Warg the Immortal wrote:[
1. Way too many men, 10,000 would basically put him on par with the Hightowers
2. Raiding Dorne, the Reach and Stormlands during Gaemon's rule, when there hasn't been a major conflict in 40 years? The Royal Fleet or Redwyne fleet would've cracked down on him immediately
3. Spies sent after him? He's just some bastard, I hardly think they're going to invest that much effort searching for him
4. Doubt Tyrosh or other free cities near the Stepstones are gonna let the whole Pirate King thing go on
5. If he's a Northmen why was he raised to be a knight? Manderlys may follow the Seven but the Hornwoods definitely don't
6. If he legitimized himself as a Manderly why is he using a different and overly complicated sigil
7. Medrick seems very op (and fighting with two swords has frequently been proven to be ridiculous, and pointless, this is based on the books not the show where that type of ludicrous swordsmanship happens), and despite his Manderly mother doesn't seem to have any of the characteristic heftiness of Manderlys
1. What number would you recommend then?
2. It isn't like he was an invading force. Piracy in the region is fairly normal, and arguably a stabilizing presence in the region could be welcomed by powerful seafaring lords.
3. A bastard responsible for the death of a legitimate child and with a tenuous if illegitimate claim. It's not something a powerful family would necessarily let slip by.
4. See point 2.
5. Fair point regarding the Hornwoods, that was an oversight on my part. But he was raised in the Manderly court; and thus according to the Faith, so I'd welcome a suggestion for another family in that regard.
6. Why did Stannis replace his sigil when he converted? He's a pirate. Seems fairly understandable that he'd have his own sigil. It's not important to me either way though. If, say, he ended up returning to Westeros; he could take the Manderly sigil back.
7. If there's any specific criticisms or suggestions you want to make that you think would make him less OP, I'm more than welcome to hear them. I thought the two-weapon fighting would be an interesting separation from the majority who will be using the typical sword and shield, and there is established examples of it in the books, so I didn't see any issue with including it. I can easily edit that out though.