Advertisement
by Laka Strolistandiler » Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:51 pm
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long
by Sao Nova Europa » Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:53 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:Going to be pro-PRC (kinda) Taiwan. Xi Jinping is somewhat less provocative in public speeches about Taiwan in 2019/2020, so Tsai Ing-wen does not get a bump in polls as in RL and Han Kuo-yu of KMT barely wins the election.
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:53 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:Going to be pro-PRC (kinda) Taiwan. Xi Jinping is somewhat less provocative in public speeches about Taiwan in 2019/2020, so Tsai Ing-wen does not get a bump in polls as in RL and Han Kuo-yu of KMT barely wins the election.
by Chewion » Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:54 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:Sao Nova Europa wrote:Going to be pro-PRC (kinda) Taiwan. Xi Jinping is somewhat less provocative in public speeches about Taiwan in 2019/2020, so Tsai Ing-wen does not get a bump in polls as in RL and Han Kuo-yu of KMT barely wins the election.
I assume that this is approved by OP, right? Just making sure so I don't write app and then get it rejected.
by Sao Nova Europa » Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:55 pm
The Manticoran Empire wrote:Sao Nova Europa wrote:Going to be pro-PRC (kinda) Taiwan. Xi Jinping is somewhat less provocative in public speeches about Taiwan in 2019/2020, so Tsai Ing-wen does not get a bump in polls as in RL and Han Kuo-yu of KMT barely wins the election.
Yeah...uh...that's kinda directly opposed to the current relationship between Taiwan and China in this RP. China is currently just as aggressive to its "rebellious province" as it is IRL.
by Laka Strolistandiler » Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:56 pm
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:All right then- another version. Japan somehow evades 1990’s financial crisis (or it’s effect is far less prevalent than IRL, because of effective gov actions and is able to maintain larger fraction of it’s 80’s economical growth, with the additional continual rise in nationalism, which results in Article 9 being repelled somewhere around late 90’s-early 2000’s. Later Japan would distance itself away from the US further in further, remaining an ally but being more self-dependent in the matter. Also far MORE anti-Chinese than it’s IRL. Maybe will try to regain Kuril Islands diplomatically or something…
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 1:59 pm
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:Nationstates Name: Laka Strolistandiler
Nation Name: Japan
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:The Manticoran Empire wrote:So the earliest major changes can be made is 1990. Which means that the specific way you want Japan to be made more powerful is not possible in the contrivance of our specific RP. However, it is a possibility post 1990. There is a growing political movement in Japan to strengthen Japan's military and it has garnered enough support that Japan is building aircraft carriers again and has deployed troops overseas on more than one occaission.
All right then- another version. Japan somehow evades 1990’s financial crisis (or it’s effect is far less prevalent than IRL, because of effective gov actions and is able to maintain larger fraction of it’s 80’s economical growth, with the additional continual rise in nationalism, which results in Article 9 being repelled somewhere around late 90’s-early 2000’s. Later Japan would distance itself away from the US further in further, remaining an ally but being more self-dependent in the matter. Also far MORE anti-Chinese than it’s IRL. Maybe will try to regain Kuril Islands diplomatically or something…
Also can I reserve Japan until the end of the discussion?
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:02 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:The Manticoran Empire wrote:Yeah...uh...that's kinda directly opposed to the current relationship between Taiwan and China in this RP. China is currently just as aggressive to its "rebellious province" as it is IRL.
PRC has actually cooperated with Taiwan, when it is run by a KMT administration. And a KMT victory is frankly more realistic than a random Republican who endorsed Obama's agenda and is pro-choice winning the elections running against Trump and Biden.
by Sao Nova Europa » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:05 pm
The Manticoran Empire wrote:Sao Nova Europa wrote:
PRC has actually cooperated with Taiwan, when it is run by a KMT administration. And a KMT victory is frankly more realistic than a random Republican who endorsed Obama's agenda and is pro-choice winning the elections running against Trump and Biden.
In the past, they have. But under Xi Jinping? They have not. In fact, they have made it fairly clear the Taiwan can expect no "equitable" resolution to the dispute between Taipei and Beijing. This is made more clear by the reorganization of China's amphibious warfare forces and the growing PLAN.
I should also point out that, if one properly examines the 2020 presidential race and removes the effects of COVID-19, it becomes a lot more plausible to see a more moderate politician win.
by SouthCarolina » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:06 pm
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:07 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:The Manticoran Empire wrote:In the past, they have. But under Xi Jinping? They have not. In fact, they have made it fairly clear the Taiwan can expect no "equitable" resolution to the dispute between Taipei and Beijing. This is made more clear by the reorganization of China's amphibious warfare forces and the growing PLAN.
I should also point out that, if one properly examines the 2020 presidential race and removes the effects of COVID-19, it becomes a lot more plausible to see a more moderate politician win.
PRC has been willing to cooperate with a KMT-run Taiwan. I am not saying that there would not be tensions or that there wouldn't be internal opposition by the independence wing in Taiwan. But tensions would not be as high as in RL.
And when was the last time an independent politician won against Republican and Democrat candidate in US history? Unless I misread your history and your President run as Republican, but that is unlikely as the current GOP has veered to the right and such a character would be considered RINO. I am just pointing out that you dismiss as unrealistic scenarios that are likely and have happened in the past actually (see President Ma of Taiwan and his relations with PRC) while having a history that takes great liberties.
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:07 pm
SouthCarolina wrote:Nationstates Name: SouthCarolina
Nation Name: France
by Laka Strolistandiler » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:08 pm
The Manticoran Empire wrote:Now in terms of this financial crisis, a major driving force behind that is the age gap in the Japanese population. You see, for much of the Post-world war 2 era, people in Japan waited to have children. So you have a large population of retirees who no longer work being supported by a population of workers that is too small to support the retirees AND keep the economy growing at the same time. It has very little to do with the Japanese government and a lot more to do with the society as a whole. Japan's economy has been largely stagnant for 30 years, with debt increasing rapidly as the government tries to solve the problem as best it can.
The repealing of Article 9 is a possibility as early as 2007 (since you've got to first get around the Japanese population being fairly divided on the topic in general). The anti-Chinese rhetoric is also a likely move to make and one that can definitely be supported, especially going into 2021, with the Chinese support of North Korea and China's increasingly aggressive attitude towards its neighbors.
However, the move away from the United States makes a bit less strategic sense if you are simultaneously going to irritate the PRC.
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long
by Monsone » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:08 pm
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:All right then- another version. Japan somehow evades 1990’s financial crisis (or it’s effect is far less prevalent than IRL, because of effective gov actions and is able to maintain larger fraction of it’s 80’s economical growth, with the additional continual rise in nationalism, which results in Article 9 being repelled somewhere around late 90’s-early 2000’s. Later Japan would distance itself away from the US further in further, remaining an ally but being more self-dependent in the matter. Also far MORE anti-Chinese than it’s IRL. Maybe will try to regain Kuril Islands diplomatically or something…
Also can I reserve Japan until the end of the discussion?
by Sao Nova Europa » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:09 pm
The Manticoran Empire wrote:Sao Nova Europa wrote:
PRC has been willing to cooperate with a KMT-run Taiwan. I am not saying that there would not be tensions or that there wouldn't be internal opposition by the independence wing in Taiwan. But tensions would not be as high as in RL.
And when was the last time an independent politician won against Republican and Democrat candidate in US history? Unless I misread your history and your President run as Republican, but that is unlikely as the current GOP has veered to the right and such a character would be considered RINO. I am just pointing out that you dismiss as unrealistic scenarios that are likely and have happened in the past actually (see President Ma of Taiwan and his relations with PRC) while having a history that takes great liberties.
My president did run as a Republican. That's a pretty key part of it. What you are failing to notice is that the OP specifically states that Taiwan and China are at loggerheads, which makes any Taiwan or China that doesn't incorporate that at the beginning of the RP problematic.
by Laka Strolistandiler » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:10 pm
Monsone wrote:To be fair, the only way to evade the early 1990s financial crisis in Japan is to prevent the asset price bubble of the late 1980s, which would mean not signing the 1985 Plaza Accord (among many, many other things). Japan would also need much stricter banking regulations to prevent reckless lending, which further contributed to the crisis of the early 1990s.
And that's without accounting for the 1997-1998 Asian Finacial Crisis, which might affect Japan in this timeline to a much more significant degree.
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long
by SouthCarolina » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:10 pm
by Chewion » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:10 pm
SouthCarolina wrote:Nationstates Name: SouthCarolina
Nation Name: France
by SouthCarolina » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:12 pm
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:14 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:The Manticoran Empire wrote:My president did run as a Republican. That's a pretty key part of it. What you are failing to notice is that the OP specifically states that Taiwan and China are at loggerheads, which makes any Taiwan or China that doesn't incorporate that at the beginning of the RP problematic.
How did he won the nomination? Such a candidate is unlikely to have won; someone who endorsed much of Obama's agenda and is for abortion clinics somehow wins the nomination against Trump, who is hugely popular among GOP voters?
Since OP wants to keep the Taiwan-China conflict, I will follow his lead (he is the OP after all and he gets to decide), so my point isn't about Taiwan. Will probably join as South Korea. My point is that American history is very unrealistic and needs to either be changed or other players be given the same creative liberties.
by Sao Nova Europa » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:16 pm
The Manticoran Empire wrote:Sao Nova Europa wrote:
How did he won the nomination? Such a candidate is unlikely to have won; someone who endorsed much of Obama's agenda and is for abortion clinics somehow wins the nomination against Trump, who is hugely popular among GOP voters?
Since OP wants to keep the Taiwan-China conflict, I will follow his lead (he is the OP after all and he gets to decide), so my point isn't about Taiwan. Will probably join as South Korea. My point is that American history is very unrealistic and needs to either be changed or other players be given the same creative liberties.
There is a difference between deciding to go with an odd domestic political leader and altering the relationship between two nations. For the most part, people can make the domestic politics however they like. The USSR and Czechoslovakia both exist. North Korea is run by a moderate female who has the goal of reaching a peaceful coexistence with the South. Players do have quite a bit of creative liberties.
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:17 pm
Sao Nova Europa wrote:The Manticoran Empire wrote:There is a difference between deciding to go with an odd domestic political leader and altering the relationship between two nations. For the most part, people can make the domestic politics however they like. The USSR and Czechoslovakia both exist. North Korea is run by a moderate female who has the goal of reaching a peaceful coexistence with the South. Players do have quite a bit of creative liberties.
And yet KMT cannot win the 2020 Presidential elections despite at one point being ahead in the polls in RL...
Whatever. Will be joining as South Korea likely, so point is moot.
by Deblar » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:19 pm
by The Manticoran Empire » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:21 pm
Deblar wrote:Nationstates Name: Republic of Deblar
Nation Name: Republic of Cuba
Capital: Havana
Territory: IRL Cuba
Population: 11,320,000
Official Language: Spanish
Recognized Languages: English, French, etc.
Head of State: Raul Castro; President of the Republic of Cuba and General Secretariat of the Cuban Communist Party
HoS Picture:
(Image)
Head of Government: ^
HoG Picture (If different from HoS):
Legislature Name: National Assembly of People’s Power
Party in Power (If bicameral note who controls each): Cuban Communist Party
GDP (nominal): 105.487 billion USD
Major Trade Partners: Venezuela, China, Spain, USSR, etc.
Major Exports: Refined Fuels, Tobacco, Sugar, Nickel, Pharmaceuticals
Major Imports: Machinery, Foodstuffs, Refined Fuel, Vehicles
Oil Production: 49,737.33 barrels per day
Oil Consumption: 153,000 barrels per day
Proven Oil Reserves: 124 million barrels
Defense Budget (USD): 0.13 billion USD
Alliances: none, good relations with China and other communist countries
Military Branches (Just list names of official Armed Forces Branches):
Cuban Revolutionary Army
Cuban Revolutionary Navy
Cuban Revolutionary Marines
Cuban Revolutionary Air Force
Cuban Revolutionary Coast Guard
Active Duty: 50,000
Reserve Duty: 40,000
Total Manpower: 5,971,000
Tanks: 1,230
AFVs: 1,570
SPA: 100
Towed Artillery: 150
Rocket Projectors: 20
Fighters: 38
Dedicated Attack: 0
Transports: 2
Trainers: 26
Special Mission: 0
Helicopters: 14
Attack Helicopters: 4
Aircraft Carriers: 0
Destroyers: 0
Frigates: 2
Corvettes: 4
Submarines: 0
Patrol: 25
Mine Warfare: 4
Other Military Information:
Extra naval assets purchased from USSR
History Changes (Subject to review and approval by OP and Co-OP):
In 2008, when the Great Recession gripped Cuba, Fidel Castro had fallen ill, and after recovery, decided to retire from his post and hand over the Presidency and the General Secratariacy to his brother, Raul Castro, who holds the position to this day. Upon taking over for his brother, Raul began to modernize the island to “keep up with the rest of the world”, as he put it, establishing internet and cell service networks, making a net-zero emissions promise to be fulfilled by 2025, and shipping in new and modern vehicles primarily from Europe and China.
As Cuba went through the decade, there was a period, albeit rather short, of a cool down of relations with the United States during the presidency of Barack Obama. This short period would come to a quick end with the ascension of Donald Trump to the presidency, and economic sanctions on Cuba would contribute to the sluggish economy of recent years, which Raul has said the government aims to fix. However, Raul’s age is no secret, and many have concerns on how much long he can rule, and who will replace him in the event of his death or resignation. Meanwhile, the Cuban citizens grow ever more restless and impatient with the communist regime. Cuba stands at a crossroads, and only Heaven knows what will become of Cuba…
Do not remove - Alpha42
by Sao Nova Europa » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:21 pm
The Manticoran Empire wrote:Sao Nova Europa wrote:
And yet KMT cannot win the 2020 Presidential elections despite at one point being ahead in the polls in RL...
Whatever. Will be joining as South Korea likely, so point is moot.
At no point did I ever say the KMT could not win the elections. I simply said that there was no possibility of a calmer relationship with the PRC.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement