G-Tech Corporation wrote:Joohan wrote:
It was an idea I had, I read the books to see if I could actually do it. Without going into a lot of detail, the triggering mechanism wouldn't actually be that difficult to make - but it was erratic. My base for the naval mines was off of David Bushnell's contact torpedo's, used in the Revolutionary war.
Oh sure - but who is going to manufacture clockwork for those? You'd probably be better off working with the flint-triggered models from Britain, if you know of those. Unreliable, sure, but inexpensive to manufacture, also sure.
Anyway! I digress. My main question was about firearms. One of the King's Guard is going to demonstrate an Icedonian model in my next post, so I was curious what you actually decided was logical to develop over the last timeskip.
Bushnell's design was flint triggered - half the time, it worked, every time.
Anyhow, I'm not sure what much there is to say - as I couldn't build a perfect replica of any particular model of flint lock. Essentially though: It's chambered in about .40 caliber, using bullets ( not balls ) which travel through the barrel's inner rifling. The rifling is down via a wheel operated lathe for uniformity and consistence. Barrel length is about 40 inches. Obviously muzzle fed: rip the top off a black powder cartridge and pour it in, then the cloth, then the bullet, tamp it down and rod it through. Standard flintlock triggering mechanism.
One deficiency which it definitely would have, and I couldn't figure a work around for, was the frizzen spring. Not so much in that we couldn't make one that worked properly ( properly enough anyway ) it's just that making wire ( as you know ) is a long and tedious task. That alone would be the most expensive piece of the weapon, and not cheap to produce.







