Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:54 pm
A question: How large is our population?
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Kowani wrote:A question: How large is our population?
Crylante wrote:An act that will legalise same-sex marriage. Civil and religious marriage are both legal under this and religions retain their right to refuse to marry people.
Inhorto wrote:Given the defeat of the previous bill, I am placing for your consideration the Human Rights Act, a collaboration between Agarntrop and me. This bill retains much of the judiciary clauses from the previous proposal, but most of everything else has changed. We are not submitting yet, so as to give people time to give criticsm.
Kowani wrote:Inhorto wrote:Given the defeat of the previous bill, I am placing for your consideration the Human Rights Act, a collaboration between Agarntrop and me. This bill retains much of the judiciary clauses from the previous proposal, but most of everything else has changed. We are not submitting yet, so as to give people time to give criticsm.
Sponsor-Dorgival R. Seč, SDP
Crylante wrote:An act that will legalise same-sex marriage. Civil and religious marriage are both legal under this and religions retain their right to refuse to marry people.
Inhorto wrote:Given the defeat of the previous bill, I am placing for your consideration the Human Rights Act, a collaboration between Agarntrop and me. This bill retains much of the judiciary clauses from the previous proposal, but most of everything else has changed. We are not submitting yet, so as to give people time to give criticsm.
Roosevetania wrote:Inhorto wrote:Given the defeat of the previous bill, I am placing for your consideration the Human Rights Act, a collaboration between Agarntrop and me. This bill retains much of the judiciary clauses from the previous proposal, but most of everything else has changed. We are not submitting yet, so as to give people time to give criticsm.
I assume this would prohibit the death penalty? If so, I would likely not be in favor since my MP is pretty tough on crime.
Roosevetania wrote:Inhorto wrote:Given the defeat of the previous bill, I am placing for your consideration the Human Rights Act, a collaboration between Agarntrop and me. This bill retains much of the judiciary clauses from the previous proposal, but most of everything else has changed. We are not submitting yet, so as to give people time to give criticsm.
I assume this would prohibit the death penalty? If so, I would likely not be in favor since my MP is pretty tough on crime.
to punish extraordinarily heinous acts against another human life
Agarntrop wrote:Roosevetania wrote:I assume this would prohibit the death penalty? If so, I would likely not be in favor since my MP is pretty tough on crime.
I mean there's a difference between being tough on crime and wanting to bring back a practise not used since the 19th century. In answer to your question, yes.
Agarntrop wrote:Inhorto wrote:Ah, crap, I'm sorry. Do you agree with that? I think extraordinary heinous acts could be punished by death; it's up to the government I think.
My character wouldn't agree. Also, Sweden abolished the death penalty in 1910 and 60% of adults don't support it iirc, so not really.