Advertisement

by Leninist South Africa » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:37 am

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:38 am
Ulls wrote:Holy Tedalonia wrote:In the midevil era pretty much nobles took all the cash they can and end up poorer than Venice which was a little tiny nation that got rich off of trade.
Then this will be unique then.Revlona wrote:
GIBRALTAR WILL BE MINE
Till Ego comes.G-Tech Corporation wrote:
Hmm. Courts as in legal courts, or noble courts?
Noble ones heavily tested for merit.

by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:42 am
Kelmet wrote:I know its a uncomfortable subject...But any of you have slavery?

by Ulls » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:44 am
Holy Tedalonia wrote:
Note Ulls you may think yourself as a European explorer, but you must remember that Europeans came (initially) to the Americas with a small amount of troops and conquered. They did this cuz they have a technology advantage. You however (against the Imperium) are outmatched, so IF Revlona beats you to Gibraltar. Don't expect the Imperium to let you go easily just cuz it's a far walk. They don't like being pushed around even though that's never happened.
On the feudalism subject. Tell me, how did a crappy little island with absolutely nothing ended up with more cash than every noble in Europe? It just doesn't work... it's heavily inefficient, because the king relies on the nobles to pay their taxes, and the noble expect crops from the peasants.
If the peasants don't get the required crop sum they lose their dinner and the nobles are now cropless and can't sell anything, and depending on the nobles wealth, the king is effected to. It removes the necessary power of the king when mismanagement happens, and he can't hold the noble accountable or he gets viewed as a tyrant...
by Aidannadia » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:44 am

by Kelmet » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:46 am
Aidannadia wrote:Anyone know the generally slave-citizen ratio in proto-Egypt city states? I can't seem to find it exactly. I know later on, the pharaohs had mass amounts of slaves, but at the moment would the institution be limited given the low population outside of those early city-states?

by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:46 am
Aidannadia wrote:Anyone know the generally slave-citizen ratio in proto-Egypt city states? I can't seem to find it exactly. I know later on, the pharaohs had mass amounts of slaves, but at the moment would the institution be limited given the low population outside of those early city-states?

by Ulls » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:50 am
by Aidannadia » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:50 am
Kelmet wrote:Aidannadia wrote:Anyone know the generally slave-citizen ratio in proto-Egypt city states? I can't seem to find it exactly. I know later on, the pharaohs had mass amounts of slaves, but at the moment would the institution be limited given the low population outside of those early city-states?
Guessing I'd say a 1/3 of the population
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Aidannadia wrote:Anyone know the generally slave-citizen ratio in proto-Egypt city states? I can't seem to find it exactly. I know later on, the pharaohs had mass amounts of slaves, but at the moment would the institution be limited given the low population outside of those early city-states?
I don't have a precise figure, but in general terms it would be quite low in this period, yes. Slaves were relatively expensive to obtain and keep- there are good reasons why the Pyramids were largely built with wage labor in the flood season instead of slavery, as we conventionally think.

by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:51 am
Aidannadia wrote:Kelmet wrote:Guessing I'd say a 1/3 of the population
Seems high.G-Tech Corporation wrote:
I don't have a precise figure, but in general terms it would be quite low in this period, yes. Slaves were relatively expensive to obtain and keep- there are good reasons why the Pyramids were largely built with wage labor in the flood season instead of slavery, as we conventionally think.
I was just seeing that it's been suggested free citizens under orders from the state were used rather than the mass amounts of slaves that it would have taken. I actually was questioning how they could hold so many during the Middle Kingdom when I stumbled upon this, considering they didn't have the manpower or equipment to do it on such a massive scale the Europeans did.

by Conwy-Shire » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:13 am
G-Tech Corporation wrote:No compromise at all? I think it is a very fair compromise between the two possibilities of quadrupled land size with no appreciable instability and doubling land size with heavy instability.
Certainly one person can change the world- but one person's impact on the world is akin to a man turning a giant ship by hauling at the steering wheel. It will move as he steers it, but slowly, over time. It took six years for Viktor to proclaim the Imperium, ten for Norsca to develop longships. A fully fledged new system of government will take time to implement- and as far as I am concerned, ten years is too little time for that system to become so popular and universally accepted as to swallow up all polities around it within a hundred miles.
Kelmet wrote:link
G-Tech Corporation wrote:and link
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Hmm, interesting. I can see why that would be an issue, but it is important, in that context, that I point out that the Imperium's population is very densely clustered for the ancient world. Most of her citizens live in the heavily settled vales of the Danube in Austria/Czechia/Romania/Hungary, with the areas that you see painted in on the map largely a case of possession rather than occupation...

by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:34 am
Conwy-shire wrote:Yah, no compromise at all, because compromising means taking the other persons option into account, as opposed to finding the middle ground between the two options you have advanced.
I am deeply willing to put this to rest though, so I will adopt the same stance you did concerning expansion:

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:46 am

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:02 am

by Leninist South Africa » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:31 am

by Ulls » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:33 am
Leninist South Africa wrote:Come to Russia, where you have the chance to move up the social hierarchy.

by Revlona » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:34 am
Leninist South Africa wrote:Come to Russia, where you have the chance to move up the social hierarchy.

by Leninist South Africa » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:38 am
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Champlania, Hallownest Eternal, Luminesa, Norsblur, Silverblade, Yshralym-Kivah
Advertisement