NATION

PASSWORD

NS Parliament Chamber [IC]

For all of your non-NationStates related roleplaying needs!

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:12 pm

The Archipelago Territory wrote:
Lysone wrote:"Madame Speaker, typically in politics people don't trash bills right before they vote for them. I can't imagine it going down too well with their constituents".

“Mr. Speaker, that was a joke.”

Mr Austin, how dare you misgender the Madame Speaker. jk
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
The Archipelago Territory
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1965
Founded: May 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Archipelago Territory » Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:30 pm

New Lindale wrote:
The Archipelago Territory wrote:“Mr. Speaker, that was a joke.”

Mr Austin, how dare you misgender the Madame Speaker. jk

“I wish to inform the honorable member that the current acting speaker is a male, after our former speaker stormed out of the chamber.”
| LAND OF THE FREE ||AMERICAN||POLITICAL|| RP || IS || UP! | - JOIN NOW!
I am a Progressive Libertarian Capitalist
YANG GANG 2020

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:28 pm

The Archipelago Territory wrote:
New Lindale wrote:Mr Austin, how dare you misgender the Madame Speaker. jk

“I wish to inform the honorable member that the current acting speaker is a male, after our former speaker stormed out of the chamber.”

Oh well. Anyways, back to politik
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
The Archipelago Territory
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1965
Founded: May 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Archipelago Territory » Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:55 pm

New Lindale wrote:
The Archipelago Territory wrote:“I wish to inform the honorable member that the current acting speaker is a male, after our former speaker stormed out of the chamber.”

Oh well. Anyways, back to politik

“Yes, and unfortunately, you and I are forced to vote for this measure.”
| LAND OF THE FREE ||AMERICAN||POLITICAL|| RP || IS || UP! | - JOIN NOW!
I am a Progressive Libertarian Capitalist
YANG GANG 2020

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:13 pm

The Archipelago Territory wrote:
New Lindale wrote:Oh well. Anyways, back to politik

“Yes, and unfortunately, you and I are forced to vote for this measure.”

How unfourtunate indeed. I was hoping we would have been able to come to a solution.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
The Archipelago Territory
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1965
Founded: May 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Archipelago Territory » Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:25 pm

New Lindale wrote:
The Archipelago Territory wrote:“Yes, and unfortunately, you and I are forced to vote for this measure.”

How unfourtunate indeed. I was hoping we would have been able to come to a solution.

“Unless the Green’s amendments work. Then we wouldn’t be forced to vote for it.”
| LAND OF THE FREE ||AMERICAN||POLITICAL|| RP || IS || UP! | - JOIN NOW!
I am a Progressive Libertarian Capitalist
YANG GANG 2020

User avatar
Borovan entered the region as he
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1115
Founded: Dec 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Borovan entered the region as he » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:38 pm

"Mister speaker," Alastar adjusted his glasses,"This tax bill has some things I like and some things I don't like. But with great reluctance I will support the bill."

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:05 pm

Mister Speaker, I am extremely concerned in the direction the parliament is going. We are now seeing a trend where my colleagues are voting on the bill, simply because we need the tax code. Again I agree that it is a necessity, but this is turning into a rushed decision that may or may not be the best decision for the citizens of Saint Hilda. What frightens me, even more, is that now at this time the Parliament Office is not allowing any other bills to be submitted. It feels like we are being pressured to vote on this bill, and that our concerns are being ignored.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
East Meranopirus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 540
Founded: Jul 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby East Meranopirus » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:45 pm

New Lindale wrote:Mister Speaker, I am extremely concerned in the direction the parliament is going. We are now seeing a trend where my colleagues are voting on the bill, simply because we need the tax code. Again I agree that it is a necessity, but this is turning into a rushed decision that may or may not be the best decision for the citizens of Saint Hilda. What frightens me, even more, is that now at this time the Parliament Office is not allowing any other bills to be submitted. It feels like we are being pressured to vote on this bill, and that our concerns are being ignored.

"Mr Speaker, I believe the Honourable Member has a few misconceptions. Firstly, the member's colleagues, which I take to be members of the governing coalition, are forced to vote for the bill not because a tax code is needed urgently, but because of a confidence and supply deal negotiated with the Center-Progressive Party, which apparently many members of the coalition were not notified beforehand. Clearly, the leaders of the coalition have negotiated a deal that strongly favours progressive and liberal causes at the expense of actual beliefs of the members of the coalition, just for a few votes to get them over the line in the confidence vote, causing this situation where government members are forced to vote on a bill that they do not support. This is the fault of the government, especially their leaders, and not the Parliament itself.

Secondly, I am not aware of a closure of the Parliament Office. However, we do have enough bills at hand for two weeks of debate and voting, and the previous Speaker had suddenly resigned, which may be causing confusion in the Parliament Office, though I am certain that will be fixed quickly."

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Mon Jul 08, 2019 9:24 pm

East Meranopirus wrote:
New Lindale wrote:Mister Speaker, I am extremely concerned in the direction the parliament is going. We are now seeing a trend where my colleagues are voting on the bill, simply because we need the tax code. Again I agree that it is a necessity, but this is turning into a rushed decision that may or may not be the best decision for the citizens of Saint Hilda. What frightens me, even more, is that now at this time the Parliament Office is not allowing any other bills to be submitted. It feels like we are being pressured to vote on this bill, and that our concerns are being ignored.

"Mr Speaker, I believe the Honourable Member has a few misconceptions. Firstly, the member's colleagues, which I take to be members of the governing coalition, are forced to vote for the bill not because a tax code is needed urgently, but because of a confidence and supply deal negotiated with the Center-Progressive Party, which apparently many members of the coalition were not notified beforehand. Clearly, the leaders of the coalition have negotiated a deal that strongly favours progressive and liberal causes at the expense of actual beliefs of the members of the coalition, just for a few votes to get them over the line in the confidence vote, causing this situation where government members are forced to vote on a bill that they do not support. This is the fault of the government, especially their leaders, and not the Parliament itself.

Secondly, I am not aware of a closure of the Parliament Office. However, we do have enough bills at hand for two weeks of debate and voting, and the previous Speaker had suddenly resigned, which may be causing confusion in the Parliament Office, though I am certain that will be fixed quickly."

Mr Speaker I would like to thank the honourable gentleman for his clarification and wish to inquire a bit more pertaining to the office. Firstly, the bill presented does not appear to be recorded in the office, yet several other codes with a similar code are. Also, upon review of the policy and reason on why the office is locked, it is not clear. So, my queries are if the current bill presented is passed, would these other bills be in addition to, and what is the reason the office has been locked?
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
Rebels and Saints
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 403
Founded: Apr 01, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Rebels and Saints » Mon Jul 08, 2019 10:22 pm

New Lindale wrote:
East Meranopirus wrote:"Mr Speaker, I believe the Honourable Member has a few misconceptions. Firstly, the member's colleagues, which I take to be members of the governing coalition, are forced to vote for the bill not because a tax code is needed urgently, but because of a confidence and supply deal negotiated with the Center-Progressive Party, which apparently many members of the coalition were not notified beforehand. Clearly, the leaders of the coalition have negotiated a deal that strongly favours progressive and liberal causes at the expense of actual beliefs of the members of the coalition, just for a few votes to get them over the line in the confidence vote, causing this situation where government members are forced to vote on a bill that they do not support. This is the fault of the government, especially their leaders, and not the Parliament itself.

Secondly, I am not aware of a closure of the Parliament Office. However, we do have enough bills at hand for two weeks of debate and voting, and the previous Speaker had suddenly resigned, which may be causing confusion in the Parliament Office, though I am certain that will be fixed quickly."

Mr Speaker I would like to thank the honourable gentleman for his clarification and wish to inquire a bit more pertaining to the office. Firstly, the bill presented does not appear to be recorded in the office, yet several other codes with a similar code are. Also, upon review of the policy and reason on why the office is locked, it is not clear. So, my queries are if the current bill presented is passed, would these other bills be in addition to, and what is the reason the office has been locked?


OOC: Wait, are thou talking about the actual Office thread? If you are, that got locked a while ago by mods for reasons involving disputes about F7 and P2TM and rules about them. Just submit a bill to the OOC thread.
Long live Liberalia!

User avatar
Vedastia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 908
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vedastia » Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:05 am

East Meranopirus wrote:
New Lindale wrote:Mister Speaker, I am extremely concerned in the direction the parliament is going. We are now seeing a trend where my colleagues are voting on the bill, simply because we need the tax code. Again I agree that it is a necessity, but this is turning into a rushed decision that may or may not be the best decision for the citizens of Saint Hilda. What frightens me, even more, is that now at this time the Parliament Office is not allowing any other bills to be submitted. It feels like we are being pressured to vote on this bill, and that our concerns are being ignored.

"Mr Speaker, I believe the Honourable Member has a few misconceptions. Firstly, the member's colleagues, which I take to be members of the governing coalition, are forced to vote for the bill not because a tax code is needed urgently, but because of a confidence and supply deal negotiated with the Center-Progressive Party, which apparently many members of the coalition were not notified beforehand. Clearly, the leaders of the coalition have negotiated a deal that strongly favours progressive and liberal causes at the expense of actual beliefs of the members of the coalition, just for a few votes to get them over the line in the confidence vote, causing this situation where government members are forced to vote on a bill that they do not support. This is the fault of the government, especially their leaders, and not the Parliament itself.

Secondly, I am not aware of a closure of the Parliament Office. However, we do have enough bills at hand for two weeks of debate and voting, and the previous Speaker had suddenly resigned, which may be causing confusion in the Parliament Office, though I am certain that will be fixed quickly."

"Mr. Speaker, the current Government is a broad coalition that is generally right-leaning, but is ultimately composed of a broad spectrum of political parties. We have monarchists, we have republicans; we have conservatives, we have liberals. There are specific issues that members of each party in Government disagree upon, but we generally have an agreement in which direction Saint Hilda should go. This legislation is a contentious issue within the membership of the coalition, but ultimately it will prevent the left from taking further power at this time. Further legislation can be proposed by other members of the Government who believe that this legislation is problematic. It does not necessarily spell the end of the current government. The Honourable Mr. Lundberg may consider that there were several points of the deal, and that it did not include 'progressive' goals overall. If that was the case, then the current Government would have never agreed to a confidence and supply agreement with the Centre-Progressive Party. The green investment bank, which is not necessarily a left-wing project, and the Rational Taxation Act, which is a contentious issue within Government but not an outright socialist bill, are two policies that were negotiated in the confidence and supply agreement. There is little other 'progressive' policy that Government has agreed to implement. We are not trying to maintain control without alienating our membership at the same time. I do not believe that the agreement is too onerous for Government to bear."
Jan van der Stel, MP for Ouderkerk in the NS Parliament
Leader of the National Freedom Party - Freedom for Our People
Dinake wrote:
Zoice wrote:The far right is truly to blame. The left may lose ground to them, but they wouldn't be losing ground if there wasn't the far right in the first place calling for batshit insanity.
That's like saying "blockbuster wouldn't be losing ground to netflix if there wasn't any netflix".
Major-Tom wrote:
Risottia wrote:Reality has a left-wing bias.
God, if I had a nickel for every time I heard some smug internet warrior say this...

User avatar
East Meranopirus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 540
Founded: Jul 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby East Meranopirus » Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:17 am

Vedastia wrote:"Mr. Speaker, the current Government is a broad coalition that is generally right-leaning, but is ultimately composed of a broad spectrum of political parties. We have monarchists, we have republicans; we have conservatives, we have liberals. There are specific issues that members of each party in Government disagree upon, but we generally have an agreement in which direction Saint Hilda should go. This legislation is a contentious issue within the membership of the coalition, but ultimately it will prevent the left from taking further power at this time. Further legislation can be proposed by other members of the Government who believe that this legislation is problematic. It does not necessarily spell the end of the current government. The Honourable Mr. Lundberg may consider that there were several points of the deal, and that it did not include 'progressive' goals overall. If that was the case, then the current Government would have never agreed to a confidence and supply agreement with the Centre-Progressive Party. The green investment bank, which is not necessarily a left-wing project, and the Rational Taxation Act, which is a contentious issue within Government but not an outright socialist bill, are two policies that were negotiated in the confidence and supply agreement. There is little other 'progressive' policy that Government has agreed to implement. We are not trying to maintain control without alienating our membership at the same time. I do not believe that the agreement is too onerous for Government to bear."

"Mr Speaker, I thank the Prime Minister for his detailed answer. However, he has not addressed the fact that many members of his coalition appear to not have been informed before the deal was made public, which would suggest that the leaders of the coalition did not adequately consult their members before making the deal, thus causing the current chaotic situation."

User avatar
The Archipelago Territory
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1965
Founded: May 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Archipelago Territory » Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:54 am

East Meranopirus wrote:
Vedastia wrote:"Mr. Speaker, the current Government is a broad coalition that is generally right-leaning, but is ultimately composed of a broad spectrum of political parties. We have monarchists, we have republicans; we have conservatives, we have liberals. There are specific issues that members of each party in Government disagree upon, but we generally have an agreement in which direction Saint Hilda should go. This legislation is a contentious issue within the membership of the coalition, but ultimately it will prevent the left from taking further power at this time. Further legislation can be proposed by other members of the Government who believe that this legislation is problematic. It does not necessarily spell the end of the current government. The Honourable Mr. Lundberg may consider that there were several points of the deal, and that it did not include 'progressive' goals overall. If that was the case, then the current Government would have never agreed to a confidence and supply agreement with the Centre-Progressive Party. The green investment bank, which is not necessarily a left-wing project, and the Rational Taxation Act, which is a contentious issue within Government but not an outright socialist bill, are two policies that were negotiated in the confidence and supply agreement. There is little other 'progressive' policy that Government has agreed to implement. We are not trying to maintain control without alienating our membership at the same time. I do not believe that the agreement is too onerous for Government to bear."

"Mr Speaker, I thank the Prime Minister for his detailed answer. However, he has not addressed the fact that many members of his coalition appear to not have been informed before the deal was made public, which would suggest that the leaders of the coalition did not adequately consult their members before making the deal, thus causing the current chaotic situation."


“Yes, as the Deputy Leader of SHAPC, NPP never informed me of the deal.”
| LAND OF THE FREE ||AMERICAN||POLITICAL|| RP || IS || UP! | - JOIN NOW!
I am a Progressive Libertarian Capitalist
YANG GANG 2020

User avatar
Equitesia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jan 28, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Equitesia » Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:21 am

The Archipelago Territory wrote:
East Meranopirus wrote:"Mr Speaker, I thank the Prime Minister for his detailed answer. However, he has not addressed the fact that many members of his coalition appear to not have been informed before the deal was made public, which would suggest that the leaders of the coalition did not adequately consult their members before making the deal, thus causing the current chaotic situation."


“Yes, as the Deputy Leader of SHAPC, NPP never informed me of the deal.”


Nobody has informed also me of the deal...
Christofer Ove Larsson.
Pastor, Representative of Gård-Little Sverige,
Leader of the
CPC!
God bless Saint Hilda!

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:12 am

Mr Speaker, regardless of any deals, coalitions, or other inter-party agreements, I believe since we don't even have a tax code yet that it is even more vital we implement something that will work best for the people. To my colleagues, I would like to notify them that I will be searching for the data I had requested, and will make accessible once it is found. I hav no doubt it will provide a better picture of the situation, and also guide us to the best solution possible.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
Crylante
Diplomat
 
Posts: 957
Founded: Dec 06, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Crylante » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:15 am

“Mr Speaker, I have doubts about a government that does not even have the ability to tell its members of the deal it has made to come to power being able to effectively govern.”
Crylantian Federation
Social democratic confederation of Latin-Danes, Danes and Finns.
IIWiki
Democratic socialist, green and British federalist
Economic Left/Right: -6.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:49 am

Crylante wrote:“Mr Speaker, I have doubts about a government that does not even have the ability to tell its members of the deal it has made to come to power being able to effectively govern.”

Mr Speaker, I agree with my colleague on this point and wish to know of the specifics of said deal. It is apparent that it is effectively controlling how other MPs are voting regardless of objections to this bill.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:07 pm

Lamaredia wrote:OOC: Since Vienna decided that it was the appropriate course to edit her message and remove the bill from debate, here it comes again. Debate will go on for 24 hours from this post.

“Debate is now open on the Rational Taxation Scheme Act for 24 hours from this time.”

Rational Taxation Scheme Act
Author: Marius Forsman (C-P)
Sponsors: Viktoria Ljungstrand (SLP:R), Lisa Forss (GR), James Penta (GR)



To improve on the system of taxation in Saint Hilda, for the betterment, prosperity, and liberty, for all.

BE IT THEREFORE ENACTED, as follows:



§1 - Amendments
  1. All existing taxes imposed on Saint Hilda previous to independence shall be abolished.

§2 - Definitions
  1. Monetary values should be taken as USD, or their equivalent value in any local currency.
  2. Income, for the sake of corporate taxation, shall be considered as net profit after expenses.

§3 - Income Tax
  1. There shall be a progressive income tax, including a negative income credit model.
  2. The tax exemption cutoff shall be at $15,000.
  3. The income subsidy rate shall be 75%.
  4. The tax rate for income from $15,000 to $30,000 shall be 20%.
  5. The tax rate for income from $30,001 to $50,000 shall be 25%.
  6. The tax rate for income from $50,001 to $100,000 shall be 30%.
  7. The tax rate for income from $100,000 upwards shall be 40%.
  8. Income for the sake of this tax includes that of capital gains made from sales during that year.

§4 - Corporate Tax
  1. The income of corporations shall be taxed at a rate of 40%.
  2. Corporations with a total income of less than $200,000 shall receive a tax rate reduction of 10%.
  3. Corporations which move to relying entirely on sustainably generated electricity shall receive a five year tax rate reduction of 10%.
  4. Corporations which increase their number of employees by at least 50% shall receive a five year tax rate reduction of 10%.

§5 - Excises and Duties
  1. There shall be a per-unit excise on tobacco products, of $20.
  2. There shall be a per-unit excise on alcoholic products, of $10.

§6 - Absentee Property Tax
  1. Residential properties that are uninhabited for more than one half of a year in total shall be subject to a tax of 20% of property value for that year.
  2. Commercial or industrial properties that are not utilized or rented by owners for more than one half of a year in total shall be subject to a tax of 20% of property value for that year.
  3. In such cases where properties are shown to be unfit for habitation or use for the aforementioned periods, no such tax shall apply.

§7 - Office of Taxation
  1. There shall be established an Office of Taxation, with responsibility to organize and enforce the taxes of Saint Hilda.
  2. The Office of Taxation shall be lead by a Director, appointed by the Cabinet Minister assigned to the responsibility of finances.
  3. The Office of Taxation shall have the right to hire employees and enter into contracts, and occupy and rent office spaces, independently. The government of Saint Hilda is responsible for accrued expenses.


Sara stands up to speak.

"Although debate has officially ended, I still wish to add my two ören on the so called 'Rational Taxation Act."

I am no fan of a progressive tax, which I consider inferior to a flat tax, and anyway, may be unnecessary and overkill for our small island when other similar countries have abolished the income tax entirely. However, I would be still willing to compromise with the RTA if it weren't for the following:

The Absentee Property Tax, §6, is perhaps the most egregious part of this bill as it heavily penalizes investments on property, vacation homes, and the like based on the spurious and unclear category of 'occupation.'

While I and my party will not vote against the bill due to my obligations to the CP as part of our coalition deal, I cannot support it, and therefore will not be present at the day of the vote. Errands, and all that."

She sits back down.
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:18 pm

Alright then, what is the next order of business if we can't do anything about the tax scheme?
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:35 pm

"Order, order, as the debate period has now ended, a vote will now take place on the Rational Taxation Scheme Act. The vote will go on for 48 hours from this point."

Please use the following template and put an X for your vote.
Code: Select all
Rational Taxation Scheme Act:
[color=#008000]Aye: [ ][/color]
[color=#800000]Nay: [ ][/color]
[color=#FF8000]Abstain: [ ][/color]


OOC: Sorry for the late start, had a lot of cat-related things to do this evening after work.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Van Hool Islands
Diplomat
 
Posts: 744
Founded: Nov 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Van Hool Islands » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:35 pm

Rational Taxation Scheme Act:
Aye: [X]
Nay: [ ]
Abstain: [ ]
Anita Chow of the Socialist Party of Banduria
Co-admin of the NS Parliament

User avatar
New Lindale
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 423
Founded: Jun 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lindale » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:37 pm

Rational Taxation Scheme Act:
Aye: [X]
Nay: [ ]
Abstain: [ ]
Last edited by New Lindale on Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

User avatar
Lysone
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Jun 09, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Lysone » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:40 pm

Rational Taxation Scheme Act:
Aye: [x]
Nay: [ ]
Abstain: [ ]
Birgitta Marklund, Member of Parliament (SLP:R)
Johanna Nyberg, former Commissioner for Fort Ulrika (SLP:R), Chairwoman of the Movement for Democratic Change

User avatar
The Archipelago Territory
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1965
Founded: May 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Archipelago Territory » Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:00 pm

Rational Taxation Scheme Act:
Aye: [ ]
Nay: [ ]
Abstain: [X]
| LAND OF THE FREE ||AMERICAN||POLITICAL|| RP || IS || UP! | - JOIN NOW!
I am a Progressive Libertarian Capitalist
YANG GANG 2020

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Portal to the Multiverse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Olthenia

Advertisement

Remove ads