Advertisement
by Yaruqo » Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:43 pm
by Greater Seludong » Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:02 pm
Kataas-taasang, Kagalang-galangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan
To: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union
From: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Katipunan of Filipinas
Encryption: HIGH
We would want to have military advisers and supplies to be sent to our country.
Thank you,
Casto Alenjandrino,
Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Katipunan
Kataas-taasang, Kagalang-galangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan
To: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Socialist Republic of Spain
From: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Katipunan of Filipinas
Encryption: HIGH
We would want to have military advisers and supplies to be sent to our country.
Thank you,
Casto Alenjandrino,
Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Katipunan
Kataas-taasang, Kagalang-galangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan
Joint Communique
To: The Ministries of Foreign Affairs of Korea, Malaysia, China,and Japan
From: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Katipunan of Filipinas
Encryption: HIGH
Greetings!
We all are of the same heritage. We are all bonded with one Oriental blood. We were all once peaceful, already independent and able to act as sovereign. Then the time comes, the Westerners quickly savaged our nations. Divided us into such cruel administrations that were only to take advantage of us. Now that almost all of us are already independent, there is another threat that coming upon us.
America, the new emerging superpower after the ashes of the Second Great War, was able to assert its influence in Asia, through our country. Their imperialist demands are a threat to all of us. But we, the Katipunan of Filipinas want to push back their influence as far as a million kilometers if needed by our independence, that will ensure American imperialism to stop in Asia. In our journey to revolution, may we ask your support, might be moral, financial or military, for our countries to continue coexisting for the next generations.
Thank you,
Casto Alenjandrino,
Minister of Foreign Affairs,
Katipunan
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
THE MAYNILA TIMES: COVID-19 Bulletin: Infected 12,891 Recovered 9,823 Deceased 287 | Science ministry: Covid vaccine near completion | 8901 people arrested for violating quarantine since March | 1-year old baby recovers from Covid | Pres. Poe: Sugbo is new COVID epicenter | Filipinas to send support to ASEAN, India | Chinese caught not wearing mask, splashes soya to policeman
SPECIAL NOTES: a Tier 6, Type 5 civ., according to this index. | This nation does not use NS stats.
by Lemlar » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:04 pm
Εκτακτες Ειδήσεις: LemlarΛεμλαρ, ξεκινώντας μια νέα εποχή καθώς το πράσινο κόμμα έχει δημιουργήσει έναν συνασπισμό με τους καθιερωμένους μοναρχικούς.
by Hypron » Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:40 pm
by Confederate American SU » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:33 pm
From: D.H. Malan and William H. Andrews of the Confederacy of South African Republics
To: Joseph Stalin of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
If the Soviet Union has a policy of protecting socialist nations, then we invite you, or a diplomatic envoy, to visit South Africa to experience South African socialism. Our nation prides itself on being ruled by the working class and farmers. You then can determine if our country fulfills the criteria. After all, have we not fought capitalism since the strikes of 1914 or even the Boer uprisings earlier on? We rose up with the Rand Rebellion, inspired by the Russian Revolution. We have been ardent in our socialist, syndicalist cause.
Sincerely, the first General Secretary of the Communist Party of South Africa.
From: Percy Fisher, Hendrik Verwoerd, and Jimmy Green of the Confederacy of South African Republics
To: Caballero of the Socialist Republic of Spain
Greetings. The Confederacy of South African Republics is interested in setting up diplomatic relations. We're also curious about your attitudes when it comes to African affairs, as it seems like that the Socialist Republic of Spain is unique in wanting to preserve its colonial empire despite being a socialist republic.
by Puertollano » Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:24 am
by Yaruqo » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:49 am
Hypron wrote:UN Building, New York City, New York
Sir Cadogen, after the Egyptian rep. speaks, gets up to attempt to resolve this quickly. "My Prime Minister has come up with a way for everyone to benefit. I'm asking that if Egypt were to cross into the Suez to take it by force, that the United Nations would intervene. In exchange, the entire canal zone will become a International Neutral Passage, but under British advisement. If the canal is closed by anyone during the unstable peace, that nation will have sanctions automatically raised on them. More canals and straits like the Bosphoros and the Strait of Gibraltar can be added to this list at another date. The Soviet Union will gain more access to the Middle East, as we couldn't close the canal except for repairs to damage, and the British Empire can keep its country together." He sits down after saying this.
by Dentali » Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:52 am
Yaruqo wrote:Hypron wrote:UN Building, New York City, New York
Sir Cadogen, after the Egyptian rep. speaks, gets up to attempt to resolve this quickly. "My Prime Minister has come up with a way for everyone to benefit. I'm asking that if Egypt were to cross into the Suez to take it by force, that the United Nations would intervene. In exchange, the entire canal zone will become a International Neutral Passage, but under British advisement. If the canal is closed by anyone during the unstable peace, that nation will have sanctions automatically raised on them. More canals and straits like the Bosphoros and the Strait of Gibraltar can be added to this list at another date. The Soviet Union will gain more access to the Middle East, as we couldn't close the canal except for repairs to damage, and the British Empire can keep its country together." He sits down after saying this.
UNSC Chamber, New York City, USA
Abdullah scoffs, and replies a little forcefully, “Last I checked, it is your government’s troops that are stationed at the Canal. Last I checked, it is your government that responded by deploying troops. My government has informed the Council of our wishes for the Canal, and once again, Britain responds immediately with an eye for violence. We are asking that your troops leave Egypt, for good, per our King’s wishes from three years ago. We are asking for ownership of the Canal, and would compensate your stakeholders, and those of the French, handsomely. Where within this request did you get ‘We shall seize the Canal by force’, to prompt such a ridiculous statement from the British delegation?”
by Yaruqo » Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:32 am
by Arvenia » Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:57 am
Official Message of the Portuguese Union
To: Confederacy of South African Republics
From: Portuguese Union
Subject: Diplomacy
Encryption: Medium to High
Dear Confederate Council, I have just started to hear about your country, which used to be an overseas territory of the British Empire. Both of our countries are neither capitalist nor communist, yet there are still differences. Your country must be either syndicalist or socialist, while mine is more economically mixed. Also, your country runs under universal white suffrage, while mine has offered civil rights to all of its overseas provinces and their native inhabitants. My country would likely be more egalitarian than yours, but besides that, I would seek diplomatic relations between our countries as to ensure peace and co-existence. Don't let our differences stand in our way and prevent us from having something in common. I am not seeking war, I am seeking diplomacy. My country is not a colonial empire anymore, it is a pluricontinental nation whose overseas provinces are treated equally with respect.
Also, both of us are dealing with this so-called "United African Commune", which must be a communist rebel group based in our territory. I hope we can do more than just diplomacy. Maybe we can militarily cooperate against the UAC and destroy it. That would do the trick. I am awaiting your response.
Atenciosamente, Supreme Leader Óscar Craveiro of Portugal and its Overseas Provinces
by Dentali » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:18 am
Yaruqo wrote:USNC Chamber, New York City, USA
"We had no intention of closing the Canal, and the Honorable Prime Minister will do well to remember that. This Government made that crystal clear, but it seems you have trouble listening. Nor did we have the intention to seize it by force. All we had done was pass an act through Parliament. Egyptian troops weren't even mobilized, not even when the British mobilized. We had no plans to take Egyptian troops to the Canal to enforce the Suez Canal Nationalization Act. If anything, we planned to use it as leverage, seeing as we're being frank. But somehow, without using force of arms, we were seizing it by force? Perhaps the Republic of China is blind, as well." Abdullah addressed the Council again. "You want an international neutral passage? Then it cannot be solely under British supervision. The Canal cannot belong to Britain forever. Nor should it. There should be joint supervision, with a transitory period of 50 years. At the end of 50 years, the Canal will be controlled in full by Egypt. And again, let me make myself clear, since China has trouble hearing, closing the Canal is bad for the world, bad for business business. And, needless to say, bad for Egypt. It would be against our interests to close the Canal, to anyone, for any reason. Even our most fervent nationalists in Parliament wouldn't think of such a thing, or if they did...well, they're in the minority, praise be to Allah. But, if the Great Powers of the world have already decided Egypt's fate like a bunch of puppeteers, and decide to hang that request, here is another proposition: We will agree to the International Neutral Passage. Britain will supervise the Canal for 50 years. After such a time, it will hand over supervision to our government. And the British will, in the interim, honor the wishes of His Majesty's Government, and all British troops outside of the Suez Canal Zone will be withdrawn. As I last checked, it is the host country's right to request that foreign troops leave its soil, and Britain violated international law by ignoring this request. Egypt is an independent country, and we deserve to govern our own affairs without British bayonets down our throats."
by Yaruqo » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:34 am
Dentali wrote:Yaruqo wrote:USNC Chamber, New York City, USA
"We had no intention of closing the Canal, and the Honorable Prime Minister will do well to remember that. This Government made that crystal clear, but it seems you have trouble listening. Nor did we have the intention to seize it by force. All we had done was pass an act through Parliament. Egyptian troops weren't even mobilized, not even when the British mobilized. We had no plans to take Egyptian troops to the Canal to enforce the Suez Canal Nationalization Act. If anything, we planned to use it as leverage, seeing as we're being frank. But somehow, without using force of arms, we were seizing it by force? Perhaps the Republic of China is blind, as well." Abdullah addressed the Council again. "You want an international neutral passage? Then it cannot be solely under British supervision. The Canal cannot belong to Britain forever. Nor should it. There should be joint supervision, with a transitory period of 50 years. At the end of 50 years, the Canal will be controlled in full by Egypt. And again, let me make myself clear, since China has trouble hearing, closing the Canal is bad for the world, bad for business business. And, needless to say, bad for Egypt. It would be against our interests to close the Canal, to anyone, for any reason. Even our most fervent nationalists in Parliament wouldn't think of such a thing, or if they did...well, they're in the minority, praise be to Allah. But, if the Great Powers of the world have already decided Egypt's fate like a bunch of puppeteers, and decide to hang that request, here is another proposition: We will agree to the International Neutral Passage. Britain will supervise the Canal for 50 years. After such a time, it will hand over supervision to our government. And the British will, in the interim, honor the wishes of His Majesty's Government, and all British troops outside of the Suez Canal Zone will be withdrawn. As I last checked, it is the host country's right to request that foreign troops leave its soil, and Britain violated international law by ignoring this request. Egypt is an independent country, and we deserve to govern our own affairs without British bayonets down our throats."
"Your government cannot be trusted, and your proclamation of nationalizing the Canal is obviously backed with force. It is as ridiculous as China nationalizing the Pyramids of Giza. Your nationalization without any negotiation or notification of the British government made clear your intent to seize the canal. The only reason you didn't is because Britain moved as quickly as it did in response."
"They have every right to defend their territory and the canal they built. If you wish to enter into a contract with Britain regarding the control of the canal over 50 years, that is your right... In truth China sympathizes with you, we have suffered under the unequal treaties and will seek to redress them through peaceful means. But make no mistake... China will NEVER support your flagrant actions and attempted strongarming of any other sovereign nation"
by Dentali » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:39 am
Yaruqo wrote:Dentali wrote:
"Your government cannot be trusted, and your proclamation of nationalizing the Canal is obviously backed with force. It is as ridiculous as China nationalizing the Pyramids of Giza. Your nationalization without any negotiation or notification of the British government made clear your intent to seize the canal. The only reason you didn't is because Britain moved as quickly as it did in response."
"They have every right to defend their territory and the canal they built. If you wish to enter into a contract with Britain regarding the control of the canal over 50 years, that is your right... In truth China sympathizes with you, we have suffered under the unequal treaties and will seek to redress them through peaceful means. But make no mistake... China will NEVER support your flagrant actions and attempted strongarming of any other sovereign nation"
"Is the Prime Minister of China now a mind reader, to know His Majesty's Government's deepest thoughts? Perhaps if you bothered to research our government, you'd realize you're talking to liberals and social democrats. This government has always believed in free trade. And even if Egypt opted to back that up with force, tell me, how long would we last with British troops near Cairo? Hm? We have a strong desire to reunite our country in full, but we're not stupid. Our troops were trained by Britain, but we didn't have armor. Do you honestly think that the Prime Minister would go to war against a better equipped military? And even if you don't trust us, we have self interest in keeping the Canal open. Closing the Canal would devastate the Egyptian economy. You may not trust our intentions, but you can trust our self-interest in keeping the Canal open. I wonder, if Britain maintained troops outside of your capital while holding onto Hong Kong, and your Government requested they leave and they didn't, would you believe they'd negotiate in good faith? Would you trust them to be respectful of your sovereignty? Would you trust them, period? If you say yes to that, then Prime Minister, I have a palace near the Red Sea to sell you for one Egyptian pound."
by Yaruqo » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:45 am
Dentali wrote:Yaruqo wrote:"Is the Prime Minister of China now a mind reader, to know His Majesty's Government's deepest thoughts? Perhaps if you bothered to research our government, you'd realize you're talking to liberals and social democrats. This government has always believed in free trade. And even if Egypt opted to back that up with force, tell me, how long would we last with British troops near Cairo? Hm? We have a strong desire to reunite our country in full, but we're not stupid. Our troops were trained by Britain, but we didn't have armor. Do you honestly think that the Prime Minister would go to war against a better equipped military? And even if you don't trust us, we have self interest in keeping the Canal open. Closing the Canal would devastate the Egyptian economy. You may not trust our intentions, but you can trust our self-interest in keeping the Canal open. I wonder, if Britain maintained troops outside of your capital while holding onto Hong Kong, and your Government requested they leave and they didn't, would you believe they'd negotiate in good faith? Would you trust them to be respectful of your sovereignty? Would you trust them, period? If you say yes to that, then Prime Minister, I have a palace near the Red Sea to sell you for one Egyptian pound."
"That's enough" the American Ambassador says before the Chinese Prime Minister retorts "We get nowhere hurling insults. The question goes to Britain, do you accept the terms?"
by Agarntrop » Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:53 am
MESSAGE FROM THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SPAIN TO THE CONFEDERACY OF SOUTH AFRICAN REPUBLICS
Hello. We would like to respond that we would refrain from using the term 'colonial empire' but that we still wish to take back what is ours on the African continent from fascists and other illegitimate and rebellious forces. Thank you for your query.
CLASSIFIED MESSAGE FROM THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SPAIN TO THE KATIPUNAN OF FILIPINAS
Very well, we will sell 5 military advisors, 500 M1893 rifles, 50 armoured vehicles, 20 tanks and 20 anti-tank (artillery) guns for the price of 100 billion pesetas in total.
by Dentali » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:48 am
Yaruqo wrote:Dentali wrote:
"That's enough" the American Ambassador says before the Chinese Prime Minister retorts "We get nowhere hurling insults. The question goes to Britain, do you accept the terms?"
"No, how dare we speak sense and truth. We don't trust the British to act in good faith, and we clearly cannot trust the great powers. You ask Britain this question as if there is one to be asked. We all know the answer they'll give, so let's cut the bullshit," the Foreign Minister remarked. "We don't trust the British to negotiate in good faith with regards to a transition of the Canal. We would prefer that matter be settled, here. We would prefer that this Council mandate a 50 year transitional term, so that neither their government, nor my government," he said, leering at the Chinese Prime Minister, "can renege on the terms. A Security Council resolution is a mandate, no?"
by The Felan Federation » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:52 am
by Dentali » Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:06 am
The Felan Federation wrote:New York City, United States of America
Ambassador Osaba eventually laughed at the back and worth dialogue between the Americans, Chinese and British against the Egyptians. "So typical the reaction of the West. I call it rather rich, that the British claim sovereignty over the Suez Canal and China and the United States supporting such a claim. Even though, if I remember my history correctly - Egypt has owned the Canal since the times of the when Pharaohs of Egypt ruled the lands. Not to mention, constructing the Suez Canal as we see now - cost the people thousands of their lives over your colonial ambitions. So all of this is just posturing - as Britain attempts to hold onto it's colonialist attitude. Considering how hostile you have been in reply to the Egyptians - I'd say this is nothing more than blatant attempt at usurping sovereignty and lands that should be against the UN Charter itself..."
"...and before you start to call us out. Our Emperors have been burned, our colonies returned and our ambitions judged and punished for. So in this case, Egypt should have the right to agree or disagree to terms - and the British are the ones whom should be negotiating. Considering that the lands of the Suez are clearly in the middle and between Egypt itself..." spoke Osaba.
by Hypron » Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:18 am
Dentali wrote:The Felan Federation wrote:New York City, United States of America
Ambassador Osaba eventually laughed at the back and worth dialogue between the Americans, Chinese and British against the Egyptians. "So typical the reaction of the West. I call it rather rich, that the British claim sovereignty over the Suez Canal and China and the United States supporting such a claim. Even though, if I remember my history correctly - Egypt has owned the Canal since the times of the when Pharaohs of Egypt ruled the lands. Not to mention, constructing the Suez Canal as we see now - cost the people thousands of their lives over your colonial ambitions. So all of this is just posturing - as Britain attempts to hold onto it's colonialist attitude. Considering how hostile you have been in reply to the Egyptians - I'd say this is nothing more than blatant attempt at usurping sovereignty and lands that should be against the UN Charter itself..."
"...and before you start to call us out. Our Emperors have been burned, our colonies returned and our ambitions judged and punished for. So in this case, Egypt should have the right to agree or disagree to terms - and the British are the ones whom should be negotiating. Considering that the lands of the Suez are clearly in the middle and between Egypt itself..." spoke Osaba.
The US ambassador looks to this new speaker with great confusion "The canal was constructed in the 1860s, by the French and British. They bought the land, they own the land and 100% funded its entire construction. I don't know what history you have read."
The ambassador reads off his notes
"Ferdinand de Lesseps obtained a concession from Sa'id Pasha, the Khedive of Egypt and Sudan, to create a company to construct a canal open to ships of all nations. The company was to operate the canal for 99 years from its opening."
" An inability to pay his bank debts led Said Pasha's successor, Isma'il Pasha, in 1875 to sell his 44% share in the canal for £4,000,000. Under the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty of 1936, the UK retained control over the canal."
"The treaty states and I quote 'After 20 years from the implementation of the Treaty parties it shall be determined if the presence of British troops is necessary as the Egyptian army may be able to guarantee shipping in the Suez Canal safely. Disagreements may be submitted to the League of Nations.'"
by Asardia » Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:36 pm
To: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Katipunan of Filipinas
From: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
The USSR will be able to send aid in the form of supplies and advisers. They will arrive in the coming weeks.
by Puertollano » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:05 pm
Asardia wrote:United Nations Security Council Meeting
The Soviet delegate at the UN had his hand covering his face. This assembly of the world's top nations had gotten off to a poor start, and it seemed a consensus wouldn't be met for a long time. Still, it was better to have the representatives yell at each other here, as opposed to bombing each other's cities. The USSR sympathized with the Egyptians, but it appeared only the British and Japanese ministers kept a level head. Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Vyshinsky decided to take his own turn to speak.
"I agree with the United Kingdom that we should take a much more diplomatic approach to this. We are representing the world's most esteemed nations after all. I say that neither the UK nor Egypt should be able to shut down the canal, and we have a UN taskforce to make sure any changes are done peacefully. The United Kingdom should also have a limit on how long their troops can remain in Egyptian soil."Warsaw, Polish People's Republic
Molotov listened closely to Rin's questions. "General Secretary, I understand Japan's history and why you are concerned with this. However, I assure you, our leader plans for the Warsaw Pact to protect itself from foreign invaders. By having a mutual defense treaty, the chances of NATO attacking us are substantially lowered. As for riots or partisans, the Warsaw Pact can send aid if they want, and if the country in question is in danger of collapse, then we will intervene. For Japan specifically, Soviet troops can be withdrawn in the next few years as your country transitions into a new era."Bulgaria and Romania
Red Army troops continued their advanced through the USBR, seizing major cities and destroying any lines of communication. Some tank units spotted a car traveling towards the Russian border, in clear defiance of the martial law and curfew set in the territory. The car had a message written on it, and while it was comedic, none of the Red Army soldiers dared to utter a single laugh. Stalin's rage would be poured down unto this country soon, and he was not afraid of sending away his own people to...re-education centers in Siberia.
The tanks stopped the car and looked at it, only to see Chairman Chervenkov. The soldiers immediately moved to detain him for the NKVD. "The general Secretary would like a word with you, Chairman," said one of the officers.
To: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Katipunan of Filipinas
From: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
The USSR will be able to send aid in the form of supplies and advisers. They will arrive in the coming weeks.Moscow, Russian SFSR
NKVD agents were alerted of Che Guevara's presence in the Soviet capital. Che arrived in Moscow minutes ago, and the agents made sure they checked his credentials and retrieved him. This was the first time a foreigner sympathetic to the socialist cause had arrived in Moscow to seek an audience with the General Secretary, and Defense Minister Vasilevsky ensured everything went according to plan. The situation in the Balkans was under tight control as NKVD and Red Army troops prevented blocked the borders, but extraditing the USBR Chairman to the capital couldn't be done just yet. Even though he was a genocidal psychopath, Joseph Stalin thought towards the future a little bit more than his previous years.
He stood in Red Square as the NKVD took Che directly to him.
by Confederate American SU » Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:03 pm
by Yaruqo » Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:47 pm
by Dentali » Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:09 pm
Yaruqo wrote:UNSC Chamber, New York, NY, USA
Abdullah listened to the representatives and glared at the British representative. "Your government ignored our request three years ago to remove your troops from our soil, and now you want them in Alexandria? The gall. We shall not agree to this. If you want to lease land for a naval base, we might be open to such a negotiation in the future, but not now. We will keep the transitory period at 50 years for the Suez Canal, not a day longer. All British troops outside the Suez Canal Zone will leave the Kingdom, per our 1946 demand. Unless the UN wishes to set the precedent that the word of a host nation means nothing when it comes to who stations troops where and for how long? And Britain must promise here and now, that it will not intervene in Egyptian affairs. If their troops leave the Suez Canal Zone and march into Egyptian territory, it will be seen as a declaration of war against the Kingdom and her people, and we will respond accordingly. We are not a puppet of the British Empire, and we refuse to be treated as such. We have the right to self determination, and we can't enjoy that right with British bayonets at our throat, not in Cairo, not in Alexandria, nowhere outside the Canal Zone."
by Lemlar » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:51 pm
Εκτακτες Ειδήσεις: LemlarΛεμλαρ, ξεκινώντας μια νέα εποχή καθώς το πράσινο κόμμα έχει δημιουργήσει έναν συνασπισμό με τους καθιερωμένους μοναρχικούς.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Cybernetic Socialist Republics, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Hypron
Advertisement