The Land Of The Free: American Political Roleplay (OOC II)

[Agarntrop]

AfAm's are SocCons?. Really? In which aspect?

Conservative Christianity. Coretta Scott King, for example, found herself estranged from many of her former civil rights colleagues when she came out for LGBT rights.

well, atang is quite socially conservative on some issues not lgbt though, but thats mainly because of the ortho jews in nis seat.

tbh atang is probably in the red, just not abrasive about it like porter.

[Sanabel]

Looking at the VSG study (which parallels this with whether they voted for Trump or Clinton in 2016), it can be safely assumed that the demographic is largely white working-class, with black and Hispanic members on the other side. Even if the 6% of people within the quadrant that voted Clinton are all minority (which is doubtful, to say the least), there's still a whopping chunk of Obama ---> Trump voters right there.

Forget about fucking “quadrants” that is not how campaigns are run

[Kargintina the Third]

Hello.

I’m still here, but I wasn’t really passionate about the character I was apping for last thread. Is it possible I could switch?

[Meelducan]

Hello.

I’m still here, but I wasn’t really passionate about the character I was apping for last thread. Is it possible I could switch?

Sure!

[Agarntrop]

Hello.

I’m still here, but I wasn’t really passionate about the character I was apping for last thread. Is it possible I could switch?

i think so

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

Looking at the VSG study (which parallels this with whether they voted for Trump or Clinton in 2016), it can be safely assumed that the demographic is largely white working-class, with black and Hispanic members on the other side. Even if the 6% of people within the quadrant that voted Clinton are all minority (which is doubtful, to say the least), there's still a whopping chunk of Obama ---> Trump voters right there.

Forget about fucking “quadrants” that is not how campaigns are run

I looked at the issues juxtaposed with income and 2016 vote, and I think I've made my conclusion off that.

[Meelducan]

Come on Diane, cripple her hand.

[Sanabel]

Forget about fucking “quadrants” that is not how campaigns are run

I looked at the issues juxtaposed with income and 2016 vote, and I think I've made my conclusion off that.

??

[Gordano and Lysandus]

If Paulson, as a libertarian, gives arthritic Brookley some marijuana, is that shake 'n' bake?

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

I looked at the issues juxtaposed with income and 2016 vote, and I think I've made my conclusion off that.

??

Same study, fig 14.

Assuming that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly white (not really a big leap of logic there), the graph shows that low-income Trump voters (therefore a decent chunk of the white working-class) are in said populist/authoritarian area of the compass.

[Jovuistan]

You know, it's a REAL achievement to become someone Richardson hates more than Prendergast, lol

It's already a real achievement to be someone hated in the whole RP.

Peter Amaras type beat.

[Main Nation Ministry]

It's already a real achievement to be someone hated in the whole RP.

Peter Amaras type beat.

Or O'Realy or Williams.

[Sanabel]

??

Same study, fig 14.

Assuming that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly white (not really a big leap of logic there), the graph shows that low-income Trump voters (therefore a decent chunk of the white working-class) are in said populist/authoritarian area of the compass.

I swear it’s like trying to give advice to a brick wall

[Jovuistan]

Peter Amaras type beat.

Or O'Realy or Williams.

Or Noble!

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

Same study, fig 14.
Assuming that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly white (not really a big leap of logic there), the graph shows that low-income Trump voters (therefore a decent chunk of the white working-class) are in said populist/authoritarian area of the compass.

I swear it’s like trying to give advice to a brick wall

I'm looking at the demographics and the issues here.

Also, the study plots each respondent on the compass, hence my conclusions. I'm working off data. Anyway, I think that's all. Need to write the phone call session now.

[Sanabel]

I swear it’s like trying to give advice to a brick wall

I'm looking at the demographics and the issues here.

Also, the study plots each respondent on the compass, hence my conclusions. I'm working off data. Anyway, I think that's all. Need to write the phone call session now.

I’m not disputing the data, just your reading of the data

[Greater Arab State]

Or O'Realy or Williams.

Or Noble!

Or Kramer.

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

I'm looking at the demographics and the issues here.

Also, the study plots each respondent on the compass, hence my conclusions. I'm working off data. Anyway, I think that's all. Need to write the phone call session now.

I’m not disputing the data, just your reading of the data

Alright. Look at figure 14 (I'm assuming you have the study open, if not, it's here: https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publica ... arties-now), where it compares political positions along with income and party affiliation. What do you think?

[Sanabel]

I’m not disputing the data, just your reading of the data

Alright. Look at figure 14 (I'm assuming you have the study open, if not, it's here: https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publica ... arties-now), where it compares political positions along with income and party affiliation. What do you think?

Again, I’m not disputing the data, just the idea that all of these people fit neatly within a box on the political compass, and will immediately go to Porter because he too fits within said box

[Main Nation Ministry]

Or Noble!

Or Kramer.

Or probably Schlang.

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

Alright. Look at figure 14 (I'm assuming you have the study open, if not, it's here: https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publica ... arties-now), where it compares political positions along with income and party affiliation. What do you think?

Again, I’m not disputing the data, just the idea that all of these people fit neatly within a box on the political compass, and will immediately go to Porter because he too fits within said box

I'm not saying that they'll immediately go to him. I'm saying that they're the best to target, because they already agree with him on the issues.

[Sanabel]

Again, I’m not disputing the data, just the idea that all of these people fit neatly within a box on the political compass, and will immediately go to Porter because he too fits within said box

I'm not saying that they'll immediately go to him. I'm saying that they're the best to target, because they already agree with him on the issues.

Many of them could potentially go to him, but there is more at play here, such as religion, regional/state identity, race, etc.

[Gordano and Lysandus]

Again, I’m not disputing the data, just the idea that all of these people fit neatly within a box on the political compass, and will immediately go to Porter because he too fits within said box

I'm not saying that they'll immediately go to him. I'm saying that they're the best to target, because they already agree with him on the issues.

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

I'm not saying that they'll immediately go to him. I'm saying that they're the best to target, because they already agree with him on the issues.

Many of them could potentially go to him, but there is more at play here, such as religion, regional/state identity, race, etc.

Oh, of course, I'm not saying ALL of them will go to him. I understand many are Hispanic, black, Muslim...I'm just looking at the ones that already voted Trump in 2016, meaning that the vast majority of them will be white Christians.

Sorry for the confusion.

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

I'm not saying that they'll immediately go to him. I'm saying that they're the best to target, because they already agree with him on the issues.

My communication skills are literally 0 lol

I bet you it came off as "people vote for the person closest on the political spectrum to them", which makes just enough sense that someone could believe it...just about.