NATION

PASSWORD

Home of the Brave: A 1960s Political RP (86th Congress)

For all of your non-NationStates related roleplaying needs!

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Chia Dal
Diplomat
 
Posts: 646
Founded: Jan 12, 2019
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chia Dal » Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:42 pm

"Aye"
Government Type: Federation
Leader: President Alexis Potter
Tech Level: MT/PMT
Territories: All of Europe, the Islands of the Caribbean, the Azores off the coast of Africa, Diego Garcia, the Soloman Islands, Namibia, South Africa and all of Russia west of the Ural Mountains
Country name: The European Federation
Founding Year: 1918

User avatar
Madrinpoor
Minister
 
Posts: 2255
Founded: Dec 01, 2020
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Madrinpoor » Sat Mar 06, 2021 7:13 pm

"Aye"
MT City-state off the coast of Japan: Sumo wrestling, tech startups, Shintō mobs, gay marriage, Bōsōzuku, taiko drums, zokusha cars, neon signs, skyscrapers, Yakuza, internet, Christians, teen biker gangs, international treaties, inter-city canals, rooftop gardens, Samurai, Internet Explorer, canned beer, and a Shogun. 2002 C.E.
Yooper High Kingdom wrote:If I could describe Mandrinpoor with one word, it would be this: Slick.
Nevertopia wrote:Madrinpoor? More like madrinWEALTH be upon your family, may your days be happy and your burdens be light.

SupportUkraine!
Cuban-American He/him

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:04 pm

Speaker Pro Tempore: "Needing a 2/3 Majority, the constitutional amendment goes as follows. 272 Aye's 150 Nay's 13 Abstentions. The bill fails and henceforth, is dead. The Amendment would have needed 18 more Aye's to pass. The House Floor is open to motions and debate. If none are made, we shall proceed with the docket."

User avatar
Cybernetic Socialist Republics
Minister
 
Posts: 2200
Founded: May 17, 2019
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:20 pm

Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY) puts the following bill into the senate docket:


Image



Official Name: Voting Rights Enforcement Act

Nickname: VREA


Overview: Enforces the right of all citizens the vote regardless of race or color.

Sponsor: United States Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY)
Co-Sponsors: United States Representative Richard Douglas (D-MN 4th)




Section 1: AN ACT To enforce the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act shall be known as the "Voting Rights Enforcement Act of 1959"

Section 2: No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on any account.

Section 3: (a) Federal examiners by the United States Civil Service Commission in accordance with section 6 to serve for such period of time and for such political subdivisions as the court shall determine is appropriate to enforce the guarantees of the fifteenth (1) as part of any interlocutory order if the court determines that the appointment of such examiners is necessary to enforce such guarantees or (2) as part of any final judgment if the court finds that violations of the fifteenth justifying equitable relief have occurred in such State or subdivision: Provided, That the court need not authorize the appointment of examiners if any incidents of denial or abridgement of the right to vote on any account (1) have been few in number and have been promptly and effectively corrected by State or local action, (2) the continuing effect of such incidents has been eliminated, and (3) there is no reasonable probability of their recurrence in the future.

(b) If in a proceeding instituted by the Attorney General under any statute to enforce the guarantees of the fifteenth amendment in any State or political subdivision the court finds that a test or device has been used for the purpose or with the effect of denying or abridging the right of any citizen of the United States to vote, it shall suspend the use of tests and devices in such State or political subdivisions as the court shall determine is appropriate and for such period as it deems necessary.

(c) If in any proceeding instituted by the Attorney General under any statute to enforce the guarantees of the fifteenth amendment in any State or political subdivision the court finds that violations of the fifteenth amendment justifying equitable relief have occurred within the territory of such State or political subdivision, the court, in addition to such relief as it may grant, shall retain jurisdiction for such period as it may deem appropriate and during such period no voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure with respect to voting different from that in force or effect at the time the proceeding was commenced shall be enforced unless and until the court finds that such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure does not have the purpose and will not have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on any account: Provided, That such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure may be enforced if the qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure has been submitted by the chief legal officer or other appropriate official of such State or subdivision to the Attorney General and the Attorney General has not interposed an objection within sixty days after such submission, except that neither the court's finding nor the Attorney General's failure to object shall bar a subsequent action to enjoin enforcement of such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure.

Section 4: (a) To assure that the right of citizens of the United States to vote is not denied or abridged on account of race or color, no citizen shall be denied the right to vote in any Federal, State, or local election because of his failure to comply with any test or device in any State with respect to which the determinations have been made under subsection (b) or in any political subdivision with respect to which such determinations have been made as a separate unit, unless the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in an action for a declaratory judgment brought by such State or subdivision against the United States has determined that no such test or device has been used during the five years preceding the filing of the action for the purpose or with the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on any account: Provided, That no such declaratory judgment shall issue with respect to any plaintiff for a period of five years after the entry of a final judgment of any court of the United States, other than the denial of a declaratory judgment under this section, whether entered prior to or after the enactment of this Act, determining that denials or abridgments of the right to vote on any account through the use of such tests or devices have occurred anywhere in the territory of such plaintiff. An action pursuant to this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of three judges in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28 of the United States Code and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court. The court shall retain jurisdiction of any action pursuant to this subsection for five years after judgment and shall reopen the action upon motion of the Attorney General alleging that a test or device has been used for the purpose or with the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on any account.

If the Attorney General determines that he has no reason to believe that any such test or device has been used during the five years preceding the filing of the action for the purpose or with the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on any account, he shall consent to the entry of such judgment

(b) The provisions of subsection (a) shall apply in any State or in any political subdivision of a state which (1) the Attorney General determines maintained on November 1, 1956, any test or device, and with respect to which (2) the Director of the Census determines that less than 80 percentum of the persons of voting age residing therein were registered on November 1, 1956, or that less than 60 percentum of such persons voted in the presidential election of November 1956.

A determination or certification of the Attorney General or of the Director of the Census under this section or under section 6 or section 13 shall not be reviewable in any court and shall be effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

(c) The phrase "test or device" shall mean any requirement that a person as a prerequisite for voting or registration for voting (1) demonstrate the ability to read, write, understand, or interpret any matter, (2) demonstrate any educational achievement or his knowledge of any particular subject, (3) possess good moral character, or (4) prove his qualifications by the voucher of registered voters or members of any other class.

(d) For purposes of this section no State or political subdivision shall be determined to have engaged in the use of tests or devices for the purpose or with the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color if (1) incidents of such use have been few in number and have been promptly and effectively corrected by State or local action, (2) the continuing effect of such incidents has been eliminated, and (3) there is no reasonable probability of their recurrence in the future.

(e)
(1) Congress hereby declares that to secure the rights under the fourteenth of persons educated in American-flag schools in which the predominant classroom language was other than English, it is necessary to prohibit the States from conditioning the right to vote of such persons on ability to read, write, understand, or interpret any matter in the English language.
(2) No person who demonstrates that he has successfully completed the sixth primary grade in a public school in, or a private school accredited by, any State or territory, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in which the predominant classroom language was other than English, shall be denied the right to vote in any Federal, State, or local election because of his inability to read, write, understand, or interpret any matter in the English language, except that, in States in which State law provides that a different level of education is presumptive of literacy, he shall demonstrate that he has successfully completed an equivalent level of education in a public school in, or a private school accredited by, any State or territory, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in which the predominant classroom language was other than English.

Section 5: Whenever a State or political subdivision with respect to which the prohibitions set forth in section 4(a) are in effect shall enact or seek to administer any voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure with respect to voting different from that in force or effect on November 1, 1956, such State or subdivision may institute an action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for a declaratory judgment that such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure does not have the purpose and will not have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on any account, and unless and until the court enters such judgment no person shall be denied the right to vote for failure to comply with such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure: Provided, That such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure may be enforced without such proceeding if the qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure has been submitted by the chief legal officer or other appropriate official of such State or subdivision to the Attorney General and the Attorney General has not interposed an objection within sixty days after such submission, except that neither the Attorney General's failure to object nor a declaratory judgment entered under this section shall bar a subsequent action to enjoin enforcement of such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure. Any action under this section shall be heard and determined by a court of three judges in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28 of the United States Code and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court.

Section 6: Whenever (a) a court has authorized the appointment of examiners pursuant to the provisions of section 3(a), or (b) unless a declaratory judgment has been rendered under section 4(a), the Attorney General certifies with respect to any political subdivision named in, or included within the scope of, determinations made under section 4(b) that (1) he has received complaints in writing from twenty or more residents of such political subdivision alleging that they have been denied the right to vote under color of law on any account, and that he believes such complaints to be meritorious, or (2) that, in his judgment (considering, among other factors, whether the ratio of nonwhite persons to white persons, registered to vote within such subdivision appears to him to be reasonably attributable to violations of the fifteenth amendment or whether substantial evidence exists that bona fide efforts are being made within such subdivision to comply with the fifteenth amendment), the appointment of examiners is otherwise necessary to enforce the guarantees of the fifteenth, the Civil Service Commission shall appoint as many examiners for such subdivision as it may deem appropriate to prepare and maintain lists of persons eligible to vote in Federal, State, and local elections. Such examiners, hearing officers provided for in section 9(a), and other persons deemed necessary by the Commission to carry out the provisions and purposes of this Act shall be appointed, compensated, and separated without regard to the provisions of any statute administered by the Civil Service Commission, and service under this Act shall not be considered employment for the purposes of any statute administered by the Civil Service Commission, except the provisions of section 9 of the Act of August 2, 1939, as amended (5 U.S.C. 118i), prohibiting partisan political activity: Provided, That the Commission is authorized, after consulting the head of the appropriate department or agency, to designate suitable persons in the official service of the United States, with their consent, to serve in these positions. Examiners and hearing officers shall have the power to administer oaths.

Section 7: (a) The examiners for each political subdivision shall, at such places as the Civil Service Commission shall by regulation designate, examine applicants concerning their qualifications for voting. An application to an examiner shall be in such form as the Commission may require and shall contain allegations that the applicant is not otherwise registered to vote.

(b) Any person whom the examiner finds, in accordance with instructions received under section 9(b), to have the qualifications prescribed by State law not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States shall promptly be placed on a list of eligible voters. A challenge to such listing may be made in accordance with section 9(a) and shall not be the basis for a prosecution under section 12 of this Act. The examiner shall certify and transmit such list, and any supplements as appropriate, at least once a month, to the offices of the appropriate election officials, with copies to the Attorney General and the attorney general of the State, and any such lists and supplements thereto transmitted during the month shall be available for public inspection on the last business day of the month and, in any event, not later than the forty-fifth day prior to any election. The appropriate State or local election official shall place such names on the official voting list. Any person whose name appears on the examiner's list shall be entitled and allowed to vote in the election district of his residence unless and until the appropriate election officials shall have been notified that such person has been removed from such list in accordance with subsection (d): Provided, That no person shall be entitled to vote in any election by virtue of this Act unless his name shall have been certified and transmitted on such a list to the offices of the appropriate election officials at least forty-five days prior to such election.

(c) The examiner shall issue to each person whose name appears on such a list a certificate evidencing his eligibility to vote.

(d) A person whose name appears on such a list shall be removed therefrom by an examiner if (1) such person has been successfully challenged in accordance with the procedure prescribed in section 9, or (2) he has been determined by an examiner to have lost his eligibility to vote under State law not inconsistent with the Constitution and the laws of the United States.

Section 8: Whenever an examiner is serving under this Act in any political subdivision, the Civil Service Commission may assign, at the request of the Attorney General, one or more persons, who may be officers of the United States, (1) to enter and attend at any place for holding an election in such subdivision for the purpose of observing whether persons who are entitled to vote are being permitted to vote, and (2) to enter and attend at any place for tabulating the votes cast at any election held in such subdivision for the purpose of observing whether votes cast by persons entitled to vote are being properly tabulated. Such persons so assigned shall report to an examiner appointed for such political subdivision, to the Attorney General, and if the appointment of examiners has been authorized pursuant to section 3(a), to the court.

Section 9: (a) Any challenge to a listing on an eligibility list prepared by an examiner shall be heard and determined by a hearing officer appointed by and responsible to the Civil Service Commission and under such rules as the Commission shall by regulation prescribe. Such challenge shall be entertained only if filed at such office within the State as the Civil Service Commission shall by regulation designate, and within ten days after the listing of the challenged person is made available for public inspection, and if supported by (1) the affidavits of at least two persons having personal knowledge of the facts constituting grounds for the challenge, and (2) a certification that a copy of the challenge and affidavits have been served by mail or in person upon the person challenged at his place of residence set out in the application. Such challenge shall be determined within fifteen days after it has been filed. A petition for review of the decision of the hearing officer may be filed in the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which the person challenged resides within fifteen days after service of such decision by mail on the person petitioning for review but no decision of a hearing officer shall be reversed unless clearly erroneous. Any person listed shall be entitled and allowed to vote pending final determination by the hearing officer and by the court.

(b) The times, places, procedures, and form for application and listing pursuant to this Act and removals from the eligibility lists shall be prescribed by regulations promulgated by the Civil Service Commission and the Commission shall, after consultation with the Attorney General, instruct examiners concerning applicable State law not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to (1) the qualifications required for listing, and (2) loss of eligibility to vote.

(c) Upon the request of the applicant or the challenger or on its own motion the Civil Service Commission shall have the power to require by subpoena the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence relating to any matter pending before it under the authority of this section. In case of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpoena, any district court of the United States or the United States court of any territory or possession, or the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or is domiciled or transacts business, or has appointed an agent for receipt of service of process, upon application by the Attorney General of the United States shall have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring such person to appear before the Commission or a hearing officer, there to produce pertinent, relevant, and nonprivileged documentary evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation, and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.

Section 10: (a) No person acting under color of law shall fail or refuse to permit any person to vote who is entitled to vote under any provision of this Act or is otherwise qualified to vote, or willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person's vote.

(b) No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for urging or aiding any person to vote or attempt to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for exercising any powers or duties under section 3(a), 6, 8, 9, or 11(e).

(c) Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address, or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both: Provided, however, That this provision shall be applicable to any political office.

(d) Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of an examiner or hearing officer knowingly and willfully falsifies or conceals a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Section 11: (a) Whoever shall deprive or attempt to deprive any person of any right secured by section 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, or shall violate section 10(a) or (b), shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(b) Whoever, within a year following an election in a political subdivision in which an examiner has been appointed (1) destroys, defaces, mutilates, or otherwise alters the marking of a paper ballot which has been cast in such election, or (2) alters any official record of voting in such election tabulated from a voting machine or otherwise, shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both

(c) Whoever conspires to violate the provisions of subsection (a) or (b) of this section, or interferes with any right secured by section 2, 3 4, 5, 7, or 10(a) or (b) shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(d) Whenever any person has engaged or there are reasonable grounds to believe that any person is about to engage in any act or practice prohibited by section 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, or subsection (b) of this section, the Attorney General may institute for the United States, or in the name of the United States, an action for preventive relief, including an application for a temporary or permanent injunction, restraining order, or other order, and including an order directed to the State and State or local election officials to require them (1) to permit persons listed under this Act to vote and (2) to count such votes.

(e) Whenever in any political subdivision in which there are examiners appointed pursuant to this Act any persons allege to such an examiner within forty-eight hours after the closing of the polls that notwithstanding (1) their listing under this Act or registration by an appropriate election official and (2) their eligibility to vote, they have not been permitted to vote in such election, the examiner shall forthwith notify the Attorney General if such allegations in his opinion appear to be well founded. Upon receipt of such notification, the Attorney General may forthwith file with the district court an application for an order providing for the marking, casting, and counting of the ballots of such persons and requiring the inclusion of their votes in the total vote before the results of such election shall be deemed final and any force or effect given thereto. The district court shall hear and determine such matters immediately after the filing of such application. The remedy provided in this subsection shall not preclude any remedy available under State or Federal law.

(f) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section and shall exercise the same without regard to whether a person asserting rights under the provisions of this Act shall have exhausted any administrative or other remedies that may be provided by law

Section 12: Listing procedures shall be terminated in any political subdivision of any State (a) with respect to examiners appointed pursuant to clause (b) of section 6 whenever the Attorney General notifies the Civil Service Commission, or whenever the District Court for the District of Columbia determines in an action for declaratory judgment brought by any political subdivision with respect to which the Director of the Census has determined that more than 80 percentum of the nonwhite of voting age residing therein are registered to vote, (1) that all persons listed by an examiner for such subdivision have been placed on the appropriate voting registration roll, and (2) that there is no longer reasonable cause to believe that persons will be deprived of or denied the right to vote on account of race or color in such subdivision, and (b), with respect to examiners appointed pursuant to section 3(a), upon order of the authorizing court. A political subdivision may petition the Attorney General for the termination of listing procedures under clause (a) of this section, and may petition the Attorney General to request the Director of the Census to take such survey or census as may be appropriate for the making of the determination provided for in this section. The District Court for the District of Columbia shall have jurisdiction to require such survey or census to be made by the Director of the Census and it shall require him to do so if it deems the Attorney General's refusal to request such survey or census to be arbitrary or unreasonable.

Section 13: (a) All cases of criminal contempt arising under the provisions of this Act shall be governed by section 151 of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 (42 U.S.C.1995).

(b) No court other than the District Court for the District of Columbia or a court of appeals in any proceeding under section 9 shall have jurisdiction to issue any declaratory judgment pursuant to section 4 or section 5 or any restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction against the execution or enforcement of any provision of this Act or any action of any Federal officer or employee pursuant hereto.

(c)
(1) The terms "vote" or "voting" shall include all action necessary to make a vote effective in any primary, special, or general election, including, but not limited to, registration, listing pursuant to this Act, or other action required by law prerequisite to voting, casting a ballot, and having such ballot counted properly and included in the appropriate totals of votes cast with respect to candidates for public or party office and propositions for which votes are received in an election.
(2) The term "political subdivision" shall mean any county or parish, except that, where registration for voting is not conducted under the supervision of a county or parish, the term shall include any other subdivision of a State which conducts registration for voting.

(d) In any action for a declaratory judgment brought pursuant to section 4 or section 5 of this Act, subpoenas for witnesses who are required to attend the District Court for the District of Columbia may be served in any judicial district of the United States: Provided, That no writ of subpoena shall issue for witnesses without the District of Columbia at a greater distance than one hundred miles from the place of holding court without the permission of the District Court for the District of Columbia being first had upon proper application and cause shown.

Section 14: The Attorney General and the Secretary of Defense, jointly, shall make a full and complete study to determine whether, under the laws or practices of any State or States, there are preconditions to voting, which might tend to result in discrimination against citizens serving in the Armed Forces of the United States seeking to vote. Such officials shall, jointly, make a report to the Congress not later than June 30, 1961, containing the results of such study, together with a list of any States in which such preconditions exist, and shall include in such report such recommendations for legislation as they deem advisable to prevent discrimination in voting against citizens serving in the Armed Forces of the United States.

Section 15: Nothing in this Act shall be construed to deny, impair, or otherwise adversely affect the right to vote of any person registered to vote under the law of any State or political subdivision.

Section 16: There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act

Section 17: If any provision of this Act or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of the Act and the application of the provision to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances shall not be affected thereby.



This bill is then honorably presented to the Senate for consideration in order to enforce the 15th and 24th Amendment to improve the United States Law and is backed by Senator Sofia Fraser

User avatar
Cybernetic Socialist Republics
Minister
 
Posts: 2200
Founded: May 17, 2019
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:29 pm

Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY): Motion to proceed to a vote.

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:41 pm

Cybernetic Socialist Republics wrote:Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY): Motion to proceed to a vote.

President Pro Tempore: "Do I hear a second or an objection?"

User avatar
Newne Carriebean7
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6716
Founded: Aug 08, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Newne Carriebean7 » Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:43 pm

Joshua Sharp
Senator from Mississippi (Democratic)



"Seconded."
Krugeristan wrote:This is Carrie you're referring to. I'm not going to expect him to do something sane anytime soon. He can take something as simple as a sandwich, and make me never look at sandwiches with a straight face ever again.

Former Carriebeanian president Carol Dartenby sentenced to 4 years hard labor for corruption and mismanagement of state property|Former Carriebeanian president Antrés Depuís sentenced to 3 years in prison for embezzling funds and corruption

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:04 pm

Newne Carriebean7 wrote:Joshua Sharp
Senator from Mississippi (Democratic)



"Seconded."

President Pro Tempore: "Hearing a Second and No Objection, the Senate shall vote on the Nuclear Safety Act. The Clerk Will now call the roll. An Aye Vote passes the bill, and becomes law, a Nay vote kills the bill."

User avatar
Cybernetic Socialist Republics
Minister
 
Posts: 2200
Founded: May 17, 2019
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:06 pm

Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY): Aye!

User avatar
Dalmannia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 782
Founded: May 01, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Dalmannia » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:07 am

Senator Earl Boone places the following proposal for a Constitutional Amendment into the docket:

Image



Official Name: An Amendment to the Constitution of the United States which Establishes Congressional Power to Tax Capital Assets

Nickname: The Equity Taxation Amendment


Overview: Grants Congress the power to levy taxes on capital assets.

Sponsor: Senator Earl Boone (D-TN)
Co-Sponsors: Representative Richard Douglas (D-MN), Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY)



Section 1: The Congress shall have power to levy a capital tax on the total value of an entity’s assets, including personal assets of cash, bank deposits, real estate, insurance, pension plans, ownership of unincorporated business, and personal trusts, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.


This bill is then honorably presented to the United States Senate for consideration in order to allow for the taxation of capital assets to improve the United States Law and is backed by Senator Earl Boone.
Co-Founder of the International Consortium of Democratic Nations

User avatar
Hopal
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1644
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hopal » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:28 am

Louisianan wrote:Speaker Pro Tempore: "Needing a 2/3 Majority, the constitutional amendment goes as follows. 272 Aye's 150 Nay's 13 Abstentions. The bill fails and henceforth, is dead. The Amendment would have needed 18 more Aye's to pass. The House Floor is open to motions and debate. If none are made, we shall proceed with the docket."

Representative Richard Douglas
[Democratic-Farmer-Labor - 4th District of the State of Minnesota]

"Motion to bring 'Commission to create Vietnam War Memorial Act' to the floor"
A Nation in South America, comprised of indigenous tribes, immigrants, French and Portuguese settlers, and European Socialists.
Representative Greg Shields (D-CA-28) [Twilight's Last Gleaming]

User avatar
Madrinpoor
Minister
 
Posts: 2255
Founded: Dec 01, 2020
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Madrinpoor » Sun Mar 07, 2021 7:14 am

Hopal wrote:
Louisianan wrote:Speaker Pro Tempore: "Needing a 2/3 Majority, the constitutional amendment goes as follows. 272 Aye's 150 Nay's 13 Abstentions. The bill fails and henceforth, is dead. The Amendment would have needed 18 more Aye's to pass. The House Floor is open to motions and debate. If none are made, we shall proceed with the docket."

Representative Richard Douglas
[Democratic-Farmer-Labor - 4th District of the State of Minnesota]

"Motion to bring 'Commission to create Vietnam War Memorial Act' to the floor"

"Seconded"
MT City-state off the coast of Japan: Sumo wrestling, tech startups, Shintō mobs, gay marriage, Bōsōzuku, taiko drums, zokusha cars, neon signs, skyscrapers, Yakuza, internet, Christians, teen biker gangs, international treaties, inter-city canals, rooftop gardens, Samurai, Internet Explorer, canned beer, and a Shogun. 2002 C.E.
Yooper High Kingdom wrote:If I could describe Mandrinpoor with one word, it would be this: Slick.
Nevertopia wrote:Madrinpoor? More like madrinWEALTH be upon your family, may your days be happy and your burdens be light.

SupportUkraine!
Cuban-American He/him

User avatar
Latvijas Otra Republika
Minister
 
Posts: 3053
Founded: Feb 22, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Latvijas Otra Republika » Sun Mar 07, 2021 7:15 am

Senator Floyd Lahde (D-MT): 'Aye'
Free Navalny, Back Gobzems

User avatar
Newne Carriebean7
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6716
Founded: Aug 08, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Newne Carriebean7 » Sun Mar 07, 2021 7:19 am

Joshua Sharp
Senator from Mississippi (Democratic)


"Nay!"
Krugeristan wrote:This is Carrie you're referring to. I'm not going to expect him to do something sane anytime soon. He can take something as simple as a sandwich, and make me never look at sandwiches with a straight face ever again.

Former Carriebeanian president Carol Dartenby sentenced to 4 years hard labor for corruption and mismanagement of state property|Former Carriebeanian president Antrés Depuís sentenced to 3 years in prison for embezzling funds and corruption

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sun Mar 07, 2021 10:35 am

Madrinpoor wrote:
Hopal wrote:Representative Richard Douglas
[Democratic-Farmer-Labor - 4th District of the State of Minnesota]

"Motion to bring 'Commission to create Vietnam War Memorial Act' to the floor"

"Seconded"

Speaker Pro Tempore: "Hearing a second and no objection, the Vietnam War Memorial Act is on the floor. The clerk will report the bill. The House is open for motions and debate."
Image



Official Name: Commission to Create a Vietnam War Memorial Act

Nickname: Vietnam Memorial Act


Overview: Out of our diligent respect, loyalty to our soldiers and remembrance of those fallen, this Act commissions the creation of a Vietnam War memorial on federal land within the Capitol district.

Sponsor: Senator Floyd Lahde (D-MT)
Co-Sponsors: Senator Joshua Sharp (D-MS), Representative Sofia "Starry" Fraser (R-NY), Senator Joseph Gorski Warszawski (R-PA), Representative Hubert Broussard (D-LA)


Section 1: This Memorial will be allocated 10,000$ and it's creation & development will be managed by the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Relations in close coordination with the federal government.

Section 2: Areas to inscribe soldier names will be mandated to be left vacant until the conclusion of the war.

Section 3: All contracted artist depictions are to be tasteful and in solemn honour of our fallen.


This bill is then honorably presented to the Senate for consideration in order to create a War Memorial to improve the United States Law and is backed by Floyd Lahde.

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sun Mar 07, 2021 10:39 am

President Pro Tempore: "The Aye's have it. The Nuclear Saftey Act passes the Senate. The bill is sent to the White House for the president's signature. The Senate Floor is open to motions and debate."

User avatar
Cybernetic Socialist Republics
Minister
 
Posts: 2200
Founded: May 17, 2019
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Sun Mar 07, 2021 10:55 am

Louisianan wrote:President Pro Tempore: "The Aye's have it. The Nuclear Saftey Act passes the Senate. The bill is sent to the White House for the president's signature. The Senate Floor is open to motions and debate."


Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY): Motion to bring the 'Voting Rights Enforcement Act' to the floor.

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sun Mar 07, 2021 10:57 am

Cybernetic Socialist Republics wrote:
Louisianan wrote:President Pro Tempore: "The Aye's have it. The Nuclear Saftey Act passes the Senate. The bill is sent to the White House for the president's signature. The Senate Floor is open to motions and debate."


Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY): Motion to bring the 'Voting Rights Enforcement Act' to the floor.

President Pro Tempore: "Do I hear a second or an objetion?"

User avatar
Madrinpoor
Minister
 
Posts: 2255
Founded: Dec 01, 2020
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Madrinpoor » Sun Mar 07, 2021 11:20 am

Rep. Juan Matamoros (D — NM 1st District) "Motion to proceed to a vote. There does not seem to be much to say."
Last edited by Madrinpoor on Sun Mar 07, 2021 11:21 am, edited 3 times in total.
MT City-state off the coast of Japan: Sumo wrestling, tech startups, Shintō mobs, gay marriage, Bōsōzuku, taiko drums, zokusha cars, neon signs, skyscrapers, Yakuza, internet, Christians, teen biker gangs, international treaties, inter-city canals, rooftop gardens, Samurai, Internet Explorer, canned beer, and a Shogun. 2002 C.E.
Yooper High Kingdom wrote:If I could describe Mandrinpoor with one word, it would be this: Slick.
Nevertopia wrote:Madrinpoor? More like madrinWEALTH be upon your family, may your days be happy and your burdens be light.

SupportUkraine!
Cuban-American He/him

User avatar
Hopal
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1644
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hopal » Sun Mar 07, 2021 11:29 am

Madrinpoor wrote:Rep. Juan Matamoros (D — NM 1st District) "Motion to proceed to a vote. There does not seem to be much to say."

Representative Richard Douglas
[Democratic-Farmer-Labor - 4th District of the State of Minnesota]

"Seconded"
A Nation in South America, comprised of indigenous tribes, immigrants, French and Portuguese settlers, and European Socialists.
Representative Greg Shields (D-CA-28) [Twilight's Last Gleaming]

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:03 pm

Hopal wrote:
Madrinpoor wrote:Rep. Juan Matamoros (D — NM 1st District) "Motion to proceed to a vote. There does not seem to be much to say."

Representative Richard Douglas
[Democratic-Farmer-Labor - 4th District of the State of Minnesota]

"Seconded"

Speaker Pro Tempore: "Hearing a second and no objection, the House will now vote on the Commission to create a Vietnam War Memorial Act. Register your votes."

User avatar
Hopal
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1644
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hopal » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:04 pm

Representative Richard Douglas
[Democratic-Farmer-Labor - 4th District of the State of Minnesota]

"Aye"
A Nation in South America, comprised of indigenous tribes, immigrants, French and Portuguese settlers, and European Socialists.
Representative Greg Shields (D-CA-28) [Twilight's Last Gleaming]

User avatar
Louisianan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5843
Founded: Mar 21, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Louisianan » Sun Mar 07, 2021 12:26 pm

United States House of Representatives
Representative Hubert Broussard
[Democratic - 3rd District of the State of Louisiana]

"Aye!"

User avatar
Madrinpoor
Minister
 
Posts: 2255
Founded: Dec 01, 2020
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Madrinpoor » Sun Mar 07, 2021 2:23 pm

"Aye'
MT City-state off the coast of Japan: Sumo wrestling, tech startups, Shintō mobs, gay marriage, Bōsōzuku, taiko drums, zokusha cars, neon signs, skyscrapers, Yakuza, internet, Christians, teen biker gangs, international treaties, inter-city canals, rooftop gardens, Samurai, Internet Explorer, canned beer, and a Shogun. 2002 C.E.
Yooper High Kingdom wrote:If I could describe Mandrinpoor with one word, it would be this: Slick.
Nevertopia wrote:Madrinpoor? More like madrinWEALTH be upon your family, may your days be happy and your burdens be light.

SupportUkraine!
Cuban-American He/him

User avatar
Chia Dal
Diplomat
 
Posts: 646
Founded: Jan 12, 2019
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chia Dal » Sun Mar 07, 2021 4:24 pm

"Aye"
Government Type: Federation
Leader: President Alexis Potter
Tech Level: MT/PMT
Territories: All of Europe, the Islands of the Caribbean, the Azores off the coast of Africa, Diego Garcia, the Soloman Islands, Namibia, South Africa and all of Russia west of the Ural Mountains
Country name: The European Federation
Founding Year: 1918

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Portal to the Multiverse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hypron

Advertisement

Remove ads