Louisianan wrote:Cybernetic Socialist Republics wrote:Governor Fraser is going take the position that Jackson probably wasn't responsible for any of the successes of WW2. Jackson really hasn't shown anything consistent with being responsible for the type of moderation it takes to run an alliance like Eisenhower did.
It's like if you have someone who's supposed to be a successful labor leader and all they do on the campaign trail is quote atlas shrugged. Reasonable to believe they weren't the ones writing their talks or doing strategy as a labor leader.
Thats a dangerous position to take since Jackson is basically our timelines MacArthur who is nationally known as a war hero. But go ahead, I'm sure MacArthur had opponents like this.
yeah the issue is that it's basically more like Curtis LeMay being treated with the dignity of MacArthur. the guy was opposed to the Vietnam war because he saw it as a waste and LeMay was relegated to being a third party vp. MacArthur wasn't a "let's just bomb all foreign enemies into the stone age and string up hippies domestically" guy.