Cold War RP: Reboot, (OPEN)

[Mathuvan Union]

Uruguay is owned by Vaas

Incorrect. It is a puppet. I will blow them out of the water
If I can’t (most likely) what free South American countries are there and also what is there available forcolonising?

[Monsone]

Uruguay is owned by Vaas

Incorrect. It is a puppet. I will blow them out of the water
If I can’t (most likely) what free South American countries are there and also what is there available forcolonising?

None. Or just take Guinea Bissau, it's free.

[Romextly]

I do need more people

[Mathuvan Union]

Incorrect. It is a puppet. I will blow them out of the water
If I can’t (most likely) what free South American countries are there and also what is there available forcolonising?

None. Or just take Guinea Bissau, it's free.

I can take Guinea Bissau? Where is it? Because I will.

[TENNOHEIKA BANZAI NIHON]

None. Or just take Guinea Bissau, it's free.

I can take Guinea Bissau? Where is it? Because I will.

It is all the way in Africa. I will say it seems like you are just going to war for the sake of going to war. Rule 6 is "No unjustified war. This means that you must state your wargoal as well as having a reason in your declaration of war."

[Mathuvan Union]

I can take Guinea Bissau? Where is it? Because I will.

It is all the way in Africa. I will say it seems like you are just going to war for the sake of going to war. Rule 6 is "No unjustified war. This means that you must state your wargoal as well as having a reason in your declaration of war."

Oh. My. God. You really can’t leave me alone can you?
It will be justified, I only expressed interest in the territory. Excuse me for war, but it makes the roleplay more interesting.
Now leave me and my country alone because you’re struggling to do that.

[Draos]

CAN WE PLEASE STOP ARGUING EVERY 5 FREAKING SECONDS FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THINGS JELLY FLAVORED.

[Mathuvan Union]

CAN WE PLEASE STOP ARGUING EVERY 5 FREAKING SECONDS FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THINGS JELLY FLAVORED.

Ew. I hate jelly. Go complain to Banzai, because they seem to think they have final say about everything you do and regularly assume you are going to break rules.

[Draos]

I DON'T CARE WHO STARTED IT OR WHOSE DOING WHAT WE SHOULD BE HERE BECAUSE WE ALL LOVE RPING IN THIS SCENARIO NOT TO ARGUE WITH EACH OTHER OVER EVERYTHING. I've seen too many damn good RPs get ruined because people can't stop arguing.

[Mathuvan Union]

I DON'T CARE WHO STARTED IT OR WHOSE DOING WHAT WE SHOULD BE HERE BECAUSE WE ALL LOVE RPING IN THIS SCENARIO NOT TO ARGUE WITH EACH OTHER OVER EVERYTHING. I've seen too many damn good RPs get ruined because people can't stop arguing.

I don’t love roleplaying here because everything’s seems to be wrong with it it.

[Monsone]

I can take Guinea Bissau? Where is it? Because I will.

It is all the way in Africa. I will say it seems like you are just going to war for the sake of going to war. Rule 6 is "No unjustified war. This means that you must state your wargoal as well as having a reason in your declaration of war."

I got a justification, land. Brazil needs more land, so a tiny corner of Africa is what is necessary to satisfy their needs.

[TENNOHEIKA BANZAI NIHON]

It is all the way in Africa. I will say it seems like you are just going to war for the sake of going to war. Rule 6 is "No unjustified war. This means that you must state your wargoal as well as having a reason in your declaration of war."

Oh. My. God. You really can’t leave me alone can you?
It will be justified, I only expressed interest in the territory. Excuse me for war, but it makes the roleplay more interesting.
Now leave me and my country alone because you’re struggling to do that.

That isn't very good justification for a war. The country does not have any natural resources not to mention you didn't even know where it was five minutes ago.

I am sorry you feel that I am picking on you, just I am a big advocate for following the rules of an RP. One of those rules is realism. You are attacking a nation a few hundred miles away, meaning you will have to deploy transport forces, no matter what. Your navy despite being highly unrealistic, seems to lack transport forces that have enough numbers to deploy very many troops in a timely manner. Such an attack would require more planning, new training, and new equipment. Brazil is not known for their amphibious assault capabilities, and it would be a shock if you fielded very many higgins boats, semi-ampbhious vehicles, or even LSTs that you would most likely require to avoid your forces from being defeated.

[Draos]

I DON'T CARE WHO STARTED IT OR WHOSE DOING WHAT WE SHOULD BE HERE BECAUSE WE ALL LOVE RPING IN THIS SCENARIO NOT TO ARGUE WITH EACH OTHER OVER EVERYTHING. I've seen too many damn good RPs get ruined because people can't stop arguing.

I don’t love roleplaying here because everything’s seems to be wrong with it it.

Then why are you here?

[Mathuvan Union]

I don’t love roleplaying here because everything’s seems to be wrong with it it.

Then why are you here?

Because I actually like my roleplay when nothing is wrong with it

Oh. My. God. You really can’t leave me alone can you?
It will be justified, I only expressed interest in the territory. Excuse me for war, but it makes the roleplay more interesting.
Now leave me and my country alone because you’re struggling to do that.

That isn't very good justification for a war. The country does not have any natural resources not to mention you didn't even know where it was five minutes ago.

I am sorry you feel that I am picking on you, just I am a big advocate for following the rules of an RP. One of those rules is realism. You are attacking a nation a few hundred miles away, meaning you will have to deploy transport forces, no matter what. Your navy despite being highly unrealistic, seems to lack transport forces that have enough numbers to deploy very many troops in a timely manner. Such an attack would require more planning, new training, and new equipment. Brazil is not known for their amphibious assault capabilities, and it would be a shock if you fielded very many higgins boats, semi-ampbhious vehicles, or even LSTs that you would most likely require to avoid your forces from being defeated.

I’ll admit that my navy is a bit big, but I have landing craft. They will land in those if I decide to
Maybe I want to start a real empire with colonies

[Draos]

Then why are you here?

Because I actually like my roleplay when nothing is wrong with it

That isn't very good justification for a war. The country does not have any natural resources not to mention you didn't even know where it was five minutes ago.

I am sorry you feel that I am picking on you, just I am a big advocate for following the rules of an RP. One of those rules is realism. You are attacking a nation a few hundred miles away, meaning you will have to deploy transport forces, no matter what. Your navy despite being highly unrealistic, seems to lack transport forces that have enough numbers to deploy very many troops in a timely manner. Such an attack would require more planning, new training, and new equipment. Brazil is not known for their amphibious assault capabilities, and it would be a shock if you fielded very many higgins boats, semi-ampbhious vehicles, or even LSTs that you would most likely require to avoid your forces from being defeated.

I’ll admit that my navy is a bit big, but I have landing craft. They will land in those if I decide to
Maybe I want to start a real empire with colonies

Bro I'm not trying to be mean but if you can't love RPing or accept genuine criticism which nihon is providing maybe it's not for you plus you're the one whose being confrontational all the time a good response would be "I thank you for your critique but I think it is fine the way it is" or "how may I improve it to avoid god modding in the future?"

[Draos]

You are always the one who comes off as combative and irrational getting upset at the slightest provocation.

[TENNOHEIKA BANZAI NIHON]

Then why are you here?

Because I actually like my roleplay when nothing is wrong with it

That isn't very good justification for a war. The country does not have any natural resources not to mention you didn't even know where it was five minutes ago.

I am sorry you feel that I am picking on you, just I am a big advocate for following the rules of an RP. One of those rules is realism. You are attacking a nation a few hundred miles away, meaning you will have to deploy transport forces, no matter what. Your navy despite being highly unrealistic, seems to lack transport forces that have enough numbers to deploy very many troops in a timely manner. Such an attack would require more planning, new training, and new equipment. Brazil is not known for their amphibious assault capabilities, and it would be a shock if you fielded very many higgins boats, semi-ampbhious vehicles, or even LSTs that you would most likely require to avoid your forces from being defeated.

I’ll admit that my navy is a bit big, but I have landing craft. They will land in those if I decide to
Maybe I want to start a real empire with colonies

Landing craft are not always suitable for the deployment of troops when you have to move your forces hundreds of miles. You will require dozens to hundreds of transport ships to carry out this amphibious operation. And even then until you secure a port, your forces will lack in heavy armor and heavy artillery.

Most nations today aren't even able to launch a massive naval invasion simply because of the lack of naval lift capabilities.

The issue with your navy is the unrealistic sense that you have 80 battleships and 5 carriers. Your nation lacks the naval slips to build more than a few capital ships at a time and most certainly lacks the funding to have built or maintained these ships. You would have most likely had to build most of them, which is impossible.

Going off the IRL costs, if you were to build the battleships you claim, it would have cost $709,107,360 1910 dollars; which is $1,798,893,408.00 in 1950, which is $19,137,986,574.72 today. So highly unreasonable, unless your nation has a very large debt. Not to mention you wouldn't have the time nor the naval slips to build that many ships in the first place.

Assuming you engaged in the program as IRL in 1906 and began building 2 battleships a year, and it took 4 years to build each ship, your last ship which is hopelessly obsolete, would have just began construction in 1946 and will have been done by 1950, although IRL the class you use was retired in 1952.

[Mathuvan Union]

Because I actually like my roleplay when nothing is wrong with it
I’ll admit that my navy is a bit big, but I have landing craft. They will land in those if I decide to
Maybe I want to start a real empire with colonies

Landing craft are not always suitable for the deployment of troops when you have to move your forces hundreds of miles. You will require dozens to hundreds of transport ships to carry out this amphibious operation. And even then until you secure a port, your forces will lack in heavy armor and heavy artillery.

Most nations today aren't even able to launch a massive naval invasion simply because of the lack of naval lift capabilities.

The issue with your navy is the unrealistic sense that you have 80 battleships and 5 carriers. Your nation lacks the naval slips to build more than a few capital ships at a time and most certainly lacks the funding to have built or maintained these ships. You would have most likely had to build most of them, which is impossible.

Going off the IRL costs, if you were to build the battleships you claim, it would have cost $709,107,<a href="tel:360 1910">360 1910</a> dollars; which is $1,798,893,408.00 in 1950, which is $19,137,986,574.72 today. So highly unreasonable, unless your nation has a very large debt. Not to mention you wouldn't have the time nor the naval slips to build that many ships in the first place.

Never mind those battleships. I have far fewer. I could use paratroopers from a plane from a carrier.

You are always the one who comes off as combative and irrational getting upset at the slightest provocation.

Oh, EXCUSE ME for expressing emotion. Sometimes I get annoyed.
But sometimes I’m just having a bad day and can’t take it anymore.

[Draos]

Landing craft are not always suitable for the deployment of troops when you have to move your forces hundreds of miles. You will require dozens to hundreds of transport ships to carry out this amphibious operation. And even then until you secure a port, your forces will lack in heavy armor and heavy artillery.

Most nations today aren't even able to launch a massive naval invasion simply because of the lack of naval lift capabilities.

The issue with your navy is the unrealistic sense that you have 80 battleships and 5 carriers. Your nation lacks the naval slips to build more than a few capital ships at a time and most certainly lacks the funding to have built or maintained these ships. You would have most likely had to build most of them, which is impossible.

Going off the IRL costs, if you were to build the battleships you claim, it would have cost $709,107,<a href="tel:360 1910">360 1910</a> dollars; which is $1,798,893,408.00 in 1950, which is $19,137,986,574.72 today. So highly unreasonable, unless your nation has a very large debt. Not to mention you wouldn't have the time nor the naval slips to build that many ships in the first place.

Never mind those battleships. I have far fewer. I could use paratroopers from a plane from a carrier.

You are always the one who comes off as combative and irrational getting upset at the slightest provocation.

Oh, EXCUSE ME for expressing emotion. Sometimes I get annoyed.
But sometimes I’m just having a bad day and can’t take it anymore.

That's when you take a step back and calm down before replying. Because this is a site for people to have fun not be at each other's throat.

[Mathuvan Union]

Never mind those battleships. I have far fewer. I could use paratroopers from a plane from a carrier.
Oh, EXCUSE ME for expressing emotion. Sometimes I get annoyed.
But sometimes I’m just having a bad day and can’t take it anymore.

That's when you take a step back and calm down before replying. Because this is a site for people to have fun not be at each other's throat.

Which is why I ask people to leave me alone. When they don’t, that’s when I get angry.
I wouldn’t be going for anyone’s throat if you didn’t tell me how to act.

[TENNOHEIKA BANZAI NIHON]

Landing craft are not always suitable for the deployment of troops when you have to move your forces hundreds of miles. You will require dozens to hundreds of transport ships to carry out this amphibious operation. And even then until you secure a port, your forces will lack in heavy armor and heavy artillery.

Most nations today aren't even able to launch a massive naval invasion simply because of the lack of naval lift capabilities.

The issue with your navy is the unrealistic sense that you have 80 battleships and 5 carriers. Your nation lacks the naval slips to build more than a few capital ships at a time and most certainly lacks the funding to have built or maintained these ships. You would have most likely had to build most of them, which is impossible.

Going off the IRL costs, if you were to build the battleships you claim, it would have cost $709,107,<a href="tel:360 1910">360 1910</a> dollars; which is $1,798,893,408.00 in 1950, which is $19,137,986,574.72 today. So highly unreasonable, unless your nation has a very large debt. Not to mention you wouldn't have the time nor the naval slips to build that many ships in the first place.

Never mind those battleships. I have far fewer. I could use paratroopers from a plane from a carrier.

You are always the one who comes off as combative and irrational getting upset at the slightest provocation.

Oh, EXCUSE ME for expressing emotion. Sometimes I get annoyed.
But sometimes I’m just having a bad day and can’t take it anymore.

There is no 1950 plane in the world that is small enough to fit on a carrier, but also be big enough to deploy paratroopers. I mean the best you can do in 1950 is have 1-2 paratroopers per plane, but they don't get any equipment pack. All planes in 1950 and even in 2020 that are used to deploy paratroopers cannot be launched from an aircraft carrier.

[Mathuvan Union]

Never mind those battleships. I have far fewer. I could use paratroopers from a plane from a carrier.
Oh, EXCUSE ME for expressing emotion. Sometimes I get annoyed.
But sometimes I’m just having a bad day and can’t take it anymore.

There is no 1950 plane in the world that is small enough to fit on a carrier, but also be big enough to deploy paratroopers. I mean the best you can do in 1950 is have 1-2 paratroopers per plane, but they don't get any equipment pack. All planes in 1950 and even in 2020 that are used to deploy paratroopers cannot be launched from an aircraft carrier.

I’ll use transport planes. Mind you, by december, my best plane will be a de haviland Venom.

[Draos]

That's when you take a step back and calm down before replying. Because this is a site for people to have fun not be at each other's throat.

Which is why I ask people to leave me alone. When they don’t, that’s when I get angry.
I wouldn’t be going for anyone’s throat if you didn’t tell me how to act.

No You're going for people's throats because you don't know how to control your emotions and deal with your problems like a normal person if someone on the site is making you mad JUST LOG OFF AND DO SOMETHING ELSE FOR A LITTLE BIT. If you keep replying all you're doing is making yourself more riled up more angry and more emotional.

[Mathuvan Union]

Which is why I ask people to leave me alone. When they don’t, that’s when I get angry.
I wouldn’t be going for anyone’s throat if you didn’t tell me how to act.

No You're going for people's throats because you don't know how to control your emotions and deal with your problems like a normal person if someone on the site is making you mad JUST LOG OFF AND DO SOMETHING ELSE FOR A LITTLE BIT. If you keep replying all you're doing is making yourself more riled up more angry and more emotional.

I’m not getting ‘riled up by replying’

I’m getting ‘riled up’ by YOUR responses.
Thanks for insulting me. If I was scummy enough, I would have reported that. I AM A NORMAL PERSON AND DONT YOU DARE CALL ME OTHERWISE EVER AGAIN.

[Monsone]

[
Landing craft are not always suitable for the deployment of troops when you have to move your forces hundreds of miles. You will require dozens to hundreds of transport ships to carry out this amphibious operation. And even then until you secure a port, your forces will lack in heavy armor and heavy artillery.

Most nations today aren't even able to launch a massive naval invasion simply because of the lack of naval lift capabilities.

The issue with your navy is the unrealistic sense that you have 80 battleships and 5 carriers. Your nation lacks the naval slips to build more than a few capital ships at a time and most certainly lacks the funding to have built or maintained these ships. You would have most likely had to build most of them, which is impossible.

Going off the IRL costs, if you were to build the battleships you claim, it would have cost $709,107,360 1910 dollars; which is $1,798,893,408.00 in 1950, which is $19,137,986,574.72 today. So highly unreasonable, unless your nation has a very large debt. Not to mention you wouldn't have the time nor the naval slips to build that many ships in the first place.

Assuming you engaged in the program as IRL in 1906 and began building 2 battleships a year, and it took 4 years to build each ship, your last ship which is hopelessly obsolete, would have just began construction in 1946 and will have been done by 1950, although IRL the class you use was retired in 1952.

Even on D-Day, for the "short" waterway known as the English Channel larger landing support ships where used. Those ships launched the smaller landing craft.

Also, when it comes to battleships, having 80 sounds great, but that is a huge resource drain. All the fuel, food, ammunition, medical supplies, etc. that those ships would need is insane. Battleships aren't cheap to operate, build, or maintain. So by having 80, or really over 10, your navy is going to end up like the Kriegsmarine. Impressive looking and sounding, but in the end, just a paper tiger that can be killed with airplanes.