NATION

PASSWORD

Broken Arrow (OOC|Special Forces|Open)

For all of your non-NationStates related roleplaying needs!

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Relikai
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10003
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Relikai » Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:58 am

Keep the telepathy in game bois, especially if such actions would override or force team leaders to adapt because team cohesion's going to be disrupted from their own plans ;)
Russia's an idiot. So is the US, and quite a few of the western sphere. Population education and literacy is your issue, not the politics of foreign nations.
A deviant in the echochamber.

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:03 am

the fact that Semyonova and Beidges are the only ones with semi-automatic marksman rifles triggers me.

Wysten wrote:Hey so I have a repeating paragraph because of some NS BS can I delete it real quick?


Lemme see first and then I can TG Anowa.

Relikai wrote:Keep the telepathy in game bois, especially if such actions would override or force team leaders to adapt because team cohesion's going to be disrupted from their own plans ;)

Who said anything about Telepathy? I just asked a hypothetical because Day would probably be one of the few sharpshooters able to fully take atvangage of that kind of situation.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:04 am

Kk wysten you're Gucci to edit.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Kyraina
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7515
Founded: Aug 12, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Kyraina » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:05 am

Insaeldor wrote:the fact that Semyonova and Beidges are the only ones with semi-automatic marksman rifles triggers me.

Wysten wrote:Hey so I have a repeating paragraph because of some NS BS can I delete it real quick?


Lemme see first and then I can TG Anowa.

Relikai wrote:Keep the telepathy in game bois, especially if such actions would override or force team leaders to adapt because team cohesion's going to be disrupted from their own plans ;)

Who said anything about Telepathy? I just asked a hypothetical because Day would probably be one of the few sharpshooters able to fully take atvangage of that kind of situation.

Beidges? And what does only having two DMRs trigger you
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is suppose to go here?

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:12 am

Kyraina wrote:
Insaeldor wrote:the fact that Semyonova and Beidges are the only ones with semi-automatic marksman rifles triggers me.



Lemme see first and then I can TG Anowa.


Who said anything about Telepathy? I just asked a hypothetical because Day would probably be one of the few sharpshooters able to fully take atvangage of that kind of situation.

Beidges? And what does only having two DMRs trigger you

*bridges

It's triggering because out of all the sharpshooters/snipers/marksman we have only two have the advantages that semi-auto DMR's bring for a squad. Out of 6 soldiers equipped with longer range rifles 4 have dedicated bolt-action sniper rifles which limits their ability to engage enemies in ways that would be more helpful to the mission overall.

Note: it's not bad nor is it a squad killer it's just something that triggers my tism
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Relikai
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10003
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Relikai » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:16 am

Well, some prefer to have rifles which do not jam as easily as a semi-automatic with multiple moving parts, affecting stability when doing long range precision shooting. No doubt semi-autos are better at close range, but further out I suppose reality would side with the bolt-action's simplicity and solid stability.

Also, being mission specific situations when considering the ratio and weight of firepower/weaponry per squad, this could either be a close-range mission or a long-range sniping mission since the team wasn't briefed about anything including location or giving the troops time to consider their optimal loadout until they were moments before landing (Much video game), meaning there was no time to consider changing to a weapon better fit for a low-visibility environment with plenty of foliage or cover. :(
Russia's an idiot. So is the US, and quite a few of the western sphere. Population education and literacy is your issue, not the politics of foreign nations.
A deviant in the echochamber.

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:22 am

Relikai wrote:Well, some prefer to have rifles which do not jam as easily as a semi-automatic with multiple moving parts, affecting stability when doing long range precision shooting. No doubt semi-autos are better at close range, but further out I suppose reality would side with the bolt-action's simplicity and solid stability.

Also, being mission specific situations when considering the ratio and weight of firepower/weaponry per squad, this could either be a close-range mission or a long-range sniping mission since the team wasn't briefed about anything including location or giving the troops time to consider their optimal loadout until they were moments before landing (Much video game), meaning there was no time to consider changing to a weapon better fit for a low-visibility environment with plenty of foliage or cover. :(

I'm not disputing bolt-actions are better at precision long range shooting. Although most modern Semi-Automatic DMR's are extremely reliable and unless you were using some sorta 60 year old spam can surplus you'd be able to be on par with bolt action rifles in terms of reliability.

I just don't see the need for 4 long range precision snipers for any mission. I'd think 2 max for something like a march across the mountains of Afghanistan.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Wysten
Minister
 
Posts: 2604
Founded: Apr 29, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Wysten » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:23 am

Insaeldor wrote:
Relikai wrote:Well, some prefer to have rifles which do not jam as easily as a semi-automatic with multiple moving parts, affecting stability when doing long range precision shooting. No doubt semi-autos are better at close range, but further out I suppose reality would side with the bolt-action's simplicity and solid stability.

Also, being mission specific situations when considering the ratio and weight of firepower/weaponry per squad, this could either be a close-range mission or a long-range sniping mission since the team wasn't briefed about anything including location or giving the troops time to consider their optimal loadout until they were moments before landing (Much video game), meaning there was no time to consider changing to a weapon better fit for a low-visibility environment with plenty of foliage or cover. :(

I'm not disputing bolt-actions are better at precision long range shooting. Although most modern Semi-Automatic DMR's are extremely reliable and unless you were using some sorta 60 year old spam can surplus you'd be able to be on par with bolt action rifles in terms of reliability.

I just don't see the need for 4 long range precision snipers for any mission. I'd think 2 max for something like a march across the mountains of Afghanistan.

Wait I thought me a NUC were the only bolt action snipers?
Famous qoutes
"Half the battle is fought on the OOC forums"
~ Albert Tzu, 1984
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your signature!
GENERATION 15: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Dayganistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1601
Founded: May 02, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dayganistan » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:38 am

Insaeldor wrote:
Kyraina wrote:Beidges? And what does only having two DMRs trigger you

*bridges

It's triggering because out of all the sharpshooters/snipers/marksman we have only two have the advantages that semi-auto DMR's bring for a squad. Out of 6 soldiers equipped with longer range rifles 4 have dedicated bolt-action sniper rifles which limits their ability to engage enemies in ways that would be more helpful to the mission overall.

Note: it's not bad nor is it a squad killer it's just something that triggers my tism

It's kind of triggering to me as well that we have four bolt action rifles but only one machine gun. Ideally every squad should have at least one and no more than two machine guns.
Last edited by Dayganistan on Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Republic of Dayganistan | جمهوری دهقانستان

A secular, Tajik dominated state in Central Asia which has experienced 40 years of democratic backsliding. NS stats are NOT used.

User avatar
Relikai
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10003
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Relikai » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:39 am

Insaeldor wrote:
Relikai wrote:Well, some prefer to have rifles which do not jam as easily as a semi-automatic with multiple moving parts, affecting stability when doing long range precision shooting. No doubt semi-autos are better at close range, but further out I suppose reality would side with the bolt-action's simplicity and solid stability.

Also, being mission specific situations when considering the ratio and weight of firepower/weaponry per squad, this could either be a close-range mission or a long-range sniping mission since the team wasn't briefed about anything including location or giving the troops time to consider their optimal loadout until they were moments before landing (Much video game), meaning there was no time to consider changing to a weapon better fit for a low-visibility environment with plenty of foliage or cover. :(

I'm not disputing bolt-actions are better at precision long range shooting. Although most modern Semi-Automatic DMR's are extremely reliable and unless you were using some sorta 60 year old spam can surplus you'd be able to be on par with bolt action rifles in terms of reliability.

I just don't see the need for 4 long range precision snipers for any mission. I'd think 2 max for something like a march across the mountains of Afghanistan.


On extended missions where timings could be unpredictable, two teams of two would be extremely valuable to prevent eye fatigue from setting in, and relieving the sniper of the constant stress of watching a target.

Unless we already know how long a mission would take, or if there is a set amount of time for a mission to take place like the Battle of Mog ending within an hour or two instead of dragging into the night and till the next day.

Which is why I will question - No briefing about location which could influence the loadout of weapons and roles of individual squad members. My character for example could operate as a sniper, a recon, and everyone's basic rifleman role. Depending on average weapon ranges and the possibility of having obscured vision, a different weapon would be picked, perhaps a semi-automatic DMR which allows for quicker acquisition of targets within close quarters as well as suppressing fire against targets hiding in the foliage.

Location and Terrain - A deciding factor in choosing of weapon loadouts. Something learnt in playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (1998). Urban or jungle? Could be the difference in being able to fire a bolt-action once every two seconds, or a semi-automatic to clear targets quickly.

The IC mentioned that only three minutes was allowed to get to the plane, which means little time to consider specific loadouts. Letting that slide, it gives no intel, no chance to switch to a different weapon, forcing players and characters to go 'as they are' without sufficient time to fine tune and adapt to proper equipment.
Russia's an idiot. So is the US, and quite a few of the western sphere. Population education and literacy is your issue, not the politics of foreign nations.
A deviant in the echochamber.

User avatar
Kyraina
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7515
Founded: Aug 12, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Kyraina » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:43 am

Wysten wrote:
Insaeldor wrote:I'm not disputing bolt-actions are better at precision long range shooting. Although most modern Semi-Automatic DMR's are extremely reliable and unless you were using some sorta 60 year old spam can surplus you'd be able to be on par with bolt action rifles in terms of reliability.

I just don't see the need for 4 long range precision snipers for any mission. I'd think 2 max for something like a march across the mountains of Afghanistan.

Wait I thought me a NUC were the only bolt action snipers?

Reli I using a R700/M40/M24 (all the same rifle), you and NuC are both using 300 WinMags, while Day has a SVD and I a MK14
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is suppose to go here?

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:45 am

Relikai wrote:
Insaeldor wrote:I'm not disputing bolt-actions are better at precision long range shooting. Although most modern Semi-Automatic DMR's are extremely reliable and unless you were using some sorta 60 year old spam can surplus you'd be able to be on par with bolt action rifles in terms of reliability.

I just don't see the need for 4 long range precision snipers for any mission. I'd think 2 max for something like a march across the mountains of Afghanistan.


On extended missions where timings could be unpredictable, two teams of two would be extremely valuable to prevent eye fatigue from setting in, and relieving the sniper of the constant stress of watching a target.

Unless we already know how long a mission would take, or if there is a set amount of time for a mission to take place like the Battle of Mog ending within an hour or two instead of dragging into the night and till the next day.

Which is why I will question - No briefing about location which could influence the loadout of weapons and roles of individual squad members. My character for example could operate as a sniper, a recon, and everyone's basic rifleman role. Depending on average weapon ranges and the possibility of having obscured vision, a different weapon would be picked, perhaps a semi-automatic DMR which allows for quicker acquisition of targets within close quarters as well as suppressing fire against targets hiding in the foliage.

Location and Terrain - A deciding factor in choosing of weapon loadouts. Something learnt in playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (1998). Urban or jungle? Could be the difference in being able to fire a bolt-action once every two seconds, or a semi-automatic to clear targets quickly.

The IC mentioned that only three minutes was allowed to get to the plane, which means little time to consider specific loadouts. Letting that slide, it gives no intel, no chance to switch to a different weapon, forcing players and characters to go 'as they are' without sufficient time to fine tune and adapt to proper equipment.

But Reli, would a mission requiring a unit the size of Siren Platoon really need sniper teams to preform such a task? This seems like a unit dedicated to direct action operations and the like. Those missions are valuable and needed but they don't seem to fit the wheelhouse of a unit this size.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Wysten
Minister
 
Posts: 2604
Founded: Apr 29, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Wysten » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:47 am

Kyraina wrote:
Wysten wrote:Wait I thought me a NUC were the only bolt action snipers?

Reli I using a R700/M40/M24 (all the same rifle), you and NuC are both using 300 WinMags, while Day has a SVD and I a MK14

Yeah I can get behind a good amount of people going DMR but I can't get behind people think bolt action is the be all end all weapon it's not. It's a sniper's weapon and that's pretty much it you can't really use it as a suppressing weapon or really any other thing besides taking out people at a slow rate.
Famous qoutes
"Half the battle is fought on the OOC forums"
~ Albert Tzu, 1984
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your signature!
GENERATION 15: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Anowa
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17631
Founded: Jul 29, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Anowa » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:49 am

Just a heads up. ICly your characters aren't aware of the awareness of OPFOR.
Awards:
Tie Winner: Most Involved in P2TM, 2016
Winner: Best Crime RP, 2016

An Intro to Anowa

User avatar
Dayganistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1601
Founded: May 02, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dayganistan » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:54 am

Wysten wrote:
Kyraina wrote:Reli I using a R700/M40/M24 (all the same rifle), you and NuC are both using 300 WinMags, while Day has a SVD and I a MK14

Yeah I can get behind a good amount of people going DMR but I can't get behind people think bolt action is the be all end all weapon it's not. It's a sniper's weapon and that's pretty much it you can't really use it as a suppressing weapon or really any other thing besides taking out people at a slow rate.

I blame video games and movies for making snipers with bolt action rifles out to be the ultimate badass killing machines. When in reality most kills are caused by inaccurate suppressing fire, air power, and indirect fire support. And well yes, you did have snipers in WWII who have upwards of 1000 kills, they're the exception not the rule.
Republic of Dayganistan | جمهوری دهقانستان

A secular, Tajik dominated state in Central Asia which has experienced 40 years of democratic backsliding. NS stats are NOT used.

User avatar
The Batavia
Senator
 
Posts: 3624
Founded: May 08, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Batavia » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:57 am

Dayganistan wrote:
Wysten wrote:Yeah I can get behind a good amount of people going DMR but I can't get behind people think bolt action is the be all end all weapon it's not. It's a sniper's weapon and that's pretty much it you can't really use it as a suppressing weapon or really any other thing besides taking out people at a slow rate.

I blame video games and movies for making snipers with bolt action rifles out to be the ultimate badass killing machines. When in reality most kills are caused by inaccurate suppressing fire, air power, and indirect fire support. And well yes, you did have snipers in WWII who have upwards of 1000 kills, they're the exception not the rule.

Snipers are overrated, seriously.
Ditched my old signature. Will be making a pretty looking one when I find the time.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

User avatar
Relikai
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10003
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Relikai » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:00 am

Dayganistan wrote:
Wysten wrote:Yeah I can get behind a good amount of people going DMR but I can't get behind people think bolt action is the be all end all weapon it's not. It's a sniper's weapon and that's pretty much it you can't really use it as a suppressing weapon or really any other thing besides taking out people at a slow rate.

I blame video games and movies for making snipers with bolt action rifles out to be the ultimate badass killing machines. When in reality most kills are caused by inaccurate suppressing fire, air power, and indirect fire support. And well yes, you did have snipers in WWII who have upwards of 1000 kills, they're the exception not the rule.


Can we not come to the reductionist assumption that all players want to be lean mean killing machines instead of doing on site HUMINT and reconnaissance which a Sniper's role is ideal for?

Anowa wrote:Just a heads up. ICly your characters aren't aware of the awareness of OPFOR.


When roles are sorted out, can Recon-roles have a report of what they can see?
Russia's an idiot. So is the US, and quite a few of the western sphere. Population education and literacy is your issue, not the politics of foreign nations.
A deviant in the echochamber.

User avatar
Lord of The Rings
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 401
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Lord of The Rings » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:07 am

Image

Full Name: Omar Majidi
Rank: First Warrior [Sepāh-e qods]
Gender: Male
Birthdate: 15th of February, 1985 [34]
Birthplace: Karaj
Nationality: Iranian
Educational Degrees:
  • Diplom-Motevaseth [High school diploma] [General]
  • Fogh-e-Diplom [Associate Degree] [Technical]
Description: (Things not evident by the character image, things like height, weight, scars, tattoos, etc.)
Criminal Background:
  • N/A [He is considered a terrorist by some countries due to his service with the NEZSA and Sepāh-e qods]
Medical History:
  • kidney removal surgery [Transplant] [26th of June, 2001]
  • Gunshot treatment to the shoulder [22nd of November 2011]
  • Fractured shoulder [22nd of November 2011]
  • Fractured wrist [22nd of November 2011]
  • Fractured jaw [12th of August 2013]
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation [8th of October, 2015]
  • Fragmentation treatments to the back, upper legs, lower legs and neck [17th of February 2018 - 23rd of July 2018]
Prior Service History:
  • Basij [Volunteer] [1999 - 2007]
  • NEZAJA / Iran Army Ground Force [Conscription] [2005 - 2007]
  • NEZAJA / Iran Army Ground Force [2007 - 2013]

    • Sistan and Baluchestan Regional Conflict [Dec.2010 - May.2013]
  • NEZSA / IRGC Ground Force [2013 - 2016]

    • Iraq-Daesh War [Apr.2014 - Oct.2015]
      • Operation Ashura
      • Second Battle of Tikrit
  • Sepāh-e qods / Quds Force [2016 - 2020]

    • Syrian Conflict [Feb.2016 -/- Nov.2019]
      • Battle of al-Qaryatayn
      • Battle of Deir ez-Zor
    • Lebanon-Daesh War [Jun.2016 - Aug.2017]
      • Qalamoun offensive
Qualifications:
  • Basic Military Training [Certified]
  • First Aid [Certified]
  • Advanced Military Training [Certified]
  • Mountain Warfare [Certified]
  • Winter Warfare [Certified]
  • Urban Warfare [Certified]
  • Reconnaissance [Certified]
  • Desert Warfare [Certified]
  • Patrolling [Certified]
  • Interrogation [Certified]
  • Special Forces Training [Certified]
  • Asymmetric Warfare [Certified]
  • CBRN Defence [Certified]
  • Drone Operator [Certified]
  • Negotiation [Uncertified - Advanced experience]
  • EOD [Uncertified - Basic experience]
Operational Role: Automatic Rifleman
Psychological Evaluation:
Biography:

Equipment:
  • Type III Ballistic Vest
  • Tactical Vest
  • Kevlar Helmet
  • thermographic Monitor
  • Gas Mask
  • Balaclava
  • Ballistic Mask
  • Pixelated Arid-Desert Pattern Uniform
  • Pixelated Woodland Pattern Uniform
  • Pixelated Urban Pattern Uniform
Primary Weapon: AK-103M
  • Obzor 1P63
  • knife-bayonet
Secondary Weapon: PC-9 ZOAF
  • Sound Suppressor
Tertiary Weapon: knife-bayonet
Additional Munitions:
  • F-1 Fragmentation Grenade [2]
  • RDG-2Ch Smoke Grenade [3]
  • RDG-2Kh Irritant Gas Grenade [2]


WIP
Last edited by Lord of The Rings on Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:24 pm, edited 17 times in total.

User avatar
Wysten
Minister
 
Posts: 2604
Founded: Apr 29, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Wysten » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:07 am

Relikai wrote:
Dayganistan wrote:I blame video games and movies for making snipers with bolt action rifles out to be the ultimate badass killing machines. When in reality most kills are caused by inaccurate suppressing fire, air power, and indirect fire support. And well yes, you did have snipers in WWII who have upwards of 1000 kills, they're the exception not the rule.


Can we not come to the reductionist assumption that all players want to be lean mean killing machines instead of doing on site HUMINT and reconnaissance which a Sniper's role is ideal for?

Anowa wrote:Just a heads up. ICly your characters aren't aware of the awareness of OPFOR.


When roles are sorted out, can Recon-roles have a report of what they can see?

I can assume that me and NUC are recon?
Famous qoutes
"Half the battle is fought on the OOC forums"
~ Albert Tzu, 1984
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your signature!
GENERATION 15: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5373
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:09 am

Relikai wrote:
Dayganistan wrote:I blame video games and movies for making snipers with bolt action rifles out to be the ultimate badass killing machines. When in reality most kills are caused by inaccurate suppressing fire, air power, and indirect fire support. And well yes, you did have snipers in WWII who have upwards of 1000 kills, they're the exception not the rule.


Can we not come to the reductionist assumption that all players want to be lean mean killing machines instead of doing on site HUMINT and reconnaissance which a Sniper's role is ideal for?

Anowa wrote:Just a heads up. ICly your characters aren't aware of the awareness of OPFOR.


When roles are sorted out, can Recon-roles have a report of what they can see?

And how much of that are we doing, and does it justify the sheer amount of marksman we have in the platoon when we could have a more diverse platoon?
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Relikai
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10003
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Relikai » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:10 am

Wysten wrote:
Relikai wrote:
Can we not come to the reductionist assumption that all players want to be lean mean killing machines instead of doing on site HUMINT and reconnaissance which a Sniper's role is ideal for?



When roles are sorted out, can Recon-roles have a report of what they can see?

I can assume that me and NUC are recon?


Recon roles can be filled by anyone. Recon roles can be assigned by team leaders to anyone best suited for environment, linguistics, culture and adaptability. No use sending a character specialised in desert warfare into the jungle for recon, nor an urban/desert specialist into the Arctic.
Russia's an idiot. So is the US, and quite a few of the western sphere. Population education and literacy is your issue, not the politics of foreign nations.
A deviant in the echochamber.

User avatar
Wysten
Minister
 
Posts: 2604
Founded: Apr 29, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Wysten » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:11 am

Relikai wrote:
Wysten wrote:I can assume that me and NUC are recon?


Recon roles can be filled by anyone. Recon roles can be assigned by team leaders to anyone best suited for environment, linguistics, culture and adaptability. No use sending a character specialised in desert warfare into the jungle for recon, nor an urban/desert specialist into the Arctic.

Alright
Famous qoutes
"Half the battle is fought on the OOC forums"
~ Albert Tzu, 1984
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your signature!
GENERATION 15: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Arengin Union
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8769
Founded: Feb 23, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Arengin Union » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:12 am

Cause of course.
"I do as I please"
-King Abraham Markev final words before jumping into a cage to fight a lion.

Proud member of the Federation of Allies

User avatar
Relikai
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10003
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Relikai » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:13 am

Insaeldor wrote:But Reli, would a mission requiring a unit the size of Siren Platoon really need sniper teams to preform such a task? This seems like a unit dedicated to direct action operations and the like. Those missions are valuable and needed but they don't seem to fit the wheelhouse of a unit this size.


Sniper Teams or Recon Teams do invaluable on-site reconnaissance while the main force waits for information updates. In an ideal scenario, local forces allied to Siren would provide local recon, sniper support (Using the same recon guys), logistical aid (Vehicles) as basics. In such a case like this scenario, Siren would most probably be setting up somewhere to wait on standby while recon was being done on the camp to decide numbers, building identification, assets like vehicles and the SCUD, a task which could take hours.

Direct Action Ops, while the name emphasizes the nature of the Op, would still have snipers. If an excess was decided, soldiers are EXPECTED to switch roles with the knowledge of their operation, equip up the proper way, familiarize themselves with the weapon and loadout before leaving with the team. No one guarantees a 100% efficiency from them, but they would still be expected to fulfill the basic role of the Rifleman which there can never be a surplus of.

Snipers fulfill the role of recon better due to their standard training and equipment to operate from a longer range, alone and with little support from a parent unit, and the emphasis to stay concealed. They know Observational Spots better than the grenadier, they can hide better than the operator with the standard thinking because of the training wired into them.

In our unique case, tasks and soldier classes has been accepted and rostered by the OP. However I did take into account the need to reduce the number of snipers which is why my char has a secondary class or so, and maybe Anowa knows (or flowed with it), and even when Operational Role stands for one, multiple roles were apped and accepted, allowing a level of versatility among players and their characters to adapt to the needs of the day.
Russia's an idiot. So is the US, and quite a few of the western sphere. Population education and literacy is your issue, not the politics of foreign nations.
A deviant in the echochamber.

User avatar
Dayganistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1601
Founded: May 02, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dayganistan » Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:23 am

Best solution in my opinion is put the snipers with bolt action rifles into their own separate sniper cell, leaving the two designated marksman with semi auto rifles in the regular squads.
Republic of Dayganistan | جمهوری دهقانستان

A secular, Tajik dominated state in Central Asia which has experienced 40 years of democratic backsliding. NS stats are NOT used.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Portal to the Multiverse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]

Advertisement

Remove ads