Vaquas wrote:Cybernetic Socialist Republics wrote:
I can't really imagine there is a more effective way of selling this than "It is the literal word of Ronald Reagan that this is the solution to this exact problem and it has also has bipartisan support."
I suppose you could go "you the workers put your labor producing the profits that allowed the purchase of the robots so you deserve a share" but that would be a direct line to being attack as a marxist argument, which is exactly what the take would been had Kurian gone that route, instead of some vague flapping around about it being too 'wonkish' and complex. As if deciding what does and what doesn't count as automation wouldn't be a mess.
But that's ok, I'll just compile a list of (not-x) senate politicians that have supported ESOPs because their real life counterparts did. There's a ton of them. Everyone else can have their chars be against it from some weird reason.
Its not about policy, the policy is fine, its about the average Republican primary voter in the year 2021 after education polarization has radically shifted things.
CNN exit poll puts college graduate support for trump in 2016 at 39% and 41% in 2020. Virtually untouched if it's moved, he gained. This is despite the fact he won in Wisconsin in 2016 and lost in 2020.
When you add to the fact that Wisconsin was won in this timeline by a guy who would easily be more attractive to college educated people than trump, there is literally no reason for me to think college polarization and defection from the Republicans in Wisconsin specifically is worse in this 2020 than real life 2016 or 2020.
again, unless I'm gonna TG about every single thing there's no way I could know what your guys perception of what politics should be is. Maybe If I was in the discord that would be feasible, but as it stands all I can do is look at real life data, I can't read minds.







)
↓





