The Holy Dominion of Inesea wrote:Reverend Norv wrote:
Fair enough. I had assumed from Krugmar's description that most of the Southron powers held various longstanding historical claims to the Mootland, which would make conflict over it a matter of honor for everyone involved, regardless of their assessment of its actual value - and I read Serebyan as particularly likely to be stubborn on a matter of honor such as that one, hence the three wars. But if those assumptions were mistaken, I can sure change the history.
The center of Serebyan is actually the smaller of the two islands that form the west coast of the inland sea. The Mootland is far from the interests of traditional Serebyan. The only reason that the Dominion controls the parts of the Mootlands that it does, the lake to the border, is because of Serelyodan desire to control main tributaries for the Aratska River Valley. The Serelyodi would have conquered up to the lake about 900 years ago and reached the current borders by at least 500 years ago. The Dominion, already disliking non-humans, would not be apt to conquer the subhuman lands. Given that, you could probably seize the Mootlands up to the first lake during the War of the Great Houses about 500 years ago, but they'd have been reconquered within a few decades. Afterwards there could be wars and skirmishes aplenty, but the borders are not liable to have changed much. At least long term.
Makes sense. Since those three wars were intended to provide some more recent experience for the Mark's forces, and since it's important to the Ironmark's regional role that it's never lost a war outright, I will just change the opponent in them from Serebyan to Tervain. That adds some tension to the Mark's current attempt to support the Tervain rebels, which is a more interesting dynamic anyway.