The Hierophancy wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:In what way is it idiotic to note that a citizen's militia is at a disadvantage when it comes to holding back state armies? I certainly don't buy that the militia will never have been engaged, if that is your premise.
Do the opposing Chinese states have standing armies or something? Just thinking as to how some of the most famed (here in the West at least) bronze / iron age armies (specifically the Greeks) were essentially militiamen who "trained" like, once a year at public games. Plato wrote a dialog about the two perfectly reasonable points of view that soldiers should be trained in using their weapons and they shouldn't, lol. That said, I don't know if the Chinese cities have the wonderful phalanx and cultural outlook to shore up and equip a bunch of 14-50 year old random citizens every battle.
I doubt they are standing armies as a rule of thumb - though there may be some of those, developed in response to Chinese expansion and mimicking the YRS. Mainly they'll just be warrior cadres from the surrounding tribal polities, armed with whatever weapons and armor they were bribed with or have managed to pull together themselves. I don't see them as vastly superior to a well drilled Chinese militia, but there's the old adage about a well-fed barbarian from a state which hasn't seen warfare to kill off their best and strongest being able to fight a Roman legionnaire on equal footing - and I don't think we're comparing the Chinese provincial militia to Roman professionals.






