NATION

PASSWORD

The Great Restoration (Semi-PMT/Nation/OOC/Dead)

For all of your non-NationStates related roleplaying needs!

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which RP should I do next?

Poll ended at Fri Jul 03, 2020 4:51 am

Cold Interbellum
2
20%
The New Age
2
20%
The Changed World
1
10%
Anno 1900
4
40%
Divided States of America
1
10%
 
Total votes : 10

User avatar
Plzen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9805
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Plzen » Sat May 02, 2020 4:36 am

Done. Took me all afternoon to write. So much research...

[Do Not Remove - AKSAI]

NS Name: Plzen, RC
RP Name: The proper and formal name of the polity is the Northern Commonwealth (da: Nordisk Samfund; sv: Nordiska samväldet; no: Nordisk samvelde, fi: Pohjoismaiden kansainyhteisö, is: Norðurlandasambandið). Unofficially and in common parlance, Norden (fi: Pohjoismaat, is: Norðurland) is used. In the English-speaking world, unofficially and incorrectly but nonetheless popularly, Scandinavia is used.

Capital: The nominal capital of the Northern Commonwealth is Copenhagen (da: København), where the Nordic Council meets. The executive and judicial branches of government as well as the Civil Service, however, have no clear administrative centre and are distributed between several offices in several cities of which none is de-facto clearly superior to the rest.
Territory: The territory of the Northern Commonwealth includes Denmark (including the Faroe Islands and Greenland), Sweden, Norway (including Svalbard and the Norwegian Antarctic), Finland and Iceland, all in accordance with post-Cold War borders with the additions of: that region of northern Germany that used to be a part of the historical Duchy of Schleswig, which is now administered as a part of Denmark, the regions of Karelia, Salla, and Petsamo that used to be a part of Finland from 1921-1939, and the Scottish island groups of the Shetlands and the Orkneys, which are now administered as dependent countries in the Kingdom of Norway.
Population: The total population of the Northern Commonwealth is 30.80 millions, showing a modest growth of slightly over 10% since the beginning of the 21st Century. This was driven primarily by immigration in the early part of this period, territorial expansion in the later part of this period, and supported by a relatively high fertility rate by European standards. Geographically, this breaks down into 6.92 millions in the Kingdom of Denmark (of which 6.81 Denmark proper including 0.40 from territorial expansion 2001-, 0.06 Greenland, 0.06 Faroe Islands), 6.14 millions in the Republic of Finland (of which 0.34 from territorial expansion 2001-), 0.42 millions in the Republic of Iceland, 5.96 millions in the Kingdom of Norway (of which 5.91 Norway proper, 0.03 Shetland Islands, 0.02 Orkney Islands, <0.01 Svalbard and Norwegian Antarctic), and 11.37 millions in the Kingdom of Sweden. Linguistically, which is a decent approximation of national culture, about 72% speak some form of Scandinavian as their primary language, 15% Finnish, 1% Icelandic, with about 3% total forming the smaller minorities of German, Russian, Faroese, Karelian, Sami, English, and Greenlandic. The remaining 9% speak as their primary language an unrecognised minority language, which are both diverse and numerous.
Type of Government: The Northern Commonwealth is a devolutionary, parliamentary, constitutional, and democratic polity.
Government Explaination: Norden is a devolutionary polity; the Nordic Council and the Commonwealth government are there largely to deal with defence, foreign policy, common infrastructural development, regulatory standardisation and other such matters which concern the Commonwealth as a whole; the governments of its constituent states and localities retain considerable autonomy and power with regards to the internal affairs of each state and locality. Norden is a parliamentary polity; the country is organised on a principle of legislative superiority, with the legislature of the Commonwealth, the Nordic Council (da: Nordisk Råd, sv: Nordiska rådet, no: Nordisk råd, fi: Pohjoismaiden neuvosto, is: Norðurlandaráð) being the highest deliberative body in the polity; the executive branch of government serves at the pleasure of the legislature, which can appoint or dismiss ministers at will. Norden is a constitutional polity; the 2035 Revised Charter of the Nordic Council continue to be the legal basis for the existence of the Commonwealth and all affairs of state are conducted in accordance with the Charter. Finally, Norden is a democratic polity; the government rests on the legitimacy of popular sovereignty; all levels of government are directly or indirectly elected through free and fair elections, with the Nordic Council itself being elected under regional proportional representation with no more than seven years between elections.
Leader(s): Dag Stjarna, Prime Minister of the Northern Commonwealth.
Image(s) of Leader(s): Image.
Party or Coalition in Power: The Nordic Council is, for the moment, held by a coalition led by the Centre Group (da: Midtergruppen) and supported by the Social-Democrats (da: Den Socialdemokratiske Gruppe).
Executive Title: With respect to the monarchies of the three Scandinavian kingdoms which continue to hold some nominal positions in the governments of these nations, the Northern Commonwealth does not have an official head of state. The highest office in the land, thus, becomes the head of government, the Secretary-General of the Council (da: Nordisk Råds Generalsekretær).
State Ideology: The Northern Commonwealth is vaguely liberal-progressive, with a highly technology- and individual-oriented approach to social problems.
Ethnicity Breakdown: Due to the decades-long integration of various immigrant communities and mixed-ethnicity children, the exact ethnic breakdown of the Northern Commonwealth is almost impossible to measure. At a very rough estimate, the Commonwealth's genetic stock is about 60% Germanic, 15% Finno-Uralic, 10% other European, and 15% non-European.
Religion Breakdown: Nominally, roughly equal numbers of people are Protestant Christian and nonreligious, the two largest groups in the Commonwealth, with small minorities of other Christians, Muslims, and other religions. Religion, however, is no longer an important part of Northern culture or daily life, with most religious people holding only nominal faith.
Flag: The flag of the Northern Commonwealth is a stylised white swan with five wing feathers representing the five member states inscribed in a white circle against a blue field.
National Anthem: The Northern Commonwealth does not maintain an official national anthem. The constituent states of the Commonwealth maintains their own national anthems, although there is no custom of playing national anthems before official or governmental events as exists in many other countries.
National Motto: The Northern Commowealth does not maintain an official motto.
Demonym: No official denonym for the Commonwealth exists. Nordbo is occasionally used in common parlance.
Map Color: Light desaturated blue

Public Goals: The Centre-Socialist coalition that currently holds power in the Northern Commonwealth seeks to achieve a variety of different objectives. First, ensure the security of the Northern Commonwealth from both foreign and internal threats. Second, ensure that the Northern Commonwealth remains the world's centre for technological research and scientific endeavours. Third, continue to manage the increasing pervasiveness of information-communication technology and avoid the implications of such technologies imploding Northern society.

Military name: The Armed Forces of the Northern Commonwealth is called Commonwealth Defence (da: Samfundets Forsvaret).
Military branches: The combat services of the Commonwealth Defence consist of the Army (da: Hæren), the Home Guards (da: Hjemmeværnet), the Navy (da: Søværnet), the Coast Guards (da: Kystvagt) and the Air Force (da: Flyvevåbnet).
Total military size: With a paper strength of 135,000 in active service, 230,000 in reserves, and a funding that averaged about 700 billion kroner a year in the last few years, the Northern Commonwealth fields a military of a size more or less to be expected from a relatively peaceable highly-developed country with somewhat concerning external threats.
Breakdown of ground force(s): Because of Norden's focus on sea and air warfare over maintaining a large ground strength and because of the incompatibility between the manpower-heavy nature of ground forces and the high costs of employment in the Commonwealth, the Northern ground forces are relatively small compared to the power of the country's seagoing and airbourne forces. The Army, the regular service component of the ground forces, employs about 49,000 men and the Home Guards, the reservist component, employs about 155,000, for a total wartime paper strength of about ~204,000. This small force, however, is flush with heavy armaments with a particular fondness for self-propelled artillery, fielding a mechanised frontline force of about ~100 air defence vehicles, ~350 tanks, ~1,000 artillery, ~1,000 infantry fighting vehicles, and ~2,500 armoured personnel carriers. The Army also has an Air Command contingent attached to it, with ~50 light recon aircraft and ~150 helicopters.
Breakdown of naval force(s): Due to the Northern Commonwealth's unique geographical constraints, being bounded by the North Sea and the Baltic as well as having inhabited islands out into the North Atlantic and the Arctic Oceans, the Commonwealth Defence takes its naval branch very seriously. Between the Navy and the Coast Guard, Norden has a seagoing strength of 2 aircraft carriers, 22 cruisers, 19 frigates, 50 mine warfare ships, 61 coastal defense ships, 140 combat boats, and 36 submarines. It maintains a naval aircraft branch of about ~70 reconnaissance aircraft (most of which light), ~60 multirole fighters, ~60 helicopters, and ~10 electronic warfare aircraft. It also maintains brigade of marines and some special forces units. All considered, the Navy employs about 41,000 regulars and 64,000 reserves, and the Coast Guard another 7,000 regulars.
Breakdown of air force(s): Norden has a rather formidable and expensive air force for a nation of its size and international stature. The Commonwealth Air Force fields a force of about ~750 multirole fighters, ~10 electronic warfare aircraft, ~50 reconnaissance aircraft (most of which heavy), ~40 transports, ~150 helicopters, and ~200 trainer aircraft. It employs a paper strength of 38,000, with another 11,000 reservists.
Breakdown of other branch(es): Northern Defence also has a variety of other branches handling logistics, cybersecurity, human resources, intelligence, counterintelligence, training, etc., but these branches are not frontline branches and do not have units intended to see combat.
Extra military information: Norden funnels a large budget, over 4% of GDP, into a military with none-too-many assets, and the results very much show in the quality of the Northern military. From virtual-reality training and neurological conditioning to cybernetic implants and live-fire combat drones, the latest innovations in science and engineering are always directly introduced into the training and equipment of the Armed Forces, aimed at creating a battlefield environment that more traditional forces cannot survive in and a pace of warfare that traditional chains of command cannot respond to. Consequently, Northern Defence fields quite possibly the most advanced and sophisticated military equipment that can be found in the world.

GDP: The nominal GDP of the Northern Commonwealth is 16.48 trillion kroner/year, making it one of the major economic powers of the mid-21st Century. On a PPP- and inflation-adjusted basis, this is 3,218 billion (1990 Int'll$). Northern Europe saw in the early 21st Century, just like in the late 20th, strong economic growth interrupted by a few recession, averaging 3.1% real GDP growth per year from 2000 to 2056.
GDP per Capita: The nominal GDP per capita of the Northern Commonwealth is kr. 535,000/year, which on a PPP- and inflation-adjusted basis is 104,500 (1990 Int'll$). There are considerable regional disparities in economic development. There is a east-west gap, with the North Sea states of Iceland and Norway generally being more prosperous than the Baltic states of Sweden and Finland, as well as an urban-rural gap, with large cities generally being more prosperous than countryside towns. The Finnish Karelian territories newly-acquired from Russia are especially impoverished.

Currency: The national currency of the Northern Commonwealth is the Commonwealth Crown (da/no: krone, sv: krona, fi: kruunu, is: króna), trading symbol NDK. Although the Commonwealth Central Bank continues to print physical banknotes and mint physical coins, the krone is a largely digitalised currency with only small transactions in the margins of society still being conducted with physical cash.
Currency and value of currency compared to USD: On a purchasing power basis, the krone is worth kr. 5.12 on the 1990 Int'll$, but due to the Commonwealth's strong and resilient economy tends to trade for much more than its purchasing power would suggest.

Major Domestic Issues: High unemployment, outdated regulations and procedures, youth delinquency, dissatisfied cultural minorities, and climate change related weather events are all domestic issues that concern the Northern Commonwealth.
Major Foreign Issues: The simple fact that the Commonwealth is surrounded by much larger and more populous nations is of grave concern to the Northern Commonwealth, and the government does its best to mitigate the security and economic threat that this poses.

History: As below:
While the idea of Scandinavian unification has held some sway in popular and intellectual circles since the 19th Century, the Northern Commonwealth as it currently exists draws its origins from the early Cold War era. Following the devastation of the Second World War, which saw Denmark and Norway occupied by German forces and Finland invaded by the Soviet Union, the nations of northern Europe became cognisant that they were unable to, as individual minor nations, defend their sovereignty and interests alone. Since cultural and historical ties bound the five northern European nations, integration between these nations was the logical outcome. Although initially integration on a fairly extensive scale was planned, including a military alliance, the differing diplomatic interests of the member states, especially those of Finland which was under tremendous diplomatic policy from the Soviet Union not to join any "western" military cooperations, the talks largely fell through. Nonetheless, an inter-governmental advisory organ, the Nordic Council, was formed as a result of these negotiations and over the coming decades the Council presided over considerable economic integration between the northern European states.

The advancement of the European Economic Community and later the European Union, however, did make obsolete many of these functions and treaties, with European institutions taking over the integration projects that the Nordic Council formerly oversaw. With borders of the European Union and of NATO running through the Nordic Region, the late 20th Century and the early 21st saw the northern European nations prosper and prosper enormously, benefiting heavily from the open markets of the capitalist sphere and the globalisation of the information age, but they largely did so alone or in the European Union framework. Trump's election as President of the United States and the subsequent downturn to the globalist idea saw the northern European nations emerging as major high-technology industrial exporters and service economies.

Both the 2020-21 coronavirus pandemic and the subsequent deterioration of relations between Germany and the United Kingdom in the early 2020s were major blows to the European international trade on which many of the northern European nations depended. With radical political movements slowly beginning to take hold across the European Union, starting from Germany, as well as in East Asia, serious concerns were raised about the viability of continuing to leave Nordic economic prosperity dependent upon international trade.

The result was a strong wave of anti-internationalism across the Nordic region. The Danish Reds, already very skeptical of globalisation and international economic integration after the European migrant crisis of the 2010s, opened several cross-aisle initiatives aimed at shielding Denmark from global political turbulences. These initiatives would survive the transition of power after the 2023 elections. In Norway, the 2020 break between the Conservatives and the Progress Party over Prime Minister Solberg's repatriation of a woman linked to the Islamic State isolated the more nationalistic Progress Party, formerly seen firmly as a party of the political right, as a kingmaker between Labour and Conservative in the 2021 Storting elections to which Labour had to make many concessions to secure the support of. In the year immediately following, the 2022 Swedish Riksdag elections saw results that were every bit as inconclusive as those of 2018, with government formation being delayed for months as a broad coalition had to be hashed out. In a move that surprised many political observers, the Social-Democrats, the Sweden Democrats, and the Christian Democrats came to an agreement on a broadly protectionist platform, outraging the Left and the Greens which saw the move as a social-democratic betrayal of progressive principles. In Finland, the Left Alliance and the Centre Party, desiring the protection of their country from international market pressures, clashed with their coalition partners in the Social-Democrats and the Swedish People's, a feud that would be settled quite decisively in favour of the former after a populace outraged at the actions taken by the European Union to deter further exits from the Union overwhelmingly voted in favour of protectionism. The Social-Democrats, in the end, conceded to Centre on the issue.

Thus, as 2023 came to a close, although a left-leaning government sat in Oslo and Helsinki, a right-leaning government sat in Copenhagen, and a strange and unstable coalition sat in Stockholm, the governments of northern Europe were all disillusioned with the aftereffects of globalisation and free international trade and all interested in more local cooperation and self-sufficiency. Although these tendencies were not visible on a diplomatic or a military level, with Denmark, Norway, and Iceland choosing to toe the EU line instead of joining the post-NATO bloc led by the Americans and Denmark, Sweden, and Finland sending some token reconnaissance forces to assist the European Union in the Central European War, on a more subtle, economic and social level radical reforms were enacted. Immigration policies were made drastically more restrictive over the course of the Central European War, as Nordic-Continental and Nordic-British trade both declined. These states, being aware that the inability of small states to survive in a chaotic international environment of which they were all reminded in the aftermath of the Second World War still held true, re-forged and strengthened the Nordic diplomatic and economic ties that have laid largely dormant since the 1970s, trusting that the other northern European countries, with a relatively high degree of political stability compared to other western states and with governments of a relatively similar, protectionist outlook on international trade, would be more reliable as economic partners than any other.

Perhaps surprisingly, trade between the former northern European NATO states and the UK and the US remained relatively unaffected by the diplomatic chaos surrounding Europe in the run-up to and in the early stages of the Central European War, although as previously noted the trade volume did decline as northern European economies slowly aligned themselves towards more local and nationalistic lines. American military bases in Denmark were withdrawn in 2023 and those in Norway in 2024, both relatively peaceably. With Norway, nominally neutral in the Central European War until winter 2024-25, being a key European exporter of oil and natural gas to both the United Kingdom and Germany - which Germany, especially, needed due to being embargoed by both the US and Russia - neither side was interested in diplomatically pushing on the issue and potentially risk a Norwegian embargo. The election of Chris Shannon and his aggressively anti-European policy in November 2024 would be the final decisive factor that pushed Norway towards siding with the European Union, although Norway steadfastly refused to send troops against the Freedom Alliance, participating in the Central European War only as a co-belligerent against Russia from 2025 onward.

Perhaps strangely, the period from the mid-2020s to the mid-2030s also saw northern technological research and engineering advances by leaps and bounds, almost a golden age of technology. With governments discouraging reliance on international trade from the early 2020s, the cost of labour-intensive goods formerly imported from the developing world or from less prosperous nations in Southern Europe rose sharply, creating huge economic opportunities for research into artificial intelligence and robotics, while new import-substitution industries were created across northern Fennoscandia. These initiatives even received considerable financial support from the European Union and from Germany, which accepted the argument that Scandinavia could not meaningfully contribute towards the European war effort without a self-sufficient industrial sector and saw large benefits in having a more developed northern flank against Russia.

The years of turbulence and strife finally resulted in a pan-European economic slowdown in spring 2027, as the effects of resource shortages, abruptly-cut international trade, and wartime uncertainty caught up to the nations of the European Union. While Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Iceland were relatively shielded from these effects through years of economic protectionism and, in the case of the three former NATO states, relatively open trade with the United Kingdom - at least until the intensification of British support to Spain in summer 2027 - and the United States, the Swedes, whose government was paralysed for years due to ideological strife between the more progressive Social-Democrats and the more conservative Sweden Democrats and Christian Democrats, suffered a recession lasting for years.

The Nordic Council was quick to respond. Aware that an impoverished, EU-reliant hole sitting between their three countries would be disastrous towards their common objective of maintaining a degree of autonomy and independence from the European Union's increasingly authoritarian policies, Denmark, Norway, and Finland all arranged emergency aid to the Swedish public sector in exchange for future concessions. The three Scandinavian kingdoms also entered a currency union to keep the Swedish krona afloat while Norway in particular offered enormous loans which provided some degree of liquidity and kept the Swedish government and the country's large international corporations from having to request EU bailouts.

By the 2027 Danish elections, which saw power switch back to the Red bloc, it was almost an open secret in the Nordic region that in these turbulent times it was the government's duty to diplomatically moderate, to both protect their citizens from the depredations of the European Union while also avoid having the actions of their citizens offend their much larger neighbours. This election also saw the slow winding-down of Scandinavia's nominal participation in the war raging across central and southern Europe, with Sweden needing its few troops for internal security and the new Red bloc government in Denmark prioritising the war against Russia, which was affecting the Nordic region directly.

This war against Russia also saw the early introduction of many innovations in military armaments that the Northern Commonwealth will become known for in future decades. With over a thousand kilometres of forested and poorly-roaded front in the Finnish countryside to cover with only a few hundred thousand troops, automated sentry turrets, electronic identification signals, surveillance drones, and assisted targeting systems proved to be vital advantages keeping the Finnish defence viable.

The forced pressures of a shared diplomatic and military situation prompted increasingly close cooperation between the northern European states in the later years of the Central European War. With military forces from all five nations holding the line in Karelia and Sapmi, a joint command was created to provide the speed and efficiency of communication that were becoming vitally necessary in the pace of battle that increased with each passing year. A common need to both present a united front against the German government and economically shield their countries from the Eurozone bloc while also continuing their active participation in the European Union and protecting Europe's - and consequently their own - shores from Anglo-American and Russian forces slowly evolved into a joint diplomatic infrastructure. Economically, with the war against Russia flooding Scandinavian kroner into the Finnish economy, the Finnish government eventually adopted it as a joint official currency in November 2029, with Iceland following soon after and outright replacing the Icelandic króna with the Scandinavian krone in 2032.

The beginning of the Gulf War in 2029, the intensification of the Continental front between Germany and Russia in 2031, and the increasing deployment of newly-developed equipment by the Nordic Armed Forces combined turned the tide decisively in favour of Finland in the war against Russia. With Russian troops being stripped from the north to reinforce more important positions in Poland and Lithuania as well as being sent to support the Gulf War in the south, and the Scandinavian militaries slowly becoming better trained and equipped to fight a low-density but high-intensity war with the years of experience, the first successful offensive against Russia were undertaken in the winter of 2031-32, retaking the Finnish border towns previously captured by Russia and advancing to within sight of Vyborg/Viipuri.

Another minor economic downturn would strike northern Europe in 2033, this time lasting much longer than the 2027 shock, with the collapse of political stability in and thus meaningful trade with the United States, the last major power outside of the European Union with which the northern European countries maintained a non-negligible volume of foreign trade. The resulting financial panic would force the northern states into increased co-dependence with each other to weather the shocks and find the necessary substitute suppliers and markets. Again, Norway's considerable public wealth had to be involved to hold the increasingly isolated Nordic bloc together. Suddenly placed in a position of tremendous power, Norway demanded considerable concessions from the bailed-out states in Denmark, Sweden, and Finland, strengthening Nordic institutions with the rationale that Norway was in an excellent position to dominate any international cooperation between the Nordic states and, thus, that this was an excellent time for Norway to push for the establishment of such cooperation. With the Nordic Council assuming powers of defence and foreign policy including against other European member states, sanctions from Continental Europe against the northern European states, and increased concern following the collapse of the United States that the European Union may also be a dangerous market or investment target, the member states of the Nordic Council slowly began to detach themselves from European affairs.

With the Revised Charter of the Nordic Council on the 28th of January, 2035, the nations of northern Europe de facto became a singular and independent state, although they would nominally remain separate and members of the European Union for several more months, with all four EU-member states withdrawing from the European Union on the 06th June 2035 and the five northern European states only officially merging into a declared Commonwealth on 04th May 2036.

The new Commonwealth would then spend its first years making a series of minor but rapid territorial gains. With the United Kingdom collapsing internally, the Northern Commonwealth would throughout summer 2036 succeed in capturing islands across the Northern Isles and the Hebrides and, mediated by the government of what remained of the United States, would sign a peace agreement with the United Kingdom with modest territorial gains soon after. Similarly, with Germany falling into civil war and with strong concerns that the turmoil might spread into southern Denmark, the Commonwealth would deploy peacekeeping forces a few dozen kilometres into German territory, establishing a Protectorate Zone that would, after a referendum about five years later, be annexed into Denmark.

The war against Russia would continue on for a few more years, although the intensity of the war would decline considerably as Russia had to increasingly concentrate on maintaining internal stability, as its economy slowly collapsed, and on other strategic objectives in the south and west. No official peace treaty would ever be signed, but with the total collapse of the Russian government in spring 2041 and Finnish troops within sight of the Winter Palace, the Northern Commonwealth would unilaterally declare the restoration of Finland's pre-1939 eastern frontiers, which would go uncontested for the next decade and a half with no Russian faction both capable and willing to challenge it.

As northern Europe finally returned to peace in 2041, it stood at the top of the world with a series of unique advantages. The first, of course, was the availability of natural resources. The North and Norwegian Seas, Greenland, and northern Fennoscandia were all possessed of abundant mineral and energy resources, catapulting the country into the largest source of natural resources and base industrial components to a European continent of 700 million people sinking enormous expenses into reconstruction. This would be further aided by the Commonwealth opting to withdraw from Norway's participation in the Antarctic Treaty after re-negotiation in 2048 and its exploitation of the Arctic, with Russia no longer in any position to dispute the Commonwealth's extensive exclusive economic zone claims across the Arctic. The second was the region's expertise in automation technology and the extensive infrastructure supporting it. Although initially developed in response to both market and military pressures, needing to substitute labour-intensive goods that could no longer be imported from less developed countries and needing to maintain a viable military presence against Russia despite a far smaller population, after the time of crisis these technologies would be turned towards economic growth. Throughout the 2040s, labour productivity surged as the Commonwealth established its place as perhaps the only country in Europe both able to economically afford and scientifically develop the various innovations made before the widespread social collapses of the late 2030s. Third was the region's political stability. The Scandinavian countries all have long parliamentary traditions dating unbroken to the 19th Century, and they were not heavily affected by the various wars both international and civil that devastated the physical capital of other nations. While most other countries in Europe had to struggle to put the pieces back in and reconstruct themselves throughout the 2040s, the Commonwealth could move forwards with developing the future, having only suffered substantial damages in Finland.

The consequent and inevitable rapid economic development were followed by a series of severe social changes, many of which were visible even in the late 2030s and only intensified throughout the 2040s. The first and most domestically obvious one was unemployment. With nearly every job that can be automated being automated, millions of formerly productive workers suddenly found themselves in situations where they did not have any skill that could not be done better by a machine. Unemployment and urban slums skyrocketed as a result. Although after the Stockholm Jobless Riots of 2043 and 2044, the Commonwealth expanded a generous citizen's dividend scheme in order to curb poverty and poverty-related social problems, the sheer anger and frustration of millions of people who no longer have any productive purpose in life continue to cause massive social strife.

Much like the World Wars of the 20th Century, the deconstruction of the liberal, globalised world of the early 21st Century left a deep cultural trauma everywhere, including in the Northern Commonwealth. Nihilistic, hedonistic, and absurdist tendencies swept the nation as new ideologies sought to make themselves heard and displace the old. Old social norms have been almost totally discarded, with all sorts of grey market vices flooding the country's alleyways. Politically, a cluster of parties predating the 21st Century still desperately cling on to some semblance of a 20th Century modern liberal democracy as extremists from all ends of the political spectrum steadily gain in popularity.

The 2040s were also characterised by the increasing diplomatic isolationism of the Northern Commonwealth. The rapid economic growth and the increasingly technological nature of Northern society severed cultural understanding between the Commonwealth and its immediate neighbours. Economically protectionist, culturally detached, and politically revolutionary, the Northern Commonwealth started to see itself and started to be seen as almost a different world. Insofar as the Northern Commonwealth still engages in multilateral diplomacy, its purpose is to either oppose a common threat or poach foreign high-skill specialists. Nothing of greater complexity than that interests the Commonwealth's diplomats.

With the world slowly returning to stability and prosperity again and resurgent and unified states now threatening its borders, however, the success of the Commonwealth's futurist project, whatever that success actually means, is not yet a certain thing...

RP Example: The old iteration.
Last edited by Plzen on Wed May 20, 2020 2:50 am, edited 14 times in total.

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 5:09 am

Plzen wrote:Done. Took me all afternoon to write. So much research...

[Do Not Remove - AKSAI]

NS Name: Plzen, RC
RP Name: The proper and formal name of the polity is the Northern Commonwealth (da: Nordisk Samfund; sv: Nordiska samväldet; no: Nordisk samvelde, fi: Pohjoismaiden kansainyhteisö, is: Norðurlandasambandið). Unofficially and in common parlance, Norden (fi: Pohjoismaat, is: Norðurland) is used. In the English-speaking world, unofficially and incorrectly but nonetheless popularly, Scandinavia is used.

Capital: The nominal capital of the Northern Commonwealth is Copenhagen (da: København), where the Nordic Council meets. The executive and judicial branches of government as well as the Civil Service, however, have no clear administrative centre and are distributed between several offices in several cities of which none is de-facto clearly superior to the rest.
Territory: The territory of the Northern Commonwealth includes Denmark (including the Faroe Islands and Greenland), Sweden, Norway (including Svalbard and the Norwegian Antarctic), Finland and Iceland, all in accordance with post-Cold War borders with the additions of: that region of northern Germany that used to be a part of the historical Duchy of Schleswig, which is now administered as a part of Denmark, the regions of Karelia, Salla, and Petsamo that used to be a part of Finland from 1921-1939, and the Scottish island groups of the Shetlands and the Orkneys, which are now administered as dependent countries in the Kingdom of Denmark.
Population: The total population of the Northern Commonwealth is 30.80 millions, showing a modest growth of slightly over 10% since the beginning of the 21st Century. This was driven primarily by immigration in the early part of this period, territorial expansion in the later part of this period, and supported by a relatively high fertility rate by European standards. Geographically, this breaks down into 6.97 millions in the Kingdom of Denmark (of which 6.81 Denmark proper including 0.40 from territorial expansion 2001-, 0.06 Greenland, 0.06 Faroe Islands, 0.03 Shetland Islands, and 0.02 Orkney Islands), 6.14 millions in the Republic of Finland (of which 0.34 from territorial expansion 2001-), 0.42 millions in the Republic of Iceland, 5.91 millions in the Kingdom of Norway (almost entirely in Norway proper, with negligible populations in Svalbard and the Norwegian Antarctic), and 11.37 millions in the Kingdom of Sweden. Linguistically, which is a decent approximation of national culture, about 72% speak some form of Scandinavian as their primary language, 15% Finnish, 1% Icelandic, with about 3% total forming the smaller minorities of German, Russian, Faroese, Karelian, Sami, English, and Aleut. The remaining 9% speak as their primary language an unrecognised minority language, which are both diverse and numerous.
Type of Government: The Northern Commonwealth is a devolutionary, parliamentary, constitutional, and democratic polity.
Government Explaination: Norden is a devolutionary polity; the Nordic Council and the Commonwealth government are there largely to deal with defence, foreign policy, common infrastructural development, regulatory standardisation and other such matters which concern the Commonwealth as a whole; the governments of its constituent states and localities retain considerable autonomy and power with regards to the internal affairs of each state and locality. Norden is a parliamentary polity; the country is organised on a principle of legislative superiority, with the legislature of the Commonwealth, the Nordic Council (da: Nordisk Råd, sv: Nordiska rådet, no: Nordisk råd, fi: Pohjoismaiden neuvosto, is: Norðurlandaráð) being the highest deliberative body in the polity; the executive branch of government serves at the pleasure of the legislature, which can appoint or dismiss ministers at will. Norden is a constitutional polity; the 2035 Revised Charter of the Nordic Council continue to be the legal basis for the existence of the Commonwealth and all affairs of state are conducted in accordance with the Charter. Finally, Norden is a democratic polity; the government rests on the legitimacy of popular sovereignty; all levels of government are directly or indirectly elected through free and fair elections, with the Nordic Council itself being elected under regional proportional representation with no more than seven years between elections.
Leader(s): Dag Stjarna, Prime Minister of the Northern Commonwealth.
Image(s) of Leader(s): Image.
Party or Coalition in Power: The Nordic Council is, for the moment, held by a coalition led by the Centre Group (da: Midtergruppen) and supported by the Social-Democrats (da: Den Socialdemokratiske Gruppe).
Executive Title: With respect to the monarchies of the three Scandinavian kingdoms which continue to hold some nominal positions in the governments of these nations, the Northern Commonwealth does not have an official head of state. The highest office in the land, thus, becomes the head of government, the Secretary-General of the Council (da: Nordisk Råds Generalsekretær).
State Ideology: The Northern Commonwealth is vaguely liberal-progressive, with a highly technology- and individual-oriented approach to social problems.
Ethnicity Breakdown: Due to the decades-long integration of various immigrant communities and mixed-ethnicity children, the exact ethnic breakdown of the Northern Commonwealth is almost impossible to measure. At a very rough estimate, the Commonwealth's genetic stock is about 60% Germanic, 15% Finno-Uralic, 10% other European, and 15% non-European.
Religion Breakdown: Nominally, roughly equal numbers of people are Protestant Christian and nonreligious, the two largest groups in the Commonwealth, with small minorities of other Christians, Muslims, and other religions. Religion, however, is no longer an important part of Northern culture or daily life, with most religious people holding only nominal faith.
Flag: The flag of the Northern Commonwealth is a stylised white swan with five wing feathers representing the five member states inscribed in a white circle against a blue field.
National Anthem: The Northern Commonwealth does not maintain an official national anthem. The constituent states of the Commonwealth maintains their own national anthems, although there is no custom of playing national anthems before official or governmental events as exists in many other countries.
National Motto: The Northern Commowealth does not maintain an official motto.
Demonym: No official denonym for the Commonwealth exists. Nordbo is occasionally used in common parlance.
Map Color: Light desaturated blue

Public Goals: The Centre-Socialist coalition that currently holds power in the Northern Commonwealth seeks to achieve a variety of different objectives. First, ensure the security of the Northern Commonwealth from both foreign and internal threats. Second, ensure that the Northern Commonwealth remains the world's centre for technological research and scientific endeavours. Third, continue to manage the increasing pervasiveness of information-communication technology and avoid the implications of such technologies imploding Northern society.

Military name: The Armed Forces of the Northern Commonwealth is called Commonwealth Defence (da: Samfundets Forsvaret).
Military branches: The combat services of the Commonwealth Defence consist of the Army (da: Hæren), the Home Guards (da: Hjemmeværnet), the Navy (da: Søværnet), the Coast Guards (da: Kystvagt) and the Air Force (da: Flyvevåbnet).
Total military size: With a paper strength of 135,000 in active service, 155,000 in reserves, and a funding that averaged about 700 billion kroner a year in the last few years, the Northern Commonwealth fields a military of a size more or less to be expected from a relatively peaceable highly-developed country with somewhat concerning external threats.
Breakdown of ground force(s): Because of Norden's focus on sea and air warfare over maintaining a large ground strength and because of the incompatibility between the manpower-heavy nature of ground forces and the high costs of employment in the Commonwealth, the Northern ground forces are relatively small compared to the power of the country's seagoing and airbourne forces. The Army, the regular service component of the ground forces, employs about 49,000 men and the Home Guards, the reservist component, employs about 155,000, for a total wartime paper strength of about ~204,000. This small force, however, is flush with heavy armaments with a particular fondness for self-propelled artillery, fielding a mechanised frontline force of about ~100 air defence vehicles, ~350 tanks, ~1,000 artillery, ~1,000 infantry fighting vehicles, and ~2,500 armoured personnel carriers. The Army also has an Air Command contingent attached to it, with ~50 light recon aircraft and ~150 helicopters.
Breakdown of naval force(s): Due to the Northern Commonwealth's unique geographical constraints, being bounded by the North Sea and the Baltic as well as having inhabited islands out into the North Atlantic and the Arctic Oceans, the Commonwealth Defence takes its naval branch very seriously. Between the Navy and the Coast Guard, Norden has a seagoing strength of 2 aircraft carriers, 7 cruisers, 32 frigates, 50 mine warfare ships, 61 coastal defense ships, 140 combat boats, and 36 submarines. It maintains a naval aircraft branch of about ~70 reconnaissance aircraft (most of which light), ~60 multirole fighters, ~60 helicopters, ~20 recon aircraft, and ~10 electronic warfare aircraft. It also maintains brigade of marines and some special forces units. All considered, the Navy employs about 41,000 and the Coast Guard another 7,000.
Breakdown of air force(s): Norden has a rather formidable and expensive air force for a nation of its size and international stature. The Commonwealth Air Force fields a force of about ~750 multirole fighters, ~10 electronic warfare aircraft, ~50 reconnaissance aircraft (most of which heavy), ~40 transports, ~150 helicopters, and ~200 trainer aircraft. It employs a paper strength of 38,000.
Breakdown of other branch(es): Northern Defence also has a variety of other branches handling logistics, cybersecurity, human resources, intelligence, counterintelligence, training, etc., but these branches are not frontline branches and do not have units intended to see combat.
Extra military information: Norden funnels a large budget, over 4% of GDP, into a military with none-too-many assets, and the results very much show in the quality of the Northern military. From virtual-reality training and neurological conditioning to cybernetic implants and live-fire combat drones, the latest innovations in science and engineering are always directly introduced into the training and equipment of the Armed Forces, aimed at creating a battlefield environment that more traditional forces cannot survive in and a pace of warfare that traditional chains of command cannot respond to. Consequently, Northern Defence fields quite possibly the most advanced and sophisticated military equipment that can be found in the world.

GDP: The nominal GDP of the Northern Commonwealth is 16.48 trillion kroner/year, making it one of the major economic powers of the mid-20th Century. On a PPP- and inflation-adjusted basis, this is 3,218 billion (1990 Int'll$). Northern Europe saw in the early 21st Century, just like in the late 20th, strong economic growth interrupted by a few recession, averaging 3.1% real GDP growth per year from 2000 to 2056.
GDP per Capita: The nominal GDP per capita of the Northern Commonwealth is kr. 535,000/year, which on a PPP- and inflation-adjusted basis is 104,500 (1990 Int'll$). There are considerable regional disparities in economic development. There is a east-west gap, with the North Sea states of Iceland and Norway generally being more prosperous than the Baltic states of Sweden and Finland, as well as an urban-rural gap, with large cities generally being more prosperous than countryside towns. The Finnish Karelian territories newly-acquired from Russia are especially impoverished.

Currency: The national currency of the Northern Commonwealth is the Commonwealth Crown (da/no: krone, sv: krona, fi: kruunu, is: króna), trading symbol NDK. Although the Commonwealth Central Bank continues to print physical banknotes and mint physical coins, the krone is a largely digitalised currency with only small transactions in the margins of society still being conducted with physical cash.
Currency and value of currency compared to USD: On a purchasing power basis, the krone is worth kr. 5.12 on the 1990 Int'll$, but due to the Commonwealth's strong and resilient economy tends to trade for much more than its purchasing power would suggest.

Major Domestic Issues: High unemployment, outdated regulations and procedures, youth delinquency, dissatisfied cultural minorities, and climate change related weather events are all domestic issues that concern the Northern Commonwealth.
Major Foreign Issues: The simple fact that the Commonwealth is surrounded by much larger and more populous nations is of grave concern to the Northern Commonwealth, and the government does its best to mitigate the security and economic threat that this poses.

History: As below:
While the idea of Scandinavian unification has held some sway in popular and intellectual circles since the 19th Century, the Northern Commonwealth as it currently exists draws its origins from the early Cold War era. Following the devastation of the Second World War, which saw Denmark and Norway occupied by German forces and Finland invaded by the Soviet Union, the nations of northern Europe became cognisant that they were unable to, as individual minor nations, defend their sovereignty and interests alone. Since cultural and historical ties bound the five northern European nations, integration between these nations was the logical outcome. Although initially integration on a fairly extensive scale was planned, including a military alliance, the differing diplomatic interests of the member states, especially those of Finland which was under tremendous diplomatic policy from the Soviet Union not to join any "western" military cooperations, the talks largely fell through. Nonetheless, an inter-governmental advisory organ, the Nordic Council, was formed as a result of these negotiations and over the coming decades the Council presided over considerable economic integration between the northern European states.

The advancement of the European Economic Community and later the European Union, however, did make obsolete many of these functions and treaties, with European institutions taking over the integration projects that the Nordic Council formerly oversaw. With borders of the European Union and of NATO running through the Nordic Region, the late 20th Century and the early 21st saw the northern European nations prosper and prosper enormously, benefiting heavily from the open markets of the capitalist sphere and the globalisation of the information age, but they largely did so alone or in the European Union framework. Trump's election as President of the United States and the subsequent downturn to the globalist idea saw the northern European nations emerging as major high-technology industrial exporters and service economies.

Both the 2020-21 coronavirus pandemic and the subsequent deterioration of relations between Germany and the United Kingdom in the early 2020s were major blows to the European international trade on which many of the northern European nations depended. With radical political movements slowly beginning to take hold across the European Union, starting from Germany, as well as in East Asia, serious concerns were raised about the viability of continuing to leave Nordic economic prosperity dependent upon international trade.

The result was a strong wave of anti-internationalism across the Nordic region. The Danish Reds, already very skeptical of globalisation and international economic integration after the European migrant crisis of the 2010s, opened several cross-aisle initiatives aimed at shielding Denmark from global political turbulences. These initiatives would survive the transition of power after the 2023 elections. In Norway, the 2020 break between the Conservatives and the Progress Party over Prime Minister Solberg's repatriation of a woman linked to the Islamic State isolated the more nationalistic Progress Party, formerly seen firmly as a party of the political right, as a kingmaker between Labour and Conservative in the 2021 Storting elections to which Labour had to make many concessions to secure the support of. In the year immediately following, the 2022 Swedish Riksdag elections saw results that were every bit as inconclusive as those of 2018, with government formation being delayed for months as a broad coalition had to be hashed out. In a move that surprised many political observers, the Social-Democrats, the Sweden Democrats, and the Christian Democrats came to an agreement on a broadly protectionist platform, outraging the Left and the Greens which saw the move as a social-democratic betrayal of progressive principles. In Finland, the Left Alliance and the Centre Party, desiring the protection of their country from international market pressures, clashed with their coalition partners in the Social-Democrats and the Swedish People's, a feud that would be settled quite decisively in favour of the former after a populace outraged at the actions taken by the European Union to deter further exits from the Union overwhelmingly voted in favour of protectionism. The Social-Democrats, in the end, conceded to Centre on the issue.

Thus, as 2023 came to a close, although a left-leaning government sat in Oslo and Helsinki, a right-leaning government sat in Copenhagen, and a strange and unstable coalition sat in Stockholm, the governments of northern Europe were all disillusioned with the aftereffects of globalisation and free international trade and all interested in more local cooperation and self-sufficiency. Although these tendencies were not visible on a diplomatic or a military level, with Denmark, Norway, and Iceland choosing to toe the EU line instead of joining the post-NATO bloc led by the Americans and Denmark, Sweden, and Finland sending some token reconnaissance forces to assist the European Union in the Central European War, on a more subtle, economic and social level radical reforms were enacted. Immigration policies were made drastically more restrictive over the course of the Central European War, as Nordic-Continental and Nordic-British trade both declined. These states, being aware that the inability of small states to survive in a chaotic international environment of which they were all reminded in the aftermath of the Second World War still held true, re-forged and strengthened the Nordic diplomatic and economic ties that have laid largely dormant since the 1970s, trusting that the other northern European countries, with a relatively high degree of political stability compared to other western states and with governments of a relatively similar, protectionist outlook on international trade, would be more reliable as economic partners than any other.

Perhaps surprisingly, trade between the former northern European NATO states and the UK and the US remained relatively unaffected by the diplomatic chaos surrounding Europe in the run-up to and in the early stages of the Central European War, although as previously noted the trade volume did decline as northern European economies slowly aligned themselves towards more local and nationalistic lines. American military bases in Denmark were withdrawn in 2023 and those in Norway in 2024, both relatively peaceably. With Norway, nominally neutral in the Central European War until winter 2024-25, being a key European exporter of oil and natural gas to both the United Kingdom and Germany - which Germany, especially, needed due to being embargoed by both the US and Russia - neither side was interested in diplomatically pushing on the issue and potentially risk a Norwegian embargo. The election of Chris Shannon and his aggressively anti-European policy in November 2024 would be the final decisive factor that pushed Norway towards siding with the European Union, although Norway steadfastly refused to send troops against the Freedom Alliance, participating in the Central European War only as a co-belligerent against Russia from 2025 onward.

Perhaps strangely, the period from the mid-2020s to the mid-2030s also saw northern technological research and engineering advances by leaps and bounds, almost a golden age of technology. With governments discouraging reliance on international trade from the early 2020s, the cost of labour-intensive goods formerly imported from the developing world or from less prosperous nations in Southern Europe rose sharply, creating huge economic opportunities for research into artificial intelligence and robotics, while new import-substitution industries were created across northern Fennoscandia. These initiatives even received considerable financial support from the European Union and from Germany, which accepted the argument that Scandinavia could not meaningfully contribute towards the European war effort without a self-sufficient industrial sector and saw large benefits in having a more developed northern flank against Russia.

The years of turbulence and strife finally resulted in a pan-European economic slowdown in spring 2027, as the effects of resource shortages, abruptly-cut international trade, and wartime uncertainty caught up to the nations of the European Union. While Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Iceland were relatively shielded from these effects through years of economic protectionism and, in the case of the three former NATO states, relatively open trade with the United Kingdom - at least until the intensification of British support to Spain in summer 2027 - and the United States, the Swedes, whose government was paralysed for years due to ideological strife between the more progressive Social-Democrats and the more conservative Sweden Democrats and Christian Democrats, suffered a recession lasting for years.

The Nordic Council was quick to respond. Aware that an impoverished, EU-reliant hole sitting between their three countries would be disastrous towards their common objective of maintaining a degree of autonomy and independence from the European Union's increasingly authoritarian policies, Denmark, Norway, and Finland all arranged emergency aid to the Swedish public sector in exchange for future concessions. The three Scandinavian kingdoms also entered a currency union to keep the Swedish krona afloat while Norway in particular offered enormous loans which provided some degree of liquidity and kept the Swedish government and the country's large international corporations from having to request EU bailouts.

By the 2027 Danish elections, which saw power switch back to the Red bloc, it was almost an open secret in the Nordic region that in these turbulent times it was the government's duty to diplomatically moderate, to both protect their citizens from the depredations of the European Union while also avoid having the actions of their citizens offend their much larger neighbours. This election also saw the slow winding-down of Scandinavia's nominal participation in the war raging across central and southern Europe, with Sweden needing its few troops for internal security and the new Red bloc government in Denmark prioritising the war against Russia, which was affecting the Nordic region directly.

This war against Russia also saw the early introduction of many innovations in military armaments that the Northern Commonwealth will become known for in future decades. With over a thousand kilometres of forested and poorly-roaded front in the Finnish countryside to cover with only a few hundred thousand troops, automated sentry turrets, electronic identification signals, surveillance drones, and assisted targeting systems proved to be vital advantages keeping the Finnish defence viable.

The forced pressures of a shared diplomatic and military situation prompted increasingly close cooperation between the northern European states in the later years of the Central European War. With military forces from all five nations holding the line in Karelia and Sapmi, a joint command was created to provide the speed and efficiency of communication that were becoming vitally necessary in the pace of battle that increased with each passing year. A common need to both present a united front against the German government and economically shield their countries from the Eurozone bloc while also continuing their active participation in the European Union and protecting Europe's - and consequently their own - shores from Anglo-American and Russian forces slowly evolved into a joint diplomatic infrastructure. Economically, with the war against Russia flooding Scandinavian kroner into the Finnish economy, the Finnish government eventually adopted it as a joint official currency in November 2029, with Iceland following soon after and outright replacing the Icelandic króna with the Scandinavian krone in 2032.

The beginning of the Gulf War in 2029, the intensification of the Continental front between Germany and Russia in 2031, and the increasing deployment of newly-developed equipment by the Nordic Armed Forces combined turned the tide decisively in favour of Finland in the war against Russia. With Russian troops being stripped from the north to reinforce more important positions in Poland and Lithuania as well as being sent to support the Gulf War in the south, and the Scandinavian militaries slowly becoming better trained and equipped to fight a low-density but high-intensity war with the years of experience, the first successful offensive against Russia were undertaken in the winter of 2031-32, retaking the Finnish border towns previously captured by Russia and advancing to within sight of Vyborg/Viipuri.

Another minor economic downturn would strike northern Europe in 2033, this time lasting much longer than the 2027 shock, with the collapse of political stability in and thus meaningful trade with the United States, the last major power outside of the European Union with which the northern European countries maintained a non-negligible volume of foreign trade. The resulting financial panic would force the northern states into increased co-dependence with each other to weather the shocks and find the necessary substitute suppliers and markets. Again, Norway's considerable public wealth had to be involved to hold the increasingly isolated Nordic bloc together. Suddenly placed in a position of tremendous power, Norway demanded considerable concessions from the bailed-out states in Denmark, Sweden, and Finland, strengthening Nordic institutions with the rationale that Norway was in an excellent position to dominate any international cooperation between the Nordic states and, thus, that this was an excellent time for Norway to push for the establishment of such cooperation. With the Nordic Council assuming powers of defence and foreign policy including against other European member states, sanctions from Continental Europe against the northern European states, and increased concern following the collapse of the United States that the European Union may also be a dangerous market or investment target, the member states of the Nordic Council slowly began to detach themselves from European affairs.

With the Revised Charter of the Nordic Council on the 28th of January, 2035, the nations of northern Europe de facto became a singular and independent state, although they would nominally remain separate and members of the European Union for several more months, with all four EU-member states withdrawing from the European Union on the 06th June 2035 and the five northern European states only officially merging into a declared Commonwealth on 04th May 2036.

The new Commonwealth would then spend its first years making a series of minor but rapid territorial gains. With the United Kingdom collapsing internally, the Northern Commonwealth would throughout summer 2036 succeed in capturing islands across the Northern Isles and the Hebrides and, mediated by the government of what remained of the United States, would sign a peace agreement with the United Kingdom with modest territorial gains soon after. Similarly, with Germany falling into civil war and with strong concerns that the turmoil might spread into southern Denmark, the Commonwealth would deploy peacekeeping forces a few dozen kilometres into German territory, establishing a Protectorate Zone that would, after a referendum about five years later, be annexed into Denmark.

The war against Russia would continue on for a few more years, although the intensity of the war would decline considerably as Russia had to increasingly concentrate on maintaining internal stability, as its economy slowly collapsed, and on other strategic objectives in the south and west. No official peace treaty would ever be signed, but with the total collapse of the Russian government in spring 2041 and Finnish troops within sight of the Winter Palace, the Northern Commonwealth would unilaterally declare the restoration of Finland's pre-1939 eastern frontiers, which would go uncontested for the next decade and a half with no Russian faction both capable and willing to challenge it.

As northern Europe finally returned to peace in 2041, it stood at the top of the world with a series of unique advantages. The first, of course, was the availability of natural resources. The North and Norwegian Seas, Greenland, and northern Fennoscandia were all possessed of abundant mineral and energy resources, catapulting the country into the largest source of natural resources and base industrial components to a European continent of 700 million people sinking enormous expenses into reconstruction. This would be further aided by the Commonwealth opting to withdraw from Norway's participation in the Antarctic Treaty after re-negotiation in 2048 and its exploitation of the Arctic, with Russia no longer in any position to dispute the Commonwealth's extensive exclusive economic zone claims across the Arctic. The second was the region's expertise in automation technology and the extensive infrastructure supporting it. Although initially developed in response to both market and military pressures, needing to substitute labour-intensive goods that could no longer be imported from less developed countries and needing to maintain a viable military presence against Russia despite a far smaller population, after the time of crisis these technologies would be turned towards economic growth. Throughout the 2040s, labour productivity surged as the Commonwealth established its place as perhaps the only country in Europe both able to economically afford and scientifically develop the various innovations made before the widespread social collapses of the late 2030s. Third was the region's political stability. The Scandinavian countries all have long parliamentary traditions dating unbroken to the 19th Century, and they were not heavily affected by the various wars both international and civil that devastated the physical capital of other nations. While most other countries in Europe had to struggle to put the pieces back in and reconstruct themselves throughout the 2040s, the Commonwealth could move forwards with developing the future, having only suffered substantial damages in Finland.

The consequent and inevitable rapid economic development were followed by a series of severe social changes, many of which were visible even in the late 2030s and only intensified throughout the 2040s. The first and most domestically obvious one was unemployment. With nearly every job that can be automated being automated, millions of formerly productive workers suddenly found themselves in situations where they did not have any skill that could not be done better by a machine. Unemployment and urban slums skyrocketed as a result. Although after the Stockholm Jobless Riots of 2043 and 2044, the Commonwealth expanded a generous citizen's dividend scheme in order to curb poverty and poverty-related social problems, the sheer anger and frustration of millions of people who no longer have any productive purpose in life continue to cause massive social strife.

Much like the World Wars of the 20th Century, the deconstruction of the liberal, globalised world of the early 21st Century left a deep cultural trauma everywhere, including in the Northern Commonwealth. Nihilistic, hedonistic, and absurdist tendencies swept the nation as new ideologies sought to make themselves heard and displace the old. Old social norms have been almost totally discarded, with all sorts of grey market vices flooding the country's alleyways. Politically, a cluster of parties predating the 21st Century still desperately cling on to some semblance of a 20th Century modern liberal democracy as extremists from all ends of the political spectrum steadily gain in popularity.

The 2040s were also characterised by the increasing diplomatic isolationism of the Northern Commonwealth. The rapid economic growth and the increasingly technological nature of Northern society severed cultural understanding between the Commonwealth and its immediate neighbours. Economically protectionist, culturally detached, and politically revolutionary, the Northern Commonwealth started to see itself and started to be seen as almost a different world. Insofar as the Northern Commonwealth still engages in multilateral diplomacy, its purpose is to either oppose a common threat or poach foreign high-skill specialists. Nothing of greater complexity than that interests the Commonwealth's diplomats.

With the world slowly returning to stability and prosperity again and resurgent and unified states now threatening its borders, however, the success of the Commonwealth's futurist project, whatever that success actually means, is not yet a certain thing...

RP Example: The old iteration.

Application approved!
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 5:14 am

SangMar wrote:
Reservation

NS Name: SangMar
Country Name: The New Southern Republic/La Nueva República del Sur
Territory: Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico

Reservation noted.
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 5:17 am

The Felan Federation wrote:
[Do Not Remove - AKSAI]

NS Name: the Felan Federation
RP Name: Siberian Confederation

Capital: Yekaterinburg
Territory: Siberia (minus Russian Far East)
Population: ~20 million people

Type of Government: Semi-federal presidential constitutional republic
Government Explanation: [optional]
Leader(s): Ivan Vladimirovich Dragunov
Image(s) of Leader(s): (Image)
Party or Coalition in Power: National unity government

Executive Title: Vozhd/Leader
State Ideology: Siberian Regionalism, neo-nativism
Ethnicity Breakdown: Russian (majority)
Religion Breakdown: Orthodox (majority)


Flag: (Image)

National Anthem: Hope in harshness
National Motto: "Unity, Tenacity, Strength."
Demonym: Siberian
Map Color: Green

Public Goals: Survive, consolidate, improve.
Private Goals: ---

Military name: Siberian Defense League
Military branches: Siberian Defense Force (regular forces), White Watch (militia), Sky Watch (air-defence), Iron Guard (special forces)
Total military size: 55,000 active, 200,000 reserve.
Breakdown of ground force(s): Active: 20,000 SDF / 5000 SW / 200 IG / 29,000 support personnel. Reserve: 150,000 WW / 50,000 support.
Breakdown of naval force(s): N/A
Breakdown of air force(s): N/A
Breakdown of other branch(es): N/A
Extra military information: Due to the fact, that the SDL is in the middle of Siberia itself - they lack any naval capacity in addition any military craft was rather quickly rendered inoperable due to the cold and lack of parts and industry to keep them operational. What exists are a few outdated biplanes utilized for scouting and reconnaissance. Most of the SDF utilizes 2020s military equipment, and even a few Soviet-era equipment, arms and vehicles. The only newest part of the SDF is their new uniforms and supply kits, meant to be more comfortable and resistant to the harshness of the Siberian climate.

GDP: ~$30 billion
GDP per Capita: $1500

Currency: Siberian Ruble
Currency and value of currency compared to USD: 1 USD = 2 SIB

Major Domestic Issues: Low development, terrorism and sectarian violence.
Major Foreign Issues: National identity, Russian unification.

History: Siberia had remained the frontier of anti-Russian activity during the 'Great Deterioration' - a combination of higher taxes, more and more resources being harvested and less being invested back into the local populace and the climbing cost of the Central European War as well - not many people wanted to take part in a pointless war, especially when it costed them their sons, fathers and brothers in a pointless expansionism. Though most of the population was content in keeping to themselves and their heads down, the deterioration and economic collapse changed things completely.

The eastern parts of Russia relied on the European-side for most of their food, supplies and luxury goods at that - once the money stopped flowing and terrorists destroyed portions of the Trans-Siberian Railway - much of Siberia rather quickly descended into chaos, starvation and civil unrest. As people fought over supplies, separtists fought over their own ideals and religious extremists attacked both sides without mercy. The situation wasn't helped by the the long summers melting the snow and permafrost into nearly impassable terrian and the Siberian winters being much worse, without aid from the central government.

The constant threat of fear, cold and starvation killed millions before order was re-established, many of the cities in Siberia having become fortified enclaves for various factions - roughly five years after the start of the troubles in Russia itself. Ivan Dragunov, a former political member of United Russia managed to eventually unify the region of Yekaterinburg under his leadership, and do so with the rest of Siberia - repairing the Trans-Siberian Railway and managing to re-connect the scattered cities across Siberia into a semi-Confederation. While order has been restored to a majority of the cities - there is still the threat of rogue militias wandering the vast wastelands and sectarianism is still constant in the few small enclaves that are too deeply entrenched to remove or eliminate.

RP Example: It's a-me. Felan the Weirdo.

Accepted, but I got three questions:
1. What is "Neo-Nativism"?
2. Could you describe the individual branches of the Siberian Defence League?
3. Could you explain to me about both the overall Siberian government and the "National Unity Government"?
Last edited by Arvenia on Sat May 02, 2020 6:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
Sao Nova Europa
Minister
 
Posts: 3420
Founded: Apr 20, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sao Nova Europa » Sat May 02, 2020 5:18 am

Will be reserving the Hellenic Federation then. Will be making an app post in a few hours.
Signature:

"I’ve just bitten a snake. Never mind me, I’ve got business to look after."
- Guo Jing ‘The Brave Archer’.

“In war, to keep the upper hand, you have to think two or three moves ahead of the enemy.”
- Char Aznable

"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."
- Sun Tzu

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 5:25 am

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:
[Do Not Remove - AKSAI]

NS Name: The Baton Rouge Free State
RP Name: The United Provinces of New England

Capital: Boston
Territory: Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Maine, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and Bermuda
Population: 17.5 Million
Type of Government: Parliamentary Style Representative Democracy
Government Explanation: The Government has a unicameral legislature with 620 Members, the nation is divided into many constituencies each with around 17500 Residents, each constituency has around 6 representatives who are elected in a runoff, ranked ballot system. Once the government is elected their first task is electing a Chief Secretary, the Chief Secretary will then select a cabinet and begin running the executive branch of government. The government passes laws in a simple majority but the Chief Secretary has a veto power, the parliament can then reverse his Veto in a super majority of 2/3. The court system contains three levels, the local circuit courts, appellate courts, and then the supreme court. The nation runs on a Napoleonic style law system, and does not use Juries but instead an inquisitorial system. Judges must pass a set of legal examinations and provide evidence of a masters in law before being hired. There are 9 judges on the Supreme Court and they are appointed for life by the Parliament.
Leader(s): Chief Secretary Edward Harrington
Chief Under Secretary Harry Giddens
Image(s) of Leader(s):

Party or Coalition in Power: The Social Progressive Party
Executive Title: Chief Secretary
State Ideology: Interventionist Economics, Private Sector Trade Unions, Social Safety Net, Progressivism
Ethnicity Breakdown: 70% Whites, 11% Blacks, 8% Hispanics, 6% Asian, 5% Other (Indian, Native American, Middle Eastern, etc.)
Religion Breakdown: 53% Non Religious/Aetheist, 30% Catholic Christian, 12% Protestant Christian, 5% Other (Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, etc.)
Flag:
National Anthem: [optional]
National Motto:
Demonym: New Englander
Map Color: Dark Green

Public Goals: Increased Economic Growth, Expand Social Safety Net, Create Trade Deals, Improve Medical System, Improve Public Transport
Private Goals: N/A

Military name: New England Defense Forces (NEDF)
Military branches: New England Naval Defense Force (NENDF), New England Ground Defense Force (NEGDF), New England Aerial Defense Force (NEADF)
Total military size: 174,000 Active, 412,000 Reserve
Breakdown of ground force(s): 89,000 Active, 318,000 Reserve
628 Tanks
3,900 Armored Vehicles
140 SPA
270 Towed Artillery
140 Rocket Projectors
Breakdown of naval force(s): 58,000 Active, 84,000 Reserve
Simple Breakdown
15x Destroyers
8x Patrol Vessels
15x Attack Submarines
1x Amphibious Command Ship
3x Frigates

Recovery History
4 Arleigh Burke Destroyers Recovered from Spain
5 Cyclone Class Patrol Vessels and 2 Avenger Class Mine Ships recovered from Bahrain
4 Los Angeles Class Attack Subs recovered from Connecticut
11 Virginia Class Attack Subs recovered from Connecticut
1 Blue Ridge Class LCC recovered from Italy
11x Arleigh Burke Class Recovered from Maine
1x Zumwalt Class Recovered from Maine
1x Ballistic Missle Submarine Recovered from Connecticut
3x Frigates recovered from Halifax
3x Patrol Vessels Recovered from Halifax

List of Ships
Prefix - NEDV (New England Defense Vessel)
Flagship -- NEDV Boston
Destroyers
Arleigh Burke = John Paul Jones Class
Zumwalt = Seeker Class
NEDV Hartford
NEDV Nantucket
NEDV New Haven
NEDV Nashua
NEDV Amherst
NEDV Salem
NEDV Providence
NEDV Portland
NEDV Concord
NEDV Lexington
NEDV Montpelier
NEDV John Paul Jones
NEDV Chester
NEDV Saint John
NEDV Charlottetown
-
NEDV Seeker

Frigate
Halifax Class = Justice Class
NEDV Justice
NEDV John Adams
NEDV Johnathan Eddy

Patrol Vessels
Cyclone Class = Maritime Class
Kingston Class = Maple Class
NEDV Maritime
NEDV Fundy
NEDV Cape Cod
NEDV Vineyard
NEDV Buzzards Bay
-
NEDV Maple
NEDV Blizzard
NEDV Oak

Mine Vessels
Avenger Class = Deep Water Class
NEDV Deep Water
NEDV Seafoam

Attack Submarines
Virginia Class = Province Class
Los Angeles Class = Hudson Class
NEDV Providence
NEDV Nova Scotia
NEDV Massachusetts
NEDV Connecticut
NEDV Rhode Island
NEDV New Hampshire
NEDV Maine
NEDV Prince Edward Island
NEDV New Brunswick
NEDV Vermont
NEDV Bermuda
-
NEDV Hudson
NEDV Worcester
NEDV Moncton
NEDV Fredricton
Breakdown of air force(s): 27,000 Active, 10,000 Reserve
40x F-16s
30x F-22s
5x B-2 Spirits
25x F-35s
10x KC-130s
Cybersecurity Operations Detail

Installations - Hanscom Air Base, Cape Cod Air Base, New Boston Airbase, Burlington Airport, Sikorsky Memorial Airport, Bermuda International Airport
Breakdown of other branch(es): N/A
Extra military information: N/A

GDP: 375.375 Billion USD
GDP per Capita: 21,450 USD

Currency: New England Florin (500, 200, 100, 50, 20, 10, and 5 Florin Banknotes; 1 Florin Coin, "Shilling" 50 Pence Coin, "Quarter" 25 Pence Coin, "Dime" 10 Pence Coin, "Penny" 5 Pence Coin)
Currency and value of currency compared to USD: 1.25 USD = 1 Florin

Major Domestic Issues: Poor Infrastructure, Degrading Medical System, Low Economic Growth
Major Foreign Issues: No Allies or Trade Deals

History: In the 2020s New England saw a rapid rise in pro environmental policies and protests began to take place about the use of carbon emissions in the region. This lead to the election of several far left independent politicians who sought to push a social-democratic agenda on the state. With increasing economic issues heading into the 2030s the area began to sever economically, socially, and politically from the rest of the US, undertaking social policies that were more similar to Left Wing European policies, and preaching similar ideas, a high rise in people being non-religious also created a decent cultural divide with the rest of the country. The region created the New England Regional Governance Committee which began to separate its political state from the rest of the government, establishing a joint Defense Command, and a unicameral Parliament, lead by the Chief Secretary. With the US falling apart from internal divisions in the late 2030s, the committee began to take more and more control over state matters.

In 2039 the Boston Stock Exchange officially separated from the New York Stock exchange as a fully independent entity. The following year in 2040, the Committee officially declared independence creating the New England Declaration, a constitution for the new state. With the subsequent collapse of Canada, the Maritimes were quickly invited to join, for their their good farm and fishing territory, which would increase food independence of the nation, as well as provide extra ports for the nation and increase the nations sphere of control. This was furthered when in 2042 a hurricane smashed into Bermuda, with no foreign aid coming in the island nation quickly fell into chaos. New England offered to rebuild the nation, provided it give all defensive control to New England, and allow New England control over its foreign policy, this was allowed, and over the next three years the island was further integrated in a series of referendums, finally in 2045 it was fully integrated as another province.

Over the next few years, the state was further developed, and several bailout packages where given to local business across the country. Meanwhile, the government created the National Supply Chain Council, aimed at creating new supply chains for the various economic sectors in the country. To execute this, a lot of mines were opened across the state, and the plastic manufacturing industry opened across the nation. By 2054 the economy was largely stable again but saw a large decrease in economic growth in the next two years, as the boom from the reconstruction began to fizzle out, also notable was the creation of several anti-corruption initiatives including heightened salaries, decreasing red tape, and the creation of an Independent Anti-Corruption Agency. Overall government efficiency increased rather quickly.
RP Example: (required, unless I know you)

1. Have you read the timeline? I think New England, like much of the Mid-Atlantic, were pretty supportive of Chris Shannon and political centrism as said in the timeline. Also, I think New England remained loyal to the federal government until the latter collapsed in 2041.
2. What would 375.375 billion be like?
3. Is your country unitary or federal?
4. Would you use "An appeal to Heaven" or "Nunquam libertas gratior extat" (Never does liberty appear in a more gracious form) as your national motto (since that section is completely empty)?

While your app looks pretty good (especially the military part), may you answer to these four points before getting approval?
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 5:25 am

Sao Nova Europa wrote:Will be reserving the Hellenic Federation then. Will be making an app post in a few hours.

Good, reservation noted.
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
The Baton Rouge Free State
Envoy
 
Posts: 265
Founded: Nov 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Baton Rouge Free State » Sat May 02, 2020 5:46 am

Arvenia wrote:
The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:
[Do Not Remove - AKSAI]

NS Name: The Baton Rouge Free State
RP Name: The United Provinces of New England

Capital: Boston
Territory: Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Maine, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and Bermuda
Population: 17.5 Million
Type of Government: Parliamentary Style Representative Democracy
Government Explanation: The Government has a unicameral legislature with 620 Members, the nation is divided into many constituencies each with around 17500 Residents, each constituency has around 6 representatives who are elected in a runoff, ranked ballot system. Once the government is elected their first task is electing a Chief Secretary, the Chief Secretary will then select a cabinet and begin running the executive branch of government. The government passes laws in a simple majority but the Chief Secretary has a veto power, the parliament can then reverse his Veto in a super majority of 2/3. The court system contains three levels, the local circuit courts, appellate courts, and then the supreme court. The nation runs on a Napoleonic style law system, and does not use Juries but instead an inquisitorial system. Judges must pass a set of legal examinations and provide evidence of a masters in law before being hired. There are 9 judges on the Supreme Court and they are appointed for life by the Parliament.
Leader(s): Chief Secretary Edward Harrington
Chief Under Secretary Harry Giddens
Image(s) of Leader(s):

Party or Coalition in Power: The Social Progressive Party
Executive Title: Chief Secretary
State Ideology: Interventionist Economics, Private Sector Trade Unions, Social Safety Net, Progressivism
Ethnicity Breakdown: 70% Whites, 11% Blacks, 8% Hispanics, 6% Asian, 5% Other (Indian, Native American, Middle Eastern, etc.)
Religion Breakdown: 53% Non Religious/Aetheist, 30% Catholic Christian, 12% Protestant Christian, 5% Other (Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, etc.)
Flag:
National Anthem: [optional]
National Motto:
Demonym: New Englander
Map Color: Dark Green

Public Goals: Increased Economic Growth, Expand Social Safety Net, Create Trade Deals, Improve Medical System, Improve Public Transport
Private Goals: N/A

Military name: New England Defense Forces (NEDF)
Military branches: New England Naval Defense Force (NENDF), New England Ground Defense Force (NEGDF), New England Aerial Defense Force (NEADF)
Total military size: 174,000 Active, 412,000 Reserve
Breakdown of ground force(s): 89,000 Active, 318,000 Reserve
628 Tanks
3,900 Armored Vehicles
140 SPA
270 Towed Artillery
140 Rocket Projectors
Breakdown of naval force(s): 58,000 Active, 84,000 Reserve
Simple Breakdown
15x Destroyers
8x Patrol Vessels
15x Attack Submarines
1x Amphibious Command Ship
3x Frigates

Recovery History
4 Arleigh Burke Destroyers Recovered from Spain
5 Cyclone Class Patrol Vessels and 2 Avenger Class Mine Ships recovered from Bahrain
4 Los Angeles Class Attack Subs recovered from Connecticut
11 Virginia Class Attack Subs recovered from Connecticut
1 Blue Ridge Class LCC recovered from Italy
11x Arleigh Burke Class Recovered from Maine
1x Zumwalt Class Recovered from Maine
1x Ballistic Missle Submarine Recovered from Connecticut
3x Frigates recovered from Halifax
3x Patrol Vessels Recovered from Halifax

List of Ships
Prefix - NEDV (New England Defense Vessel)
Flagship -- NEDV Boston
Destroyers
Arleigh Burke = John Paul Jones Class
Zumwalt = Seeker Class
NEDV Hartford
NEDV Nantucket
NEDV New Haven
NEDV Nashua
NEDV Amherst
NEDV Salem
NEDV Providence
NEDV Portland
NEDV Concord
NEDV Lexington
NEDV Montpelier
NEDV John Paul Jones
NEDV Chester
NEDV Saint John
NEDV Charlottetown
-
NEDV Seeker

Frigate
Halifax Class = Justice Class
NEDV Justice
NEDV John Adams
NEDV Johnathan Eddy

Patrol Vessels
Cyclone Class = Maritime Class
Kingston Class = Maple Class
NEDV Maritime
NEDV Fundy
NEDV Cape Cod
NEDV Vineyard
NEDV Buzzards Bay
-
NEDV Maple
NEDV Blizzard
NEDV Oak

Mine Vessels
Avenger Class = Deep Water Class
NEDV Deep Water
NEDV Seafoam

Attack Submarines
Virginia Class = Province Class
Los Angeles Class = Hudson Class
NEDV Providence
NEDV Nova Scotia
NEDV Massachusetts
NEDV Connecticut
NEDV Rhode Island
NEDV New Hampshire
NEDV Maine
NEDV Prince Edward Island
NEDV New Brunswick
NEDV Vermont
NEDV Bermuda
-
NEDV Hudson
NEDV Worcester
NEDV Moncton
NEDV Fredricton
Breakdown of air force(s): 27,000 Active, 10,000 Reserve
40x F-16s
30x F-22s
5x B-2 Spirits
25x F-35s
10x KC-130s
Cybersecurity Operations Detail

Installations - Hanscom Air Base, Cape Cod Air Base, New Boston Airbase, Burlington Airport, Sikorsky Memorial Airport, Bermuda International Airport
Breakdown of other branch(es): N/A
Extra military information: N/A

GDP: 375.375 Billion USD
GDP per Capita: 21,450 USD

Currency: New England Florin (500, 200, 100, 50, 20, 10, and 5 Florin Banknotes; 1 Florin Coin, "Shilling" 50 Pence Coin, "Quarter" 25 Pence Coin, "Dime" 10 Pence Coin, "Penny" 5 Pence Coin)
Currency and value of currency compared to USD: 1.25 USD = 1 Florin

Major Domestic Issues: Poor Infrastructure, Degrading Medical System, Low Economic Growth
Major Foreign Issues: No Allies or Trade Deals

History: In the 2020s New England saw a rapid rise in pro environmental policies and protests began to take place about the use of carbon emissions in the region. This lead to the election of several far left independent politicians who sought to push a social-democratic agenda on the state. With increasing economic issues heading into the 2030s the area began to sever economically, socially, and politically from the rest of the US, undertaking social policies that were more similar to Left Wing European policies, and preaching similar ideas, a high rise in people being non-religious also created a decent cultural divide with the rest of the country. The region created the New England Regional Governance Committee which began to separate its political state from the rest of the government, establishing a joint Defense Command, and a unicameral Parliament, lead by the Chief Secretary. With the US falling apart from internal divisions in the late 2030s, the committee began to take more and more control over state matters.

In 2039 the Boston Stock Exchange officially separated from the New York Stock exchange as a fully independent entity. The following year in 2040, the Committee officially declared independence creating the New England Declaration, a constitution for the new state. With the subsequent collapse of Canada, the Maritimes were quickly invited to join, for their their good farm and fishing territory, which would increase food independence of the nation, as well as provide extra ports for the nation and increase the nations sphere of control. This was furthered when in 2042 a hurricane smashed into Bermuda, with no foreign aid coming in the island nation quickly fell into chaos. New England offered to rebuild the nation, provided it give all defensive control to New England, and allow New England control over its foreign policy, this was allowed, and over the next three years the island was further integrated in a series of referendums, finally in 2045 it was fully integrated as another province.

Over the next few years, the state was further developed, and several bailout packages where given to local business across the country. Meanwhile, the government created the National Supply Chain Council, aimed at creating new supply chains for the various economic sectors in the country. To execute this, a lot of mines were opened across the state, and the plastic manufacturing industry opened across the nation. By 2054 the economy was largely stable again but saw a large decrease in economic growth in the next two years, as the boom from the reconstruction began to fizzle out, also notable was the creation of several anti-corruption initiatives including heightened salaries, decreasing red tape, and the creation of an Independent Anti-Corruption Agency. Overall government efficiency increased rather quickly.
RP Example: (required, unless I know you)

1. Have you read the timeline? I think New England, like much of the Mid-Atlantic, were pretty supportive of Chris Shannon and political centrism as said in the timeline. Also, I think New England remained loyal to the federal government until the latter collapsed in 2041.
2. What would 375.375 billion be like?
3. Is your country unitary or federal?
4. Would you use "An appeal to Heaven" or "Nunquam libertas gratior extat" (Never does liberty appear in a more gracious form) as your national motto (since that section is completely empty)?

While your app looks pretty good (especially the military part), may you answer to these four points before getting approval?

1. Oh that's my bad for some reason I thought it was 2040 that it fell apart. Also I saw that they were, but personally I thought that was somewhat unrealistic as New England has always been skewed pretty far left, as its very closely associated with figures like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, both quite polarizing.
2. Afraid I don't understand the question. If you are implying its unrealistic I would beg to differ as new England has been largely stable given the somewhat peaceful transition, and thus domestic business has remained somewhat healthy, that said the gdp per capita has still dropped from 75,000 in 2019, to 21,000 here, and the GDP from 1.3 Trillion to 375.4 Billion as seen here.
3. Unitary, I had hoped my lack of a description for local governments or local court systems might elude to that, although I recognize that this is my fault for not specifying that.
4. I was actually hoping to use Dum Spiro Spero "While I Breath, I Hope" as it relates well to what I think New England's values would be.

User avatar
Plzen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9805
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Plzen » Sat May 02, 2020 5:51 am

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:2. Afraid I don't understand the question. If you are implying its unrealistic I would beg to differ as new England has been largely stable given the somewhat peaceful transition, and thus domestic business has remained somewhat healthy, that said the gdp per capita has still dropped from 75,000 in 2019, to 21,000 here, and the GDP from 1.3 Trillion to 375.4 Billion as seen here.

Consider: the United States no longer exists. What does “USD” mean here?

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 5:54 am

I currently have no idea which country I should play as, whether it would be Germany, Korea, Australia, a Chinese successor state, a US successor state, an Indian successor state, a Latin American nation or a Middle Eastern nation. However, my country is essentially a major power.
Last edited by Arvenia on Sat May 02, 2020 6:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 5:57 am

Plzen wrote:
The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:2. Afraid I don't understand the question. If you are implying its unrealistic I would beg to differ as new England has been largely stable given the somewhat peaceful transition, and thus domestic business has remained somewhat healthy, that said the gdp per capita has still dropped from 75,000 in 2019, to 21,000 here, and the GDP from 1.3 Trillion to 375.4 Billion as seen here.

Consider: the United States no longer exists. What does “USD” mean here?

I think Baton forgot to put in Florin.
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
The Baton Rouge Free State
Envoy
 
Posts: 265
Founded: Nov 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Baton Rouge Free State » Sat May 02, 2020 6:07 am

Plzen wrote:
The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:2. Afraid I don't understand the question. If you are implying its unrealistic I would beg to differ as new England has been largely stable given the somewhat peaceful transition, and thus domestic business has remained somewhat healthy, that said the gdp per capita has still dropped from 75,000 in 2019, to 21,000 here, and the GDP from 1.3 Trillion to 375.4 Billion as seen here.

Consider: the United States no longer exists. What does “USD” mean here?

I mean.... wtf it doesnt say USD, wut are u on about.

User avatar
Ha Liang
Secretary
 
Posts: 35
Founded: Mar 31, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Ha Liang » Sat May 02, 2020 6:21 am

Deleted
Last edited by Ha Liang on Mon May 04, 2020 9:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Plzen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9805
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Plzen » Sat May 02, 2020 6:41 am

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:I mean.... wtf it doesnt say USD, wut are u on about.

I would hope that this would be obvious, but if not:

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:GDP: 375.375 Billion USD
GDP per Capita: 21,450 USD

Since the United States no longer exists, and is therefore no longer backing the value of the United States dollar, what does this mean? There are several ways in which this can be interpreted and ambiguity isn't ideal to have in an application.

User avatar
The Baton Rouge Free State
Envoy
 
Posts: 265
Founded: Nov 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Baton Rouge Free State » Sat May 02, 2020 6:54 am

Plzen wrote:
The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:I mean.... wtf it doesnt say USD, wut are u on about.

I would hope that this would be obvious, but if not:

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:GDP: 375.375 Billion USD
GDP per Capita: 21,450 USD

Since the United States no longer exists, and is therefore no longer backing the value of the United States dollar, what does this mean? There are several ways in which this can be interpreted and ambiguity isn't ideal to have in an application.

Ahh thats not the part you quoted earlier is it? Haha. No matter, I thought you would know this already, but most modern economic calculations are done in dollars, and that's the most readily available statistics, to its easier for me to do all the calculations for my projections for the RP in 2019 Dollars, rather than some fake currency I created just now.

User avatar
Plzen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9805
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Plzen » Sat May 02, 2020 7:29 am

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:Ahh thats not the part you quoted earlier is it? Haha. No matter, I thought you would know this already, but most modern economic calculations are done in dollars, and that's the most readily available statistics, to its easier for me to do all the calculations for my projections for the RP in 2019 Dollars, rather than some fake currency I created just now.

So these are 2019 USD in real terms, then. That's... actually quite the impoverished state. Two-thirds loss of GDP, and it's not like the region got bombed or something like that.

Sounds like a good place to snap up on the cheap to manipulate later.
Last edited by Plzen on Sat May 02, 2020 7:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Baton Rouge Free State
Envoy
 
Posts: 265
Founded: Nov 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Baton Rouge Free State » Sat May 02, 2020 7:38 am

Plzen wrote:
The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:Ahh thats not the part you quoted earlier is it? Haha. No matter, I thought you would know this already, but most modern economic calculations are done in dollars, and that's the most readily available statistics, to its easier for me to do all the calculations for my projections for the RP in 2019 Dollars, rather than some fake currency I created just now.

So these are 2019 USD in real terms, then. That's... actually quite the impoverished state. Two-thirds loss of GDP, and it's not like the region got bombed or something like that.

Sounds like a good place to snap up on the cheap to manipulate later.

I mean the world economy collapsed, so I would think it'd be among the highest, unless some magic godmodding deus ex machina allowed someone to somehow get a gdp pc higher than 25k.
Last edited by The Baton Rouge Free State on Sat May 02, 2020 7:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Felan Federation
Diplomat
 
Posts: 858
Founded: Aug 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Felan Federation » Sat May 02, 2020 7:53 am

Arvenia wrote:
The Felan Federation wrote:

Accepted, but I got three questions:
1. What is "Neo-Nativism"?
2. Could you describe the individual branches of the Siberian Defence League?
3. Could you explain to me about both the overall Siberian government and the "National Unity Government"?


1) Neo-Nativism? Ah, my bad. Basically regular nativism is the idea of 'our people first' mentality - which was rather common in Russia already. Although, due to the whole war, economic collapse and I am assuming - much more wealth being directed away from the Siberian Districts towards the European side - you can imagine a few people got peeved at the idea. The idea of Neo-Nativism is basically a more regional-focused idea of nativism - meaning that the wealth generated in their lands belong to them. In practice the 10%/90% split is more favored for the local communities - meaning the 'government' can mine and sell their resources; though a majority of the money should be invested back into the community it came from.

2) I thought I did so? But in essence - Siberia is...Siberia. So no ships likely there, and due to the more advanced industry likely being in the European-side of Russia - they couldn't maintain any kind of air force either. The only thing approaching 'flight' are maybe a few air balloons and biplanes older than the seniors in Siberia. But as I mentioned the Siberian Defense Force is your regular army guys; White Watch is your militiamen; Sky Watch is responsible for air-defense and operating the few operational AA-systems. While Iron Guard is basically the SIberian-version of Spetznaz.

3) The Siberian government is basically the Vozhd being the Executive with strong controls over matters of foreign, diplomacy and economy - similar to the Russian President - under him is a legislature known as the Council - which involves two representatives sent from each city or region in Siberia to represent their interests - mostly voting yay or nay over things that may affect their region of Siberia completely.. The Unity Government was basically formed against the terrorism elements and the other non-russian elements. Plus, since many cities had been cut off - many parties had splintered and formed their own ideas and policies.

Instead of trying to bring everything under a singular ideology - Vozhd Ivan instead offered every party to control their own city and send representatives to the 'capital'. United Russia has many splintered factions, and a few of Russians more 'other' parties managed to take control over some regions, hence the national unity. (I suck at explaining political stuff)

User avatar
Arvenia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13182
Founded: Aug 21, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Arvenia » Sat May 02, 2020 7:59 am

The Felan Federation wrote:
Arvenia wrote:Accepted, but I got three questions:
1. What is "Neo-Nativism"?
2. Could you describe the individual branches of the Siberian Defence League?
3. Could you explain to me about both the overall Siberian government and the "National Unity Government"?


1) Neo-Nativism? Ah, my bad. Basically regular nativism is the idea of 'our people first' mentality - which was rather common in Russia already. Although, due to the whole war, economic collapse and I am assuming - much more wealth being directed away from the Siberian Districts towards the European side - you can imagine a few people got peeved at the idea. The idea of Neo-Nativism is basically a more regional-focused idea of nativism - meaning that the wealth generated in their lands belong to them. In practice the 10%/90% split is more favored for the local communities - meaning the 'government' can mine and sell their resources; though a majority of the money should be invested back into the community it came from.

2) I thought I did so? But in essence - Siberia is...Siberia. So no ships likely there, and due to the more advanced industry likely being in the European-side of Russia - they couldn't maintain any kind of air force either. The only thing approaching 'flight' are maybe a few air balloons and biplanes older than the seniors in Siberia. But as I mentioned the Siberian Defense Force is your regular army guys; White Watch is your militiamen; Sky Watch is responsible for air-defense and operating the few operational AA-systems. While Iron Guard is basically the SIberian-version of Spetznaz.

3) The Siberian government is basically the Vozhd being the Executive with strong controls over matters of foreign, diplomacy and economy - similar to the Russian President - under him is a legislature known as the Council - which involves two representatives sent from each city or region in Siberia to represent their interests - mostly voting yay or nay over things that may affect their region of Siberia completely.. The Unity Government was basically formed against the terrorism elements and the other non-russian elements. Plus, since many cities had been cut off - many parties had splintered and formed their own ideas and policies.

Instead of trying to bring everything under a singular ideology - Vozhd Ivan instead offered every party to control their own city and send representatives to the 'capital'. United Russia has many splintered factions, and a few of Russians more 'other' parties managed to take control over some regions, hence the national unity. (I suck at explaining political stuff)

Got it.
Pro: Political Pluralism, Centrism, Liberalism, Liberal Democracy, Social Democracy, Sweden, USA, UN, ROC, Japan, South Korea, Monarchism, Republicanism, Sci-Fi, Animal Rights, Gender Equality, Mecha, Autism, Environmentalism, Secularism, Religion and LGBT Rights
Anti: Racism, Sexism, Nazism, Fascism, EU, Socialism, Adolf Hitler, Neo-Nazism, KKK, Joseph Stalin, PRC, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Communism, Ultraconservatism, Ultranationalism, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Transphobia, WBC, Satanism, Mormonism, Anarchy, ISIS, al-Qaeda, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 969 Movement, Political Correctness, Anti-Autistic Sentiment, Far-Right, Far-Left, Cultural Relativism, Anti-Vaxxers, Scalpers and COVID-19

User avatar
Plzen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9805
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Plzen » Sat May 02, 2020 8:07 am

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:I mean the world economy collapsed, so I would think it'd be among the highest, unless some magic godmodding deus ex machina allowed someone to somehow get a gdp pc higher than 25k.

You can destroy a person's home and workplace, you can destroy a nation's roads and harbours, but you can never take away from a man the skill in his hands or the knowledge in his mind.

It took, what, all of a decade for Europe to recover from the Second World War? And that was after almost every major city on the Continent got reduced to rubble.

User avatar
Revlona
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7284
Founded: Jan 23, 2017
Father Knows Best State

Postby Revlona » Sat May 02, 2020 8:13 am

Trying to decide on whether Dixie or Bonnie Blue flag should be the national anthem

I mean God Save the South is a thing but it doesn't roll off the tongue like the other two. Any suggestions?
Lover of doggos

User avatar
The Baton Rouge Free State
Envoy
 
Posts: 265
Founded: Nov 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Baton Rouge Free State » Sat May 02, 2020 8:35 am

Plzen wrote:
The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:I mean the world economy collapsed, so I would think it'd be among the highest, unless some magic godmodding deus ex machina allowed someone to somehow get a gdp pc higher than 25k.

You can destroy a person's home and workplace, you can destroy a nation's roads and harbours, but you can never take away from a man the skill in his hands or the knowledge in his mind.

It took, what, all of a decade for Europe to recover from the Second World War? And that was after almost every major city on the Continent got reduced to rubble.

Yah and that was with the aid of many billions of dollars from the US, and many parts still didn't fully recover until the 80s and 90s. Most of Central France for example, or Germany. Besides, those countries still had other nations to trade with, and they had the factories with which to rebuild their economies with. Like so much is wrong with that statement, I don't think any strand of educated economic thought actually agrees with what your saying. If all the buildings in one nation are destroyed, sure it might only take a decade for that country to rebuild, given proper aid from other countries and reliable trade partners. The entire world collapses though? You cna expect an economic depression worse than ever before seen in the world, we're talking severe negative regressions, the kind of stuff that would make Milton Friedman turn in his grave. Because there literally are no companies left, the world economy didnt die, it literally ceased to exist for like... the entire 2040s basically, like there was no trace of any modern economic activity, just a few states based around some semblance of a war economy.

User avatar
HypErcApitAl
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1651
Founded: Feb 16, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby HypErcApitAl » Sat May 02, 2020 8:48 am

Thinking of joining this rp (although I'm in three other rps), but it seems like alot of hardwork. (The RP also reminds me of another RP I was in, "2024: A Long Peace")
(quotes)
Kehrernesia wrote:
"Hypercapital's greatest wish would be for others to stop thinking of them (Hypercapital) as too "edgy" and for said other persons to get to truly know and appreciate the depth of Hypercapital's lore."

"Peace is a lie." ~ Sith Code (excerpt)


Classical Liberal (ClaLib), Proud stan of Kim Jong Un's sis, Kanye West 2024, Vermin Supreme (whenever)

User avatar
Plzen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9805
Founded: Mar 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Plzen » Sat May 02, 2020 8:52 am

The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:-snip-

The Communist Bloc received basically none of that US aid money that you are talking about, but after two world wars and a Great Depression, Eastern Europe still had a higher GDP in 1950 than in 1913. This is still true even if you exclude Russia/USSR, which more than doubled its GDP during this period.

Economies really are quite resilient to these temporary shocks. Nearly two decades after the big crises of the 2030s, the world in this RP should be well on the path to recovery. In general, that is; of course some will do a lot better and some will do a lot worse.
Last edited by Plzen on Sat May 02, 2020 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Baton Rouge Free State
Envoy
 
Posts: 265
Founded: Nov 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Baton Rouge Free State » Sat May 02, 2020 9:03 am

Plzen wrote:
The Baton Rouge Free State wrote:-snip-

The Communist Bloc received basically none of that US aid money that you are talking about, but after two world wars and a Great Depression, Eastern Europe still had a higher GDP in 1950 than in 1913. This is still true even if you exclude Russia/USSR, which more than doubled its GDP during this period.

Economies really are quite resilient to these temporary shocks. Nearly two decades after the big crises of the 2030s, the world in this RP should be well on the path to recovery. In general, that is; of course some will do a lot better and some will do a lot worse.

Ok so um... There was the Molotov Plan. And also that’s because European countries were still expanding due to war economies. Wut ur trying to do here is compare two completely different situations and say they are similar. They aren’t, one is a war, this is an unprecedented global collapse where literally every nation on the planet ceased to exist. We’re basically looking at the thickest L curve in history here. Nonetheless I don’t think ur 100,000 1990 dollar gdp pc is realistic in any sense, even if there wasn’t such a collapse in the world, Nordic countries are still only expected to hit something like a 60-70k GDP pc by 2050. Even Norway isn’t expected to grow much as its success is largely tied to how well its sovereign wealth fund is doing, which needless to say, would have evaporated in an instant if such a crisis occurred.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Portal to the Multiverse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cybernetic Socialist Republics, Lunas Legion, The Stellar Union, Zarkenis Ultima

Advertisement

Remove ads