United States House of Representatives
Representative Hubert Broussard
[Democratic - 3rd District of the State of Louisiana]
"I motion that we take this amended bill to a vote."
Advertisement
by Louisianan » Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:14 pm
Louisianan wrote:Speaker Pro Tempore: "The Clerk will read the amended bill."(Image)Official Name: An Amendment to the Constitution of the United States which Establishes Congressional Power to Tax Capital AssetsNickname: The Equity Taxation Amendment
Overview: Grants Congress the power to levy taxes on capital assets.Sponsor: Senator Earl Boone (D-TN)
Co-Sponsors: Representative Richard Douglas (D-MN), Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY)
Section 1: The Congress shall have power to levy a capital tax on the total value of an entity’s assets, if the entities income is over $3.000 per year', including personal assets of cash, bank deposits, real estate, insurance, pension plans, ownership of unincorporated business, and personal trusts, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States.
Section 2: Congress shall have the ability to tax capital assets of families if their Household earns more than $12.000 yearly, if the income is less than $12.000 yearly, the family is exempt from this taxation.
This bill is then honorably presented to the United States Senate for consideration in order to allow for the taxation of capital assets to improve the United States Law and is backed by Senator Earl Boone.
by Hopal » Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:52 pm
Louisianan wrote:Louisianan wrote:Speaker Pro Tempore: "The Clerk will read the amended bill."(Image)Official Name: An Amendment to the Constitution of the United States which Establishes Congressional Power to Tax Capital AssetsNickname: The Equity Taxation Amendment
Overview: Grants Congress the power to levy taxes on capital assets.Sponsor: Senator Earl Boone (D-TN)
Co-Sponsors: Representative Richard Douglas (D-MN), Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY)
Section 1: The Congress shall have power to levy a capital tax on the total value of an entity’s assets, if the entities income is over $3.000 per year', including personal assets of cash, bank deposits, real estate, insurance, pension plans, ownership of unincorporated business, and personal trusts, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States.
Section 2: Congress shall have the ability to tax capital assets of families if their Household earns more than $12.000 yearly, if the income is less than $12.000 yearly, the family is exempt from this taxation.
This bill is then honorably presented to the United States Senate for consideration in order to allow for the taxation of capital assets to improve the United States Law and is backed by Senator Earl Boone.
United States House of Representatives
Representative Hubert Broussard
[Democratic - 3rd District of the State of Louisiana]
"I motion that we take this amended bill to a vote."
by Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:32 pm
Official Name: Federal Relief Ensuring Entrepreneurialism ActNickname: FREE Act
Overview: This legislation is intended to, while decreasing bureaucracy, address the chronic poverty experienced by millions within these United States while encouraging and aiding in their self improvement within the context of free markets and free enterprise. It accomplishes this through the creation of a Federal Minimum Income Program and an Employment Education System. This legislation additionally seeks to relieve the burden of wage price controls on unemployed people unable to find work, small businesses who are driven into stagnation or closure and the lower income individual's who's consumption disproportionately consists of those products negatively effected by wage price controls, by simultaneously phasing out minimum wages as redundant.Sponsor: Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY)
Co-Sponsors: Senator Joshua Sharp (D-MS)
Section 1: The story of American prosperity has been the story of free individuals exchanging goods and services with each other through the mechanism of the market and freedom of enterprise. Yet, despite the free market organization of the economy, the great depression taught us that a failure of government to provide a means for the less fortunate to be insulated by fluctuations in the market can lead to immense suffering and freedom harming strife. The federal government therefore, must to provide the best possible means to ensure the maximum possible freedom of markets and enterprise, so individuals may reach the highest heights and lift the nation with them, while also protecting the citizenry from the lowest lows. In response to the great depression, a web of well meaning, though tangled programs were implemented to provide economic security. However, this tangled web has unnecessarily increased the size of the federal bureaucracy and has lead to an unnecessary degree of central planning by the government, something that has the tendency to pull nations toward tyranny. We must, therefore implement a remedy to this conundrum that is most compatible with American ideals of freedom of free markets and free enterprise.
Section 2: Establishes a Federal Minimum Income Program, paying all citizens either employed or in education for the purpose of future employment, with an income below the poverty line or sufficiently close to the poverty line, payments to bring them above it, with a gradual phase out intended to preserve the pursuance of higher incomes.
Section 3: Replaces and absorbs the funding of existing welfare programs into the expenditure of the Federal Minimum Income Program, while phasing out the federally mandated minimum wage gradually over the course of the first year of the implementation of the Federal Minimum Income Program.
(a) After the first year of implementation, state and local level minimum wages are prohibited.
(b) Converts existing federal unemployment insurance expenditures into funds for an Employment Education System tasked with providing education to unemployed individuals for the purpose of gainful employment.
Section 4: Amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to add a new subsection to Section 7 as follows: The forty-hour workweek limit may be waived in a given state, pursuant to an act of the relevant state legislature, which must be passed on a yearly basis to remain in effect.
This bill is then honorably presented to the Senate for consideration in order to change welfare and anti-poverty measures to improve the United States Law and is backed by Sofia Fraser.
by Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:33 pm
by Louisianan » Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:44 pm
Cybernetic Socialist Republics wrote:Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY): Motion to bring the FREE Act to the floor.
by Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Tue Mar 23, 2021 5:27 pm
by Louisianan » Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:40 am
by Louisianan » Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:41 am
by Louisianan » Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:41 am
by Hopal » Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:45 pm
by Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:07 pm
by Chia Dal » Wed Mar 24, 2021 5:13 pm
by Louisianan » Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:35 am
by Louisianan » Sun Mar 28, 2021 9:22 am
Cybernetic Socialist Republics wrote:Louisianan wrote:President Pro Tempore: "As I've heard no objection, I'll grant the motion, without a second. The chair invites the gentlelady to take the floor, and introduce the bill."
Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY):
After negotiations, I am now able to present a revised version of the FREE Act, which carries bi-partisan endorsements of three presidential candidates, that stand on three different sides of the civil rights issue, a Senator, a Governor and a private citizen. It is not often that we can see the the advancement of proposals that have this degree of diversity in support across party lines, but this evidence of what is possible if we come together for the best interests of Americans.
The FREE Act ensures a guaranteed minimum income for all those willing to work to improve themselves, replacing our bureaucratic and restrictive system of wage controls and welfare with something far more efficient. It simultaneously equalizes the burden of anti-poverty measures between north and south, urban and rural, rich and poor, while allowing states to, if they so choose, more freedom in delegating control over workhours to negotiations between worker and employer, union and business.
by Hopal » Sun Mar 28, 2021 9:25 am
Louisianan wrote:Speaker Pro Tempore: The Nay's have it, the Equity Tax Amendment dies. The House Floor is open to motions and debate.
by Louisianan » Sun Mar 28, 2021 9:33 am
by Cybernetic Socialist Republics » Sun Mar 28, 2021 9:46 am
Louisianan wrote:Cybernetic Socialist Republics wrote:
Senator Sofia Fraser (R-NY):
After negotiations, I am now able to present a revised version of the FREE Act, which carries bi-partisan endorsements of three presidential candidates, that stand on three different sides of the civil rights issue, a Senator, a Governor and a private citizen. It is not often that we can see the the advancement of proposals that have this degree of diversity in support across party lines, but this evidence of what is possible if we come together for the best interests of Americans.
The FREE Act ensures a guaranteed minimum income for all those willing to work to improve themselves, replacing our bureaucratic and restrictive system of wage controls and welfare with something far more efficient. It simultaneously equalizes the burden of anti-poverty measures between north and south, urban and rural, rich and poor, while allowing states to, if they so choose, more freedom in delegating control over workhours to negotiations between worker and employer, union and business.
President Pro Tempore: "Seeing as there are no questions, the bill will be placed back into General Debate. The Senate Floor is open to motions and debate regarding the Free Act."
by Chia Dal » Sun Mar 28, 2021 4:57 pm
by Louisianan » Sun Mar 28, 2021 5:00 pm
by Louisianan » Sun Mar 28, 2021 5:01 pm
by Hopal » Sun Mar 28, 2021 5:03 pm
Why did you object to taking up the Workplace Investigations Act? I thought you co-sponsored it.
by Chia Dal » Sun Mar 28, 2021 5:27 pm
Hopal wrote:Louisianan wrote:Speaker Pro Tempore: "Hearing both a second and an objection to the motion, the House will now vote on whether or not we take up the Workplace Investigations Act."
Representative Richard Douglas
[Democratic-Farmer-Labor - 4th District of Minnesota]
"Aye"
After registering his vote Douglas sends a note to WilliamsWhy did you object to taking up the Workplace Investigations Act? I thought you co-sponsored it.
I'm using this as a test vote before we really vote on it.
by Louisianan » Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:56 pm
by Louisianan » Tue Mar 30, 2021 5:59 pm
by Hopal » Tue Mar 30, 2021 6:23 pm
Louisianan wrote:Speaker Pro Tempore: "The Aye's have it. The Chair invites Mr. Douglas to the floor to introduce the bill."
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Cessarea, Google [Bot], Honghai, Lunas Legion, Pasong Tirad
Advertisement