpower - 85,622,850

Equipment:

Land
Tanks - 205
Vehicles - 23,000
Self-Propelled Artillery - 35
Towed Artillery - 70
MLRS: 82

Air
Fighter Jets - 24
Transports - 31
Trainers - 83
Special Mission - 4
Helicopters - 79
Attack Helicopters - 12

Navy
Frigates - 1
Corvettes - 3
Patrol Vessels - 175
Mine Warfare - 3

Alliances (If different from IRL): UN, African Union, East African Economic and Trade Assembly (members: The EAF, South Sudan, Malawi, Mozambique, and the DRC); close ties maintained with the EU and the US (and, to a lesser extent, the USSR)

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP):
1994: The horror that was the Rwandan Genocide shocked the region of East Africa, who were further enraged by the general lack of a UN/Western response. Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania all agree to take matters into their own hands, launching the Joint Rwanda Intervention Force of Tanzania, Uganda, and Kenya (JRIFTUK) and sending troops into Rwanda, who help the Rwandan Patriotic Front expel the National Revolutionary Movement for Development government and the Hutu armies into the Congo, liberating the country and ending the Genocide. This sets the precedent for increased cooperation between the countries of East Africa, and is seen as the origins of a potential political union that became the East African Federation.

1995: With the new government in place in Rwanda, they form the East African Coalition of Defense with Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania, seeking to increase cooperation with the rest of East Africa in a bid to "secure the nation's future". Burundi would later join in 1997 for similar reasons, leading to another joint intervention in Burundi’s civil war. It was the first political organization of it's kind in East Africa.

1999: The East African Coalition of Defense member nations begin discussing the potential creation of a more integrated organization in East Africa along the lines of the European Union.

2001: By now the talks have slowed, with no agreement needed, but the 9/11 Attacks in America and the resulting upheaval of global geopolitics reignites the fervor of discussion, with parties involved fearing that East Africa would be further left behind. A nominal agreement is reached by the end of the year, and by the end of 2022, the EACD became the East African Community.

2005: The first proposal for the eventual integration of the East African Community into a single federation is made by Kenya, though at this point the idea lacks very widespread support. It is therefore tabled by the organization.

2008: The 2008 Recession doesn’t hit East Africa very hard, but it does put a bit of an economic strain on the region. It motivates the East African Community to begin to pursue greater economic integration within the region. By 2010, a common market and customs union have been established and put in place.

2011: South Sudan is admitted as a member of the EAC soon after its independence from Sudan. The question of East African integration is again brought up, this time by Uganda, and this time around it is more heavily considered as support for it had grown in the region. Official negotiations as to how a hypothetical federation would look and what the process of unification would consist of would begin by 2012. South Sudan, however, pulled out of negotiations after the outbreak of its civil war.

2014: A nominal agreement to pursue the creation of a federation in East Africa is signed in Arusha by Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, and Tanzania. Disputes, specifically over the extent of economic and political integration between the countries, are resolved over the next year, and the agreement is set in stone. The integration process is scheduled to conclude in 2021.

2016-2019: Phase I - economic integration. A common currency, the East African Shilling, is adopted, and barriers to domestic trade within the region are lifted to the extent agreed upon. Economic structures are modeled after the European Union.

2019-2020: Phase II - military integration. Each of the armed forces of the East African countries are integrated into the East African Defense Forces, of which the commander-in-chief will be the head of government. Intelligence agencies are also integrated and placed under the supervision of the East African Agency of Security and Intelligence. The Republics - the individual states of the EAF - are allowed to retain semi-militarized national guards.

2020-2022: Phase III - Administrative integration. All three branches of the Federal Government of the Federation are organized and structured in this period. The Federal Government is made to include a ceremonial President, a Premier that holds most executive powers, a Cabinet appointed by the Premier, a bicameral Federal All-People’s Congress modeled on America’s Congress (equal representation upper house, proportional representation lower house), and an independent judiciary. Elections are scheduled for every 3 years for the All-People’s Congress and every 6 years for the Premier; the President is to be appointed by a special joint committee consisting of heads of the Republics and representatives of the All-People’s Congress; this committee also approves candidates for the Cabinet. Republic governments are largely structured along the lines of the Federal Government and are afforded considerable power to determine domestic policy so long as it doesn't go against Federal policy. The complications caused by the COVID-19 pandemic caused the completion of this phase - and, therefore, the formal establishment of the East African Federation - to be delayed from its original 2021 goal to 2022.

2022: The ratification of the East African Federal Constitution marks the establishment of the East African Federation. The momentous occasion is met with jubilation and celebration from within the new union, and was applauded by many foreign governments as well. However, the new Federation faced challenges early on. Ethnic nationalist militias, particularly in Rwanda and Burundi, would begin an insurrection against the government, provoking a response from the Defense Forces. With support from the West, mainly the United States, United Kingdom and Germany, the insurgents were largely defeated within months, though the conflict put a strain on the country’s economy. Meanwhile, the first elections were held amid the fighting, with Peter Mathuki winning the Premiership, Martin Ngoga being appointed President, and the All-People’s Congress being filled.

2023: The East African intervention in South Sudan commences. Though the South Sudanese Civil War came to an end at around the time that the EAF formed, violence and insurgency still persisted. One such insurgency threatened to overthrow the South Sudanese Unity Government, which requested military aid from the Federation, which would come in April 2023. Following months of combat and a string of military victories for East Africa and South Sudan, the insurgency had been successfully defeated by summer of 2024, though East African troops have maintained a presence in South Sudan as a peacekeeping force. Meanwhile, pursuing economic cooperation, the East African Federation, along with Malawi and Mozambique, form the East African Economic and Trade Assembly. South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo would join in 2024.

2024: The intervention in South Sudan concludes, with the insurgency being successfully defeated. It seems that peace has finally come to South Sudan, and the East African Federation would provide aid to help South Sudan in its recovery. South Sudanese-East African relations grow deeper as a result of this cooperation. South Sudan would join the EAF-headed EAETA along with the Democratic Republic of the Congo later in the year. Meanwhile, the East African economy begins a rebound, as the greater levels of trade with its neighbors gives it a much needed boost.

2025: The current year. The Federation prepares for its first midterm elections in May while also engaging in so-far secret negotiations with South Sudan to bring it into the East African Federation as a Republic. Meanwhile, the EAF also intends to take a greater role in global affairs, whatever that may look like. Overall, things appear to be looking up for the nascent East African Federation as it moves into the future.

Do not remove - ALPHA777
Last edited by Deblar on Mon Apr 03, 2023 6:02 am, edited 9 times in total.

User avatar
NewLakotah
Minister
 
Posts: 2438
Founded: Feb 18, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby NewLakotah » Wed Mar 22, 2023 4:36 pm

Catalaonia wrote:Nationstates Name: Catalaonia
Nation Name: Union of Yugoslavic Republics (Yugoslavia)
Capital: Belgrade, Federal Republic of Serbia
Territory: All Territories under Former Yugoslavia.
Population: 28.7 Million (Approx)
Official Language: Serbian and Bosnian
Recognized Languages: Serbian, Bosnian, Slovenian, Kosovar and Croatian.
Flag:
(Image)
National Anthem (optional): N/A

Head of State: President Ratimir Smirnov (NP)
HoS Picture: https://imgur.com/y8YM6hC
Head of Government: President Ratimir Smirnov
HoG Picture (If different from HoS): N/A
Legislature Name: Yugoslavian Assembly
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): National Party-Democratic Unionist Coalition

GDP Nominal: $674 Billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $17,650 per capita
GDP (PPP): $709 Billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $21,763 per capita
Currency: Yugoslavian Dinar

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges:

Nationalism at every angle - Despite the 1986 Belgrade Conference, which established a new constitution, recognition of nationalist sentiments and the creation of a multi-party democracy, sentiments across the federation remain strong, especially in Bosnia and Slovakia, who faced the worse of the 1991 Yugoslavian Crises, which was an 11-month internal conflict from nationalist groups against the Yugoslav army, killing over 140,000 people. This remains both a political problem for the union, but also an economic problem.

Honeymoon Period is over - Known as the Golden Era of Yugoslavia, between 1988-2008, the Yugoslavian economy doubled in it's size, mostly due to the radical market reforms during the early 90's, as-well as the nation's entry into the EU in 1995, however, the 2008 Crises ended all progress, and forced the government at the time to enter a 4-year period of strict austerity measures. While the economy still remains in a growing period, the honeymoon period of the 90's and 2000's seems to be over.

Weak, Weak, Weak! - Yugoslavia's weak government, having seen a coalition government since 1990, has been a problem since then, and has created the notion that the nation may not be stable, with most parties disagreeing on major issues. The current government disagrees on both economic and social issues, with the National Party wanting a more conservative social policy as opposed to the more liberal Democratic Union.

Diversity - Yugoslavia has a diverse set of cultures and nationalities, and while some have suggested it was a miracle Yugoslavia avoided a civil war during the Bosnian Cold Conflict from 1988-1995 and the Slovenian Independence War of 1990, the melting pot of cultures has left Yugoslavia with the issue of further devolution.

The Cold Conflict - Ever since 2018, Yugoslavia has been involved in a cold conflict against ultra-nationalist Bosnian paramilitaries, and has cost the lives of 1,500 people since it began. This has created a notion that nationalist movements are still rife across the nation, albeit not to the extend of the late 80's to early 90's.

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges:

Socialism at the door step - Having successfully transitioned during the mid-90's from a communist economy to that of a mixed, lazes-faire system, they are currently bordered with socialist and communist states, which makes it a tricky battle considering they are part of the EU.

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here):

Branches of Yugoslavia's Military:
- Yugoslavian Army
- Yugoslavian Navy
- Yugoslavian Air Force
- Yugoslavian Home Force

Yugoslavian Army
Having seen large deductions since the end of the 1988 Crises, the army currently has 110,000 Regular troops split into 8 Army Groups, with around 350,000 Reservists split into 16 Army Reserve Groups. They are currently armed with late 2000's era weaponry, with some of the reserve groups armed with weaponry from the 90's. Although not involved in any international operations, they are involved, in a limited basis, with the ongoing Bosnian Insurgency, with over 3,500 men in current active operation.

Yugoslavian Navy
The Navy has not seen conflict in many decades, and has been in a period of gradual cuts, currently housing 9,950 Personal and with 80 Vessels. The navy has been for the last 7 years the lowest spending area of the Yugoslavian Military, and houses currently it's biggest asset, 5 submarines, all bought from the USA in the mid-2010's. The majority of ships are Patrol Boats, mostly used to combat against drugs coming through to ports, and have not been in combat use since the second world war.

Yugoslavian Air Force
Much like the Navy, it has seen little action, only limited to that of the latter stages of the Yugoslav War, although had been in some use in 2019 and 2023 during the Bosnian Insurgency. Small but effective, the air force has a wide use of helicopters and jets, although still within the 90's and early 2000's versions, they would not be ready with conflict from another nation, and merely used for domestic purposes.

Alliances (If different from IRL): EU and UN.

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP):

May, 1980 - The death of long-standing communist leader, Josip Broz Tito, led to a furious debate between the Conservatives and Progressives. Conservatives wanted a similar tito-idelogue as President of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, with elder statesman and long-time supporter, Petar Bolkic, who had been part of the Yugoslav government since the early-50's, with progressives supporting a young radical by the name of Branislav Svetleachni, who had supported a gradual change to a more market-driven economy, as-well as supporting the multi-party democracy, a growing faction in governed since the early 70's. On the 20th May, Bolkic was elected by a landslide victory, mostly due to promises for some market-driven reforms, while also wanting to keep Tito's legacy stable and straight.

1980-1983 - Bolkic introduces some reforms, such as the Market Reform Act, which makes some effort to stabilise the collapsing Yugoslavian economy. He quickly introduces harsh austerity, raising land taxes by almost 20% to keep the money flowing. During the first 3 years, Bolkic faced constant battles in government between Conservatives and Progressives, as he was unable to keep either side happy. His only real victory was considered when he successfully put down an attempted Bosnian insurgency in November, 1982 without many casualties. His unpopularity and a growing resentment to the communist state, and Yugoslavia as a whole, led to his resignation in May, 1983.

1983-1985 - Bolkic's replacement was a progressive-driven Svetleachni, who was considered even to some reformists to be far too radical. He managed to win in a vote due to his (false) promises to keep the communist regime alive, but his economic policies were far different. He quickly proposed new market reforms, state price deductions and an end to the communist system. During his 2 years, he made wide ranging changes, such as the creation of Regional Assemblies, ending of austerity measures, new freedoms for the free-market and a new supply-side driven economics. His radical economic reforms did the opposite of stabilisation, driving up inflation and creating a supply crises in the nation. By the end of 1985, he faced the potential collapse of Yugoslavia all together.

1986 Liberalisation of the People - By March, 1986, insurgencies and uprisings occurred across Yugoslavia, as a growing census for the overthrowing of not just the communist regime, but of Yugoslavia become real. While he garnered up thousands of troops to defeat these insurgencies, the biggest one within Bosnia, he proposed a new Liberalisation of the People, which would make grand-sweeping reforms, introducing new democratic practises, creation of a wide-ranged assembly, socially liberal reforms and a path to the survival of the state. However, he purged the Conservatives in a bloody period of 3 weeks, arresting or killing them, now trying to unify his government before implementing his radical reforms. By the end of the month, his cabinet was full of progressive yes-men, and began the Liberalisation of the People.

1986-1988 - The reforms, while managed to clam down inflation by the economy now used to a more balanced public-private system, and the re-structuring of the Yugoslavian government managing to create a much more efficient law-making system, as the market-based supply now became settled in Yugoslavia, Svetleachni now made large offensives on these insurgencies, committing a 2-year campaign of their defeat. While successful in Slovenia and Croatia, the Bosnian Insurgency remained so, but the bulk of the Yugoslavian Wars was not done yet. The next 2 years, he faced little political opposition, and slowly managed to drive the economy back to a growing nation in Europe. He softened the nation's stance on NATO in 1988, and became far more neutral as the cold war slowly came to a close.

Yugoslav Wars (1989 - 1994) - However, merely 8 months later, and the Bosnian Nationalist Army, Croatia Movement of the People and the Slovenian Paramilitaries attempted to break-free of Yugoslavian control, after almost a decade of economic decline, regional disparities and the partly due to Svetleachni's reforms, which had liberalised much of Yugoslavia's nation, socially and economically. The 5-year war saw siege and conflict spur up across the nation, as a growing faction of separatists among the Communist Party who called for the breaking of Yugoslavia. During the war, the Yugoslavic government attempted to create peace on 2 occasions, the 1990 Belgrade Convention was the first international attempt to bring peace, with major nations hoping for an end to the wars. However, this collapsed after just 3 days of negotiation .

The war saw over 150,000 killed, with war crimes committed across the board. In 1992, the Second Belgrade Conference laid the foundations for peace and prosperity in the nation, which promised, with unanimous acceptance, introduction of multi-party democracy and the restructuring of the state to give further autonomy to federal states. It was accepted by all bar one, Bosnia, with the Federal President of Bosnia supporting the ultra-nationalist Bosnian Freedom Army. The conflict continued on for another 2 years, with during those 2 years, 35,000 people were killed, with the Tuesday Massacre seeing the deaths of over 850 civilians by the Bosnian Regiment of Yugoslavia. By 1994, the BFA had been defeated after the Battle of Neum, ending the war.

This led to the 3rd Belgrade Convention, with submitted further reforms of a modern democracy, despite's it's unpopularity with large swaths of his government and the party, Svetleachni' put it forward and was accepted. The 3rd convention saw the creation of multi-party elections, creation of regional assemblies and the motion of a "gradual removal socialism and communism". The motives for this radical shift are unknown, with some suggesting he had wanted a much softer version of socialism, opting for democratic socialism, while others have suggested that Svetleachni' was putting the security of Yugoslavia first before the party and government. However, a new era had come to Yugoslavia, but would it last.

1997 Parliamentary Elections - Svetleachni' quickly stepped down after the creation of multi-party democracy, calling for a new leader to bring Yugoslavia into the next era. He was replaced by two interim leaders from 1994-1997, that being a statesman by the name of Boleslaw Dubnov, who led until 1996, and Orlin Jaksch, who led for only 4 months until resigning before the 1997 elections, sighting potential defeat. Since the end of the Yugoslav Wars, there had been the establishment of 3 main parties; Democratic Union (A centre-right party), National Party (a right-wing conservative party) and the Labour and Farmer's Party (a democratic socialist party). It was highly suspected it was to be a hung parliament, with general popularity for each party at a stand-still.

It saw the DU wins the polarity of seats, with the LFP winning the second most. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia, while still popular in some areas, was seen as leading to old ideas, and placed 4th behind the National Party. This led to a DU-LFP coalition and the first democratically-elected government in Yugoslavia's history.

1997-2005 - The next 8 years would see a period of stability and growth for Yugoslavia. Led by centrist statesman Blahoslav Shevchenko, leader of the Democratic Union, he would make further liberal reforms socially, legalising abortion as-well as the Freedom of Religion Act. He made large-scale investments into education and infrastructure in a re-building period for the nation. In 1999, he banned the Communist Party, arresting over 150 former members of the party. Shevchenko, while he increased the nation's debt in the short-term, managed to establish a modern education system and much better infrastructure, slowly transforming Yugoslavia into a modern democracy. The DU increased it's seat share by 34 seats, while still remaining in a coalition, and looked onwards and upwards. Yugoslavia also entered the EU in 2005 during the enlargement era.

2005-2008 - By the 2005 Parliamentary elections, Shevchenko resigned due to ill-health, replaced by Vice President Zelik Bakalowits, and faced a popular National Front who opposed EU entry and wanted further liberalisation of the economy, sighting the large amount of economic intervention in the markets to be preventing large economic growth. In the election, Bakalowits and the FLP managed to survive, although was forced into a divided coalition with the National Party to keep stable governance. During this period, Bakalowits was forced to make large military investment, as-well as he was unable to gain majority support for new education reforms. By 2008, he called a snap election to gain the FLP-DU coalition back.

2008-2012 - The 2008 election saw the DU-FLP coalition back, with elder statesman Dragotin Marinovic as President. Dragotin Marinovic encountered the financial crises in his first tenure, and saw to create mass stimulus packages, bailouts and investment into the economy to battle it, dramatically increasing the nation's national debt. Marinovic's investments, while successful to prevent a collapse, failed to prevent the halt of growth, and see a 6% drop in economic growth in 2009. He abandoned his investment rhetoric and was forced by the Democratic Union's more hardliner members to enact austerity measures for the 2010 Budget. Although unpopular and considered a traitor to his former investment strategy, Marinovic's measures managed to cut debt in the medium term by 2012, and saw a 1.4% growth in 2012.

2012-2020 - However, Marinovic was forced into the 2012 election unpopular, and faced a National Party Presidency. The 2012 Parliamentary elections saw the National Party finish first, who pushed for reversal of austerity measures and large investment into infrastructure, reforms to social security and a new Yugoslavian identity in the nation. Zbyna Rabinov, leader of the NP, went into a coalition with the Democratic Union, and now looked to make a change. The next four years saw a gradual removal of austerity measures, new right-wing reforms to education, reforms to police which led to increased powers and centralisation of power. Rabinov managed to, despite a loss of seats, see the NP as the largest party in the 2016 Parliamentary elections, beating out an out of touch FLP. The election also saw 2 new parties enter the Yugoslavian Parliament, such as the Socialist Party of Yugoslavia and the Republican Party of Yugoslavia.

During his second tenure as President, he battled the 2017 Bosnian Protests, which did lead to the 2018 Insurgency beginning, as-well as making further investment into healthcare. Although unpopular with some of the more conservative figures of the NP, he was deemed popular by the majority of the nation due to the growing economy and his successful education reforms being a widespread success. However, his popularity dwindled in 2018, when he failed to prevent a Bosnian insurgency from becoming mainstream, and was faced with collapse once more. From 2018-2020, his crackdown's were a failure and he faced a third parliamentary election in 2020 on the backdrop of a growing Covid-19 crises.

2020-2024 - Leader of the Democratic Unionists, a young and aspiring centrist, Milon Jablonski, was deemed the most popular, with the FLP and NP deemed incredible. He won a majority of 4 in the Yugoslavian Parliament, the only majority government. Milon Jablonski, while only leading for 4 years, made major reforms in devolution, creating two new special zones for ethnic minorities in Kosovo and Serbia. However, his lack of economic successes as-well as mismanagement with the growing Bosnian insurgency led to him becoming more unpopular throughout the 4 years, and by 2024, led to him facing defeat.

2024-Present

The 2024 Parliamentary Elections led the National Party managing to gain the most seats, followed by the Democratic Union Party. This led to Ratimir Smirnov, leader of the NP, to become President and facing a regional crises, economic stagnation and a growing second cold war. In his first year, he managed some limited education reforms, as-well as a successful raid in Bosnia to see the killing of a senior figure in the Bosnian Insurgency, taking a hardliner stance on the issue.

Do not remove - ALPHA777

Overall, not too many issues from my POV... however, in the early 1990s I can't see that occurring without US/NATO intervention, similar to what happened IRL. So, if having some level of foreign intervention in order to quell the genocide from the United Nations and NATO works for you then i feel like that would make the most sense in that time period; when America was at its most active and the USSR and Eastern Europe at its most vulnerable.
"How smooth must be the language of the whites, when they can make right look like wrong, and wrong like right." ~~ Black Hawk, Sauk

"When it comes time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song, and die like a hero going home." ~~ Tecumseh

Free Leonard Peltier!!

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:57 pm

Somurias wrote:Nationstates Name: Somurias
Nation Name: Republic of Indonesia
Capital: Jakarta
Territory: Indonesian territory (with Timor Leste)
Population: 272,27 million
Official Language: Indonesian
Recognized Languages: Indonesian and 652 known native languages
Flag:
National Anthem (optional): Indonesia Raya

Head of State: President Prabowo Subianto
HoS Picture:
Head of Government: President Prabowo Subianto
HoG Picture: Same as HoS
Legislature Name: People's Consultative Assembly (MPR)
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Gerindra

GDP Nominal: $1.72 trillion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $5,364
GDP (PPP): $4.7 trillion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $16,124
Currency: Indonesian rupiah (Rp) (IDR)

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges:
A house divided - Considering that President Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) did not want to step down from his position as a president of Indonesia, the TNI along with the People's Representative Council launched a coup on the president, leading to a civil war between the citizens of Indonesia and the TNI, which ended in victory for the citizens of Indonesia.

Unstable government - The civil war did ended up causing the missing of several good Indonesian politicians, which forced the chosen citizens to run the country without knowing whether if what they're doing was right. This lead to many problems caused by the politicians' inefficient decisions.

War in Papua - Indonesia has been fighting against the Papuan separatists for years.

Unity in democracy - The war did unite the Indonesian citizens under a new democracy without the military interference in politics.

Anti-corruption - The newly elected politicians know that President Suharto might have become the most corrupt president in Indonesia, and that the People's Representative Council did what they wanted to do against President Gus Dur because of money influences. They don't want the same thing to happen again.

Stable economy - The monetary crisis failed to destroy the Indonesian economy in 1998, leading to a more stable economy condition.

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges:
Threat from the North - The Indonesian military are still aware of the Chinese ships in the Natuna Sea (which is called as South China Sea by China), and they are worried if China and the USSR will launch an attack on Indonesia, considering that President Suharto make it looks like Indonesia is leaning to the West.

Neutralism - According to the laws, Indonesia is forced to stay neutral in case the West and the East clashed against one another, although it is hard for Indonesia to stay neutral considering that China is currently claiming the Natuna Sea as theirs.

The South China Sea Disputes - China claimed the Natuna Sea as theirs, even though according to the agreement, it was owned by Indonesia. Since President Megawati lead Indonesia, Chinese ships caught committing illegal fishing in the Natuna Sea are approached directly by the TNI AL and if they tried to escape, they are to be destroyed. That is until the Chinese ships are caught in North of the Natuna Sea. From then the TNI AL is on high alert, stand ready in case a war broke out between Indonesia and China.

Military Information:
Name: Indonesian National Army (TNI)
Motto: Tri Dharma Eka Karma (Three services, one determination)
Service branches: TNI AD (Ground Force), TNI AL (Navy), TNI AU (Air Force)
Commander in chief: President Prabowo Subianto
Minister of defense: General Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan
Chief of staff: Admiral Yudo Margono
Conscription: Yes

Military Size:
Active personnel: 800,000
Reserve personnel: 1,095,000
Military manpower: 1,895,000
Available for military service (civilian aged 15-49): 108,000,000

AFVs
Tanks: 460 units (203 MBTs)
Armored vehicles: 1,523 units
Light armored vehicles: 514 units
Light strike vehicles: 156 units

Artilleries:
Ballistic missiles: 15 units
Rocket Launcher: 87 units
Howitzer: 579 units (399 without the old howitzers)
Surface-to-air missiles: 99 units
Anti-aircraft guns: 405 units

Aircrafts (TNI AD):
Attack helicopters: 48 units
Transport helicopters: 260 units
Fixed wing aircrafts: 8 units

Watercrafts (TNI AD):
Fast boats: 43 units
Transport ships: 10 units

Aircrafts (TNI AU):
Stealth fighters: 15 units
Fighters: 162 units
Maritime patrols: 10 units
Tankers: 3 units
Transports: 71 units
UAVs: 31 units
Trainer aircrafts: 1,884 units

Ships:
Submarines: 5 units
Frigates: 21 units
Corvettes: 25 units
Fast attack crafts: 32 units
Patrol boats: 31 units
Fast interceptor crafts: 88 units
Mine countermeasures vessels: 11 units
Multipurpose support ships: 36 units
Training ships: 8 units
Tanker ships: 5 units
Command ships: 1 unit

Other military informations:
-5 KF-21 Boramae units are serving the TNI AU
-3 F-35 Lightning II units are serving the TNI AU
-7 JTD-3 Soedirman units are serving the TNI AU, although many things need to be fixed in order to increase the stealth effectivity of the fighter jet

Notes:
-The amount 108,000,000 people in the data will stand against invaders in their own island, which make Java more protected then other islands. It is also as a form of the Indonesian law which says, "Every Indonesian citizens are allowed/obligated to protect the homeland" which means every Indonesians are allowed to join the military and obligated to fight for Indonesia when Indonesia was attacked.

Alliances (If different from IRL): N/A (although currently leaning a bit to the West and might want to have an alliance with the USA once China showed the signs of possible military aggression)

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP):
-1998, survived the monetary crisis
-2002, Suharto stop being a president
-2002, Gus Dur rise to power
-2004, The coup
-2004, Indonesian Civil War - Clash between the loyalist and democrat TNI and between the citizens
-2005, Fall of Jakarta
-2005, Peace agreement between the loyalist TNI soldiers and democrats
-2009, first election: Megawati won the election
-2012, the term reformation
-2012, resignation of Timor Timor
-2012, Treaty of Denpasar
-2014, second election: Megawati won the election
-2016, war against terrorists
-2018, South China Sea Disputes
-2018, Massive military reformation
-2019, third election: Joko Widodo won the election
-2020, COVID in Indonesia
-2022, New normal
-2024, fourth election: Prabowo Subianto won the election
-2024, legalized conscription

Do not remove - ALPHA777

Note: I am open for advices and I'm willing to edit it (when I've got time of course) :)

Accepted
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:07 pm

Here is the Discord! It is highly, highly recommended that you join as lots of meetings etc are easiest to host here and lots of OOC discussion occurs on the Discord.

https://discord.gg/d28rwDW3pZ
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:38 pm

Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:49 pm

Start date is January 20th, 2025
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
New Provenance
Diplomat
 
Posts: 567
Founded: Jan 09, 2021
Democratic Socialists

Postby New Provenance » Thu Mar 23, 2023 6:22 am

Nationstates Name: New Provenance
Nation Name: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Capital: London
Territory: IRL British Isles, British Overseas Territories, Falkland Islands
Population: 68,300,000 (est. 2025)
Official Language: English
Recognized Languages: English
Flag:
Image

National Anthem (optional): God Save the King (2022-present)

Head of State: King Charles III
HoS Picture:
Image

Head of Government: Prime Minister Theresa May (since 2021)
HoG Picture (If different from HoS):
Image

Legislature Name: UK Parliament, divided into the un-elected House of Lords (upper house) and the elected House of Commons (lower house)
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Conservative majorities in both houses of Parliament

GDP Nominal: $4.3 trillion USD (est. 2025)
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $61,493 USD (est. 2025)
GDP (PPP):
GDP (PPP) Per Capita:
Currency: British Pound

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges:
No to May - With the 2025 general election looming, the Conservative Party conference has splintered into two factions. One is the 'committed conservatives', formed by pro-austerity and anti-EU forces within the Tory party, despises Prime Minister Theresa May for her windfall tax and her moderate stances on the economy. Second is the 'Cameronite' faction, composed of moderate, centrist and pro-EU forces who strongly backed former prime minister David Cameron during his time as party leader; this faction opposes May for being 'back and forth' on many issues. May must unite the party lest she suffer a defeat to Labour in a generally competitive election.
Cost of Living - While Theresa May's government has managed to mostly subdue the economic distress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic five years ago, cost of living remains irritating to ordinary Britons, and a plurality of voters say Labour is more suited to manage the economy, albeit by only a 4% margin. In an effort to gain moderate support within her own party after it splintered over the party response to immigration and COVID, May doubled down on more moderate fiscal measures of reigning in the economy, opting not to pursue defense cuts, NHS cuts, or other major forms of austerity during her premiership. Nonetheless, cost of living and housing costs especially remain an issue, which Labour intends to bring up in the campaign.
Shadow of Brexit - While Brexit was voted down by 50.4% of Britons in the 2016 leave referendum, the shadow of the movement remains. Nigel Farage, now the leader of Reform UK, maintains a grip over the more far-right nationalistic members of the voting base, who have defected from the Tories as May has sought to moderate her party especially after the party saw its majority shrink in the 2019 general election. While the Brexit movement has lost traction in the country as of late, its supporting forces remain bitter over the 2016 fight.

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges:
Not the Empire - Theresa May has sought to present herself as the Margaret Thatcher of the 21st Century by supporting a multi-stage, comprehensive overhaul of the British Armed Forces and the Royal Navy especially during her premiership. However, she recognizes and the British government recognizes that the UK is no longer the Empire. Its influence globally is waning against newer powers like China, though the May government has sought to push back by strengthening Britain's place on the world stage and developing its military capabilities, while strengthening its participation in the European Union, NATO, and other alliances.
Brother or Client - Some within the Conservative Party, more right-wing elements particularly, have questioned the country's tight 'brotherhood' relationship with the United States. Nigel Farage has called the partnership 'one-sided' and has called on the British government to 'make itself independent and self-sustaining again'. Support for the US-UK special relationship remains as high as ever, but the whispers in the background remain.

The May government is more hawkish than the IRL Johnson government, as May seeks to mimic the straightforward and hawkish attitude of Margaret Thatcher during her tenure in Number 10.

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here):

UK Defense Budget:
$68.3 billion (2021, +12.6% from 2020)
$69.5 billion (2022, +2.3% from 2021)
$73.4 billion (2023, +5.0% from 2022)
$75.8 billion (2024, +3.2% from 2023)

Current Budget: $75.8 billion under the 2024 budget, $76.6 billion to potentially be sought under the 2025 budget

Manpower:
Pop: 68,300,000
Total Military Personnel: 269,000
- (221,000 active personnel)
- (48,000 reserve personnel)

Army Personnel: 128,500 active
Air Force Personnel: 42,000 active
Navy Personnel: 50,500 active

ROYAL AIR FORCE
- 42,000 active personnel
- 175 fighters (154 at readiness), with procurements of F-16Vs, F-35s, and the deployment of refurbished Eurofighters
- 262 helicopters (224 at readiness), with procurement of new Westland Puma HC2s, AH-64E Guardians, and the refurbishment of AgustaWestland Apaches
- 81 UAVs (74 at readiness), with the procurement and maintenance of Thales Watchkeeper WK450s

BRITISH ARMY
- 128,500 active personnel
- 245 tanks (212 at readiness), with procurements of Israeli Merkava Mark 2s in 2012
- 2,330 armored fighting vehicles (roughly at 65% readiness), with procurements of Ajaxes, CVR(T)s, and Bulldog FV 430 variants
- 174 towed and MLRS rocket artillery (155 at readiness), with procurement of new Sky Sabres and GMRLS

ROYAL NAVY
- 50,500 active personnel
- 15 submarines (with the addition of 5 Astute-class submarines produced between 2017 and 2025)
- 2 aircraft carriers (Queen Elizabeth-class)
- 11 destroyers (+5 Type 45 destroyers between 2017 and 2025)
- 12 frigates (no change)
- 28 patrol vessels (+2 River-class PVs between 2022 and 2025)


Alliances (If different from IRL): The United Kingdom remains a member of all IRL alliances. Brexit did NOT take place in this timeline, as the leave vote was defeated by just over 50% of Britons voting against leaving the Union. Today, Britain is a more active member of the European Union and continues to adhere to international and EU accords on immigration and such.

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP):

1992 - John Major is elected Prime Minister as the Conservatives sweep to one of their largest victories in history, with 41% of the vote
1993 - The Back to Basics campaign is introduced by the Major government, but becomes a political liability for the Conservatives as a series of ministerial scandals unravel that show Tory hypocrisy
1994 - In a bid to shift public opinion as polls showed Labour likely to win the coming 1997 general election, Major unveiled a series of military investment efforts that was later coupled with law enforcement investment legislation that would be passed in late 1994 and early 1995. This policy would see a re-orientation of Britain's military doctrine to a more 'active defense' and a generally more interventionist doctrine, in light of the Gulf War and an increasingly sidelined Britain on the world stage
1997 - Tony Blair elected Prime Minister in a landslide victory where Labour secures its first majority in decades
2001 - After failed attempts to initiate comprehensive healthcare reform, Blair is re-elected into office by a smaller margin than expected - there is no "silent majority" victory for Labour, and 2005 is pinned as a potential point where the Tories could return to power
2005 - Blair is re-elected with 40.4% of the vote (rather than only 35% IRL) despite Conservative efforts to pin Labour as failing to fulfill its promises on healthcare. Sensing his time as premier beginning to approach its conclusion, Blair worked with his renewed majority to pursue comprehensive reforms to the National Health Service. NHS austerity was ended and significant funding increases to the service would be implemented, alongside efforts to double the number of doctors and medical professionals to prevent possible patient backlogs. Internal transparency programs would be implemented, waiting times brought down by allowing private providers to expand their treatment options while keeping said private treatments free, and Blair would block negotiations to boost doctors' pay rises whilst allowing them to take significantly more evening and weekend leave.
2007 - Blair pushes on without resignation and opts to push for a national crime bill, that sought to expand rehabilitation for drug users and provide short-term 'job acquirement assistance' to the homeless to help them get access to free short-term vocational and occupational training. The effort, while successful and generally popular, was undercut by Blair's decision to not include amendments to boost the number of police officers on the ground and allocate additional funding to 'diversify' their equipment arsenals
2009 - Facing old age and with David Cameron presenting himself as a youthful alternative to lead the country into the second decade of the 21st century, Blair announces his intention to step down from party leadership to allow a 'young alternative' to 'lead Labour to a victory'. For this task, Gordon Brown is selected.
2010 - Brown is only prime minister from November of 2009 to May of 2010, when David Cameron carries the Conservative Party to a victory, on a platform of 'fiscal responsibility'. He does not openly advocate for austerity, and voices his support for moderate policies like greater cooperation with the EU on border security. A coalition with the Liberal Democrats forces Cameron to moderate his views and his policy as prime minister.
2012 - Pursuing a strengthening of the armed forces and a development of readiness capabilities, Prime Minister Cameron announces a deal for the purchase of Merkava Mark 2s from Israel to supplement existing primary armored combat vehicle units in the British Army. During the same period, a bill was pushed through Parliament accelerating the development of next-generation, independent combat platforms, including the proposed Challenger 3 and other domestic defense programs. (This would accelerate the Challenger 3 timetable from a 2027 introduction to a 2025 introduction)
2013 - As prime minister, Cameron developed a wing of supporters within his party known as the 'Cameronites', who are generally characterized as moderates, centrists, and 'compassionate conservatives' who supported Cameron's premiership with enthusiasm. From his election onward, Cameron pursued policies that were pro-multilateralist and generally moderate on social issues, with the prime minister emphasizing the need to 'develop a Britain that respects the cultures that comprise our united kingdom'. He pursued education and infrastructure as his top priorities, making investments into the education system and expanding government transparency efforts to allow the government to cut unnecessary costs. Austerity would not be implemented, but budgetary cuts to the military would be seen. Infrastructure was supported early on by Cameron, but he shied away from making heavy investments towards the latter part of his tenure. He supported efforts to take down poverty by expanding pre-school and technical school access in the country, and encouraging the development of childcare services across the country. Cameron (as IRL) supported same-sex marriage, calling it a 'matter of equality, not a matter of my conservatism'.
2015 - The 2015 general election saw Conservatives secure a legitimate majority, nullifying the need for a coalition with the Liberal Democrats. In this election, the SNP also rose to prominence in Scotland, at the expense of Labour, now under Ed Milliband. Cameron campaigned on a generally successful premiership, allowing him to cruise to re-election with relative ease. He pursued tourism and EU relations as the primary focus for his second term as prime minister.
2016 - Brexit campaign and referendum. Forces within the Conservative Party who had grown distasteful of Cameron's so-called 'false conservatism' had successfully pushed an EU leave referendum through the House of Commons. Cameron and his moderate allies campaigned hard against the effort, with Labour joining forces. When the leave vote was finally held, 50.4% of Britons voted against leaving, while 48.9% voted to leave. The referendum was a victory for the pro-EU Cameron government, who was emboldened by the victory. The defeat strengthened Cameron's position in government.
2018 - Cameron pushes a new round of military investments in a successful bid to pledge to boost UK military defense spending, UK active and reserve personnel, and 'a greater, more prepared Royal Navy'. The plan established a staged initiative to boost funding for the UK military above the NATO minimum and well into the range of 60-70 billion by 2024, with plans to fund that by continuing to streamline government spending and the entry of private providers in a regulated manner into the NHS healthcare system from 2017 onwards, in a bid pushed by Cameron in cooperation with the committed conservatives of the party.
2019 - Home Secretary Theresa May presided over a successful crime bill to increase sentences for violent crimes, streamline the judicial system and work on solving case backlogs, and boost the number of police officers on the ground by 25% within five years. Since the failed Brexit referendum (where she earned the ire of the Cameron government for her indifference to the issue), she shifted ever so slightly to the center, becoming a part of the small but highly influential 'middle-ground conservatives' faction in the party - composed of Tories who preferred to work with both the moderate Cameronites and the committed conservatives. This thrusts her into the spotlight as a potential successor to Cameron.
2020 - The COVID-19 pandemic hits (as IRL) and Cameron initiates lockdowns and quarantine mandates to prevent the spread of the virus. In the 2020 general election, in May of 2020, Cameron secures victory as COVID has yet to take its toll on the country. However, the various waves of the virus takes a toll on Cameron and his premiership, and in December of 2020 and in early 2021, a large spike in COVID cases led to resignations within Cameron's government. Facing a party that was fracturing over lockdown and quarantine rules, Cameron resigned in May of 2021, almost exactly a year after winning his third term in office. He is succeeded in a party leadership election by Theresa May, the Home Secretary who began immediate work to bring the party together after the fracturing over COVID. She brings comprehensive economic legislation to tackle the crisis, including an injection of funds into NHS emergency services, the establishment of 'virtual appointments' to alleviate the pressure on hospitals and on in-person medical professionals, and the procurement of the proper amount of PPEs needed in Britain's hospitals. Her COVID combating efforts, however, are undermined by repeated surges and calls from her right flank to lift the quarantine and lockdown - which she eventually does in mid-2022.
2023 - With the COVID pandemic finally settling, May turns her attention to strengthening the NHS system by bringing in well-regulated private companies to boost capacity and increase insurance coverage over a wider amount of Britons. She also unveils a new, more hawkish foreign policy as she seeks to mimic Margaret Thatcher in that sense. Cost of living is tackled primarily by cuts to the income tax and to the VAT tax, afforded for thanks to Cameron's fiscally responsible policies as prime minister. Price caps on essential goods, electricity, and heating are implemented, and May's government sits down with providers of these services to work to bring costs down over time. A windfall tax on wealthy corporations and excess profits in the energy and petroleum industries are implemented in a highly controversial move that earns May the ire of committed conservatives in the party.
2024 - May advocates for energy independence, unveiling a plan to wean Britain off Eastern oil and boost energy independence in light of 'how Britain operated during the pandemic'. Plans to expand the reach and ability of the NHS to provide healthcare are also laid down, with plans to strengthen private sector involvement even more. Military funding increases continue under May's government, which allows Labour to attack the May government on their failure to reign in the economy sufficiently enough. (Nonetheless, there is a positive change in how the UK was affected by cost of living compared to IRL)
2024-present - May faces pressure from both Cameronites like George Osborne and committed conservatives like Rishi Sunak and 'fringe wing' MPs like Liz Truss to change the direction of the party ahead of the next general election, scheduled for May 2025 as per the Fixed-term Parliaments Act of 2011 (not repealed in this timeline).


Do not remove - ALPHA777
Last edited by New Provenance on Sat Mar 25, 2023 8:27 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Chewion
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20696
Founded: May 21, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Chewion » Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:05 pm

Yaruqo wrote:
Nationstates Name: Yaruqo
Nation Name: Republic of Iran
Capital: Tehran
Territory: IRL Iran
Population: 90,410,659
Official Language: Farsi
Recognized Regional Languages: Azerbaijani, Kurdish, Gilak, Mazanderani, Luri, Balochi, Arabic, and various other regional languages.
Flag:
(Image)
National Anthem: Ey Iran (shortened)

Head of State: President Reza Pahlavi (Independent)
HoS Picture:

Head of Government: Prime Minister Sayyid Mohammad Sadeq Kharazi (NEDA)
HoG Picture:

Legislature Name: The National Assembly (Persian: گردهمایی ملی, romanized: Mad̲j̲les-e mellī), or simply the Majles. Unicameral legislature.
Party in Power: A large tent coalition consisting of numerous secularist parties currently holds a majority within the Majles, with most of the parties falling under the center-left or center-right. The coalition currently consists of the social democratic Nedaye Iranian Party (NEDA), the Iranian Solidarity & Labour Party (ISL), the center-right National Trust Party (NTP), the centrist Executives of Construction Party (ECP), and the center-left Will of the Iranian Nation Party (HAMA), as well as a handful of smaller parties.

GDP Nominal: $2.022 trillion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $22,368
GDP (PPP): $1.830 trillion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $20,245
Currency: Iranian rial (ریال) (IRR)

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges:

A Republic, if You Can Keep It: Unlike most of its regional neighbors, Iran has the advantage of an educated population that genuinely supports a democratic regime. But democracy alone cannot fix the nation’s problems, and if the democratic government is unable to address the needs of the Iranian people in the short and long term, democratic institutions could face serious challenges.

It’s Always About the Money: While the Iranian nation has struggled under the international sanctions regime as a result of the Ayatollah’s nuclear program and various human rights violations, it’s been the hope of many Iranians that a new regime will mean that the nation’s economic woes will be rectified, including the startling rates of inflation and youth unemployment that continue to plague Iran.

Let’s Not Blow This Out of Proportion: Iran’s nuclear energy sector, historically beset by international sanctions and Israeli clandestine operations, could use a silver lining. Many hope that, without the Ayatollah in power, the Iranian government can pursue a genuinely civilian nuclear industry, which would address shortfalls in domestic energy supplies. But just because Tehran might seek to focus on the development of civilian nuclear infrastructure, doesn’t mean that Israel (or even Saudi Arabia) will tolerate it.


Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges:

A Delicate Line: The relationship between Iran and Israel is, to say the least, fragile. While the new regime was quick to re-establish formal diplomatic relations with the United States, decades of anti-Zionist propaganda has meant that relations with Israel, which was derecognized in 1979 by the Islamic Republic, could not be re-established.

It’s Always About the Money, Part 2: With the downfall of the regime of the ayatollahs, the new democratic regime is hoping to regain control of the various frozen and seized assets that have been held around the world, including various assets that were held in the wake of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Without the return of those assets and the flow of foreign investment, the Iranian economy could risk stagnation and further decline.

The Great Game II: On the plus side, it helps when your democratic revolution has the backing of both the Americans and the Soviets. But now you have to contend with both currying favor - and seeking returns on their “investment” - in a way that means every action you take could affect the balance of power in the region, and could result in unintended consequences.

Military Information: Branches of the Iranian Armed Forces (Artesh): Ground Forces; Air Force; Navy; and the Air Defense Force. The Iranian Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) and its affiliates were dissolved by the transitional government, and the IRGC’s financial assets were seized, as well. The Law Enforcement branch was dissolved in favor of civilian police departments on local, provincial, and federal levels.

The Ground Forces consist of approximately 350,000 personnel. They also possess 3,892 tanks, 64,288 vehicles, 574 self-propelled artillery pieces, 2,032 towed artillery pieces, and 992 MLRS rocket artillery pieces.

The Air Force hosts around 37,000 personnel. They possess around 523 total aircraft, including 190 fighters, 18 attack types, 84 fixed-wing transports, 94 trainers, 9 special-mission aircraft, 7 tankers, 120 helicopters, and 10 attack helicopters.

The Navy has approximately 18,000 personnel. They possess 101 total assets, including 7 frigates, 3 corvettes, 19 submarines, 21 patrol vessels, and 1 mine warfare vessel.

And finally, the Air Defense Forces have about 15,000 personnel. They possess a multitude of assets.

The new government has kept defense spending at around 2, 2.5% of the nation’s GDP.

Alliances: No change, don’t think they’re in any defense pacts or alliances.

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP): The POD is centered on the Mahsa Amini protests of 2022. ITL, the regime, egged on by hardliners within the Supreme Council and the IRGC, cracks down heavily against protesters after nearly a month of continuous protests. When these protests continue to persist and grow outside of the student population and into working class communities around the provinces, the IRGC makes the fateful decision to begin a campaign against the protests, starting with summarily and publicly executing hundreds of detained protesters, rather than stick to the regime’s preferred method of giving them a mock trial and executing them in private.

The barbarity of the move shocks the country into near universal outrage. A general strike is announced, and the IRGC and its Basij react harshly. In the past, such crackdowns were met with the flight of strikers and protesters. But with the cruelty of the regime on full display, during the week of November 7th, 2022, the protests and strikers began to fight back. Army units and disaffected IRGC and Law Enforcement units begin to either arm protesters or outright join them, and reports of street battles around the country start to slip past the country’s tightlipped media environment. As the situation continues to unfold, Reza Pahlavi, the son of the ousted Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, serves as a unifying voice for the opposition in Iran, encouraging them to keep up the fight while he rallied for support among the Iranian diaspora and their various host countries in the West and USSR.

Despite the pressure and the threat of civil war, Supreme Leader Ali Khameini doubled down in his support of the IRGC’s actions. With the working class, students, the Army, and now members of the Iranian merchant class starting to rebel against the regime, Commander-in-Chief of the Iranian Army Abdolrahim Mousavi publicly declared that the Iranian Army could not support the regime, but that it would not actively engage in armed insurrection against the government.

IRGC units would begin to find themselves hunted by their old compatriots, and soon the regime’s forces began defecting, deserting, or otherwise reconsolidating their positions within Tehran. There, street fighting between rebel units and IRGC units, as well as continuous and pitched mass demonstrations and sit downs, would sound the death knell for the regime of the ayatollahs.

Supported by the United States and the Soviet Union, the opposition arranged for Reza Pahlavi to become the impending transitional government’s leader, on the condition that he sign away any and all claim to the throne of Persia, a condition that he [reluctantly] accepted. As the regime’s leaders fled the country to whatever safe havens they could find, a new interim government would be established on January 7th, 2023, a day made ironic in that a Pahlavi was returning to be the new regime’s president on the anniversary of the start of the revolution that ousted his own father.

For many Iranians, though, they didn’t care. The new transitional authority went to work on drafting a new, democratic constitution (which would be approved via referendum that May), normalizing relations with the United States, and addressing the ills of the Islamic Republic’s regime. The first free and fair elections for the Iranian parliament and presidency were held on July 15th, 2023, with Reza Pahlavi running for a first term as an independent and winning, and secularist parties having a marginal majority in the National Assembly, where they would form a secularist unity government.



Do not remove - ALPHA777

Accepted.
Pro: America, guns, freedom, democracy, military, Trump, conservatism, Israel, capitalism, state rights.

User avatar
Catalaonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 201
Founded: Oct 15, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Catalaonia » Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:45 pm

NewLakotah wrote:
Catalaonia wrote:Nationstates Name: Catalaonia
Nation Name: Union of Yugoslavic Republics (Yugoslavia)
Capital: Belgrade, Federal Republic of Serbia
Territory: All Territories under Former Yugoslavia.
Population: 28.7 Million (Approx)
Official Language: Serbian and Bosnian
Recognized Languages: Serbian, Bosnian, Slovenian, Kosovar and Croatian.
Flag:
(Image)
National Anthem (optional): N/A

Head of State: President Ratimir Smirnov (NP)
HoS Picture: https://imgur.com/y8YM6hC
Head of Government: President Ratimir Smirnov
HoG Picture (If different from HoS): N/A
Legislature Name: Yugoslavian Assembly
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): National Party-Democratic Unionist Coalition

GDP Nominal: $674 Billion
GDP Nominal Per Capita: $17,650 per capita
GDP (PPP): $709 Billion
GDP (PPP) Per Capita: $21,763 per capita
Currency: Yugoslavian Dinar

Domestic Policy Overview/Challenges:

Nationalism at every angle - Despite the 1986 Belgrade Conference, which established a new constitution, recognition of nationalist sentiments and the creation of a multi-party democracy, sentiments across the federation remain strong, especially in Bosnia and Slovakia, who faced the worse of the 1991 Yugoslavian Crises, which was an 11-month internal conflict from nationalist groups against the Yugoslav army, killing over 140,000 people. This remains both a political problem for the union, but also an economic problem.

Honeymoon Period is over - Known as the Golden Era of Yugoslavia, between 1988-2008, the Yugoslavian economy doubled in it's size, mostly due to the radical market reforms during the early 90's, as-well as the nation's entry into the EU in 1995, however, the 2008 Crises ended all progress, and forced the government at the time to enter a 4-year period of strict austerity measures. While the economy still remains in a growing period, the honeymoon period of the 90's and 2000's seems to be over.

Weak, Weak, Weak! - Yugoslavia's weak government, having seen a coalition government since 1990, has been a problem since then, and has created the notion that the nation may not be stable, with most parties disagreeing on major issues. The current government disagrees on both economic and social issues, with the National Party wanting a more conservative social policy as opposed to the more liberal Democratic Union.

Diversity - Yugoslavia has a diverse set of cultures and nationalities, and while some have suggested it was a miracle Yugoslavia avoided a civil war during the Bosnian Cold Conflict from 1988-1995 and the Slovenian Independence War of 1990, the melting pot of cultures has left Yugoslavia with the issue of further devolution.

The Cold Conflict - Ever since 2018, Yugoslavia has been involved in a cold conflict against ultra-nationalist Bosnian paramilitaries, and has cost the lives of 1,500 people since it began. This has created a notion that nationalist movements are still rife across the nation, albeit not to the extend of the late 80's to early 90's.

Foreign Policy Overview/Challenges:

Socialism at the door step - Having successfully transitioned during the mid-90's from a communist economy to that of a mixed, lazes-faire system, they are currently bordered with socialist and communist states, which makes it a tricky battle considering they are part of the EU.

Military Information (If different from irl you must indicate that here):

Branches of Yugoslavia's Military:
- Yugoslavian Army
- Yugoslavian Navy
- Yugoslavian Air Force
- Yugoslavian Home Force

Yugoslavian Army
Having seen large deductions since the end of the 1988 Crises, the army currently has 110,000 Regular troops split into 8 Army Groups, with around 350,000 Reservists split into 16 Army Reserve Groups. They are currently armed with late 2000's era weaponry, with some of the reserve groups armed with weaponry from the 90's. Although not involved in any international operations, they are involved, in a limited basis, with the ongoing Bosnian Insurgency, with over 3,500 men in current active operation.

Yugoslavian Navy
The Navy has not seen conflict in many decades, and has been in a period of gradual cuts, currently housing 9,950 Personal and with 80 Vessels. The navy has been for the last 7 years the lowest spending area of the Yugoslavian Military, and houses currently it's biggest asset, 5 submarines, all bought from the USA in the mid-2010's. The majority of ships are Patrol Boats, mostly used to combat against drugs coming through to ports, and have not been in combat use since the second world war.

Yugoslavian Air Force
Much like the Navy, it has seen little action, only limited to that of the latter stages of the Yugoslav War, although had been in some use in 2019 and 2023 during the Bosnian Insurgency. Small but effective, the air force has a wide use of helicopters and jets, although still within the 90's and early 2000's versions, they would not be ready with conflict from another nation, and merely used for domestic purposes.

Alliances (If different from IRL): EU and UN.

History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP):

May, 1980 - The death of long-standing communist leader, Josip Broz Tito, led to a furious debate between the Conservatives and Progressives. Conservatives wanted a similar tito-idelogue as President of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, with elder statesman and long-time supporter, Petar Bolkic, who had been part of the Yugoslav government since the early-50's, with progressives supporting a young radical by the name of Branislav Svetleachni, who had supported a gradual change to a more market-driven economy, as-well as supporting the multi-party democracy, a growing faction in governed since the early 70's. On the 20th May, Bolkic was elected by a landslide victory, mostly due to promises for some market-driven reforms, while also wanting to keep Tito's legacy stable and straight.

1980-1983 - Bolkic introduces some reforms, such as the Market Reform Act, which makes some effort to stabilise the collapsing Yugoslavian economy. He quickly introduces harsh austerity, raising land taxes by almost 20% to keep the money flowing. During the first 3 years, Bolkic faced constant battles in government between Conservatives and Progressives, as he was unable to keep either side happy. His only real victory was considered when he successfully put down an attempted Bosnian insurgency in November, 1982 without many casualties. His unpopularity and a growing resentment to the communist state, and Yugoslavia as a whole, led to his resignation in May, 1983.

1983-1985 - Bolkic's replacement was a progressive-driven Svetleachni, who was considered even to some reformists to be far too radical. He managed to win in a vote due to his (false) promises to keep the communist regime alive, but his economic policies were far different. He quickly proposed new market reforms, state price deductions and an end to the communist system. During his 2 years, he made wide ranging changes, such as the creation of Regional Assemblies, ending of austerity measures, new freedoms for the free-market and a new supply-side driven economics. His radical economic reforms did the opposite of stabilisation, driving up inflation and creating a supply crises in the nation. By the end of 1985, he faced the potential collapse of Yugoslavia all together.

1986 Liberalisation of the People - By March, 1986, insurgencies and uprisings occurred across Yugoslavia, as a growing census for the overthrowing of not just the communist regime, but of Yugoslavia become real. While he garnered up thousands of troops to defeat these insurgencies, the biggest one within Bosnia, he proposed a new Liberalisation of the People, which would make grand-sweeping reforms, introducing new democratic practises, creation of a wide-ranged assembly, socially liberal reforms and a path to the survival of the state. However, he purged the Conservatives in a bloody period of 3 weeks, arresting or killing them, now trying to unify his government before implementing his radical reforms. By the end of the month, his cabinet was full of progressive yes-men, and began the Liberalisation of the People.

1986-1988 - The reforms, while managed to clam down inflation by the economy now used to a more balanced public-private system, and the re-structuring of the Yugoslavian government managing to create a much more efficient law-making system, as the market-based supply now became settled in Yugoslavia, Svetleachni now made large offensives on these insurgencies, committing a 2-year campaign of their defeat. While successful in Slovenia and Croatia, the Bosnian Insurgency remained so, but the bulk of the Yugoslavian Wars was not done yet. The next 2 years, he faced little political opposition, and slowly managed to drive the economy back to a growing nation in Europe. He softened the nation's stance on NATO in 1988, and became far more neutral as the cold war slowly came to a close.

Yugoslav Wars (1989 - 1994) - However, merely 8 months later, and the Bosnian Nationalist Army, Croatia Movement of the People and the Slovenian Paramilitaries attempted to break-free of Yugoslavian control, after almost a decade of economic decline, regional disparities and the partly due to Svetleachni's reforms, which had liberalised much of Yugoslavia's nation, socially and economically. The 5-year war saw siege and conflict spur up across the nation, as a growing faction of separatists among the Communist Party who called for the breaking of Yugoslavia. During the war, the Yugoslavic government attempted to create peace on 2 occasions, the 1990 Belgrade Convention was the first international attempt to bring peace, with major nations hoping for an end to the wars. However, this collapsed after just 3 days of negotiation .

The war saw over 150,000 killed, with war crimes committed across the board. In 1992, the Second Belgrade Conference laid the foundations for peace and prosperity in the nation, which promised, with unanimous acceptance, introduction of multi-party democracy and the restructuring of the state to give further autonomy to federal states. It was accepted by all bar one, Bosnia, with the Federal President of Bosnia supporting the ultra-nationalist Bosnian Freedom Army. The conflict continued on for another 2 years, with during those 2 years, 35,000 people were killed, with the Tuesday Massacre seeing the deaths of over 850 civilians by the Bosnian Regiment of Yugoslavia. By 1994, the BFA had been defeated after the Battle of Neum, ending the war.

This led to the 3rd Belgrade Convention, with submitted further reforms of a modern democracy, despite's it's unpopularity with large swaths of his government and the party, Svetleachni' put it forward and was accepted. The 3rd convention saw the creation of multi-party elections, creation of regional assemblies and the motion of a "gradual removal socialism and communism". The motives for this radical shift are unknown, with some suggesting he had wanted a much softer version of socialism, opting for democratic socialism, while others have suggested that Svetleachni' was putting the security of Yugoslavia first before the party and government. However, a new era had come to Yugoslavia, but would it last.

1997 Parliamentary Elections - Svetleachni' quickly stepped down after the creation of multi-party democracy, calling for a new leader to bring Yugoslavia into the next era. He was replaced by two interim leaders from 1994-1997, that being a statesman by the name of Boleslaw Dubnov, who led until 1996, and Orlin Jaksch, who led for only 4 months until resigning before the 1997 elections, sighting potential defeat. Since the end of the Yugoslav Wars, there had been the establishment of 3 main parties; Democratic Union (A centre-right party), National Party (a right-wing conservative party) and the Labour and Farmer's Party (a democratic socialist party). It was highly suspected it was to be a hung parliament, with general popularity for each party at a stand-still.

It saw the DU wins the polarity of seats, with the LFP winning the second most. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia, while still popular in some areas, was seen as leading to old ideas, and placed 4th behind the National Party. This led to a DU-LFP coalition and the first democratically-elected government in Yugoslavia's history.

1997-2005 - The next 8 years would see a period of stability and growth for Yugoslavia. Led by centrist statesman Blahoslav Shevchenko, leader of the Democratic Union, he would make further liberal reforms socially, legalising abortion as-well as the Freedom of Religion Act. He made large-scale investments into education and infrastructure in a re-building period for the nation. In 1999, he banned the Communist Party, arresting over 150 former members of the party. Shevchenko, while he increased the nation's debt in the short-term, managed to establish a modern education system and much better infrastructure, slowly transforming Yugoslavia into a modern democracy. The DU increased it's seat share by 34 seats, while still remaining in a coalition, and looked onwards and upwards. Yugoslavia also entered the EU in 2005 during the enlargement era.

2005-2008 - By the 2005 Parliamentary elections, Shevchenko resigned due to ill-health, replaced by Vice President Zelik Bakalowits, and faced a popular National Front who opposed EU entry and wanted further liberalisation of the economy, sighting the large amount of economic intervention in the markets to be preventing large economic growth. In the election, Bakalowits and the FLP managed to survive, although was forced into a divided coalition with the National Party to keep stable governance. During this period, Bakalowits was forced to make large military investment, as-well as he was unable to gain majority support for new education reforms. By 2008, he called a snap election to gain the FLP-DU coalition back.

2008-2012 - The 2008 election saw the DU-FLP coalition back, with elder statesman Dragotin Marinovic as President. Dragotin Marinovic encountered the financial crises in his first tenure, and saw to create mass stimulus packages, bailouts and investment into the economy to battle it, dramatically increasing the nation's national debt. Marinovic's investments, while successful to prevent a collapse, failed to prevent the halt of growth, and see a 6% drop in economic growth in 2009. He abandoned his investment rhetoric and was forced by the Democratic Union's more hardliner members to enact austerity measures for the 2010 Budget. Although unpopular and considered a traitor to his former investment strategy, Marinovic's measures managed to cut debt in the medium term by 2012, and saw a 1.4% growth in 2012.

2012-2020 - However, Marinovic was forced into the 2012 election unpopular, and faced a National Party Presidency. The 2012 Parliamentary elections saw the National Party finish first, who pushed for reversal of austerity measures and large investment into infrastructure, reforms to social security and a new Yugoslavian identity in the nation. Zbyna Rabinov, leader of the NP, went into a coalition with the Democratic Union, and now looked to make a change. The next four years saw a gradual removal of austerity measures, new right-wing reforms to education, reforms to police which led to increased powers and centralisation of power. Rabinov managed to, despite a loss of seats, see the NP as the largest party in the 2016 Parliamentary elections, beating out an out of touch FLP. The election also saw 2 new parties enter the Yugoslavian Parliament, such as the Socialist Party of Yugoslavia and the Republican Party of Yugoslavia.

During his second tenure as President, he battled the 2017 Bosnian Protests, which did lead to the 2018 Insurgency beginning, as-well as making further investment into healthcare. Although unpopular with some of the more conservative figures of the NP, he was deemed popular by the majority of the nation due to the growing economy and his successful education reforms being a widespread success. However, his popularity dwindled in 2018, when he failed to prevent a Bosnian insurgency from becoming mainstream, and was faced with collapse once more. From 2018-2020, his crackdown's were a failure and he faced a third parliamentary election in 2020 on the backdrop of a growing Covid-19 crises.

2020-2024 - Leader of the Democratic Unionists, a young and aspiring centrist, Milon Jablonski, was deemed the most popular, with the FLP and NP deemed incredible. He won a majority of 4 in the Yugoslavian Parliament, the only majority government. Milon Jablonski, while only leading for 4 years, made major reforms in devolution, creating two new special zones for ethnic minorities in Kosovo and Serbia. However, his lack of economic successes as-well as mismanagement with the growing Bosnian insurgency led to him becoming more unpopular throughout the 4 years, and by 2024, led to him facing defeat.

2024-Present

The 2024 Parliamentary Elections led the National Party managing to gain the most seats, followed by the Democratic Union Party. This led to Ratimir Smirnov, leader of the NP, to become President and facing a regional crises, economic stagnation and a growing second cold war. In his first year, he managed some limited education reforms, as-well as a successful raid in Bosnia to see the killing of a senior figure in the Bosnian Insurgency, taking a hardliner stance on the issue.

Do not remove - ALPHA777

Overall, not too many issues from my POV... however, in the early 1990s I can't see that occurring without US/NATO intervention, similar to what happened IRL. So, if having some level of foreign intervention in order to quell the genocide from the United Nations and NATO works for you then i feel like that would make the most sense in that time period; when America was at its most active and the USSR and Eastern Europe at its most vulnerable.


Sure. well I guess between 1990-1992 would be the highest point of the conflict, considering there was no real effort by the Yugoslav government until the 1992 Belgrade Convention, and so I think between them, Bush would've defiantly intervened. I was thinking that the 1992 Convention would have international involvement from the USA, UK etc. Basically, US involvement between 90-92 could justified another convention, so I think it was just me not mentioning it tbh.

User avatar
NewLakotah
Minister
 
Posts: 2438
Founded: Feb 18, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby NewLakotah » Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:24 pm

Catalaonia wrote:
NewLakotah wrote:Overall, not too many issues from my POV... however, in the early 1990s I can't see that occurring without US/NATO intervention, similar to what happened IRL. So, if having some level of foreign intervention in order to quell the genocide from the United Nations and NATO works for you then i feel like that would make the most sense in that time period; when America was at its most active and the USSR and Eastern Europe at its most vulnerable.


Sure. well I guess between 1990-1992 would be the highest point of the conflict, considering there was no real effort by the Yugoslav government until the 1992 Belgrade Convention, and so I think between them, Bush would've defiantly intervened. I was thinking that the 1992 Convention would have international involvement from the USA, UK etc. Basically, US involvement between 90-92 could justified another convention, so I think it was just me not mentioning it tbh.

Gotcha, yeah that works great from my POV. Intervention during that two-year period would definitely occur.
"How smooth must be the language of the whites, when they can make right look like wrong, and wrong like right." ~~ Black Hawk, Sauk

"When it comes time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song, and die like a hero going home." ~~ Tecumseh

Free Leonard Peltier!!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Portal to the Multiverse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Vadrana

Advertisement

Remove ads