Rebels and Saints wrote:New Lindale wrote:Madame speaker, I would like to remind my collegue that the bill does not specify sexual acts, but the legal recognition of a union between two citizens.
"Exactly my point, Madame Speaker. The bill actually does nothing. A marriage is nothing but a name. Two people who love eachother will act the same regardless of whether they are married or not. It's all hollow words. If you want to deal with problems, make a bill with some strength to actually do something. If you don't, stop writing bills that attempt to deal with them. This bill manages to simultaneously be powerless and evil in its intent."
Madame speaker, I think the purpose of this bill was primarily for legal reasons and providing the benefits of those who chose to marry. While on this topic, I think we need to find some reform to the institution itself, considering how common divorce has become today.